ML20039B568
| ML20039B568 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yellow Creek  |
| Issue date: | 12/30/1981 |
| From: | TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20039B559 | List: |
| References | |
| YCNP-SMR-6, NUDOCS 8112230243 | |
| Download: ML20039B568 (36) | |
Text
. . . . .. . . . . . - . ... . .. . . . -
3 4
i i
l 1 a.
3 v '. -TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 1
i .
i.
I i
- j. '
i YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT I
4 . SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT
~YCNP - SMR-6 i .
December 30, 1980-i 1
i.
t 1
i.
4 .--
Knoxville Tennessee June 1981 8.
8112230743 011f17' PDR I
ADOCK 05000866 i PDR ..
~ CONTENTS Page Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 1
_.- Monitoring Results . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. ... . . . . 1 4
II. Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions . .. . . . . . . 4
'III. Summary of Mitigation Expenditures . . . . . . .. ... . . . . ~16 Tables .
Table 1. Estimates of Population and Population Change for Alcorn and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi, and Hardin County, Tennessee, for Monitoring Secondary
, Socioeconomic Impacts of Yellow Creek Nuclear 7
Plant Construction June 30, 1977 - June-30, 1980 . . . 6 --
Table 2. School Systems Report of Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Direct Impact Students December 1980 . . . . . . . . . 7 i
Table 3. Education Mitigation Payments Through December 1980 . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. '7 Table 4. Traffic Evaluation . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . 15 Table 5. Summary of Mitigation Expenditures as of December 30, 1980 . . .. .. . . . . .. . .. . . . . 16 Appendixes Table A- 1. Town of Current Residence . . . . .. . .. . . . . 19 6
Table A- 2' . Source and Location of Construction Employees .
. . 21 Table A- 3. Distribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Table A- 4. Comparison of Survey Results with Projections and Selected Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
- Table A- 5. Mover Summary . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 24 Tabin A- 6. Alcorn - Employees Living Within the County . . . . 25 Table A- 7. Tishomingo - Employees Living Within the County . . 26 Table A- 8. Hardin - Employees Living Within the-County . . . . 27 Table A- 9. Corinth - Employees Living Within the City Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Table A-10. Iuka - Employees Living Within the City Limits . . 29
. Table A-11. Savannah --Employees Living Within the City Limits . . . . . . . . . ... .. . . . . . . . . 30
) Appendix B - Definition Level of Service D . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
.. Appendix C Employee Questionnaire. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . 32 Appendix C Follow-up Questionnaire . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . 33 I . Appendix D - Socioeconomic Monitoring Cycle . . . . . .. . . . . . 34 EXHIBIT i
-Figure 1. Towns Containing Construction Employees .
35 l
f YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT I
SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT BACKGROUND
=
- This is the sixth in a series of reports describing the monitoring and mitigation of socioeconomic impacts which result from the construction of the Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant. This reporting period began July 1,1980, and ended December 30, 1980. These semiannual reports are prepared to fulfill a commitment made by TVA in the construction permits hearings. The impact area is defined as portions of Alcorn and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi, and Hardin County, Tennessee. This area was selected because it was projected to receive a significant population influx due to the a
proj ec t . However, the impact area may be redefined if significant impacts are identified elsewhere.
I. Monitoring Results In February 1981 TVA conducted a survey of all TVA employees at Yellow Creek as of December 30, 1980. The timelag between employ-ment and survey gives the employees who moved an opportunity to make personal adjustments and should provide a better view of employee distribution, family characteristics, and housing choice.
The employment level dropped this period from 3,060 to 3,002, and
, informatior. was available for 78 percent (2,350). Based on that information, 422, or 18 percent, indicated that they moved into the area to work at the project (movers). Of the total 422, 213 located in the impact area. Local employees (nonmovers) commute to the project from a widespread area, but 37 percent of the total
. work force consisted of. residents of'the impact-counties. The I
information obtained with respect to the distribution of movers and nonmovers is contained in tables A-1 and-A-2 as well as figure 1.
Additional information on the distribution, family characteristics, and housing choice of movers is contained in tables A-3 through A-11.
Table A-1 lists the towns'of current residence of all employees. 'It is basically a " mailing address" location rather than a jurisdictional-location since all employees must provide a place name even though they'may not live within any municipal limits. Figure 1 is based on this table.
At the county level and above, both the origin and location of all employees are contained in table A-1. -The diagonal line of the "from-to" tabulation shows resident employees (nonmovers); for-
- example, resident employees from Hardin County are found by locating .
Hardin County'in the "from"' column and' going across the table to the "to" column, in which Hardin County also appears. In this survey.
i 204 residents of Hardin County were employed'at the end of December.
Movers are shown by all other information in the table. For. example,'
47 employees moved from."Othe- Recruiting Counties" to Tishomingo County, Mississippi.
Table A-3 provides extrapolated data for the impact area including the number of movers within the city. limits for the three primary impact communities. To compare the survey results with projections, ,
selected parameters ~from the Socioeconomic Impacts section (revision 4, dated June 16, 1978, of the " Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Environmental.
Report").were applied to the number of employees surveyed. The
- l 1
l results of this' comparison are.found in table A-4. No mover rats
, was projected except for peak employaent (30 percent). However,' the family characteristics, housing cho.ce, and location pattern:can be compared.
Surveyed employee characteristics are similar to those projected.
Sixty percent were expected.to bring their families. This survey found that 74 percent did, and the remaining 26 percent did not have families in the impact area. Projections indicated one school-age child per family, and the survey result was the same. The average family size was larger than projected at 3.4 compared with the' projected 3.0. A considerable difference has been experienced in the d
projected (30 percent)' mover rate and surveyed mover rate _-(18 percent) .
A 30 percent mover rate for employment-level 3,002 would be 901 movers, and the projected population influx would be 1,983; but there were only 539 movers (18 percent), and the total surveyed population influx was.
1,477.
The housing choice of movers is continuing to vary considerably from projections, which were made only for peak employment. -Fifty-six percent of the movers chose houses, and 25 percent chose mobile homes. The peak projections were that 35 percent would choose' -
, houses and.that 45 percent would choose mobile homes. The projec--
tions (20' percent) and. survey results (19 percent) remain close for those choosing apartments, sleeping rooms, and other accommodations.
The "other" category includes tents, . campers, ' and recreational vehicles.
- . _ _ ,, -. -. , _ _, . . _ . . . . - - , _ _ . , _ , _ . _ . _ . _ _ , - ~ , .
_4_
The largest area and most significant variation from the projections continues to be the mover distribution to the Corinth area and to ,
areas outside the impact area. Some 50 percent of the movers were projected to locate in the Corinth area, but only 9 percent of the movers have located there. No movers were projected '.o locate outside the impact area, but in fact 48 percent located outside the impact area. While there is no real explanation for the Corinth result, the location of movers outside the impact area is not unexpected. Based on past survey results, about 20 to 30 percent of the movers were expected to locate outside the impact area. However, in order to prepare for the maximum numbers of movers, the total influx was allocated to the impact area as baris for estimating impacts. Of the towns outside the impact area, Florence, Alabama, has received the largest number of movers (35). Florence has a population of about 37,000; so the additional movers would not create a significant adverse impact. The projections (40 percent) and survey results (33 percent) were close for the Burnsville and Iuka areas of Tishomingo County, Mississippi. The projections (10 percent) and survey results were the same for the Savannah and Counce areas of Hardin County, Tennessee.
Detailed data on family status and characteristics and housing choice of surveyed movers for the whole project are found in table
- A-5. The same information for the impact counties is found in tables A-6 through A-8 while tables A-9 through A-11 present the information on movers within the city limits of the impact communities.
II. Func;'.onal Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions Secondary Employment--Secondary employment is defined as a temporary increase in the trade- and service-related resident population which can be attributed to the Yellow Creek project. If the population increase in a cou. ty is greater than that arising directly from the project or from other primary emp'nyment increases, we would conclude that the possibility of secondary employment exists. Since the project began, Alcorn and Hardin Counties have experienced increases in population exceeding any increases which can be explained by project-related influx and change in population associated with other primary employment (see table 1).
Education--Monitoring direct impact on education occurs primarily through reports from the five impacted school districts. School
. districts submit reports annually showing the names of all students whose parents are employed at the Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant, the school previously attended, school grade in which enrolled, and essential attendance and transportation information.
The construction employee monitoring program yields more aggregated data by counties for cross-referencing with the school district reports. The reports submitted by the school districts have indicated that all the impacted school districts have fewer direct impact students compared to TVA-projected estimates. Summary data from the school systems report are shown in table 2. A census conducted using Public Law 81-874 guidelines yields most of the data school systems needed for reporting purposes.
Y Table 1 ESTIMATES OF POPULATION AND POPULATION CHANGE FOR ALCORN AND TISHOMINGO COUNTIES, MISSISSIPPI, AND HARDIN COUNTY, TENNESSEE FOR MONITORING SECONDARY SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS OF YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTION JUNE 30, 1977 - DECEMBER 31,19A?.
Remainder of Population Population 'Channe in Change in Project -Nonproject Related Chanae in Population Channe in-Estimate Estimate Population Estimate Related Population Population as of hssible from Other Population- ,
6/30/77 12/31/80 6/30/77 - 12/31/80 6/30/77 - 12/31/20 12/31/PO Primary Employment Unexplained ,
-Alcorn County 29,900 32,919 3,019 189 2,830 758- 2,072 l
Tishomingo County 16,500 18,843 -2,343 478 1,865 5,050 0 Hardin County 20,700 22,789 2,089- 184 1,905 .786 '1,119 Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census Current Population Reports Series P-25 and P-26, " Population Estimates."
Community Economics 6/30/81
. Table 2 SCHOOL' SYSTEMS REPORT OF YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT ~
DIRECT IMPACT STUDENTS DECEMBER 1980
, .1 Number of Children Number of Children School System of Lo' cal Residents of Movers Total Corinth Separate 13 11 24 luka Separate 131 100' 231 Alcorn County 119 6 125 Hardin County 124 38 162 Tishomingo County 321 .105 426
-Total ~ 708 260 968 TVA, the Mississippi and Tennessee Departments of Education, and the five local' school districts have entered into formal contractual agreements-for alleviating impacts on local school districts. Under these agreements, TVA~has provided-funds for schoolbus transportation.
Table 3 TVA EDUCATION MITIGATION PAYMENTS THROUGH DECEMBER 1980 School System TVA Payments l
Corinth $ 37,156 Iuka 35,276 Alcorn 31,702 Hardin 36,000 Tishomingo 15,448
, Total $155,582 Public Law 81-874 assistance is available to the school districts to of fset additional operating costs, All school districts except for one are participating-inithis funding program.
Local Government Budgets--Monitoring of project impacts on local governments is an ongoing process handled by the program coordi-nator. The coordinator lives and works in the local area and maintains continuous com=unications with local government officials.
The following is a summary of actions and payments made to mitigate the impacts on local governments' budgets during this period.
Contracts with all three counties for the implementation of county-wide emergency response systems continued in effect. In Hardin County the procurement of equipment was essentially complete. Local volunteer units were organized and operation of the system begun.
Agreement was reached between Hardin County and the city of Savannah for the Savannah fire chief to also assume direction of the county department. This has integrated the operations of the two major fire protection agencies in the county and is functioning smoothly.
An additional payment was made to Hardin County for $76,535. This ,
brings the total payment to Hardin County to $138,585.
Activities in Tishomingo and Alcorn Counties continued. These activities primarily consisted of identifying volunteer organiza-tions and the development of interlocal agreements to provide the framework for the countywide -" stems. No payments were made to Tishomingo County under this contract during this period. A $3,000
. payment was made to the Yellow Creek Watershed Authority for plan-ning services in connection with this effort. Payments were made to Alcorn County totaling $5,925.
A contract was executed with the city of Savannah 2n the amount of
$15,000 to purchase equipment for them to participate in the countywide
system. This agreement was later supplemented to extend 1 the assistance ,
to $27,000. No payments were made to Savannah during this period.
TVA's total commitment to this system through December 31 was $537,250.
s Verbal agreement has also been reached on a joint training' center for the impact counties. This agreement is contingent upon the successful completion of the countywide systems in Tishomingo and Alcorn Counties. TVA's share of this training center would be up to-
$50,000.
l Assistance to local governments for law enforcement continued during this period. Contracts with Iuka, Tishomingo County, and Burnsville remained in effect. No payments were made to Tishomingo County.
during this period.' Payments to Iuka totaled $15,950 during this
. period. This brings total payments to date.to the city of Iuka for law enforcement to $45,952.
An additional contract with the city of Burnsville was executed during.this period. This contract provided partial-payment for a new police car and a law enforcement' deputy. TVA's commitment under this contract was for up.to $11,200. .This brings the total commitment to Burnsville to $18,200.
Implementation of the computer system in the town of Savannah continued. Additional payments of $2,402 were made during this period.
Local Recruitment and Training,--The two full-time day programs (carpenter and equipment mechanic) which began in May 1980 with 25 students each are still in operation. All participants are residents of the local recruitment area established for Yellow Creek Nuclear
- Plant project. This period,19 apprentices began training, bringing the total at the Yellow Creek project to 199 in training in 9 skilled craft programs. All apprentices were recruited from the established recruitment area for the Yellow Creek project.
To help meet the demand for boilermakers' manpower shortage and to reduce TVA's construction mover impact, special emphasis has been given to a training program in the recruitment area. The boilermaker training program had an enrollment of 22 students--15 graduated in
- November 1980 and were employed by TVA. The graduates of the boiler-maker training program are from the three-county recruitment area.
In addition, requests for and participation in voluntary s' ills improvement upgrading and preemployment qualififcation training at the training center have been beyond staff expectations. The center offers training in a wide range of subjects from typing to welding. Approximately 200 individuals per week participate in programs. TVA's clerk-typist employment test is given every other week. TVA has a special Intensified Craft Training Program which consists of 25 carpenter and 25 equipment mechanic trainees. .
Upon completion of this training, the trainees may qualify for an advanced apprenticeship position with TVA or another area employer.
These combined training and apprenticeship programs are designed to reduce mover impacts by qualifying the local populations for skilled craft employment.
Housing--Conditions in the local housing market are generally the same as indicated in the last report. The population. influx to
. Alcorn County, Mississippi, declined slightly this period. Slight
- increases in mover population were found in Tishomingo County, Mississippi, and Hardin. County, Tennessee; but there. appears to have been sufficient' housing to accommodate the inmoving population.
Water and Sewer--The Short-Coleman Park Water Association continued to have difficulty in supplying sufficient potable water to meet
~
demands at the construction site and to its users in the area. A new well has been brought on line;' however, its capacity is far short of its anticipated yield. The well is sufficient to provide temporary relief to the water shortage problems of the association,
- but it is not expected to be sufficient for needs during the dura-tion of the construction project. A contract for assistance to'the association was executed. This contract obligated TVA.for~up to
$95,000 to expand the capability of the water system. Work under-
- this contract would involve the drilling of an additional well and the repair of unreliable and leaking equipment at the association's old water treatment plant. No payments were made during the period-under-this contract. A payment of $13,911 was made to the city of Burnsville for water and sewer system assistance.
9 TVA will continue'to evaluate the water and sewage treatment systems
. in the impact counties to assess additional future mover impacts which might occur.
l
)
l Recreation--Community recreation impacts were monitored through i local contacts'and field review. Two requests for' planning assis-1 tance were received during the period. The city of Savannah requested assistance in developing a program appraisal for the city
~
recreation and parks department. TVA recreation staff ar'e currently .
working with Savannah officials to complete the appraisal, which is intended to ' identify long-range needs for the department and present more cost-efficient management alternatives.
A request for planning assistance was also received from park officials at J. P. Coleman and Tishomingo State Parks. Annual visitation rates at both parks have increased significantly since construction started on the Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant. Recreation staff will be working with the park superintendents to identify - -
possible alternatives to relieve the increased visitor pressure.
There were two requests for payment on existing recreation mitigation contracts received during the period. The city of Savannah, Tennessee, received full payment on a $50,000 contract to construct a new city park. Corinth, Mississippi, received $7,195 to assist in developing-a new athletic field complex. The following table lists total TVA financial payments for recreation through December 31, 1980.
TVA RECREATION MITIGATION PAYMENTS ,
Tishomingo County $26,279 City of Savannah 50,000 City of Corinth 7,195 *
$83,474 o
Health and Medical Services--Ninety-three percent of the employees reported.no need to travel for prinary medical' services. Colbert and
' Lauderdale Counties, Alabama,'had considerably higher percentages reporting no travel than did Alcorn, Tishomingo, and Hardin Counties.
Specialty care is available in Tupelo, Muscle Shoals, Birmingham, Nashville,t and Memphis; and a small percentage of employees traveled to these points. Negotiations for a sanitarian to serve Alcorn and
.Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi, continue.
School health nurse / educators continue to work in both Alcorn'and Tishomingo Counties although no vouchers were received, and no payments were made during the reporting period.
Employee Transportation--The. Van-Bus Pool program at Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant experienced.a 13 percent increase in ridership this period, while traffic flow has~been reduced by approximately 562 vehicles due to the impact of van and bus ridership. The average ridership was 32 persons per bus and 9.5 persons per van. Three addi-tional buses were.put into operation this period bringing the total number of operating buses to 21 and the total number of operating vansoto 30. The Quad-Cities area of Alabama continues to maintain the highest concentration of vans and buses coming to and from the
. Yellow' Creek site. As of December 31, 1980, 44 percent of the day shift
. work force ,;s riding TVA vans and buses, . or just' under 1,000 people a day. TVA's expenditures this period for employee transportation were
$289,573.
-9
Traffic--In December 1978, the Mississippi State Highway Department began supplying TVA with traffic counts for eleven locations on a a semmiannual basis. To supplement these counts, TVA began in 1979 taking intersection counts at four intersections near the site on the ,
same semiannual basis.
During this reporting period the opening to traffic of two new roads in the vicinity of Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant significantly altered the travel patterns for some of the TVA commuters. State Route 350, connecting Corinth, Mississippi, to State Route 25 north of Cross Roads, was completed by the Mississippi State Highway Department.
The department began supplying TVA with a semiannual traffic count on State Route 350 during this period. ,
Road project 1002, connecting luka-Red Sulphur Springs Road at Short, Mississippi, with State Route 25 south of Yellow Creek embayment, was completed by Yellow Creek construction forces. The intersection at Short is one of the four intersections where intersection counts are made. These counts and other observations indicate that the TVA commuters that once traveled Patrick Church Road for access to the site now use project 1002.
With 3,000 people employed at the site, 700 commuter vehicles are .
used in the transportation of the peak shift employees. Peak-hour volumes and hourly volumes during the peak TVA commuting hour for
- 12 key highway segments are shown in table 4. The hourly volumes
Table 4 TRAFFIC EVALUATION (JULY 1980 TO DECEMBER 1980)
Peak Hour Volume During During Peak TVA TVA Commuter Daily Peak Shift Change Traffic Volume luka-Red Sulphur Springs Road North of Road Project 1002 730 730 700 Iuka-Red Sulphur Springs Road North of Patrick Church Road 400 400 330
'Iuka-Red Sulphur Springs Road (Project 1001) between Patrick Church Road and SR-25 360 360 330 SR-25 North of U.S. 72 Junction 730* 620 450 U.S. 72 West of Alabama State Line 520 520 255 SR-25 South of SR-365 Junction 400 400 190
. SR-25 South of Tennessee State Line 280 280 100 SR-350 West of SR-25 Junction 60* 50 25 SR-25 Southwest of SR-25 Junction 130 130 70 SR-25 Sour.a of Iuka 350* 330 70 U.S. 72 West of SR-365 Junction 520 520 30 SR-25 midtay between Patrick Road and Iuka-Red Sulphur Springs Road 190 190 60
- Because of the shif t schedule at the project, the peak TVA commuting traffic occurs during an hour other than the peak hour for some of the highway segments being
. monitored
-- w - , -- v
indicate level of service D or better operation is provided on all the key highway segments (see appendix B). -
I I
As indicated in table 4, the peak TVA commuting traffic occurs during an hout other than the peak hour for some of the highway segments being monitored. This can be attributed to the fact that i the shifts are scheduled such that the majority of the TVA commuter traffic does not coincide with the current peak hours.
III. Summary of Mitigation Expenditures TVA's mitigation expenditures this period totaled $492,456; and the major expenditures this period were for employee transportation, recreation and local governments budgets, l Table 5
SUMMARY
OF MITICATION EXPENDITURES AS OF DECEMBER 30, 1980 Expenditures Expenditures This Period To Date Education $ 21,379 $155,582 Employee Transportation 289,573 913,062 Health & Medical Services 19,947 38,347 Local Recruitment and Training -
380,000 -
Local Gov'ernment Budgets 103,812 227,895 Recreation 43,834 83,474 Water and Sewer 13,911 31,000 Total $492,456 $1,829,360
-..... . . . - . . . - . . . .. _- . . = . -. .- -_ .. _ --. .. .- . . . - .-- -. . - .. .
5
+
1 Appendixes 9
0 e
9 6
0 m
Table A-1 FCLLCW UP SURVEY TCmN OF CURRENT RESIDENCE RUN DATE 04/06/81 YELLCm CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT EPPLCVEES RUN TIME 093112 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 12-31-84 REPCRT 2 MOVED TO ALREACY TOMN 10hN IN TChN TOTAL POPULATICN ATHENS AL 5 17 22 13.637 CHEROKEE AL 9 67 76 1.484 FLDRENCE AL 35 237 272 36,000 KILLEN AL 7 29 36 683 LEIGHTCM AL 7 36 43 1,231 MU$CLE SHCALS AL 19 56 75 6,907 RUSSELLVILLE AL 6 45 51 7,814 SNEFFIELD AL 24 63 87 12.000 TUSCUMBIA AL 17 1C4 121 8.828 8CCNEVILLE MS 5 39 44 5.895 BURNSVILLE MS 9 63 72 784 CCRINTH MS 38 134 172 10.900 IUKA MS 124 349 473 2,389 TISHCMINSC MS 7 46 53 410 ELLINGTON GLEN MS 5 4 9
, SAVANNAH TN 26 151 177 5.576 CCUNCE TN 16 30 46 600 SU8 TOTAL 359 1470 1829 LEXINGTCN AL 2 8 10 278 PHIL C AMPBELL AL 0 5 5 1.230 REC BAY AL 2 to 12 2.464 ROGER $VILLE AL 2 17 19 950 TChN CREEK AL 0 14 14 1,203 wATERLCO AL 2 e 10 262 8ELMONT MS 2 20 22 1 237 FULTON MS 1 6 7 2.899 GOLDEN MS 2 6 8 339 RIENZI MS 4 7 11 363 SALTILLO MS 0 5 5 836 DENNIS NS 2 11 13 125 ADAMSVILLE TN 2 12 14 1,344 BETHEL SPRINGS TN 0 7 T 842 CLIFTCh TN o 5 5 737 CCLLINbOOD TN O 5 5 922 IRCN CITY TN 2 5 7 504 LEXINGTON TN 2 5 7 5,024 LCRETTC TN 0 15 15 1.557 MICHIE TN 1 18 19 569 PARSCNS TN 1 8 9 2,167 RAMER TN 0 10 10 451 SELMER TN O 17 17 3.495 ST JOSEPH TN 0 5 5 63T
Table A-1 (continued)
FOLLCW OP SURVEY T0hN OF CURRENT RESIDENCE RUN DATE 04/06/81 YELLCW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT EMPLOYEES RUN TIME 093112 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 12-31-80 REPORT 2 MOVED TO ALREADY TchN TOWN IN TchN TOTAL POPULATION WAVNESSORO TN 0 15 CRUMP 15 1,983 TN 0 6 6 CYPRESS IAN TN 350 O 5 5 LECMA TN 300 0 5 5 300 LUTTS TN 0 8 8 200 MORRIS CHAPEL TN 1 7 SkILOH 8 120 TN O 13 13 ,
SU8 TOTAL 28 288 316-OTHER 35 170 205
- TOTAL RESPChSES 422 1928 2350 YChP WCRKFORCE TOTAL 3002 12-31-80
- , - , - y .-,-* -..%-- , -,.--,v, --,-----y.,, , , , , . ,,,,_vw,.-y,..,m<-w.,~,-, --n#.,,, ,..,,,_,y- - . -,,,_ --
.m., -.. , - -,, , .>
Table A-2 FCLLCh UP SURVEY SOURCE AhD LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES RUN DATE 04/06/81 YELLCh CREEK huCLEAR PLANT RUN TIME 093146 q ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 12-31-80 REPORT 4 OTHER OTHER OTHER OTHER
IMPACT CCUNTIES------- REC. ALA8ANA MISS. TENN.
FROM --- TO ALCORN TISNCMINGO HARDIN COUNTIES COUNTIES COUNTIES COUNTIES OTHER (4)
ALCCRN (Il 149 7 2 3 161 IISHCPINGO til 6 513 5 13 1 1 539 f F ARCIN (1) 1 204 3 2 210 CTHER RECRUITIhG CCUN I2) T 47 5 1139 1 1 4 1 1205 CTHER AL. CCUNTIES (3) 6 22 5 23 14 70 CTHER MI SS. CCUNTIES (3) 2 14 1 5 1 1 24 ETHER Th. CCUNTIES (34 19 2C. 18 18 1 4 90 ARKah5&S 1 1 NENTUCKY 2 2 1 5
- k. CARCLINA 2 1 1 4 CTHER STATES 4 10 9 15 3 41 TCTAL 195 648 250 1221 16 2 11 7 2350 NCTE: DATA DN DIAGONAL INDICATE NGhMOVERS, WITH THE EXCEPTION CF MOVES WITHIN A CCUNTY.
ALL CTHER DATA INDICATE MOVERS.
Ill RECRUITING COUNTY (21 ALABAMA CCUNTIES: COLSERT, CULLMAN, FRANKLIN, L AUDERD ALE , LAmRENCE, LI"ESTCNE.
MARION MISSIS $1PPI COUNTIES BENTON, DESOTA, ITAWAMSA. LAFAYETTE, LEE, MARSHALL, PONTOTCC, PRENTISS, TIPP AH, UNION TENNESSEE COUNTIES: CHESTER, DECATUR, F AYETTE, GILES, HARDEMAN, HAYh000, HENDERSON, LAWRENCE, LEWIS, MADISON, MCNAIRY, PERRV, SH E L 8 Y , hAYNE 131 ALL COUNTIES IN ALABAMA, MISSISSIPPI, AND TENNESSEE OTHER THAN RECRUITING COUNTIES (4) "CTHER" INCLUDES NON-RESPONSES OR ERR 0NEDUS RESPONSES FOR CURRENT ADDRESS.
t 22-M Table A-3 YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT .
, DISTRIBUTION OF MOVERS AND ASSOCIATED i' POPULATION BY COUNTY AND COMMUNITY DECEMBER 30, 1980 Number l Percent 2 of Population Influxl County of Movers Movers School Age Total Alcorn', MS 11 61- 49 189 Tishomingo, MS 35 188 117 478 Hardin, TN 11 59 51 181 4
Other Counties 43 231 169 626 Total 100 539 386 1,477 Community 3 Corinth, MS 2 11 1 26' Iuka, MS 9 50 33 124 Savannah, TN 2 11 5 32 Total 13 72. 39 182
- 1. Numbers extrapolated.
- 2. Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.
- 3. Within municipal limits.
a k
i I T -'w%4 y-> y ,3n- , --
w-y%7yy w w gw, yyr--y %w- g y y ---r y, y'-'e- yr g-,-3-,-
23-
' Table-A-4 i
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT COMPARISON OF SURVEY RESULTS WITH 1
PROJECTIONS FOR SELECTED PARAMETERS EMPLOYMENT LEVEL'- 3,002.-
MOVER LEVEL - 53a i
! Projected Surveyed i Percent Number Percent Number
! Movers with Families 60 323 74 398' I
Movers without Families 40 216 26 140 School-Age Children --
323 --
386 School-Age Children per Family --
1 --
1 Total' Population Influx --
1,185 -- 1,477 b.
Percent Number- Percent Number Housing Choice
. Houses' 35 189 56 304 Mobile Homes '45 243 25 133 Apartments, Sleeping. Rooms, and Other 20 108 19 102.
2 100 540 100 539 Percent Number Percent Number Distribution by County Alcorn, MS - Corinth Area 50 270 9 49 Tishomingo, MS - Iuka and Burnsville Areas 40 216 33 170 Hardin, TN - Savannah and Counce Areas 10 54 10 54 48 266.
.0ther Areas' 0 --
2 100 2 Total 100 540 /539 1
- 1. Numbers extrapolated.
- 2. Percentages may' not addito 100 because of rounding.
- - - _ _ _ =
24-Table A-5 -
FOLLOW UP SURVEY WCRKERS WHO MOVED INTO YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 010 RUN DATE 04/06/81 MOVER
SUMMARY
REPORT IF ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 12-31-80 RUN TIME 093101 WITH TOTAL CHILDREh CHILDREN MOVERS CHILCREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH h!THOUT TOTAL FAPILY SCHOOL CHILCREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS AhNUAL EMPLOYEES HCUSE OhNED 79 44 120 58 21 HCUSE REhTED 3 82 12 3 11 5 2 9 21 APARTMENT RENTED 13 5 10 4 2 18 31 PCBILE HCME aEhTED 2 0 1 0 0 1 3
- CBILE HCME ChhED 10 3 9 4 1 7 17 SLEEPING RCCM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MCTEL
- CTHER 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 TO T AL 117 55 151 71 26 40 157 HCURLY EPPLCVEES FCUSE OwhED 57 37 87 50 14 r0USE RENTED 5 62 59 36 91 54 21 14 73 O APARTMENT RENTED 11 3 10 7 0 12 23 608ILE HCME RENTED 14 6 19 7 2 to 24 MC8ILE HCME ChhED 46 26 60 37 11 14 60 SLEEPIhG ROOM 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 aCTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 CTHER 7 1 5 2 0 12 19 l TO TAL 195 109 272 157 48 70 265 i
ALL ENPLCYEES HCUSE OmNED 136 81 207 1C8 35 8 144 FCUSE REhTED 71 39 102 59 23 23 94-APARTMENT RENTED 24 8 20 11 2 30 54
, PC81LE HCME REhTED 16 6 20 7 2 11 27 l POSILE HCME OWNED 56 29 69 41 12 21 77 SLEEPING ROCM 1 0 0 0 0 3 4 MCTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OTHER 8 1 5 2 0 13 21
- TOTAL 312 164 423 228 74 l 1 ;. 3 422 l
l l
l
Table A-6 FOLL0h UP SURVEY WCRKERS WHO MOVED INTC YELLCW CREEK NUCLEAR PL ANT AREA PAGE 004 ALCCRh RUN DATE 04/06/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CCUNTY TOT AL REPORT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 12-31-80 RUN TIME 093101 htTH TOTAL CHILDREN CHIL DR EN MOVERS C H IL DR EN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS hlTH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHCOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS shNUAL EMPLCYEES HCUSE ChhED 22 11 41 14 9 0 22 MCUSE RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 APARTMENT RENTED 2 0 1 0 0 4 6 dOSILE HCME RENTED
- CBILE HCME CWhED SLEEPING ROOM
=
PCTEL C1HER TOTAL 25 11 42 14 9 5 30 PCURLY EMPLCYEES 2 2 5 3 1 2 4 HCUSE OwhED FCUSE REhTED 5 2 6 4 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 2 APARTMENT R[NTED 1 PCBILE NCME REhTED 2 1 3 1 0 0 2 4 3 4 4 0 0 4 PC8ILE HCME chNED SLEEPIhG RCCM "0TEL (THER 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 15 8 18 12 3 3 18 ALL EMPLOYEES l FCUSE CWhED 24 13 46 17 10 2 26 6 2 6 4 2 1 7 j HOUSE RENTED 3 0 0 0 5 8
- APARTMENT RENTED 1 MOBILE HCME RENTED 2 1 3 1 0 0 2
! 0 4 PCB11E HCME OWNED 4 3 4 4 0 SLEEPING ROOM MCTEL CTHER 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 40 19 60 26 12 8 48 TOTAL l
l l
l
Table A-7 FOLLCh UP SURVEY WCRKERS WHO MOVED INTO YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 005 TI SHOMINGC RUN DATE 04/06/81 EMPLOYEE 5 LIVING WITHIN THE CCUNTY TOTAL REPORT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 12-31-80 RUN TIME 093101 WITH TCTAL CHILDREN CHIL DR EN MOVERS CHILDREN NUM8ER IN IN MOVERS e blTH IN CF GRADE HIGH h!THOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS AhNUAL EMPLCYEEL HCUSE ChhED 19 12 25 to 5 1 20 HCUSE RENTED 3 1 3 2 0 4 7 APARTMENT RENTED 4 2 3 1 1 4 8 808ILE HCME RENTED 2 0 1 0 0 1 3 PCOILE HCME ChhED 7 1 5 1 1 7 14 SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 PCTEL CTHER TOTAL 35 16 37 20 7 18 53 MCURLv EMPLOYEES HCUSE OWNED 14 7 12 7 4 0 14 PCUSE RENTED 20 14 31 20 9 3 23 APARTMENT RENTED 3 1 2 1 0 4 7 PCBILE HCME RENTED 8 2 9 2 0 2 10
- C8ILE HCME ChhED 23 9 25 13 7 11 34 SLEEPING RCCM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 "CTEL CTHER 4 1 4 2 0 1 5 TOTAL 72 34 83 45 20 22 94 ALL EMPLCYEES FCUSE CWhED 33 19 37 23 9 1 34 HCUSE RENTED 23 15 34 22 9 7 30 APARTMENT RENTED 7 3 5 2 1 8 15 PO8ILE HCME RENTED 10 2 10 2 0 3 13 PC81LE HCME ChhED 30 10 30 14 8 18 48 SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 PCTEL CTHER 4 1 4 2 0 1 5 .
TOTAL 107 50 120 65 27 40 147
- 2 7-Table A-8 FCLLCh UP SURVEV WCRKERS WHO MOVED INTO YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 006
?
HARDIh RUN DATE 04/06/81 EMPLCYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CCUNTY TOTAL REPCRT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 12-31-80 RUN TIME 0931G1 hlTH TOTAL CHILCREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREh SCHCCL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS AhNUAL EPPLCVEES FCUSE OWNED 19 10 25 8 5 0 19 HOUSE RENTED 2 1 4 2 0 0 2 APARTMENT RENTED
- CBILE HCME RENTED PCBILE HCME ChhED 1 1 2 2 0 0 1 SLEEPING ROOM PCTEL OTHER TOTAL 22 12 31 12 5 0 22 NCURLY EMPLOYEES HCUSE OWNED 5 5 10 5 3 0 5 HCUSE *ENTED 6 5 9 6 1 1 T APAR1MEh? RENTED 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 PCSILF Pfe' RENTED 1 1 2 1 1 3 4 PC8tLE HCME ChNED 4 3 8 3 3 1 5 SLEEPING ROOM MCTEL CTHER 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 TOTAL 16 14 29 15 8 8 24 ALL EMPLCYEES HCUSE ChhED 24 15 35 13 8 0 24 HOUSE RENTE0 8 6 13 8 1 1 9 APARTMENT RENTED 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 MOBILE HOME RENTED 1 1 2 1 1 3 4
- CSILE HCME ChhED 5 4 10 5 3 1 6 SLEEPING ROOM PCTEL CTHER 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 TCTAL 18 26 60 27 13 8 46
- 2&-
Table A-9 .
FOLLCW UP SURVEY WCRKERS WHO MOVED INTO YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 001 CORINTH RUN DATE 04/06/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPDAT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 12-31-80 RUN TIME 093101 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHCCL SCHOOL F AMILY MOVERS AhhuAL EPPLCVEES PCUSE OWNED 3 1 4 1 0 0 3 HCUSE RENTED APARTMENT RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 MOSILE HCME RENTED r PC8tLE HCME OWNED SLEEPING ROOM
- PCTEL CTHER TOTAL 4 I 4 1 0 2 6 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE ChhED HCUSE RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 APARTNENT RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 P08ILE HCME RENTED POSILE HCME OWNED 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 SLEEPING RCOM 40TEL OTHER TOTAL 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 ALL EMPLCYEES HCUSE OWNED 3 1 4 1 0 0 3 HCUSE REhTED 1 0 0 0 0 0 '
2 0 0 0 0 2 4 APARTMENT RENTED MOSILE HCME REhTED POSILE HOME ONNED 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL
- CTHER T 1 4 1 0 2 9 TOTAL
Table A-10 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAP PLANT AREA PAGE 002 IUKA RUN DATE 04/06/81 EMPLOYEES L'.VING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVT. EMPLOYEES 12-31-80 RUN TIME 093101 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH h!THOUT TOTAL F AMIL'I SCHOOL CHILDREh SCF00L SCHDOL F AMILY MOVERS AhNUAL EMPLOYEES HCUSE OWNED 7 5 10 5 3 0 7 FCUSE RENTED 2 0 1 0 0 2 4 APARTMENT RENTED 4 2 3 1 1 3 7 NCSILE HCME RENTED PCBILE HCME OWNED 3 0 1 0 0 2 5 SLEEPING ROOM MCTEL CTHER TOTAL 16 7 15 6 4 7 23
- PCURLY EMPLOYEES HCUSE OWhED HOUSE RENTED 5 4 8 4 3 0 5 APARTMENT RENTED 3 1 2 1 0 2 5 MCBILE HOME RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 NCBILE HCME CWhED 2 1 6 6 2 2 4 SLEEPING RDOM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 NCTEL CTHER TOTAL 11 6 16 11 5 5 16 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 7 5 10 5 3 0 7 HOUSE RENTED 7 4 9 4 3 2 9 APARTMENT RENTED 7 3 5 2 1 5 12 PCBILE HCME RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
- 08tLE HCME OWNED 5 1 7 6 2 4 9 SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MOTEL OTHER TOTAL 27 13 31 17 9 12 39
-3 0 _.
Table A-11 FOLLCW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO VELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 003 SAVANNAH RUN DATE 04/06/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS RE PORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 12-31-80 RUN TINE 093101 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN huMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH hITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHCOL CHIL DR E N SCHOOL SCHOOL FANILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HCUSE OWNED 5 1 6 1 0 0 5 HCUSE REhTED APARTMENT RENTED MC8ILE HCME REhTED PCBILE HCME OWNED
$LEEPING ROOM
- MOTEL CTHER TOTAL 5 1 6 1 0 0 5 HCURLY EPPLOYEES PCUSE OWhED HOUSE RENTED 2 2 3 3 0 0 2 APARTMENT RENTED 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 7081LE HCME RENTED PCBILE HCME OWNED SLEEPING RCOM PCTEL CTHER TOTAL 2 2 3 3 0 2 4 ALL EMPLOYEES HCUSE OWNED 5 1 6 1 0 0 5 HOUSE RENTED 2 2 3 3 0 0 2 APARTMENT RENTED 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 MOBILE HOME RENTED 7081LE HCME CWNED SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL OTHER TOTAL 7 3 9 4 0 2 9
Appendix B TRAFI'IC LEVEL DEFINED Level of Service D Level of Service D approaches unstable flow,' with tolerable operating ,
speeds being maintained through considerably affected by changes in
~
operating conditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restric-tions to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds. Drivers have little freedom to msneuver, and comfort and convenience are low, but conditions can be tolerated for short periods of time.
Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Highway Research Board-Special Report 87, 1965.
1
- 3 2-l APPENDIX C-1 EMPLOYEE QUESTIONNAIRE NAME SOCIAL SECURITY NO.
LAST FIRST
- 1. WHERE DlD YOU LIVE BEFORE BEGINNING WORK ON THIS PROJECT?
CITY COUNTY
. STATE
- 2. WHERE ARE YOU NOW LIVING DURING THE WORK WEEK?
STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY STATE
- 3. DO YOU LIVE INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS? YES NO 4 IN WHAT TYPE OF RESIDENCE IN THE PROJECT AREA DO YOU LIVE?
- 1. BOARDING OR SLEEPING ROOM 4. MOBILE HOME
- 2. MC TE S. 5. HOUSE
- 3. APARTMENT 6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)
YES NO
- 6. IN THE PROJECT AREA,WITH WHOM DO YOU LIVE?
- 1. BY MYSELF 3. WITH ROOMMATES,
- 2. WITH MY FAMILY
" ^
- 4. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)
- 7. HOW MANY CHILDREN LIVE WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA DURING THE WORK WEEK?
OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO GRADE SCHOOL?
OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOL?
- 8. HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADDRESS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS 7 YES NO TH ANK YOU FOR COOPERATING IN THIS SURVEY.
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT NEW EMPLOYEE SURVEY
APPENDIX C-2 FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONNAIRE
^
YES. IF SO, SKIP TO QUESTION 2.
NO. IF NOT, PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION 3:
WIERE ARE YOU NOW LIVING DURING THE WORK WEEK?
STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY STATE DO YOU LIVE INSIDE TIE CITY LIMITS? YES NO CHECK WHICH TYPE RESIDENCE IN THE PROJECT AREA YOU LIVE IN
- 1. BOARDING OR SLEEPING ROOM
- 2. morel 3 APARTMEIR
- 4. MOBILE HOME
- 5. HOUSE
- 6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)
YES NO 3 IN THE PROJECT AREA, CIECK WITH WHOM YOU NOW LIVE:
- 1. BY MYSELF
. 2. WITH MY FAMILY 3 WITH ROOMMATES. HOW MAhT?
4 OTHER (FLEASE SPECIFY)
- 4. HOW MANY CHILDREN LIVE WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA?
0F THESE, HOW MANY GO TO GRADE SCHOOL?
OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOL?
- 5. HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADDRF1S MORE THAN SIX r40NTHS? YES NO
- 6. HAVE YOU OR ANY OF YOUR FAMILY LIVING WITH YOU IN TIE PROJECT AREA HAD ANY DIFFICULTY OBTAINING HEALTH TREATMENT?
YES. IF SO, CHECK THOSE WHICH YOU HAD DIFFICULTY OBTAINING?
DOCTOR (NOT EMERGENCY)
DENTIST EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT HOSPITALIZATION OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) .
NO
- 7. HAVE YOU OR ANY OF YOUR FAMILY LIVING WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA HAD TO TRAVEL OUISIDE YOUR PRESENT COUNTY TO OBIAIN HEALTH TREATMENT?
YES. IF SO, WHAT WAS TIE SERVICE AND WHERT DID YOU HAVE TO GO?
NO THANK YOU FOR COOPERATING IN THIS SURVEY.
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PIJ.NT
_34.
Appendix D Socioeconouic Monitoring Cycle Time Required from Official
. Survey Date* Activity 2 weeks Allow for personnel paperwork.
3 weeks Print labels, survey forms and mail to project.
3 weeks Conduct survey and return forms.
2 weeks Code forms, update files, and send tables to coordinator.
4 weeks contingency time for reproduction, mail, or project site problems.
2 weeks First two sections of report drafted and sent to functional staff.**
3 weeks Functional staffs draft sections and submit
, them.
4 weeks Prepare and distribute draft report and receive Comments.
2 weeks Incorporate comments and send final report to production.
2 weeks Printing.
2 weeks Contingency time for mail, typing, or other delays.
I week Reports distributed.
- The survey date for each project is the last day a person can be i hired and still be surveyed.
- Functional staff are those dealing with specific areas such as education or health.
o
9 s '
y 2.6%M^Wi.M..;Q.? i I [ #
M Y-E ;_ ].
d
%,$.dt-.-l%! ~1. ' ; -~~'
' = - . = , , 'e-gj w o c o, ;6
[//
3MKS t..:..,.q h Q ....
4 .
Y g c- (. --e -..-. s N jy '.*"*
~ y --we #
'N / ./ f co" '*-
mye jA^ ' N-Ny, O Ma*p ,g g n y- - , N^T'iotuut ime ,~
,A yr4
'/ \ ~ ., g ,/cnes7 ;No r-M,=.4 , g , cf' --u(......f. 7 s - ,
l , -
/
~'
7
- . I t o V, v i :::- D , .g 4 J~
o --
~ [~-/
- u. ; -/
L. 'w1 ~~~"
c::: .,,,,,, l N
7IW b .'
N e6g_.
m,,
t .
f
\-
E l ' , ' <" . ,5._ .. t. ... . . \ .
.+64 - ,byv i.
e p.. b g--( 9 /m/a x;.:_.- %
N- ;
'*~dUh--.~.'~{'m' ' --
,J M^ "
C .m
( / '
/- ~
(n ' o - *~~ at
... . jA 3, l-
. ly .- .,
, ' , , , , ,'\ .
'4 x
I
.'7 ,,~y
......... 1 t <* *
- 4. ,.
{
w..
WA t .
A-..
1 ,
- l. { , ,,/
. ,p.
l HARptMTN
. .cy
- b ,pc.,Mp-
, .s
' ' ' ' l~
- _'f A R D I Iel lNq*smom- l N.4 t m I ** G
~ . ' '; (
Ll.
3
~
f' ,,
,I y 3 g f i .-.,, ,i T ..~,3 l i
}
'**ac'bui)) ym Pul.sk -
l sma noI,e
,W sj ',. g.
, , , , , , , r.y.,,
,l_ . ~-.--
- j l - . m ac c i e ( ~ T ,
f
) 3 3 3
~
=._ yl t w % l s
-,..y N a.,_-,.. N trN 02 i
/
,s% .- - _
.i . ..... ,,
(g. -
~
y, . . .. . ;s.
y,p..
l~~a-a ..l 1
.. m
_1..)fg,. ..... y ;.f, ,,
t m
- . m,m'.ed , a ""*.] non tella mK(lan nan v
, ..m.1 _ . . -
.. ( .. o s. m9 -
_.)k.
.~. : -
y g
~ y-- ,, ! i N .-. m y:.: <t ;---~- L l - ,
e ,.- /-
A =-
p x
s X~dl h gYN/
- - i -
$m.k*.
b N ON 7' '
[ D =-
- f A tM /u
. M_.
% ;gppgg .f {fLOREN % Ae' .
if MAD 5
/,a. Nr%r=9.
/
P /*e ws i
J Ih,;$ casa-M;
$ s
- , sh rsvits se
- o.. q'W h' man run '-.4 I 8
%Y..."(Wl
- o. e .,,, ,s
' ~~'-
l N.,-~- a, gO f..
?w=. ~~&~-w b"',1i3f I*.,24\
^
- t
..- __,.__ t ..
wp.
i t - ,
. r' s--- '
,& - [ iv Qi.y ..
p-
/j}- ;....... '* ~
g - -" i
_% 'Ql&j',
N
-- Y l?.>s. . .,.z~ v 4'q=A-M E % /' u /
s
.h, '-
F s -
New Albany '#*** , - - .
r "" 4,.
. no...nv.n.1 FIGURE 1
- u ~ ~
P ' -"'* s.. ~ j,, fa "
", 1 . e-r e t YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT
.h - o .---
g,,, . .I " 7. 's$~~ /
f'
[
. */,
M.E."
towns cONTAINING CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES
.... - .s / '
gWAM A '"i b y i w c- #
4 ptANT SITE d' , k, -
j Ltt " - ' -
m -
W - -- _ - 3 d****."'._ < ' * "' DECEMBER 1980 f ,/, . .. . ' I.".Pl.'R, **"-~~ I O I5 30 i .,1- s
- *-a.a h x . ., -[7,
- f . _. (y\ *~~~ 6 3 ""*' SCALE OF MILES
[ M s i( k
- [#~~~ 1 . ", : t
- NOTE: TOWN 5 UNDERLINED CONTAIN EMPLOYEES