ML20037B664

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Topical Rept Evaluation of BQ-TOP-1,Revision 3A, QA Program for Nuclear Power Plants. Rept Acceptable
ML20037B664
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/16/1980
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20037B663 List:
References
NUDOCS 8010280682
Download: ML20037B664 (2)


Text

.

Tcpical Report Evaluation Report fiumber:

BQ-TOP-1, Revision 3A Report

Title:

Quality Assurance Progra:a for iluclear Pc,;er Plants Revision Date:

October 1920 Criginating Organization:

Bechtel Pcver Corporation P:vicwed By: Quality Assurance Branch T.::ARY OF__ TOP.I.C..Al. _ REP.O_RT_

!<pical report BQ-TOP-1, Revision 3A describes the quality assurance program t.hich the Bechtel Power Corporation applies to those design, procurement, and constructicn activities involving safety-related structures, systems, and com-penents of nuclear power plants within the Bechtel scope of work.

BQ-TOD-1, Revision 3A commits Bechtel to comply with the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and to comply with the regulatory position provided by the NRC (oith some exceptions which have been found acceptable by the NRC) in the following Regulatory Guides:

Rc g u l a to ry Gu_i de,

Date, 1.28 6/72 1.30 8/77.

1.37 3/73 1.38 3/73 1.39 3/73' l.58 8/73 1.64 6/76 1.74 2/74 1.88 10/76 1.94 4/76 1.116 6/76 1.123 10/76 NSI N45.2.12 (D-3, P,-4) 2/74 htel Pv..er Cu, arction Las provided for cur

.alunicn a detailed @scription of vganiza tions nd gccups involvr>d in u pirr :nting activities equired by the 911ity assurance program and a delincation of dutics, responsibilities, and othority of those organi/ations involved in the quality assurance pr ogram.

"Q-TCP-1, Revisico 3A 6 scribes the msur es used to carry out the Eechtel Poiter F q ;ratici vali ty a" ora me progran, and it d:: scribes how the app?icable require-Ms of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 will be satisfied by the adainistration and

,1: intation of th.ne coasures.

1RY OF RE_G_U_I_A_I_C.RY L Q U AT.I O_N

'a* ve evaluated the quality assurance program and the organizations responsible for quality auurance functions as & scribed in BQ-TOP-1, Revision 3A. 'de find

!.it quality, mrance policy.nd dira tion originate at an acceptebly idgh f101028 0 682

.. c.nage.: ant level and are effectively comunicated to other parts of the organira-tien.

Those performing quality assurance functions have respcnsibility and i

authority cormensurate with their duties in implementing the quality assurance program. lle alta find that ruasures have been established, to be implemented by written procedures and instructions, which address each of the criteria of Appendix 3 in an acceptable rs.nner.

Based en our review and evaluation of BQ-TOP-1, Revision 3A, we conclude that:

1.

The erganizatic.ns and parscns perferning quality assurance functicas within Ecc'.tel Pc..er Corpor.itica have the required independence and authority to eTrectively impic :nt the quality assurance program without undue influence frca tkse directly resrcasible for costs and schedules, and 2.

If a Sec;lci Power Corporatica quality assurance program contains the require-r 2nts anti centrols which, when properly implemented, ccmply with the require-ints of Appendix B to 10 CFh Part 50 and the applicable regulatory guides and standards contained in Chapter 17 of the NRC Standard Review Plan (NUREG-75/037, Fevision 0).

.. = =..

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _