ML20036C281
| ML20036C281 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 05/26/1993 |
| From: | Crlenjak R NRC Office of Inspection & Enforcement (IE Region II) |
| To: | Medford M Tennessee Valley Authority |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9306160030 | |
| Download: ML20036C281 (37) | |
Text
3 o
o fi
- N LN*J Y
MAY 2 61993 gh cr Docket No. 50-327, 50-328 License No. DPR-77, DPR-79 Tennessee Valley Authority ATTN: Dr. Mark 0. Medford Vice President, Technical Support 3B Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
MANAGEMENT MEETING
SUMMARY
On May 24, 1993, the NRC staff met at the Sequoyah Training Center with representatives of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) management staff to discuss activities regarding the restart of Sequoyah Units 1 and 2. is a list of the individuals who attended the meeting and is the handout material supplied by TVA.
The topics discussed included the Sequoyah Restart Plan, focus areas, restart readiness activities, post-restart assessments, and schedule.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, pleaso contact us.
Sincerely, Origional Signed by R. V. Crlenjak R. V. Crlenjak, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 4 Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosures:
1.
List of Attendees 2.
Presentation Notes cc w/encls:
(See page 2) 930616003o 930526 PDR ADOCK 05000327 p
\\\\
f60/
- ~%
o
.g MAY 2 61993 Tennessee Valley Authority 2
cc w/encls:
Mr. W. H. Kennoy, Director Mr. M. J. Burzynski, Manager Tennessee Valley Authority Nuclear Licensing and ET 12A Regulatory Affairs 400 West Summit Hill Drive Tennessee Valley Authority Knoxville, TN 37902 5B Lookout Place 1101 Market Street TVA Representative Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Tennessee Valley Authority Rockville Office Mr. Michael H. Mobley, Director 11921 Rockville Pike Division of Radiological Health Suite 402 T.E.R.R. A. Building, 6th Floor Rockville, MD 20852 150 9th Avenue North Nashville, TN 37218-5404 General Counsel Tennessee Valley Authority County Judge ET 11H Hamilton County Courthouse 400 West Summit Hill Drive Chattanooga, TN 37402 Knoxville, TN 37902 bec w/encls:
(See page 3)
Mr. R. M. Eytchison Vice President Nuclear Operations Tennessee Valley Authority 3B Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Ms. Marci Cooper, Site Licensing Manager Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P. O. Box 2000 Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379 Mr. Robert Fenech, Site Vice President Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority iP. O. Box 2000 Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379 i
l l
i
'l 1
r
~
9 T
Tennessee Valley Authority 3
bec w/encls:
J. R. Johnson, DRP/RII G. C. Lainas, NRR F. J. Hebdon, NRR 5
P. J. Kellogg, DRP/RII S. E. Sparks, DRP/RII D. E. LaBarge, NRR NRC Document Control Desk NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2600 Igou Ferry Road Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379
(
4
)
b SSparks:vyg ellogg 05/t(/93 05/])/93 i
- J
E-3 d'
t I
i
[NCLOSURE 1 LIST OF ATTENDEES NRC t
S. Ebneter J. Partlow A. Gibson G. Lainas R. Crlenjak W. Holland S. Shaeffer P. Kellogg S. Sparks F. Hebdon D. LaBarge J. Jacobsen P. Koltay L. Plisco R. Long TVA
- 0. Kingsley, Jr.
R. Eytchison R. Fenech M. Medford R. Beecken J. Baumstark D. Lundy M. Cooper J. Ward Other TVA Personnel
d ENCLOSURE 2 SEQUOYAH : NUCLEAR PLANT TVA/XRC RESTART PANEL MEETING i
l SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT TRAINING CENTER MAY 24,1993
4 0
_ g O
PURPOSE TO REVIEW THE SEQUOYAH RESTART PLAN SCOPE, METHODOLOGY, AND PROGRESS TO DATE 1
AGENDA TVA/NRC RESTART PANEL MEETING MAY 24,1993 INTRODUCTION R.M. EYTCHISON l
OVERVIEW OF TVA CORPORATE ORG.
R.M. EYTCHISON PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION R.A. FENECH WHAT HAPPENED e
UNDERLYING WEAKNESSES RESTART PLAN OVERVIEW R.A. FENECH FOCUS AREAS BALANCE OF PLANT D.L. LUNDY BACKLOGS J.S. BAUMSTARK OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE J.S. BAUMSTARK TECHNICAL PROGRAMS J.N. WARD AND PERFORMANCE PEOPLE / ORGANIZATION /
R. A. FENECH CULTURE RESTART READINESS R.A. FENECH POST-RESTART ASSESSMENT R.A. FENECH SCHEDULE R.A. FENECH
NUCLEAR POWER NUCLEAR OPERATIONS NUCLEAR OPERATIONS VICE PRESIDENT Admin Assistant R. EYTCHISON
.b i
f I
BROWNS FERRY SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT READINESS
- 1. ZERINGUE B. FENECH D.KEUTER TOTAL OPERATIONAL QUALITY READINESS
. Nuclear Power Total
. Formulation / Execution of operational quality program readiness policies development and
. Operating plant performance implementation monitoring
. Manage / Assess operational readiness for all sites, including:
-training
-material condition
-equipment limitations
-staffing
-personnel performance
-technical programs
- 3
!"S" "*
~
s
NUCLEAll POWElt TECllNICAL SUPPOltT TECllNICAL SUPPORT hl. 51ED170lt D I
I I
I I
l ColtPOltATE Ol'EltATIONS NUCI.EAll NIICI.EAlt CONCEltNS NilC 1.lC & ItEG NUCl.EAlt ENGINEEltlNG SICitVICES lil!SINESS Ol'S SUI'l'OltT ltESOI.IITION AltitAlltS ASSUltANCIC I DifittlAh!
J. Al.l.EN (ACI'ING)
T. l'ANNING T. NICGitATil T. COSILY
- 11. SCllolclEl D J. SIA CllO E W Sist
- Design & lingt Sids
- Nudcar Training
- Dosiness Planning
- Nudcar l'ucl>
- Fingeiyw Concerns
- l'aimary NitC Interface
- OA
- PR A
- Operations Support
- liscal Man.igerntna
- Nudcar Contacts &
- Site QA/QC
- I it.cnses & Pt tnuts
- Independent Satity linginetring
- Config Control
- Security Oversight Procurement
- Engr Oversight
- Administrative Support
- Nudcar Expcriciwe Iteviews
- l'ite Protection
- Nudes Procedures / Standards
- Chemistry
- Document Control
- Maintenance Protzdures
- NSitIl
- Operator 1.icensing
- Information Services and
- Hiness for Duty Training Computer Suppirt
- Industrial Engineering
- Steam Genciator Prograrn
- Djuipment Expeilise
- System Exprtisc
- Tedmitat standards
-4 men roe 0%'17,93
,_--..u
,m.~.
I*.
CORPORATE SUPPORT SENIOR MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT e
FREQUENT CONSULTATIONS REVIEW OF TECHNICAL PROGRAMS j
WEEKLY PROJECT MEETINGS e
SUPPORT ACTIVITIES STAFF AUGMENTATION PROVISION OF MONETARY RESOURCES PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS TECHNICAL SUPPORT - SEVERAL AREAS DIRECT SUPPORT BACKLOG IDENTIFICATION ASSISTANCE DISCOVERY SYSTEMATIC VALUE ENGINEERING REVIEWS WORK-OFF DEVELOPMENT i
BUDGET ANALYSES ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT EXPEDITING i
5
r, PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTS OF ISSUES WHAT HAPPENED?
RECENT EVENTS OCCURRED WHICH WERE INDICATIVE OF A BROADER e
PROGRAMMATIC PROBLEM TVA WAS ALREADY ASSESSING MANY PREVIOUS EVENTS / PROBLEMS WHEN PLANT SHUT DOWN OCCURRED.
SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION IN PROCESS KEY AREAS OF SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN:
BALANCE OF PLANT OPERATIONS PROGRAMS 6
.o CAUSE DETERMINATION ASSESSMENT WHY DID IT HAPPEN?
THE FOLLOWING COMMON WEAKNESSES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED:
POOR COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS INADEQUATE CONTROL OF WORK e
INADEQUATE CONFIGURATION CONTROL LACK OF PROGRAM OWNERSHIP e
LACK OF SENSITIVITY TO THE BALANCE OF PLANT UNDERLYING CAUSE: INEFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT / PERSONNEL EFFECTIVENESS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (WORK PRIORITIZATION) 7
T I
1 RESTART PLAN D
i 4
j
]
l 1
l 8
4 FOCUS AREAS BOP e
BACKLOGS OPERATIONS PROGRAMS PEOPLE / ORGANIZATION / CULTURE CORPORATE / SITE INTERFACE 9
s RESTART CRITERIA ADVERSE IMPACT ON SAFETY SYSTEM AVAILABILITY AND PERFORMANCE SIGNIFICANT CHALLENGE TO PLANT / PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE DUE TO INDIVIDUAL OR AGGREGATE IMPACT HIGH POTENTIAL TO IMPACT PLANT OPERATING RELIABILITY PRUDENCE OF OR NEED FOR WORKING DURING TWO UNIT OUTAGE IMPLEMENTING PROCESSES IMPLEMENT, CONTROL OR ASSESS PLANT READINESS FOR RESTART MANAGEMENT RESTART REVIEW COMMITTEE BACKLOG REVIEW COMMITTEE SYSTEMS READINESS REVIEWS DEPARTMENT READINESS REVIEWS t
10
s FOCUS AREAS
.5 BALANCE OF PLANT r
PLANT RELIABILITY AND AVAILABILITY h
EVALUATIONS SECONDARY PLANT RELIABILITY STUDY STONE AND WEBSTER DESIGN STUDY SITE QUALITY ASSURANCE BALANCE OF PLANT WORK PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS e
MAINTENANCE / OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT REVIEWS BALANCE OF PLANT TECHNICAL PROGRAM REVIEWS 6
l 11
m FOCUS AREAS BALANCE OF PLANT (CONT'D)
IDENTIFIED WEAKNESSES MATERIAL CONDITION DEFICIENCIES i
BOP MODIFICATIONS (19 UNIT 1, 25 UNIT 2)
E.G., #3 HEATER DRAIN TANK LEVEL CONTROL VALVES (105 & 106),
TURBINE RUNBACK AND TERMINATION PRESSURE SWITCHES, CONTROL AIR RELIABILITY
- UPGRADES, GENERATOR BREAKER
- 5034, MAIN TRANSFORMER BUCKHOLTZ RELAY REPLACEMENT)
BOP MAINTENANCE:
700 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS 180 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS EROSION / CORROSION: TARGET TEE REPLACEMENT 3000 FT SMALL BORE 300 FT LARGE BORE MAINTENANCE PROCESSES AND STANDARDS PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE PROCESSES I
CONTROL OF WORK STANDARDS POLICY EXPECTATIONS CONFIGURATION CONTROL PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE PROCESSES e
SITE PRIORITIZATION 12
4.
FOCUS AREAS BACKLOG REVIEW COMMITTEE ISSUE e
NEED TO UNDERSTAND IMPACT ON EFFICIENT OPERATION AS WELL AS AGGREGATE SIGNIFICANCE FROM MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE RESTART ACTION-RELATED OBJECTIVES e
ENSURE THAT BACKLOG ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY OR IN THE AGGREGATE DO NOT POSE AN UNACCEPTABLE RISK TO EFFECTIVE PLANT AND SITE OPERATION HARDWARE PERSONNEL / MANAGEMENT LAY FOUNDATION FOR EFFECTIVE CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF BACKLOGS FOLLOWING RESTART 1
ACTIONS e
IDENTIFIED AND PRIORITIZED EXISTING BACKLOGS ESTABLISHED A BACKLOG REVIEW COMMITTEE 1
.l 13
t FOCUS AREAS BACKLOG REVIEW COMMITTEE (CONT'D)
TWO CATEGORIES OF BACKLOGS REVIEWED BY THE BRC SYSTEM PROGRAM e
SYSTEM RELATED BACKLOG:
HARDWARE-RELATED OR HIGH POTENTIAL TO IMPACT HARDWARE ISSUES IMPACT ON SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY OR RELIABILITY POTENTIAL TO HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR SAFE AND RELIABLE OPERATION PROGRAM RELATED FOR THOSE ITEMS NOT CATEGORIZED AS SYSTEM REVIEW BACKLOG
[
1 14
FOCUS ' AREAS
~ BACKLOG LISTS -
POST-RESTART BACKLOG MANAGEMENT CURRENTLY DEVELOPING LONG-TERM BACKLOG MANAGEMENT.
i METHODOLOGY
'i
'l e
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE METHODOLOGY WILL BE IN PLACE BEFORE RESTART TO MAINTAIN BACKLOGS AT AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL SUCH -
l THAT:
IMPEDIMENTS TO EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE WILL BE MINIMlZED l
t IMPACT OF BACKLOGS ON WORKLOAD IS REDUCED INCREASE THE MARGIN / STRENGTH OF STATION CONDITION.
t i
i
-t 1
I i
15 l
"..+
UNIT C12 W C' WORKOFF CORRECTIVE MAINTENAl\\ CE 2,500 i
2,000 N
N o 1,500 9
3 u.O 1,000 ASSUMPTIONS:
- 1. Starting point: 2008 WOs
-c as of 5/9
- 2. Restart goat is less than or equal to 722 WOs
- 3. Unit rate is 48 mhr/WO 5W
- 4. Dedicated Manpower:
119 people /wk i
i 1
'l l
I i
t i
i i
t i
f i
i f
1 i
t
~ t t
l' i
i 0t e-CO LO N- 0) w M O w M O n 4
- e. co in - co. in N c) b 4 03 T e-bC N N k.C C NbbC DkbC D' N n C C NbbC ND m n o e < <
so so to w w w n n n w w w PL ANNED POPut a tsch O 2,000 t,963 l ASS lA33 1.8$$
1.777 9.e99 1,821 6.618 t,415 1.540 12e5 4.040 st$
870 722 722 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 PS 326 75 7$
75 325 75 75 75 4001D 975 12%
125 17e I PS 17e Im 17e 200 350 3tNJ 300 270 223 75 7%
Plan 10 COMFtEli acinat-W 2 0oe i si?
MalNITf D 16 s
-. _... ~,.
6 v2 v v j
(.
U OPERATIONS 200 E
-Eqs _g B
\\
m s
N s
b 150 Y =\\
x BA E
W 3
N b
100 E
Assumptions a'a g
cg
- 1. Starting point: 178 3
- 2. Restart Goalis less than or equal to - 10
'E o
50
- a. incomino rate: a a't Z
- 4. ops Tracking only B
s
'B-8-G-G-G-O
'2 l
0 '?
M.
6 0
5 E
E N
8 S
E
'N.
8 E
8 _- W _
__5 E-E N
5 E
R G
It/1410lt1AIKXJEl n
..n _
n.
u
- 1..
_s-
.ua. _uh _.us
_m.
.w_
u
_1 ~
.12..
- t..
w.
_ u.a.
_ u2 1/e itu te,u iv3 14a tan ivo iio tr3 ea ru 60 so 48 ao to i,.3 to to io io to io ADDED 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
.3 3
3 3
3 3
.3 RNICOMPLETE to 10 to 10 to to 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 i3 13 11 3
3
-3 3
3 3
3 ACTUN,E 1TB 176 176 170 155 14J IN 116 D
17
-<,r7.w,.- -
r-
.,r-,,,-_v.,.c-v.--4 M,..
w v,
,,,...,..-w.,w.-we,,, -, -...
.v,.
...,-s
...+.wo4,-,,-e-.---,~,--.w,,i..,,,--,,_...-,,_,v.,
.,-n..--,--,
,,ey,,.---,.-w,,,
..,.,,,_,..-..4e,,--,,h
- i-=r,*
t I
a i
1 h
o-eq e ~ ~
j ll]
p -wie ~ ~
p-u8 e " ~.
[
/
d
- WB 8N o
UB 2"e
'l
/
ll-l C
- ;aja a e
/
j Guq? ~ e y
w:@ ~ e iI p
,,a s~e Ill
- vis~e
-j p
C/)
e
- zie ~ e Z
d
- cuis ~ e O
,/
- s-e h
d oc/; 8*e f
/
4 r;1 cvq8 " 9 33 au "9s T
5 i
ml?**?
s m
CL
=
i g
a poe=
v I
0 7,
8
- magass i
e
, 8u@ "
=
a g
3 s
T k
Sme6 f ed! "
e
=a sa B
Bl 83es a
w ea0 00
/
i; sis seq I
Er w o*
i a30 0 1 W-m v> c
_c O k
r-N cd &
-pub i
l s
q ac B B
W r" o
o o
o o
o o
o o
Ea9e e
v m
o m
o v
N gdga
)
m me a
S,OM/BM dO 858WnN 2e e
e o
e i
L'.
t e
_t I
t
-H s, e o
[
j eda o e O
W f ;ue s ~ m l
eq s e I
m
~
ve 8,,
r
~
h sq
. s
$u-,.
~-
qm y
_,vg e a,qa-.
)
w r
/
Q wign
~
y C/) U)
/
m se J
Z
- cume-4 O
m e--
n __.
00N 3 o I
w 3
l1 O <C
/
ms se p
/ cc
,E
- wn a - - n 4
a 9
7qs-s y
E a
-uqa ~ e O
i
/
3 E
f
??.'$ R o
- Z E
q w, eo,e
~
E
/
2 l l l E
}
d t up s gj oo I ' I ks]5 r/r a a
E 2.._e
- 3mh f 5. S 6 %
5&d a 5
E wT3'$
I su5e
[eere
- w:j a s
E i
m
-)
E
.e m rug a z
~
- C E '
E 5,
i i
@c:.o'$
O O
O O
O O
9dG 7>
O co to v
cs; svEa e
a SMOONIM dO B281/\\lnN' E
3 e,
t
a 2
-x na a
h A :, - ",',
f i
h f
y 7
- oo Q-e3} n a o 9t/ a' o o
[}-
9/9 woo O
'F
[+
L/B W oo l
I i
g- ;q~e-
/
O - st/ o oe f'
L t/ to 0 - m P,
pf**
ooN t
e
_ yo
~
T lll A
_ wno-g-
l (f) z
-4 Q
C L/J '.: o o 9
n o
/
w
&(
,I
- >hn*"
W g
,~
g
_ s1s o n ww qsujao"2 3 l
a
]
O
,Cs J a; a
" a y
m En 2
g wi n m
l
~
T
,3 L) p/ /
,a g
g
~;e/dao=n D
Qu'
.s
- aud;o"a i
t 5
i if
^
,,s)ex
- tud;oo; 1
a 3
t y
h th 1
l ga w wn m e a
l i
ses s.-
t E
E53 Ed t2/C O i!
E"so*R J vd 7 Ci GGa_O I
2 P
E j
~!
Q m;
- Scl0 0
m 1
O O
O O
O O
cw L
S' d U g LO V
CD OJ r
o N
3%fW j
ssBauO cnOH dO uB8WnN
)
Q G
B i
M A
t NI f'
M A P A P L
L C
D A
A T
D N
U N E
A D
e 1
E t
0 D
U C
P O
O
% Ou. $ O_ZO][1 2% 1 m
M P
LP U
L
)
E A
N I
l E
f 1
2 3
4 5
6 04 0
0 O
0 0
0 0
E O
I bb f
~
~
~
T 4
9 nC4 1 2
5 1
mDe i 3
aCD 1 O
3 2
9 k4 1
4 1
vee i E
3 C
vE D i 64 1
vND i
M 2
4 L
- bN i
A 34 I
bC i
N D
2 2
e e
)
nC@
t T
i 1
2 2
1 0 3 3
5 E
oDM t
E t
I ot 1
l 9
2 tNO i
N L
1 I
3 l ot 1
o I
A bm I
N 1
1 e
3 0 l
eCM i
\\
t 10 o t
C O
6 5432 1 A 1
1 5
okO I
a S
0 0 p I 3DUInRSS n
ot enc et UM E
r a
vp dti o s U
ekb t
o 1
t 5
e r
0 o i f ei t
t d
ocr maiP epla air nT e
nt gI c
t t
c i eee eg g O
n4 t
t 6
i o o t
p
/dir o oN E
mow saaiS r
nee 1
=
lg kM1 e
t l n:
e i t t
t 5
o o y a o2is:
N n
n s le8 2
si pm z
u o
1 t
0 1
nCo i =
pa h
s 1
0 5 w//0sP t
r pio o nDto i
=
r s
- ePwt M T
n r Mk h s t
1 ot 5 a
0 s
n o
be f
a ot 4
6 r
0 e
qu 1
t 5
-bco f
o.
l P
0 o a
to t
01 6 mC i.n i
o o
~
5 M
mNN I
o.
t t
5 o o mNc i
e t
t 5
o o
)
s a
f
2 i
l t
A c
F e A e S
a t
D t
c t
a A
D u m n
E a
D =
t 0
o 1
t
' c c
~
D Ou HCOLw O
o M
r L
tP u
t E
a l
t g
i 1
1 2
o n
O 5
0 5
0 E
o bN I
0 0 nC4 l 0 0 nDe I
54 321 A 0 0 I
S DU4nRSS en c et U nDD l
C diwo s o 0 0 M
U r
ci t t
kme iP t
a a.s i r r
nT nt oI T4 l
t t g
0 0 ee G
O P
d:
n r o oN N
a aiS yCs-l m2 t
l n:
4 e
0 0 a
- it s:
nm 1
p
/ l 1 ECD l
oh T
e I
C r
ws 9 0 0 w/
ks E
T eT eDo l
.: A t
r f t C
oh 0 0 r
9F e
2 i n
/
f C
w rs o bN i
k t r 0 6 a
e l
H v
q M0 i
g u
0 0 a
)
1 1
3 1
to t
i l
o nC@
t 9
tDn i
S 7
2 t
nDO i
U 2
0 1
o r
2 i
l o
i Ee l
P 3 1 s
P i
i oCn 1
O T
0 0 s
t eDO 1
\\
R A
i 0 o e 0 t
eD5 1
T C
a
$4 i
i 3 0 n
F 1
0 0 t
oC e-l a
oCD I
S C
i 2 0 s
i okin i
2 0 t
be i
1 0 s b0 t
c i 0 e i
eCn I
o 0 r mDN i
e 0 i mDc l'
5 o 0 r
)
2
".e s
ll(l!l I
i t
U C
Co D
l\\
A e a e t
s C
D l
a a
D u N m
l t
a D m 1
D 01 OoE2_F2wzb/(
T t
- 0 0
C P
)
O o
M pu e
ta 1
2 3
4 1
ttl t
i i
0 0
0 0
on 0
0 0
0
/
o t
I X-2 a
S O e u s
x#
2 m2 i 54321 A 1
O 9 e C
2 2
.. S ma i DUnI RSS r
enc et U 4 O I
e s a t t ntg I
O s
di ot r M i t t
cr maiP e O l
2 ma i aair nT e
e 4 eeg g O
R p
d: r o oN x
- a I
M/eit NaaiS e O I
e F
t tn:
aA:
R s:
n 3 a:
I p
1 l 3 4 O 2 2
2 o
3e 4 3
1 s w
ws7 E
a* i e
3 kt 5 O 6 2
r 4
h C
a N
n t
O 1
3 an t
/
2 A
o o
2 e
T r
e 3 O S
s
- u i
qu L
i J
e I
el I
C V
0 O 1
3
- e I
t 5
4 2
o X
E 2
3 m*
i 5
e 1
2 2
3 E
5 s 0
N 2
1 3 mn t
x S
0 2
2 3 s 2
3 A
2 1
3 m8 i
I 0
2 2
3 0 N
2 3
l
- e i
N G
C 2
1 a
0 s
me 1
T 2
1 3
0 0
2 3
2 2
31 2 aa i
I 2
s 0
3 mn t
O 2
1 2e 0
2 3
4
~t I
N 2
1 2
0 i
2 3 s N
2 1
O 0 2 1
l n;
i N
r 2
CeCT e
3 s
us oE tamS r
nt i D
r 0 4 1
2 n=
t er m:
2 s
3 s
w nn i
w t.
t m m O
0 l
1 2
e e
3 a
n n
t p
i o
si C
0 0
w t
e r
o
- e 1
i b
U 0
0 s
e s
a me i
u t
0 0 0 f
2 f
M i
5 ci 0
aN t
e 0 0 0 n
t f
o ma i
E r
0 0 0 N
T S
f
~
)
~
t I
C N
z E
R 2
A P A
.P t
t c
D A
A t
D u N N
E
~
t 5
D N t
E 0
O c Cob _O2
% Q1 $c C
P o
O u
P g
u r
t g
A 1
g 2
4 6
0 t
t 0
N 0
0 0
0 0
O bb t
~ /V 3 0 2 T N
U 3
oC4 t 54321 A
/ v 7
2 0 8 9 S
N DuInRSS N
e - c et U
/ v s a nDe-i di ot r M N
I 2 0 0 i t I
t c-maiP i r nT a
nt g I
/ v t i I
mDD 1
e-g g O
N C
7 6 0 9 0
p d: r o oN M=aaiS v
T
/
34 I t l n:
i 7
f 0
a eit N
l 4
3 n
- s:
h p - 5l7 eCe i
oi e
/ v 3 0 6 7
I at s N
O wt es e
mt.
/
2 v
r - sh eC(O i
1 I
9 0
'N 1
1 S
/a 1
wn k
L O
/ v 9
4 0 7 8
vDD i
r L
e q
v
$N t
u S
I 0 9 l
C 2
I 4
a v
t 2CD i
o 9
F 0 5
~
2 8
ice i
v E
5 6
S 0 F n
4 N
/ v S
N 2
0 0 mDM i
N 4
oDO I
/ v t
0 0 N
E I
ED I
/ v N
.0 0
(
N v
G R
/
eCM i
N 0 0 eDO t
/ v 0 0 N
eDb i
/ v a
0 0 N
I v
T b4 t
/
0 0 N
bCe i
/ v 0 0 E
N v
bCD i
/
L N
0 0 M
oDto 1
/ v 0
0 N
v E.e 1
/
S 0 0 N
.0 0
- $0 i
/ v N
3 v
mCto i
/
0 0 N
mDN i
/ v 0 0 N
/
. mDc i
Nv 0 0
)
L.
"...t' 5
FOCUS AREAS OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE UPGRADE FOCUS / STATUS CONFIGURATION CONTROL PROCEDURE REVIEW / COMPLIANCE CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS STRENGTHENING OF MANAGEMENT / PERSONNEL FEEDBACK QUALITY ASSURANCE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM RESTART READINESS TEAM e
STAND-DOWNS 25
~
~4 t
-e ii *, '.
{
+..
FOCUS AREAS j
- )
TECHNICAL PROGRAMS & PERFORMANCE 1
i i
PROBLEM AREAS 1
NO SINGLE OWNER OF PROGRAMS j
FRAGMENTED IMPLEMENTATION SPLIT RESPONSIBILITIES i
OBJECTIVES OF RESTART EFFORTS i
ASSESS ADEQUACY OF SITE PROGRAMS AND IMPLEMENTATION ASSESS CONSEQUENCES OF ANY IDENTIFIED WEAKNESSES AND 'TAKE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE CURRENT.lMPLEMENTATION.
CONSISTENT WITH RESTART PLAN OBJECTIVES ENSURE CLEAR OWNERSHIP FOR SITE PROGRAMS IS ESTABLISHED ll PROVIDE A FOUNDATION FOR CONTINUED LONG-TERM PROGRAM ENHANCEMENTS
[
a KEY ACTIONS NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW BOARD CHAIRMAN HEAD OF OVERSIGHT PANEL REVIEW OF SELECTED "HIGH RISK" TECHNICAL PROGRAM AREAS REVIEW.OF PROGRAM AREAS BY DEPARTMENT PROGRAM OWNERS AS PART OF DEPARTMENT READINESS ASSESSMENTS ESTABLISHMENT OF A TECHNICAL PROGRAMS AND PERFORMANCE ORGANIZATION 26
~
FOCUS AREAS TECHNICAL PROGRAMS AND PERFORMANCE ORGANIZATION PURPOSES (1)
MAINTAIN RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE HEALTH, WELL BEING, AND QUALITY OF ASSIGNED PROGRAMS (2)
OVERSEEINTRA-DEPARTMENTALIMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES TO ENSURE THAT PROGRAM OBJECTIVES ARE BEING REALIZED STATUS DEPARTMENT MANAGER IN PLACE e
5 OF 7 MANAGERS ARE NOW IN PLACE 20 OF 27 ENGINEERS ARE IN PLACE CORPORATE PERSONNEL AND CONTRACTORS ARE AUGMENTING STAFF UNTil FULL STAFFING IS IN PLACE TRANSITION SCHEDULE IN PLACE 27
FOCUS AREAS PEOPLE / ORGANIZATION / CULTURE PEOPLE e
PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS ALL OF OPERA TIONS NON-OPERA TIONS PERSONNEL EVAL UA TED TO 1ST-LINE SUPERVISORS REMAINING PERSONNEL WILL BE EVALUA TED SUBSEOUENT TO RESTART e
ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE ACTION PLANS FOR " CHANGE NEEDED" MANA GEMENT POSITIONS WILL IMPLEMENT AS APPROPRL4 TE PRIOR TO RESTART ORGANIZA TION e
WILL DEFINE ORGANIZA TION RESPONSIBILITIES AND INTERFACES i
e REVISIONS WILL BE MADE AS APPROPRIA TEBEFORE AND AFTER RESTART e
IMPROVED COMMUNICA TIONS ESSENTIAL CUL TURE e
STAND-DOWNS SHORT TERM FOCUS ON DEPARTMENT WEAKNESSES L ONG TERM FOCUS ON BIGGER PICTUREISSUES FOR RESTART / POST-RESTART DEPARTMENT MEETINGS J
28
RESTART READINESS i
SYSTEM READINESS OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF SYSTEM CONDITION AND FUNCTIONALITY OF 86 SYSTEMS SYSTEM ENGINEER DRIVEN -- AFFIRMATION THAT SYSTEM CAN SUPPORT i
SAFE AND RELIABLE OPERATIONS BACKLOGS, TRENDS, WALKDOWNS OF FOCUS SYSTEMS t
i T
DEPARTMENT READINESS CONDUCTED BY DEPARTMENT MANAGERS WILL ENSURE COMPLETlON OF ASSIGNED RESTART ACTIONS PEOPLE, PROCESSES, AND HARDWARE IN THEIR ORGANIZATION ARE SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT SAFE AND RELIABLE RESTART AND OPERATION POST-RESTART WORK AND IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS ARE l
SUFFICIENTLY
- DEFINED, PRIORITIZED,. SCHEDULED, AND CONTROLLED APPROPRIATE POST-RESTART ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING PROCESSES IN PLACE i
i 1
6 29
4 g
RESTART READINESS (CONT'D)
SITE READINESS INPUTS CONSIDERED FOR SITE READINESS DECISIONS INCLUDE:
SYSTEM AND DEPARTMENT READINESS AFFIRMATION CLOSEOUT OF OUTAGE ACTIVITIES BY THE OUTAGE MANAGEMENT TEAM CLOSEOUT / DISPOSITION OF ALL RESTART LIST ITEMS REVIEW OF PERSONNEL AND ORG ANIZATION ADEQUACY, INCLUDING CORPORATE / SITE INTERFACE ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS / REVIEWS UTILIZED TO FURTHER AFFIRM SITE READINESS RESTART READINESS TEAM REVIEW OF OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT SENIOR MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT GROUP REVIEW QA RESTART ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 1
ASSESSMENT / OVERSIGHT IMPROVEMENT AREAS IDENTIFIED BY ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS --
RESTART PLAN ADEQUACY CORROBORATED INPO TREND ANALYSIS NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW BOARD REVIEW TVA SENIOR MANAGEMENT REVIEW l
l 30 1
s..
POST RESTART ASSESSMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CORPORATE OVERSIGHT IMPROVEMENTS CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS 4
9 31
r-3 3..
)
SCHEDULE OPERATIONS RESTART READINESS TEAM 5/12 - 21 6/28 - 7/2 j
SENIOR MANAGER OVERSIGHT GROUP 5/26 - 28 6/7 - 14 i
i OPERATIONAL READINESS ASSESSMENT TEAM BEGIN 7/6 (PROPOSED)
I UNIT 2 MODE 4 7/7 (TENTATIVE)
)
UNIT 2 MODE 2 7/23 (TENTATIVE) i 1
i 32
.