ML20039A696
| ML20039A696 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point |
| Issue date: | 11/24/1981 |
| From: | Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Solarz S HOUSE OF REP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20039A686 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8112210167 | |
| Download: ML20039A696 (2) | |
Text
,
puto [t; UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3
g WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 n
- j
\\...../
November 24, 1981 CHAIRMAN The Honorable Stephen Solarz United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515
Dear Congressman Solarz:
I am writing this letter in response to you and your colleagues' concern over the delay in appointing the board which will preside over the proceeding at Indian Point.
On September 18, 1981, the Commission issued a Memorandum and Order which, in addition to clarifying the January 8 order on the scope and procedures for the proceeding, appointed the members of the Board.
I have enclosed a copy of that order for your convenience.
'he appointment of the Board removed the last obstacle to the actual i
commencement of the proceeding.
The next step will be requests by interested citize'ns and agencies to participate in the hearing, followed by Board action on those requests and the holding of a prehearing conference by the Board to decide further schedules. As the amended order indicates, the Commission has requested the Board's recommendations within one year.
With regard to your concern over emergency planning at Indian Point, it is, as you know, the subject of a systematic, on-going review by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the NRC.
The NRC relies on FEMA to determine the adequacy of off-site preparedness.
FEMA has stated it would not be able to make a definitive finding until it has completed its formal review of emergency plans, and until it has conducted an emergency preparedness exercise, now scheduled for Indian Point in March, 1982.
After FEMA has completed its review, the NRC will incorporate FEMA's findings into oiir overall evaluation of the adequacy of emergency preparedness. The Union of Concerned Scientists and the New York Public Interest Research Group have filed a petition in the j
Second Circuit Court of Appeals seeking review af the NRC's failure to l
take action against the Indian Point licensees over issues of emergency planning.
t I
l I
8112210167 811124 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR
The; Honorable Stephen Solarz 2-Emergency planning is also one of the issues the Commission has delineated for consideration at the hearings.
It should receive full attention during those proceedings.
If I can be of further assistance, please contact me.
Sincerely,
.#r7 ll
. 6-
/ -7
- r v fdM3, O h'n'~ (b$bWh2 Nunzio/J.Paljddio v
Enclosure:
Memorandum and Order r
9 e
I l
-