ML20038C574
| ML20038C574 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 12/03/1981 |
| From: | Delgeorge L COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8112110240 | |
| Download: ML20038C574 (2) | |
Text
_ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
o
'N Commonwealth Edison (o
/ one First Nationsi Plaza, Chicago, tilinois O
C } Address Reply to: Post OIfice Box 767 Chicago Illinois 60690 g
sgQayj w#
December 3, 1981 Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division o f Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Quad Cities Station Unit 2 Barrier Fuel Ramp Test Scheduled for End o f Cycle 6 NRC Docket No. 50-265 Oear Mr. Eisenhut:
On November 12, 1981, a conference call concerning the Quad Cities Station Unit 2, Cycle-6, barrier fuel demonstration test was held between the Commonwealth Edison personnel and Mr. M.
Tokar of your staff.
The attachment to this letter documents the items which were agreed upots in this call.
Please address any questions you may have concerning this matter to this of fice.
One (1) signed original and thirty-nine (39) copies of this transmittal are provided for your use.
Very truly yours, b
Wf a
L.O. DelGeorge Director of Nuclear Licensing Attachment cc:
Region III Inspector - Quad Cities im IO g}h,. F 2979N eg 0112110240 811203 PDR ADOCK 05000265 P
PDR Q
Attachment Quad Cities Unit 2 Barrier Fuel Test Conference Call he followirg itms concernirg the Quad Cities 2 Cycle 6 Barrier Fuel D monstration were agreed to in a conference call on Nou mber 12, 1981 between T. J. Rausch, J. A. Silady and D. O'Fr,yle of GCo and M. Tokar of the NRC Staff.
1.
CECO agrees to provide more detailed information on the expected paak local powers and power charges in the fuel which will be raged durirg the E006 control rod withdrawal test. R ese data shall include information on both the barrier fuel in the racp cells as well as the adjacent fuel in the buffer regions. It will be provided when more refined predictions are available (June,1982).
2.
If offgas activity increased durirg the EOC6 rap test to a significant level in excess of the usual noise and transient behavior, CECO agrees to notify NRR personnel in Bethesda as well as I&E personnel.
3.
Provided that outage time is available off critical path, CBCo agrees to sip the test cell ass ablies as well as any buffer region ass ablies which are scheduled for reinsertion for Cycle 7, to confirm that the claddirg is sound even if no failure indications were evident from offgas and coolant monitorirg durirg the EOC6 ramp test.
4.
CECO agrees to provide a canparison of the fuel failure probability for the planned d eonstration (i.e. barrier fuel in the test cells) relative to a postrasted test with standard fuel in the test cells. 'Ihis information would also be supplied by June, 1982.
CECO emphasized that these it es, while related to the EOC6 ramp test, are not needed for review and approval of the reload licensirg analyses aril BOC6 startup authorization.
..