ML20037B352
| ML20037B352 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 03/21/1978 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20037B349 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8009150621 | |
| Download: ML20037B352 (4) | |
Text
.
O
,4 MAR 2 ; rm APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket No.50-010 Dresden Units 1, 2, 3 Docket No. 50-237 Docket No. 50-249 This refers to the inspection' conducted by representatives of.the Region III (Chicago) office at the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Morris, Illinois, of activities authorized by NRC Operating Licenses Nos. DPR-2, DPR-19, and DPR-25.
During this inspection conducted'during December,1977, and January, 1978, the following apparent items of noncomoliance were identified.
~
1.
Sections 3.9.A and 3.9.B of the Unit 3 Technical Specifications require that the Unit 3 diesel generator and the Unit 2/3 diesel generator be operable, except under certain specified conditions.
Contrary to the above, the Dresden Unit 3 diesel generator and the Unit 2/3 diesel generator were not operable as required for a period of approximately 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> on December 28, 1977.
This violation had the potential for contributing to an occurrence related to health and safety.
(Civil Penalty - $5,000) 2.
Sections 3.4.A and 3.4.B of the Unit 2 Technical Specifications require that, except for the temporary inoperability of a redundant component, the standby liquid' control system be operable when the reactor is operating.
Contrary to the above, on January 5,1978, with Unit 2 operating, the standby liquid control system was not operable as required.
This is an Infraction.
(Civil Penalty - $4,000) 3.
Section 6.2.A.7 of the Unit 3 Technical Specifications requires that detailed written procedures including applicable checkoff lists covering surveillance and testing requiremente be prepared, approved, and adhered to.
0009R50 4
W t I is7a 4
Appendix A -
Implementing procedure DTP 8, " Technical Staff Surveillance Plan," item F.1.a. requires that the technical staff unit lead engineer or his designee complete the surveillance checkoff sheet (data sheet 1) after the equipment status on Table 1 is verified as being in a satisfactory condition.
Table 1, item 6, requires a review of the diesel generator status.
Contrary to the above, when performing surveillance on December 28, 1977, the technical staff unit lead engineer completed data sheet I without verifying that the status of the diesel generators on Units 3 and 2/3 were in a satisfactory condition.
This is an Infraction.
(Civil Penalty - $3,000) 4.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, requires that activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances.
e a.
Dresden Administrative Procedure DAP 3-5, " Equipment Out-of-Service Procedure," requires that equipment be taken out-of-service in accordance with Step 1 of the procedure.
Step 1 sets forth a procedural sequence to be followed including requests for equipment out-ci-service, proper tagging, and the tracking of such equipment.
l Contrary to the above, during October, 1977, motor control i
center breaker No. 2871 on Unit 2, used to supply redundant power to uninterruptable buses 28-7 and 29-7 was tr'..
out-of-service without following Step 1 of DAP 3-5.
This is an Infraction.
(Civil Penalty - $3,000) b.
Commonwealth Edison Company's Quality Assurance Manual, QA 5.1, requires that instructions and procedures be used to assist personnel in assuring that important activities are performed, and that these documents reference applicable i
acceptance criteria which must be satisfied to assure that the quality related activity has been properly carried out.
Contrary to the above, the acceptance criteria within procedures DOS 6600-5 and DOS 6600-6, " Bus Undervoltage and ECCS Integrated Test for the 2(3) (and 2/3, respectively) Diesel Generator,"
are not of a type appropriate to the circumstances in that they are not adequate to assure that the quality related activity is properly carried out.
This is an Infraction.
(Civil Penalty - $3,000) w mw
,e Y
p
0 Appendix A
- 3-MAR 21 Ea
~
t c.
Connonwealth Edison Company's Quality Procedure QP 3-51,
" Design Control for Operations - Plant Modifications,"
Section C requires that the Shift Supervisor or Operating Engineer shall sign and date the Modification Approval Sheet after operational modification testing has been completed and test data reviewed (Step 27.c) prior to authorizing operation of the modified equipment (Step 28).
Contrary to the above, on November 5,1977, operation of the modified auto start relays associated with the Unit ~2/3 Diesel Generator was authorized without completing operative testing and the Modification Approval Sheet.
.This is an infraction.
(Civil Penalty - $3,000) c -
5.
Unit 2 Technical Specifications, Section 6.2.A.5, requires that detailed written procedures, including applicable checkoff lists l
covering safety instrumentation operation, be prepared, approved, I
and adhered to.
Dresden Instrument Procedure, DIS 700-1, "APRM Flow Bias System Calibration," requires that surveillance be performed according i
to the data sheet. The data sheet includes an "as left" column which shows the condition of the set point following completion of the test. The "as left" reading.is to correspond to the acceptance criteria showr in the data sheet.
Contrary to the above, on December 22,1978,.the licensee failed to adhere to this procedure in that according to records, the "as left" condition of the flow converter setpoints were about 3%
in the nonconservative direction of the acceptance criteria.
This is a deficiercy.
(Civil Penalty - None)
This notice of violation is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations. You are hereby required to submit to this office, within twenty (20) days of your receipt of this notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance, (1) admission or denial of the alleged items of noncompliance; (2) the reasons for the items of noncompliance, if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken by you and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
e n
w
..~ -. n g<
w g.>,,s N.
~,
"4, gg
- 7 s
e
- y n
-,an 9 ~ -.
- * ^
.v.g:-m v
. l.J:.u c'M
. a c' S i '. n_
.t s
\\-
L N
g g
x.
.~.
-w b
k*e s
,.m d[c!I,, '
W 2 i ss i \\,5
. Appe,ndtx:A i
.,.N7
<v m'
.,s (3 A -
3
- sgN,
_ h$.-
k
.s,
-.- +
a 4,
s
, s, v-
+g..
.m.
N.
~.. \\
sq g,
i Its, m 5' of the Notice
' o c
\\lWith. regard to tne deficiency identiffed in; ired because corrective
(,, '
lof Violation, no'further informaticn i's,;requ P.
.- 9 action was 'tdan prinr 'to completion of this~ inspection.-
ps.
s N
_g
.m.s-ss w
m g
.p\\
a
,,s s
m N
s 4
d%.,.
.s
.o m
v.
-,,2 r
')
f %. "%
g
'f d\\
k'
- N
'g.
(.$
i s
+'
i.
,s
\\
+
g r
y T
S
$\\
a
-^*
e 4
s #
E su a
\\
b l,
1
. r a
s a
l
\\..
a 3
m.c n
i '\\
= 1
,~
[
3 a
u e
w
.s t.
v x
l
-k l
l4 3
7
-r l
^
n I
~
g e
b l'
(
l
's v
y 4
.J 3-
+
^
h i'
,ww.-~-,
.w-.
,