ML20037A309
| ML20037A309 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/20/1979 |
| From: | James Anderson BRAND INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. (BISCO) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19289A139 | List: |
| References | |
| 1064-10, NUDOCS 7908270369 | |
| Download: ML20037A309 (39) | |
Text
-
~
- r l
7 l
f FIRE TEST CONFIGURATION FOR SILICONE FOAM FIRE BARRIERS BISCO REPORT NO. 1064-10 June 20, 1979 James S. Anderson Technical Director 7908270361
..,....,..r...
8 T
5420 Old Orchard Road, Skokie, Illinois 60077
- Area Code 312/966-6200 gg gg g
techn@Begg laboed@acu e w = ponn u e cruen e n n
~
June 25, 1979 Mr. Jim Anderson BISCO Brand Industrial Services, Inc.
1420 Renaissance Drive Park Ridge, Illinois 60068
Dear Mr. Anderson:
I have reviewed the Final Report entitled, " Fire Test Configuration for Silicone Foam Fire Barriers," -
BISCO Test No. 1064-10.
The specimen was fabricated, and the test performed in accordance with BISCO Test Procedure No. 1064-10, Re-vision No. 3 dated April 3, 1979.
The fire and hose-stream tests referred to in this report were conducted at the Construction Technology Laboratories, a Division of the Portland Cement Association, fire test facility on May 8, 1979.
The report describes accurately the details of specimen
, fabrication, test procedures, observations during test, and test results.
I Sincerely yours, hb')
Director Fire Research Department Melvin S. Abrams rk CR-4454 Copy to-W. G. Corley Central File 1
-=m e- - - -.
i 9
GENERAL Procedures described in this report define methods used to
+
perform fire barrier testing on a prototype fire barrier con-figuration representative of conditions existing at V. C.
Summer Nuclear Generating Station.
The fire barrier test 3
provides a means for determining the validity and integrity of procedures and materials to be used at the V. C. Summer Station for fire barriers rated for three hour protection.
The fire barrier test was performed on a gypsum board wall with seal thickness extensions to create the following penetrations:
1.
A penetration containing two cable trays filled 60%
with cable and sealed to a thickness of 9-3/4".
2.
A penetration containing two cable trays filled 60% with cable and sealed with 11-3/4" thickness of silicone foun.
The test assembly was exposed to fire in a vertical position and following the three hour fire exposure was subjected to a hose stream test.
The fire and hose stream tests were performed at the Construction Technology Laboratories, a Division of Portland Cement Association, 5420 Old Orchard Road, Skokie, Illinois 60077.
The tests were witnessed by representatives of Gilbert Associates, American Nuclear Insurers, Brand Industrial Services, and Construction Technology Laboratories.
FABRICATION OF TEST ASSEMBLY The test assembly is constructed of a gypsum board wall contained between an upper and lower concrete slab.
These upper and lower I
.n.-r-,,n,,
.,.,,n-..
,.n
-.---.,-,..,,.n,
l Report 1064-10 Page two slabs are each 8" in thickness x 3' long x 74" wide and are separated by four 4" steel I beams.
The orientation of the slabs in the walls shown in drawing 1064-10-1.
The function i
of the slabs and I beams are to provide structure for the gypsum board test wall and are not evaluated as part of the fire test.
The details of the wall construction are shown in drawing 1064-10-2.
Three layers of 1/2" gypsum board are attached to either side of 4" steel studs, with the exterior sheet of gypsum board on each side separated from the inner two sheets by a 3/8" subgirt allowing a cooling air pass in the gypsum wall facing.
A 40" x 76" opening is cut in the gypsum board wall and oriented in such a fashion that along one of the faces a steel stud is adjacent to the opening and along the other faces of the opening the steel studs are inset from a distance of 3" to 8".
Four 7" x 24" steel cable trays representative of those trays used at the V. C. Summer Nuclear Station are set equally spaced in the opening and each cable tray is filled to 55% with a combina-tion control and power cables also representative of those cables used at V. C.
Summer.
PREPARATION OF OPENING The gypsum board wall section has an overall thickness of 7-3/4" which is less than the required thickness of silicone foam
O Report 1064-10 Page three necessary to achieve a three hour fire rating.
The test is designed to evaluate two foam thicknesses, 9-3/4" and 11-3/4",
in conjunction with the gypsum board wall to determine their I
effectiveness in providing a three hour fire rating.
To allow for both thicknesses a Babcock and Wilcox M-board divi-der is mounted horizontally across the opening as shown in drawing 1064-10-3, separating the opening into two individual openings each 37-1/2" x 40".
The M-board is 1" in thickness and 13-3/4" in width such that it extends 1" beyond the thickest face of the silicone foam seal from either side of the gypsum board wall.
In order to achieve the seal thickness required a 6" wide ceramic board is installed around the perimeter of the openings on both sides of the gypsum board wall as shown in drawing 1064-10-3.
For the upper opening the M-board is 1" in thickness adding a total of 2" to the wall thickness of 7-3/4" thereby creating a 9-3/4" seal thickness.
The lower opening ie sur-rounded by 2" thick M-board on either side of the seal adding a total of 4" to the basic gypsum board wall resulting in an overall seal thickness of 11-3/4".
In each case the ceramic board is attached to the gypsum wall by 2" screws with fender washers located on 6" centers.
The 4" hollow section between the gypsum board wall faces is dammed with a permanent ceramic board plug fabricated from B&W
Report 1064-10 Page four M-board and shaped as shown in drawing 1064-10-2.
The plug is approximately 2" in thickness and is tapered as shown in the drawing to fit fro'm 1/2 to 3/4 of its thickness into the wall gap.
DAMMING AND SEALING DETAILS The test assembly was temporarily dammed on both faces with Ethafoam manufactured by Dow Chemical Company consistent with BISCO Procedure DMI-1.
The damming was removed and dis-carded prior to the test.
In each of the cable trays the cables were separated with Babcock and Wilcox Kaowool ceramic fiber according to BISCO Procedures and that fiber was left in place throughout the duration of the test.
The entire opening was filled with Dow Corning 3-6548 silicone foam to a depth of 9-3/4" on the top portion and 11-3/4" on the lower portion, in each instance in a manner consistent with BISCO Procedure 207-IP.
The foam was installed by BISCO personnel at the Construction Technology Laboratories while the test
, assembly was in a vertical position.
The completely sealed, test assembly was allowed to air cure for a minimum of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> prior to the fire test.
FIRE TEST The test assembly containing the penetration seal systems was subjected to a three hour fire exposure in the large beam
Report 1064-10 Page five furnace at the Construction, Technology Laboratories.
The soeciman was placed in the furnace in a vertical position.
The fire exposure followed the standard time / temperature relat,ionship 1
described in ASTM Designation:E119.
Furnace Temperatures as measured by 3 thermocouples located in the furnace were monitored through-out the three hour test.
These temperatures and the varia-tions from those of the standard ASTM Designation: E119 time /
temperature curve are shown in Table I.
Temperature measurements at various points on the unexposed surface of the silicone foam and of the penetrating objects were made throughout the test.
The location of the thermo-
~
couples used for those temperature measurements are shown in Figure 1064-10-4.
The unexposed surface temperatures are shown in Table II.
A maximum temperature in the 9-3/4" seal of 2700 F was obtained at the end of the three hour exposure period, l
the average of the iemperature measurements at the end of the j
three hour period was 2030 A maximum temperature in the 11-3/4" seal of 280 was obtained at the end of the three hour exposure period, the average of the temperature measurements at the end of the three hour period was 178 By observation the appearance of the fire barrier throughout the duration of the test was typical and as expected with one exception.
At two hours and thirty five minutes into the test a small burn through occurred adjacent to cable tray "C"
in 1
Report 1064-10 Page six the 11-3/4" thick seal area at a position about 2/3 of the way up the edge of the cable tray and directly between a cable and the tray wall.
That burn through continued to be apparent throughout the remaining twenty five minutes of the test to the extent that by two hours and fifty minutes into the test a distinct red glow at that point was evident.
By careful evaluation of the point of failure it was determined 4
that the cause of burn through was an area of direct contact between the cable and 'the cable tray throughout the entire thickness of the silicone foam seal, thereby precluding access by the silicone form during installation to the complete peri-meter of the cable.
Standard BISCO installation procedures require separation of the cable at one edge of the fire barrier with a ceramic fiber to allow the liquid stage silicone material to completely encapsulate all penetrating objects.
Failure to make such appropriate separation may result in a burn through as observed, caused by propagation of the fire along the cable jacket.
It was concluded that proper adher-ence to the BISCO damming procedures would prevent a burn through of this nature from occurring, as evidenced by the condition of the balance of the cable trays in the remaining seals.
HOSE STREAM TEST After the three hour fire exposure period the test assembly was moved from the furnace to another location for the hose
Report 1064-10 Page seven f
Stream test.
The hose stream test consisted of a discharge from a slid stream with"a minimum pressure of 30 psi at the base of the nozzle.
The stream was directed at the exposed side of the test slab from a distance of 20 f t. for 50 seconds which is in excess of the 2-1/2 minutes per 100 sq. ft. of specimen as required by ASTM Designation: E119 and ANI/)RRP ax,- -ni.s.
The unexposed surface of the test assembly was inspected after the application of the hose stream.
The silicone foam barrier Itaterial was not dislodged nor did any water appear to penetrate any of the seal systems with the exception of the burn through area noted earlier in cable tray number 3.
The depth of char-ring or bu:ning of the silicone foam fire barrier material ranged from 4-1/2" to 6".
SUMMARY
A test assembly consisting of a gypsum board wall section con-taining a single opening, divided into two penetrations and two cable trays in each penetration representing a configura-tion consistent with the details of V. C. Summer Nuclear Generating Station was tested according to ASTM Designation: E119. The gypsum wall section was extended to the appropriate deal thick-ness by the addition of a 6" wide perimeter of M-board around the opening.
The top penetration was sealed to 9-3/4" of thickness with Dow Corning 3-6548 silicone foam installed by Brand Industrial Services, Inc. (BISCO) according to applicable
Report 1064-10 Page eight BISCO procedures.
Pertinent test results are listed:
1.
No passage of flame occurred at any of the penetration systems during the three hour test except for a section of cable tray number "C" in the 113/4" seal section.
This isolated burn through area was determined to have been caused by improper separation of the cable from the cable tray prior to application of the silicone foam liquids.
2.
The limiting end point temperature of 402 F (3250F + 770F 0
at the start of the test) as defined in ASTM Designation:
E119 on the unexposed surfaces of the silicone foala was not reached at any of the locations at the end of the three hour fire test.
Maximum temperature reached was 2800F.
3.
There was no dislodgement of the silicone foam material during the hose stream test.
All of the penetration seal systems withstood the hose stream test successfully with the exception of a small amount of leakage around the burn through area in cable tray number "C" as noted previously.
w-..
s LY s
- -l s...
-q) ma
[.h O
m
$ FIRE TEST WALL c[- -
- T,!
j.
.1-PLAN
.2-Id Ir c
e
,l f " I BEAM l
4 L
e g
<~ (CAST - IN PLATE t
SEE DETAIL) i' si
- et ELEVATION 3..
ye
- z 2,
4
2
t 31 1
1 2-3/8'. STUD
- y w.
TEST WALL CONSTRUCTION 5
o o o t/)
scale: NTS
- pp'*v'd by:
d'*"" by: D A K 3/8" PLATE l < l
'4 l
- *: 6 8.79 VIRGIL SUMMER
~
E NUCLEAR STATION bisco PLATE DETAIL a.
.a 1420 renatssance driv.
l l
ftv.
date descflpflon A*'*','
'I IY Y "IV* i g
y.
l
l Gypsum wall l
with metal stud t
l i
.O O
O O.
Ceramic board O-o l
s T{ ':'/
I I U
\\'i
~ '
-- C e r a m i c
\\j
"'s.- Toard plug O
o (r-L #10 x 2"scre,1 t
g gg w/ fender
~.
\\sN.
Q -Silicone washer
.\\-
\\ \\ \\ 'N.
foam O
O O
O
\\
,g \\
s
[$1 c
ceramio
'..\\
f.
board plug ceramic Board ramic Perimeter Build-up Detail' s
Ceramic Board Extension of Gypsum Wall, for use with silicone foam acele: NTS 8PProv' don J,s A.
d'**8 bn J, s, A.
date:
1/3/79 g*
V. C. SU?VtER NUCLEAR STATION UNIT I y.
bisco e,.,,,,,.r,,.,..,*.
d-a.
s..
rm e.n.is s.nc. e,n to64-10$
te dato description-o.a ereo,.,.,u,., coa,ss pu,,, p g_ y
,,,,,yyy 5
I 72" l'
7'//
I"
'e A
g 5
6' WIDE M-BOARD
'I PERIMETER or oPNG.
s' M. BOARD S
g
- s... :
k(0$@h
- T R AY "A"
~
N FULL DEPTH Sh*
1 g
SILICONE FOAM
' TR AY B"
. o"oooo J
~~4 i
o 1" M-BOARD.
.$k!,
9 Div10ER i 'd4 )
.'R.8
~
I I
~~'
.m....,.
OO
@ IfH6 j _ _.;
-TR Av "c" g
FULL DEPTH 11 %" %$
[ *----
r a
m SILICONC FOAM 3
- g'.,
[
hhk j
-TRAY"O" e-s
- -v
- .'h'.N k'.
1(_
h :g'.f {
N 2" M BOARD e.
9 e
- 7 TEST SLAB y
e TEST SLAB SIDE VIEW TEST SLAB FRONT VIEW V. C.
SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION scale: NTS approved by:
drawn by: DAg
<r: 5-21 79 GYPSUM BOARD a
bisco E WALL PENETRATION TEST brandindustrialservices, Inc.
dwg. 00.
8420 renaissance drive
,e,.
d.,.
do,c,,,,,on
- 'A'e>gr=
,,,e,,,,,,,
1064-10-3 I
INCHES FROM THERMOCOUPLE FIRE EXPOSED NUMBER SURFACE l@@
4 /8:.
7 2
4 /8 7
3 SEAL 7
5 /8" 4
9 /43,,
l2 THICKNESS 5
57/8" h
5 /8
7 6
7 47/8 h
4 /8' 7
8 7
5 /8"
!nmmmmumnumm mmmmmunummmmmmmusnm 9
"l l5 h
12 93/4" 13 9 3/4 SEAL I4 ll3/4" THICKNESS 113/4 15 11 3/4 a
16 11 3/4"
- hh I7 9 3/4" l"
Ti $
20 11 3/4' i
V. C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION scale: NTS
- ppro"d br d'**" br D A V
- 8'*: 5-21 79 GYPSUM BOARD PENETRATION B
SEAL TEST hjg g k THERMOCOUPLE LOCATION t'#,.O!!%"#w'*""'
a.
e,,crooe10n
- '::.yi#
f,'
106A -l0- 4 i
a
6 e
.i.
m.
.....4
,r 3
a y
g e.a
~.
w 3
i p
u O
u u
~\\--%-'
g g
p \\ - -' ' _.
n.
3
,/
/
'i O
o
/
',,st, o
- [/ -
'?
5 8
.4 3
3 I
g 000 e
3 a
Il//.-j's, 'f/?
\\,,
/,
f
/
' ij,7; / /,,,/,9,/
g
/
R m
.a o
a
./
~
}3
,r i
s v
,// ' fi /.,~'
/ '
0 E~5$
',!ll-l//,j !!!,/ l'
]
B
/~
E%
~
', ; '1, _[,g, t j,
'l ljjl
/
J c
/ '
' I j', W8 ' -- - -
$o l ~l
/,,
,j.,
f.
i n,
c, u l
/
- foll l
< u 2 9'.
~s j?'
NE O
lii
~
J o N
R e-f
//
.J.hY&$h: $
'Y Y
0 l
. YIIlllYl!!!,!!
7 hp a
- 3. u m
mg 2
a 3
.o
- D yi liEt=Ess i, s4 i
i J K, \\
'g"
\\
r>
- ,s -c/,,/ s ?, n y 1 3.,;;;;iiii;;;;g
\\
\\L-
\\.
\\,\\
..y. - s,,
.i a
\\
\\
\\
h,>-
e ii,
..;c., m i
\\,,, ^ l',.-
..w'
- t
\\
\\
\\ -\\\\ \\
\\
in N %
- s. ' ' '. ?
II
,o e
2}A '. ;'
p'- - l ' in,;g
\\
' > \\ <\\
r
\\
\\'s - '
//f E
'x N'
fx 'v..'s
\\\\'i
[. s \\x x x(D, g,bs'i' %:==-f//,x
e'
/
.y ;
l l'
3 s
\\-
\\ \\\\ ;e
- . q - s,, /,<
.s s
'r s
s.
~.
\\
i~s
'\\x\\, 's x, N %
gD N.
- s\\,;,'i x\\.
gs7
/
/ /
'.x'\\h '>w'6'Q(.y 4og g,.s
/
,7'
'M
//
i
/
s
,y,
. (,,,g y m
n
~
' g,' ' Q -
_\\
-f '
7 g
.x,%x x ~\\ jN~# /
y <s'.
s
=
J
', N Q.L';.m
\\, - -
-6 ' / '-6,, <'. .
- Q
'/'
-f
\\,
a
~*
?
3
'F 3
N9 3g yg 3S I
i-r-
y
~
TABLE II Temperature at the point midway between the fire expos 6d and Temperature at the cold face non-exposed faces of the (non fire exposed) of the silicone neal silicone seal i
Temp.
Tern Temp.
Temp.
9 3/4" at at 9.3/4" at a t.
seal 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> 3 hours.
seal 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> 3 hours i
i TC #1 180 1350 TC #11 120 180 TC #2 240 1350 Tc #12 110 150 TC-#3 1070 1350
[
TC #13 110 145 8
TC #7 270 1110 TC'#17 190 270 TC #10 210 270 TC 68 1170 1470 11 3/4" 11 3/4"'
seal seal TC #34 100 120 TC #4 90 TC #5 100 1110 TC #15 100 150 Tc #6 235 1110 TC #16 90 100' TC #9 535 1360 TC #19 135 240 TC 410 465 1350 TC #20 195 280 V. C. SUMf1ER HUCLEAR GENENATION STATION t.
scate:
approved by:
drawn by:
date:
Temperature measurements of siliconc E
i foan fire barriers in gypsun board wall s~nsonsasurr. senice e.
dxa. ne.
1420 rensissance drive
- Part ridge. II. 60068 rev.
date description p o,,,popy g g, a q,,,,pyg m
3 brand industrial sesvices. Inc.
1420 renaissance detve, park ridge, Illinois 60068, (312) 298-1200, telex 282-482 n
a subsidary of orand insulations,inc.
,(
j Page 1 of 5 I
PROCEDURE COVER SHEET I
Procedure No.
Dated Revision No, Dated
~
1064-10 Jan. 9, 1979 3
4/3/79 TITLE:
FIRE TEST CONFIGURATION FOR SILICONE FOAM FIRE BARRIERS
SUBJECT:
as in title for V.
C.
Summer Nuclear Station Unit I SCOPE OF CURREllT REVISIO?l:
i l
l l
l This document contains information proprietary to Brand Industrial Services, Inc.,
and shall be surrendered upon request from Brand Industrial Services, Inc.
The
~
contents are not to be used for other than the expressed purpose for which loaned without written permission of Brand Industrial Services, Inc.
I BISCO APPROVAL SIGNATURES 1
l l
ORIGlilAL ISSUE REV. 1 REV. 2 REV. 3 REV. 4 REV. 5 REV. 6 AUTHOR Q.A. APPROVAL PR A t
l
-mwmemnm a, x_
Proc. #1064-10 l
Rev. 3 /'..
4/3/79 Page 2 of 5 1.0 Purpose
~
1.1 This procedure describes the design and assembly of a prototype test of a wall section constructed from a 7 3/4" gypsum board. wall, representing walls in V. C. Summer Nuclear Station Unit I.
1.2 This procedure describes the method by which the penetration through the gypsum board wall is prepared 1
and extended by use of ceramic board and sealed with silicone foam to provide a three hour rated fire barrier in tne penetration.
1.3 This procedure describes the fire test method for the j
verification of the fire rating of the silicone foam /
ceramic board fire barrier.
2.0 General i
2.1 The fire test may be performed at Portland Cement Association Research & Development Construction Tech-nology Laboratories, Old Orchard Road, Skokie, Illinois.
2.2 Testing shall be witnessed by representatives of at least the following organizations.
2.2.1 South Carolina Electric & Gas Company and/or Gilbert Associates, Inc.
2.2.2* Portland Cement Association 2.2.3 Brand Industrial Services, Inc.
2.3 Upon completion of testing a report shall be prepared and copies of the report forwarded to South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, GAI and BISCO for their use.
2.4 A gypsum board wall section shall be constructed by BISCO personnel using three layers of 1/2" gypsum board separated by 3/8" x 2 1/2" wide subgirts on each side of 4" steel studs as shown in drawing 1064-10-1.
2.5 The ceramic board plug damming material and ceramic board perireter build up material shall be fabricated from 2" thich Babcock & Wilcox M board.
Proc. 51064-10 4/3/79 Rev. 3 Page'3 of 5 2.6 The cable tray, cable, subgirts, and steel studs included in the fire test shall be provided by South Carolina Electric & Gas Company and shall be representative of that material used in the construc-tion of V.C. Summer Nuclear Station Unit I.
2.7 The silicone foam penetration seal shall be Dow Corning 3-6548 silicone foam components installed and inspected by BISCO in accordance with the design criteria set forth in this procedure and Standard BISCO Production Quality Assurance Procedures.
3.0 Design 3.1 Testing shall be performed in accordance with this procedure on a gypsum board and metal stud assembly measuring approximately 72" x 100" on the outside and 7-3/4" in overall thickness.
3.2 A 40" x 76" penetration shall be made through the test wall.
3.2.1 That opening shall be split into two openings each 40"x 37h" by the insertion of 1" thick M-Board horizontally in the opening.
That M-Board shall be mechanically fastened to the sides of the opening and extend 3" out from either face of the gypsum board wall.
3.2.2 Each of the two openings shall be filled with two 7" x 24" cable trays and those trays shall be filled to 55% with representative cables.
3.3 The 4" hollow section of the gypsum board wall shall be l
closed with a prefabricated ceramic board plug as shown j
in drawing 1064-10-1.
This ceramic board plug shall be fabricated from 2" thick B&W - M-Board cut to a 1/2" taper and fit into the hollow wall section to a depth of at least 1/2 of that of the ceramic plug.
Ceramic fiber may be used as necessary to complete sealing of all inner portions of the wall prior to injection of the silicone foam.
3.4.
6" wide ceramic board shall be installed around the perimeter of the openings on both sides of the gypsum board wall as shown in drawing 1064-10-1.
The ceramic board shall be attached to the gypsum wall by 2" screws with fender washers located not less than every 6" on the length of the perimeter.
d = " y i l.jja.y J
' ? f - + %1t-
- +=
b$bWS 4,
- +-
j'
~-
Proc. #1064-10 4/3/79_.
Rev. 3 Page 4 of 5 3.4.1 Around the upper 40" x 35" opening, the perimeter M-Board shall be 1" thick, resulting in an extended wall thickness of 9-3/4" overall.
3.4.2 Around the lower 40" x 35" opening, the peri-meter M-Board shall be 2" thick, resulting in an extended wall thickness of 11-3/4' overall.
3.5 The built-up penetrations shall be filled to'the full thickness with silicone foam, dammed and installed in accordance with BISCO Standard Production and Quality Assurance Procedures.
4.0 Testing 4.1 The test assembly containing the penetrations with cable tray and silicone foam / ceramic board fire barriers shall be subjected to a three-hour fire exposure from the large wall furnace at the Portland Cement Association.
4.1.1 The fire exposure shall follow the standard time temperature relationship described in ASTM E-119.
4.1.2 The temperatare measurements et various points on the surface of the silicone foam and of the penetrating objects shall be made throughout the test.
~
4.l.3 The surface temperature shall be evaluated in accordance with the ANI/MAERP test document.
4.1.4 A hose stream test 4.s defined in the ANI/MAERP document shall be nacessary as part of this procedure.
5.0 Review of data 5.1 Furnace temperature and individual silicone foam' seal surface temperature record shall be reviewad to determine the performance of the seal during the exposure.
5.2 The cotton waste test as described by ASTM E-119 shall not be censidered necessary as part of this test procedure.
5.3 The failure of any one part of the various items included in this test procedure shall not be construed as failure of the entire test.
End of procedure
il 11 i.;i I
- n mju L
R*
i i
e rc srr y
L "ee 2dh e
g N
O 0
ns s
xea u
3 I
1 fw T
- y A
0/
r 4
1w o
b T
o6 f
f n
S 0
n.1 w
g l
a R
w rd A
d l
l EI a
w L
l CT m
UI u
NN O
O O
O s
U p
R m
E g
l y
i G
g y
t tt c.
p a
t n
t f
g U
I.
j s
e o
S e
dD 3
c *v ivn o r
n ed6o r
6p O
O ap o
C
- se0, c 0 g.
t ou i
n n 6. y g
y n uI B-s b
t I
d n
d V
u i e. p s s y
cl em e
da n g3 v
n edg ii ta o
I i,
r dr r
mu xo P
ok n n:nro a
aB Ef P
as O
O r
G bspp er de Ce rn t
ao e
oc m
B1 9
O i
1 7
r c1
/
e i 9.
S 8
~
P m
T
/
o O
O O
O ah N
1 rt c
ei s
- e Cw l
e i
a t
b c
a s
d e
g g
n u
u o
cl cl cm ip ip ia m
ad if rr '
n m
lo ad o
it rr S
ea p
i Co cr ea Co b
s
-T g
-v d
s e
, \\.s s\\
d s
u 3
s t
.~
s s
s' l
C" \\
[f 4~
il ll
\\
aa s
e wt ta e
d mm u
l g
sh v.
g\\'.
\\. ]
i re pt
\\
yi Gw
~,
.1
"\\
\\
l i ' '
\\
,\\
\\
\\
s 2-
~
c i
c.
md i
ar md ra ar eo ra Cb eo cb t
I Cc7 RET bisc0 f'
\\
V COMPONENT TRACEABILITY LOG P.C.A.-V.C. Summers-Pressure Test 4~19-D PROJECT NAME FIRST ENTRY DATE 024 PROJECT NO=
LAST ENTRY DATE
~
MACHINE NO.
PRODUCT Lot Weight Lot Weight Lot Weight Lot Weight System Number or Number or Number or Number or.
Comments Part A Quantity Part B Quantity Port Quantity Part Quantity 1036-001 EN02-02-450#
4509 9333 9333 C
l
(
Weight or Quantity column on this form refers to weight (weight or quantity) and is expressed in lbs (Ibs., gallons, etc.)
Entries reviewed by Date
O ocT REV bisco O)'
(
COMPONENT TRACEABILITY LOG PROJECT NAME P.C. A. V.C. Sumer - Fire Test 5-5-79 FIRST ENTRY DATE 3024 PROJECT NO=
LAST ENTRY DATE 040
.C.3-65u MACHINE NO, PRODUCT Lot Weight Lot Weight Lot Weight Lot Weight System Number or Number or Number or Number or, Comments Port Quantity Port Quantity Port Quantity Port Quantity 1040-00]
EN02-02-4509 450#
9333 9333
/
I
(
Weight or Quantity column on this form refers to Weight
"" 9 SU ""'Y lbs and is expressed in (Ibs., gallons, etc.)
Entries reviewed by Date 5 n P.
Inen**%^'\\
O ocr-2
~
Rev. 5 bisco
(
O l
V
~
SYSTEM VERIFICATION LOG P
3024 PROJECT NAME
.C. A.-V.C. Summers Pressure Test JOB NO.
PRODUCT NAME.C.3-6548 DENSITY RANGE 15 thru 22 D
DENSITY EVALUATION CELL STRUCTURE SYSTEM INSPECTION DENSITY Q.C. INSP.
WITHIN RE RE NO.
DATE (PCF)
'"' '^
RANGE SAMPLE ACCEPT SAMPLE 1036-001 4-20-79 18.55 X
X J.T.
f
$ indicates criteria for acceptance contained in QCP-006
(
__--_________________-________-_______a
O ocr-2
~
"" 5 bisco
(
D I
V 4
SYSTEM VERIFICATION LOG PROJECT NAMF P.C.A.~ V.C. Sumers Fire Test JOB NO. 3024 PRODUCT NAME.
D.C. 3-6548 DENSITY RANGE DENSITY EVALUATION CELL STRUCTURE SYSTEM INSPECTION DENSITY Q.C. INSP.
WITHIN RE RE NO.
DATE (PCF)
'^
RANGE' SAMPLE ACCEPT SAMPLE 1040-001 5-5-79 19.01 x
D wL.-
1040-001 5-5-79 17.78 x
Dwt-i
$ indicates criteria for accepfance contained in QCP-OO6
(
hisco
(
Q QCT-3 TRACEABILITY LOG 3024-Project Nome P.C.A.-V.C. Summer - Pressure Test Job No.
D.C.3-6548/RTV 732/794 R
Product
. ggevoggon Room
' Penetration /
Damming Damming Final Q..C.
Opening or Poured Inspection Systems Msual Inspection inspector Number Passe Date Initials identification
' Depth
- Data, 01 12" 4-20-79 1036-001 t
r I
4 Pass-Acceptable per Quality Control Procedure QCP 007 FJB 3/78 REY.5 J
bisco
(~
l QCT-3 TRACEABILITY LOG Project Name P.C. A. V.C. Sumer - Fire Test Job No. 3024 Product D.C. 3-6548 Elevation N.A.
Room N.A.
Domming Damming Finol Q..C.
Opening or Poured Inspection Systems V.isual Inspection Inspector identification Depth Date Number Pass
- Date Initiofs 02 A
9 3/4" 5-5-74 N 001 y
R 7 70 B
9 3/4" 5-5-79 1040-001 x
5-7-79 D*
C 11 3/4" R-R-7 0' inan_nni y
R 7 70 D*
7 0
11 3/4" 5-5-79 1040-001 x
5-7-79 og i
o 1
I l
lI $ Poss-Acceptable per Quality Control Procedure OCP 007 l
l l
REY. 5 FJB 3/78
1 sC0i.L m.
.2 )
l
~
(
(a CERTIFICATION of Calli..SX: ~ 0N Balance (0haus Dial-0-Gram F. *el 2610)
Serial g 2-102 tQUIF:'EST TESTED: - -
1610 grams (2610 w/ supple;.: tal weights)
SIZE or RANGE:
CAL 15 RATION FREQUE!!CY:
6 months
. > ~..,
p
.x...
~
B1SC0 Standard Weight Set f21:001 used :s Standard, Weisist 1
'. f.r set varied by.B)SCO (3-4 balance, vanff+d by CEge Labora,'.
.C
~:
TRACEASILITY:.
~
torias (Certificate 50371) to ::ES -39M 1-l E4-lSS-316.
+
74 c ;.- O.
s,,,,-
k '... - -
Cate of Va'rification:
01-12-79 Date Due:
C7-12-79
'-Y 10 o, ram Dial Accuracy _:
~
~
Standard:
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00-5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 - S.00 10.00 Readings:
0.00.0.59 1 98 2.98 3.97 4.96 5.56
'E.97 7.53 5.95 9.k2-
~
Davia tion: 0
.01
.02
.C2
.03
.04
.04-
.03
.05'
.05
.05 100 gram _Esam Accurs' y_:
]
c f ndsrd:
0.00 10.00 20.00' 30.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 70.00 80.00 '90.00 1,00.00 Readings:
0.00 9.99 20.01 30'00 39.99 50.00 60.O'2 70.03 30.03'90.04 100.00 t
. 01-
+.01 O
.01 O
+.02l+.03
+.03,}.+.04 O
j Deviation:.O 500 gram' Beam Accuracy:
'~
~
Standard:
0 00 10d.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 500.00 Readings:
0.00. 99.97 199.94~299.'91 359.53 3:'s.12
.~..
Deviation: 0 03
.06
.09
.17
.12
- ~
~-
It is hereby certified that the described equipmerit has been inspected and' tested l as indicated above, and that the Standard used in obtaining data is calibrated and traceable to the National Bureau of Standards.
Q
\\/W /c Y d4 1.
,F. 3. Barta "
~
.~
l Quality Assurance F*anager '
l { nd Industrial Services, Inc.
i
.g a.*
g a
e n
0 a
bisco C) c l
=
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIAN.CE SHIPPED TO:
Portland Cement Assoc.
DATE 4-16-79 5420 Old orchard Ct.
Skokie, IL
?
'E CUSTOMER P. O. NO.
CUSTOMER SPECIFICATION
~
3024 BISCO PROJECT NO.
D.T.
2242 PRODUCT LOT, BATCH, MILL NUMBER QUANTITY D.C.
3-6548 Part A EN029333 4509 D.C. 3-6548 Part B EN029333 450%
D.C. RTV 732 Caulk EG088059 1 case of 12 tubes
/
J.C.
RTV 732 Caulk EIl08051 1 case of 12 tubes It is hereby certified that the articles. listed above comply with all applicable purchase order specification requirements.
MM
____m
t bisco
(
l CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIAN.CE SHIPPED TO: Portland Cement Assoc.
DATE 4_1g_79 5420 Old Orchard Ct.
Skokie,.IL
~
~ CUSTOMER P, O.
NO.
CUSTOMER SPECIFICATION BISCO PROJECT NO. 3024 D 'J 2248 PRODUCT-LOT, BATCH, MILL NUMBER QUANTITY n_c.
790 caulk O P 098594 2 cases @ 12 Tubes Ea.
it is hereby certified that the articles listed above comply with cli applicable purchase order specification requirements.
(
2 bisco f
n 1V>
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIAN.CE SHIPPED TO: Portland cement Assoc.
DATE 04-16-79 5420 Old Orchard ct.
..5 CUSTOMER P. O.
NO.
CUSTOMER SPECIFICATION
^
BISCO PROJECT NO. 3024 D.T.#2242 PRODUCT LOT, BATCH, MILL NUMBER QUANTITY B W. kaowool Bulk N/A 56 ~1bs_
B.W.
M_
Pn=rd v/n v 4-g 9:-
in 7n g M_W_
M.
nnard M /n 9a en p +- g1 in 2
(
I It is hereby-certified that the articles listed above comply with cli applicable purchase order specification requirements.
M
b.ISCO C
Q
\\
U RECEIVING INSPECTION CHECKLIST
-(SITE) 04-20-79 3024 DATE JOB no.
P.C.A. - Virgil Summers Pressure Test'
~
PROJECT NAME VENDOR Bisco D.C.
790 Caulk MATERIAL RECEIVED OP098594 QUANTITY 2 es 0 12 tubes ea LOT / BATCH no.
7.
Required inspection Instruction Accept Reject Verify R O. Against Material Received Certificate of Compliance for Material Received X
X X
Inspect for Shipping Damage X
x Inspect for Proper Markings x
x Visual Inspection x
Dimensional Inspection Special Instructions per Attached Material @ Accepted ORejected
- o. c. inspector
(
04-20-79 Remarks:
Date
~~~
~
bisco CV)l f
RECEIVING INSPECTION CHECKLIST
-(SITE) 9 DATE JOB no.
3024 7
11I.:- Vircil Sumers Presss2re Test PROJECT NAME D F VENDOR Bisco MATERI AL RECElVED D.C.
3-6548
/D.C. RTU 762 Caulk LOT / BATCH no.r n?o333 part A QUANTITY 450 lbs.'
EN029333 Part B asn 1ke
_ED088059 Caulk 1 cadeG12 Tubes' Jsa17 mnban 1 inAns1 r -m 11-1 c3 3
r Required Inspection Instruction Accept Reject Verify R O. Against Material Received Certificate of Compliance for Material Received x
x X
Inspect for Shipping Domoge x
inspect for Proper Markings x
Visual Inspection Dimensional inspection Special Instructions per Attached Material Q Accepted ORejected
- o. c. inspector a 9n_7o Remarks:
Date
9
~
4 31S CO C
Q\\
U RECEIVING IN'SPECTION CHECKLIST
-(SITE)
DATE na on 79 JOB no. 'nM PROJECT NAME Pm n
- vim 41 es,--4 e possure tese VENDOR nisco MATERIAL RECEIVED n w. waowool Bulk /2" B.W.
M-Bo ard/l"B.W.M -Bo ard LOT / BATCH no. N/A QUANTITY ss rm -
~
y/3 10 n er _ w+ - @m n/a 54 sc.Ft. G lin i
Required Inspection Instruction Accept Reject Verify R O. Against Material Received x
x Certificate of Compliance for Material Received x
y inspect for Shipping Damage x
l Inspect for Proper Markings x
l Visual Inspection Dimensional Inspeetion-Special Instructions per Attached 1
Material @ Accepted ORejected
- o. c. insocier
!I 04-20-79 Remarks:
Octe I
1 I
~
a DT! 'L8 bisco
... I
.s.r.I se,,..es. In 3
M
$30 bonnie lane. elk grove oltt.g, 'piggnols 60007. 1312) 640 1200 e subs 4 diary of, *,esad Insulations. In gr 'ivery ticket Bisco l
Portland e e nt-N s
630 Bonnie Lane ar 5420 old orchard court,.
Elk Grove, IL 60007 Skokia, IL 966-62d'0..
f i
oo. -
r.
o.
"4/18/79
"' Bisco 3024-
=,;
~~.n a
2 cases 790 Caulk', Lot SQP0'98594 D
14" C Clamps O
1 box Pressure Test Cages 16' Arnaflex covering N
O T
W R
l
]
I T
E l-1 l
IS':" f 417 g
E
~
Y O
N l
D 1
l l
l H
E
(
1 R
f, l
E i
(
I ill claims MUST be made Received By 5 d:ys from date of delivery h."2*I.*7'37*U"'"5 AcK'rNnW mnmnan-on-m
tJ Dj2242
' '. bisco..-
O
.1......
- V' Ig 630 bonnie ;.ne. eth Grove elff.0.e. 8811aolo 50007. IJ1216401200
........,,e,...n......o..
{J livery ticket
. ~
Bisco PorWnd Cent 630 Bonnie Lane
$r-5420 Old orchard Cto
- o Elk Grove, IL 60007 e.
Skokie, IL
/
1 4/16/79 sisco Truck OU h
g.-m ou,.,-m uanniai.
~
1 SP-20 Machine with Home a Gun D
9005 6548 A&B Lot FEN 029333 O
2 cases 732 caulk Lot !EIl03051 & EGOS 6059 56f Kaovool Bulk N
1 48" sc 48* Tost Slab O
30 sq.ft 2" M-Board bx 3/8" Concrete AnchoTs 54 ca.ft l' M-Escard
- 1/2 bx Masonary fastners 12 rolls Doch Tape W
2 Jiffy Mixers R
2 1Y1 Graco transfer purtus I
1 Hand clearnr T
2 airiline E
1
% Milwaukee Drill 1
Tool Bond B
1 gal Acetone E
1 DII-25 Roto sn-r Y.
1 Milwaukee J1g Saw O
3 Shts Ethafoan N
1 roll Polyethylene O
1 Extension cord l
1 dox Canvas Gloves H
1 doz Rubber Gloves E
I 8
Coveralls
_R 2
Handsaws IST #411 E
1 Cable Ties
./
-[ j.,'
"f '/
All c!zims MUST be made Ketelved By "
-L
'hin 5 d2ys from date of delivery if.En.3.*2.*_"*".I'.".S._ AC K NOWI FO GM ENTI Ar.r.nl lalTimr: n orj
...-...v.,,,,.vn a v,,,,,,,,,,.
. s. v,___.,,
V *) :
BIS C O' TECHNICIANS '
Date:
flovember 8,1976
(
- C rRPIMEE NAIE:
THchael T. }larner 341-54-6754' socrar sEcuaITY i
. m E OF TRAINING:
Formulator 'G' " Clamp" Silicone foam dispensing unit.
with MFP or Collins dispensing t.ype gun.
~.
TRAINI?:G CONDUCTED BY:'
Thomas Gilmore
~
Sr. Technician TITLE
~
EVALUATION BY:
Sam Andreakos General Sulerintendent i
TITts Mr. Warner has s'uccessfully completed the above training 'and
~
EvAtuATION:
is knowledgeable of the sbove equipment on air and calibration control of this unit with full mechanical evaluation and trouble-shooting knowledge.
(
=
PICO:C IMDATIO?!S:
4.-'.5 General Sup@t./Instructoe/ 2e E
~
~
g y s e _: f p a r t..7-zY-77
.I)
~
.3 L t. ;o.Is co
(
EVALUATION AND QUAT.. FIdATION
SUMMARY
D.'. t e December 12, 1978
' EMPLOYF.E NAME:
Lin6s vencika TYPE CF TRAINING: Coq.plete opei ition and maintenance of silico'ne
. I. cam _ _i.n.i. x.i..n_g.2_id. _di spa.n s i ng un i f s.
....- :... _.....~ -. _
TITLE sr. Techni ibn TRAINING CONDUCTED BY: Ja.mes_Neg ome EVALUATION BY:
' Frank Montan'a TITLk Construction Mant EVAT.UATION Mr. vc = c1k a h a s succ ce s fully com.>o.l... t..e..d th..e. above training and is knowledgable of the. calibr'ation,. dispensing,.
and trouble shooting of above equipment.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
f f M & E j -12~ Y h, "0E%w DATE ) 7-]*)..') $
Construction Mgr.
,e EVALUATION AND QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
b.isco l
BISCO PERSONNEL
(
Evaluation Date:
02-13-79.
~
EMPLOYEE NAME:
JOSEPH TIS SOCIAL SECURITY Nb.141 68 24-DEPARTMENT Ouality Control TYPE OF TRAINING:
X(1) Classroom X (2) On-Site
__(3) On-Site TRAININb CONDUCTED BY: (1).
Robert Lieto Title Sr. Q.A. Supervis.
(2)
Robert Lieto Title Sr. Q.A. Superyisi (3)
Title DESCRIPTION OF TRAINING:. (1)
Quality Con' trol Procedures (Q.C.P.'s):
Mr. Tis studied the standard Quality Control Procedures and was introduce to the various techniques of implementing the procedures.
His ability to understand and interpret the information and instructions contained in the Q.C.P. 's and his degree of retention was judged to be satisfactory.
(
(2) QCP's Mr. Tis has shown that he understands and can perform silicc foam density and cell structure evaluations and can accurately perform damming depth inspections..
(3) QCP's l
EVALUATION:
The tr.aining received and the favorable evaluation qualifies Mr. Tis to perform all inspections within the scope of the BISCO Quality Control Department and as dictated by the BISCO Quality Assurance Manager.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SUPERVISOR:
None
(
EVALUATION AND QUALIFICATION DETERMINATION BY:
[
- 2 ~
(Frank J FBarta)
TITLE:
Quality Assurance Manager i
e e < - -. -, - - -