ML20038A819
| ML20038A819 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/10/1980 |
| From: | NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUREG-0629, NUREG-0629-ERR, NUREG-629, NUREG-629-ERR, NUDOCS 8111160496 | |
| Download: ML20038A819 (4) | |
Text
-
i b
,s>* **coq'o, d'
UNITED STATES 8
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
h WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
'; ?
o,
?,.
,/
March 10,1980
- ..+-
! 3 ERRATA SHEET for s
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION BUDGET ESTIMATES FISCAL YEAR 1981 (NUREG 0629)
(Green Book) l D
',}1 Please replace Page 18 with th '
revised version attached, y{
Q,s$$'
- sf e
s O
e
{
)
O (Dollars in Thousands, except whole dollars in narrative material)
NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION ccatinued without e'w4ngering the public health and safety and in New and/or expanded environmental qualification accordance with applicable environmental regulations. Continue requirements for safety grade equipment within to schedule OL reviews in a timely manner to assure the review containment, croce:s will not be a critical path item that would delay the rearter fuel load and startup testing.
Implementation of atmospheric transport models to forecast and hindcast release impacts, Cortinue to perform selected early site reviews (ESR) to remove scr< or all site suitability issues from the critical path of CP Pump end valve operability and reliability assurance, reviews. These reviews can decrease portions of the site /
environmental reviews when the applicant subsequently submits a Revised criteria on hydrogen generation and requirements CP application. Such early reviews can also accelerate the on hydrogen recombiners, issuance of a Limited Work AJthorization (LWA) which enables the applicant to start some construction prior to issuance of the New requirements for containment atmosphere sampling, CP.
Revised containment isolation criteria.
Standard Plant Designs - Continue to review and approve various standard plant designs that will provide impetus to the industry to utilize one of the various standardization concepts. This The following table summarizes new applications and planned will increase the predictability of the acceptability of plant licenslng action completions in FY 1979 - FY 1981.
design from the licensing review standpoint. Pursue potential efficiencies of standardization in trying to achieve the goal of FY 1979*
FY 1980*
FY 1981" a shorter average CP safety review. The use of standard plant CP designs in concert with a previously approved site should result incoming 2(4) 0
'l(2) in significant savings in time and money to the nuclear industry under review 19(34) 14(25) 13(23) with no adverse impact on overall safety.
completed 2(4) 0 1(2)
Continue to improve the stability and predictability of the OL licensing process by increased use of rulemaking and review of incoming 4(7) 10(21) 4(6) changing requirements by the Regulatory Requirements Review under review 24(39) 34(60) 33(57)
Committee (RRRC).
completed 0
8(9) 10(11)
Significant impacts of the Three Mile Island accident occur in Std Plant the reviews of OL's, CP's and 5tandard Plants. The effort applied incoming 1
0 3
to casework is not to resolve the problems identified by TMI, under review 10 10 9
but to implement the lessons learned into the actual reviews.
completed 0
4 4
This results in increased review scope and depth in certain of the review areas as listed below, for every licensing case.
ESR incoming 2
1 0
Enhanced emergency planning activities, under review 6
7 4
completed 0
3 0
Implementation of new and/or revised accident analysis requirements.
" Figures in ( ) represent the number of units.
Revised February 1980 18 a
C
.cgo
)
(Dollars in Thousands, except whole dollars in narrative material).
NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION - continued
[
without endangering the public health and safety and in New ar.d/or expanded environmental qualification accordance with' applicable' environmental regulations.. Continue requirements for safety grade equipment within
..-to schedule OL reviews in a timely manner to assure the reefew containment,.
-process will not be a' critical path ites that would delay the Implementation of atmospheric transport models to reactor fuel. load and startup testing.
forecast and hindcast release impacts,
. Continue to perform selected early site reviews (ESR) to remove some or all site suitability issues from the critical path of CP-Pump and valve operability.and reliability assurance,-
reviews. These reviews-can decrease portions of the site /-
~ environmental reviews when the applicant subsequently submits a Revised criteria on hydrogen generation and requirements CP application. Such early' reviews can also accelerate the on hydrogen recombiners,-
l.
issuance of a Limited Work Authorization (LWA) which enables the l'
applicant to start some. construction prior to issuance of the New requirements for containment. atmosphere sampling,.
CP.
Revised containment' isolation criteria.
Standard Plant Designs - Continue to review and approve various standard plant designs that will provide impetus to the industry to utilize one of the various standardization concepts. This The following table summarizes new applications and planned will. increase the predictability of the acceptability of. plant licensing action completions in FY 1979 - FY 1981.
design.from the licensing review standpoint.. Pursue potential efficiencies cf standardization in trying to achieve the goal of
~FY 1979*
FY 1980*
FY 1981
a shorter' average CP safety review. The use of standard plant
'CP d^ signs in concert with a previously approved site should result incoming
- 2(4) '
0~
1(2)
'in'significant savings in time and money to the nuclear industry under revi a '
19(34) 14(25)
-13(23).
with no adverse impact on overall safety.
completed 2(4) 0 1(2)
Continue to improve the stability and predictability of the OL licensing process by increased use of rulemaking and review of incoming..
4(7) 10(21) 4(6)'
chs~'ing requirements by the Regulatory Requirements Review under review 24(39) 34(60) 33(57)
Comc,ttee (RRRC).
completed 0
8(9) 10(11)
Signif' cant impacts of the Three Mile Island accident occur in Std Plant incoming 1
0 3
the reviews of OL's, CP's and Standard Plants. The effort applied to casework is not to resolve the problems identified by TMI, under' review 10 10 9
but to implement the lessons learned into the actual reviews, completed 0
4.
4 This results.in increased review scope and depth in certain of the review areas as listed below, for every licensing case.
ESR incoming 2
1 0.
Enhanced emergency planning activities, under review 6
7:
4 completed 0
3 0
Implementation of new and/or revised accident analysis requirements,
" Figures in ( ) represent the number of units.
Revised February 1980 18
%V (Dollars in Thousands, except whole dollars in narrative material)
NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION - continued without endangering the public health and safety and in New and/or expanded environmental qualification accordance with applicable environmental regulations. Continue requirements for safety grade equipment within to schedule OL reviews in a timely manner to assure the review containment, process will not be a critical path item that would delay the reactor fuel load and startup testing.
Implementatio.1 of atmospheric transport models to forecast and hindcast release impacts, Continue to perform selected early site reviews (ESR) to remove some or all site suitability issues from the critical path of CP Pump and valve operability and reliability assurance,,
reviews. These reviews can decrease portions of the site /
environmental reviews when the applicant subsequently submits a Revised criteria on hydrogen generation and requirements CP application. Such early reviews can also accelerate the on hydrogen recombiners, issuance of a Limited Work Authorization (LWA) which enables the applicant to start some construction prior to issuance of the New requirements for containment atmosphere sampling, CP.
Revised containment isolation criteria.
Standard Plant Designs - Continue to review and approve various l
standard plant designs that will provide impetus to the industry to utilize one of the various standardization concepts. This The following table summarizes new applio tions and f anned will increase the predictability of the acceptability of plant licensing action completions in FY 1979 - FY 1961.
design from the licensing review standpoint. Pursue potential efficiencies of standardization in trying to achieve the goal of FY 1979*
FY 1E" FY 1981" a shorter average CP safety review. The use of standard plant CP designs in concert with a previously approved site should result incoming 2(4) 0 l(2) in significant savings in time and money to the nuclear industry under review 19(34) 14(25) 13(23) with no adverse impact on overall safety.
completed 2(4) 0 l(2)
Continue to improve the stability and predictability of the OL licensing process by increased use of rulemaking and review of incoming 4(7) 10(21) 4(6) changing requirements by the Regulatory Requirements Review under review 24(39) 34(60) 33(57)
Committee (RRRC).
completed 0
8(9) 10(11)
Significant impacts of the Three Mile Island accident occur in Std Plant the reviews of OL's, CP's and Standard Plants. The effort applied incoming 1
0 3
to casework is not to resolve the problems identified by TMI, under review 10 10 9
but to implement the lessons learned into the actual reviews.
completed 0
4 4
This results in increased review scope and depth in certain of the review creas as listed below, for every licensing case.
ESR incoming 2
1 0
Enhanced emergency planning activities, under review 6
7 4
completed 0
3 0
Implementation of new and/or revised accident analysis I'9"II'"l
Figures in ( ) represent the number of units.
Revised February 1980 18
.