ML20037B592
| ML20037B592 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden, Quad Cities, Zion  |
| Issue date: | 04/11/1974 |
| From: | Jennifer Davis NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Kuhlman C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20037B593 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8010220708 | |
| Download: ML20037B592 (1) | |
Text
./
(. * **
Q _ lA s
i'-
=
nr APR 11 1974 p:.
p ::.=:
(=
c
[1 HOTE TO C. H. KUHLMAN N
G ACCEPTABILITY OF SAMPLE PISULTS Note the April 3,1974 letter from Region III to Comonwealth Edison Cocpany with the attached results of split samples on
..E effluents. Tais letter raises two questions:
(1) Is this the proper avenue for informing Cocuonwealth Edison of the
- ci AEC results, and (2) How do the results of the other splits
~==
p compare with the AEC results.
~
j :.
During the tine in which we have had these cooperative agree-j_
~~~
rents between AEC and the states, a question which frequently c
hao arisen is how do we place on the public records the results of the split scaples and how do we resolve significant differ-I ences in results. I surmise, prior to dispatching the April 3 letter, that Region III had resolved any differences to a satisfactory level.
U Basically, my question concerninghis letter is whether it follows your progran=atic approach to placing in the public record tbc result of these sampics.
!?
Original signed by J. G. Davis John G. Davis, Deputy Director l
for Field Operations l
Enclosure:
[
l As Stated ii E..
i l:
- C**
.. ~.
ow-.-s*
JcDa
- t
- :m - -
_4 /.$/.7.4 _...
n.' e *
/
re.ac.n..u.24,ac>ig.aU 1 0 2 2 0 7 0 [................. g i
...