ML20036B504

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission ISSUANCES.July- September 1992

ML20036B504
Person / Time
Issue date:	04/30/1993
From:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:
References
NUREG-0750, NUREG-0750-I01, NUREG-0750-V36-I01, NUREG-750, NUREG-750-I1, NUREG-750-V36-I1, NUDOCS 9305250147
Download: ML20036B504 (52)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. k l i I i I ~ l i NUREG-0750 ) Vol. 36 Index 1 i i ilNDEXES TO: l 4NUCLEARTREGULATORYp l COMMISSION:LISSUANCES! i iJup-!Septenibere19921 j l AsJneap l _ i Co.. : Ly . ;4.A

0

^ 1 l U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i l l k I l 9305250147 930430 t PDR NUREG PDR i 0750 R l i i<..

i L i 1 i I t_ 1 I I 9 i f r i i Available from f Superintentendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Post Office Box 37082 t Washington, D.C. 20013-7082 A year's subscription consists of 12 softbound issues. 4 indexes, and 2-4 hardbound editions for this publication. j Single copies of this publication are available from National Technical + Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 ? -) l i l 1 l Errors in this publication may be reported to the - Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Services Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 (301/492-8925) 4

l i ) J NUREG-0750 4 Vol. 36 Index 1 I ' INDEXES TO i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ISSUANCES 4 i July - September 1992 i i I i a i 1 l 1 i i l i l U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ~ l Prepared by the Division of Freedom of information and Publications Services l [ Office of Administration i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington. DC 20555 (301/492-8925) j i 1 l r

i 1 f Foreword i Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission (CLI), the Atomic l Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative Law Judges (AU), l the Directors Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking ~j (DPRM) are presented in this document %csc digests and indexes are intended l to serve as a guide to the issuances. Infonnation elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are: Case name (owner (s) of facility) Ibil text reference (volume and pagination) Issuance number j Issues raised by a;pellants l Legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes) Name of facility, Docket number Subject matter of issues and/or rulings Type of hearing (for construction permit, operating license, etc.) Type of issuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.). Dese information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate fonnats arranged as follows: 'j

1. Case Name Index De case name index is an alphabetical arrangement of the case names of the issuances. Each case name is followed by the type of hearing, the type of issuance, docket numter, issuance number, and full text reference.

2. Digests and IIcaders De headers and digests am presented in issuance number order as follows-the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LBP),

the Administrative Law Judge (AU), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and tic Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM). De header identifies the issuance by issuance number, case name, facility name, docket number, type of hearing, date of issuance, and type of issuance. De digest is a brief narrative of an issue followed by the resolution of the ' ] issue and any legal references used in resolving the isste. If a given issuance covers more than one issue, then separate digests are used for each issue and are designated alphatetically. I t til I, a 1 } i -i .i

I

3. Legal Citations Index i

This index is divided into four parts and consists of alphabetical or alpha-numerical arrangements of Cases, Regulations,' Statutes, and Others. - These citations are listed as given in the issuances. Changes in regulations and statutes may have occurred to cause changes in the number or name and/or aIplicability l of the citation. It is therefore important to consider the date of the issuance. The references to cases, regulations, statutes, and others are generally followed by phrases that show the application of the citation in the particular issuance. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.

4. Subject Index i

Subject words and/or phrases, arranged alphabetically, indicate the issues and subjects covered in the issuances. The subject headings are followed by phrases that give specific information about the subject, as discussed in the issuances being indexed. These phrases are followed by the issuance number ? and the full text reference, j 5, Facility Index l t The index consists of an alphabetical arrangement of facility names from ~ the issuance. The name is followed by docket number, type of hearing, date, '[ . type of issuance, issuance number, and full text reference. { ? I I t f t ly i Lh I i i ? s ( h .t I

., -., ~ _.. - - . ~.... i l l l I I l e I r l \\ l I l l 1 I l p 1 CASE NAME INDEX ALABAMA POWT_R COMPANT CIVIL PINALTY; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Approvmg Settlement Agnement and Ternunsung Pmceedmg); Dmiet Nas. 5434ECvP,54364CvP (ASIEP Na 91426-02-CavPt ISP-92 21, 36 f NRC 117 0992) ( ARIZONA PUBUC SERVICE COMPANT, a al. REQUEST JOR ACITON, ITNAL DIRECIDR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CJ.R. 3 2.2(E; Duciet Na 54528,5G529,54530; DD-92-4,36 hTC 143 0992) i l BABOOCK AND VIICOX DECOMMISSIONING, AEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Allowing Ihanca to Amend or Supplement Thest Ileanna Request); Docka Na 74135-DCOM (ASLEP Na 92-667-03-DCOM) (Materials Ucense Na SNM-145); IEP-92c24,36 NRC 149 0992) CUNIF # E11CITJC IILUMINATING COMPAhT and TOllIO EDISON COMPANT g = Ah*II E I y l

hEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Daisi Nos. 50*&A 50-346-A (Applications to Suspaw Anutrust Con &nans); (2192r11,36 NRC 47 (1992)

C ANTTIEUST; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Graming Oty of Brook Park Monan for Ime d Iraerven6m); Dmia Nos. 50440-A,54346-A (ASulP No. 91-64441-A) (Suspension of Anntrust Can&dans) (FacGry Ope-stmg lacensas Na NPF-58, hW3); IEP-92-19,36 NRC 98 0992) y DAN!Il BORSON on Behalf of PUBUC CTIZTN DENIAL OF PETTHON TOR RUI1MAKINO; Docket Na PRM 5454; DPRM-92-1,36 NRC 31 / l 0 992) l GENTRAL ELECTRIC STDCKIlOIl)ERS' AUlANCE, et al. DENIAL OF PETTTION ICR RULEMAKING; Docken Na PRM 2019, DPRM 92-2,36 NRC 37 0 992) g d IIOUSTON UGlHING AND POW 13 COMPAhT, et al. ENIOPCEMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos, 5041,50-499; CL1-9210,36 NRC 3 0992) 1DUISIANA ENTRGY SERVICES L.P. MATT. RIALS UCINSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Ruling on Dancove y Disputes Pertaimng to Conten6ans L and M), Docket Na 743070 ML (ASLilP No. 9144142-ML) (Spec.al Nudcar Matenals Ucerne); IEP-9215A,36 NRC 5 0992) i NORTIIFAST NUCLEAR 1.NERGY COMPAhT OPERATING LICLNSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDIR (Estahhshmg Picading Schedule); Dc ;ket Na Sa336-01A (ASIEP Na 92465 02-OIA) (f0L Na DPR45) (Spent luel Pml Deman); IEP-92-17,36 NRC 23 0992) OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Omposing Sanctions upor CCMN and Striki g Ihans); Docket Na 54336-OIA (ASIEP Na 92465-02CLA) (Spent Ibel 3%1 Design) (TOL No. DPR-65); IEP-92-26, 36 NRC 191 0992) OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Ohg Sdicdules and Pmheanna Canferenn); Dmiet No. 50 336OIA (AS!EP Na 92465-024LA) (Spent Fuct Pool Desa;n) (IOL No DPR45); IEP-92-28,36 NRC 202 (1992) l 0100 EDISON COMPANT ANTITRUST; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Dmiet Na 50-440 A (Applications to Suspend Antarust Candidons). CU-9211,36 NRC 47 (1992) c i i 1 a l i .I ) 2-

i i i I CASE NAME INDEX I t h ANTITRUST; MEMORANDUM AND ORDI'R (Granung City of Brook Park Monun for laie j 1mervemian); Data Na 5044&A (ASGP Na 91444-0* A) (Suspension of Anntrust Cmdnians) ? (l' cibiy Operanna Ucense Na NPF-58); GP-92.9,361 #iC 98 (1992) a PACIFIC GAS AND E11CIRIC ODMPANY OPERAllNG UCENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Illing Seedules and [ Preheanng Conferenm); Docket Na 50275 CIA-2,50323 OIA 2 (ASGP No. 9246943 OLA-2) L (Consmcuan Pened Recovery) (liscDity Operanng Licenses Na DPR 80, DPR-82); LBP-92-27,36 NRC 196 0992) PIPING SPLC1AllSTS. INC and IORREST L ROUDEBUS!! d.h.a. PSI INSPECTION, and d.b.a. PIPING SPECIA12STS,INC. ENIORCEMENT; ITNAL INTTIAL DECISION (Revoking Domse), Ducha Nos. QMk29626CM&OM 2 (ASLBP Nos. 92453-024M, 92462-06CM-2) (boense Revocanon, Ucense Suspension) (Bypmdua Material Ucense No. 24-2482601) (EA 91-!% 92454); LDP-92-25,36 NRC 156 0992) ENTORCEMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Proposed Raolution of the Case) Docket No-i OW29626CMAOM 2 (ASGP Nos. 9245kO2-OM,92462-06-OM-2) (Bypmducs Material bacnse No. 242482401) (EA 91-136,92 054) (12 cense Revocanon Ucense Suspensian); GP-92-16,36 t NRC 15 0992) i RANDAIL (', OREM, D O. ( INORCEMENT; MZMORANDUM AND ORDER (Approving Seulemera Agreernent and Terminaung i Pmemedes); Dodet Na 03031758-EA (ASLBP Na 92456-01-LA) (EA 91-154) (Bypmdua i Maisnal Ucense No. 34-2620141); GP-92-18,36 NRC 93 (1992) j SACRAMENT MUNIC2 PAL LTIUTY DIS'IRICT DECOMMISSIONINO; PREIIEARING CONTERENCE ORDER (Temnnsnns Pmoemd2ng); Dodet No. -[ 54312 DOOM (ASIBP Na 92463-02-DCOM) (r Eg Plan) (Ivcility Opmating Ucense 4 No. DIW54); LBP-92-23,36 NRC 120 0992) [ SAIITY UGIIT CORPORATION, as al. MATERIALS UCENSE; MEMORANDUM; Docket Nos. 030-05980 MIAE2, 030 05982-MIAE2 (ASLBP Na 91-65941-M1,9246442rE2); LBP-92-16A,36 NRC 18 0992) MATERIALS LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Doda Nas- 03045980.MIAE2, 030-05982-MIAW2; CLJ-9213,36 NRC 79 0992) TEXAS ITITUTIES ELFLTRIC COMPANY, et at OPERATING UCENSE AND CONSTRUCDON PERMIT AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Dode Nas. 504454IACPA,50446-01 CU-92rt2,36 NRC 62 (1992) UME"ICO MINERALS (DRPORA110N MATERIALS UCENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Request for llearing and [ Stsy of Ucense Amendment); Doda Nos 4048681-MLA (ASGP Na 9246641-MIA) (Source f Matenals Ucense No. SUA-1358); LBP-92-20,36 NRC 112 0992) j MATTRIALS UCENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Amendmern); Docket No. 4408681-MLA (ASGP No. 92-66&O1.MLA) (Source Materiais Ucense No. SUA 1358); GP-92-22, f 36 NRC 119 (1992) f r i J r 2 I, I

i i l I l l I i i j I I l l l l l I 4 ) l 1 l l I DIGESTS j ISSUANCES Ol' TifE FUCLEAR RI'.GULATORY COMMISSION ) l i j (11-92-10 liOUSTON LIGifTING & POH1.R COMPANY, et al. (Soudt 'Jexas 1%;ect, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-498,5D499; INFORCEMENT; July 2,1992; MLMORANDUM AND ORDER a l A he Canrmssam denies the motion of ilausum lightmg & Power Company to modify or quash h ten 00) OfSm of Invesugations' (OI) suhpomas issued to censin South Texas I%;ect employees and 7 management officials m an investiganon concerrJng Anmas J. Sapomo, Jr. 01 issued the subpoenas aner / l Geone mdividuals suanpted to emduian thcar volumary teadmany. De Carmmasion finds that ops sefusal [ to garantee as a precm66an to a compcIled irscrview that a waness will unequivocal y accerve a copy of l hs transcript does nas violate the Adannistrative Prumdure Act. i H Transcript r;ghts grarned under secuan 555(c) of the Admimstrauwe Procedure Act do not extend r j to tesnmany voluntarily sma. United States v. Marray,297 F.2d 512,821 (2d Cir.1962), An'y GeneraPs [ l Mamal an the Admmistrative Procedure Act 67 (1947). l C Section 555(c) of the Admirnstrative Piecedure Act requires that when testimony is compeDed from a party cr a witnass, that person is enutled, upon payment of ecsts to obtain a copy d his transcribed testimmy. Ilowever, a "compcIled" witncus' right to elxain a tranzens of his tesumany may be hmited in [ [ nonpublic investigatory proceedmgs to inspection of the transenpt, upon a showing of " good cause*' by the i agency. t ,3 D The invocatian af the good-cause excepuan comained in secnon 555(c) of the Admimstrative l Promdure Act is wadun the agency's d scretion and apphes to situnuans where evidence is taken in a case ~s 1 j in winch prosecunans may be brought later andit would be dernmernal to the due execuuan of thelaws to l perma copies of the transcrip to be circulated. Commercial Capital Corp. v. SEC,360 F.2d 856,358 (7th i Cir.1966). I L An agmcy is not required to make a good.cause determmaum pnrr to recaving usumony finm l e witness. SEC v. Spwher. 594 F.2d 317,319 (2d Cir.1979). r I (11-92-11 01I10 l'DISON COMPANY (I%rry Nuclear Power Plant Una 1) and C11NEIAND 111CIKIC g ILLUMINAllNG COMPANY and 1DLEDO EDISON CDMPANY (Perry Nuclear Power Plam Umt 1; i Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Statsun, Unit 1), Dockes Nos. 5044G A,50 346 A (Apphcauons so Suspend I Anutrust Condaiuns). ANTITRUST; August 12,1992, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A he Commission demcs City of Cleveland's appealof a Prehesnng Curderence Order IliP-91-38, 'f 34 NkC 229 0992), whidi gramed Apphcants' beanng paluons. he Camrmssion determincs that its l broad authonty to amend licenses at the request of hcensee esteds m requests for amendmems to anntrust l condamns. The Conemsaian also denies City of Cleveland's mouon for revocauan of the Commission's ] refensi of the heanns sequasis to the Licensing Board. De Conunissian t'etermines that the licensing Board's developnent of a detailed record and analysis of the complex issues raised in this proceedmg will j sid the Camrrussion in any seview that svey be undertaken. B Amendmems to operatir:g licmsen are setemniated under hoth the Atomic Energy Act (Al A) and the Comnnasion's imphanemirig regulations. Sc.: AEA55161.182,183,157,189. 42 U S.C. 612201 2232,2233,2237,2239 (1982); 10 CIA il 5030. 50 92 (1992) C llcaring rights pmvided in scenan 189 of the Atomic Energy Act may be mvoked not an!y by smerestod members of the public but also by license applicams ur beersnes. 42 U.S C. I 2239(a)(1)(19E8). D Ahhough a lanse apphcam er bcensee may have a right to a heanng under section 189 of the ALA if its amerest as adversely affected (e g.. if a heense or amendment appbcauun is demed or a license as i l i 3 i i 1 l h l i l l i j i i

DIGESTS l ISSUANCES OF TitI: NUC11AR RIEL'LATORY COMMISSION suspended or revoked), a leanng must still be requested; oderwise Sta!!'s decision a fmal. See 10 CIA li1103(b),2.105(d),2.108(b),2.1205 (1992). E The Comnussion has jurisdienan under sectums 103,161, and 189 of the AEA to emenain Applu:ams* mpnest to amend Gar hceses to suspend Gm effect of anutrust enndiums. Neither the staunery language nor the kgislative history of scene 105 of the AEA suggesis out Congnas amended anntrust licese conditions a be immutable, inespecuve of whether the condaians have becomo unjust over tinut Nenher linustan Lighting and Power Co. (South Texas Projem Units I and 2), CLt.7713,5 NRC 1303 (1977), nor Florida Power and Ught Co. (St. Imas Nuclear Power Nnt, Umt 1; Turkey Point Naclear Generanng Nnt, Units 3 and 4), A1AB 423,6 NRC 221 (1977), prohibit suspenasan of amiuust condanais at e licensee's request F Staff's considentian of Appbcants' amendment request was not a 'teanng" that sausfies secnun 189 of the AEA; Staff's determinauan was admmistranve in natute and does nra suf5ce as an adjudicatory seview d om application sequest. CLI-92-12

• fEXAS UnUTIES DlffRIC COMPANY, et al. (Comandw Peak Steam Deans Station Unita 1 and 2). Dodtes Nus. 50 445-OIACPA,50446OLI OPERATING UCENSE AND CDNSTRUCTION PERMIT AMENDMENT; August 12.1992. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A

he Commissian denies Fetinaners' requests for late imervernian in Gee Camande Peak OL poceedings and the Unit 1 CPA proceedmg. whidi were ck med in 1988 pumuara a a settlement agreemat. he Commissian further denies Peunaners' motians to imervene and to serpen om record in de Unit 2 pr==eAng, fmding that Feubaners have faded to sansfy the criteria far late intervenuon and fu appamng of the vuowd. The Cummissian funher denies the sequests for protamive ordem,fas susparuuan of the Una 1 eperanng bcense, and for oral argument on the motians before it B Once the Commissian has issund an operunng hoense im a unit, that acnan effecnvely closes an en opportunity far a heanrig on that license or en any annsuuction pesmit amendnunts. Any subsaqueu dallenge io Gut unit's license must take the form of a pennan under 10 CIA $ 2.206 for an order under 10 CJ.R. I 2.201 C Because oral argurrent is clearly discretianary under 10 CJA $ 2.763, the Commission requires that a party saaking oral argument must explain how oral arguman would assist h in naddng a darkians. De Commissian sney deny sequests far oral argunusa when based on the party's wrinen. ' - Out h fuDy - ---ds the posnians of the panicipsens and has sufficiers infarrnation upon which to base ha decuum. D. A petinanar is not baned fan requesnns eral argurnern on a painan for late imervenian. De sequinsnent in 10 CJA $2.763 that a request for oral argumera be made in a '%rief"' only apphes an pleadman the constitute an *appenE" E Far the Commission to gara a patinon far late intervenhan, a petitioner mum danestrate a fevershle balancing of the five factos ses farth in 10 CIA 6 2.714(aXIXi)-(v). These five facias are- (1) good cause,if any,im fa'hus to fue en tune; (2) the availabihty of edier means far protecnng the peutioner's imerest; (3) the estern to which the petitioner's paruespstian might ressmably assist in developmg e sound secord; (4) the caters to whidi the petinaner's irnerest wal bc.,. " by existing perues; and (5) the cuent to whidt the pensioner's panicipation will broaden the issues or delay the proceeding. F The teat for "gned esuse"is not sunply when a petitioner becomes aware of the maierialit anoks l w imroducs irno evidence. Instead, the test is what the aformation became svaDable and wimm a petidmer sessarmbly should have becane aware of that informanort In essmoe, nca edy must a petluoner have acted L promptly after teamma of the new infornation, but ene information itself must be new informane, not informatice already in the pubbe domain. I O When an miervennan is entremely undrnely and the peuunner unedy fails to demonstrate any good i cause for late intervenuan, h must make a compelling case that the other four facwrs weigh in its favor in j order to satisfy the late-fihng standant A patinoner han satLfied the accand prang of the five-factor " law innervernum test" where there i is currmoy no ongoing pr-%g and therefore no other means by utich that pentioner's imerest aan be protected.10 Cf.R. I 2.714(aXI)(n). I h l a 1, i 5 i i t I

i l i DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF TIIE NUCII.AR RI'GULATORY COMMISSION 3 A penunner has sansfted the founh prang of the fwe-factor " late imervendon taf where there is cunent?y no engaing meAmg and themfare no other pony abic to repnment that peutaoner's imerest 10 CIA 5 2.714(sXIXwl J In evaluanng the five factors to be met by a pounone socking a grara of late antervenan, de sacand and founh factors are de least importata d the 6ve. K When a poudaner addicsses the durd entenon, "the catet to which his] pameipadan might seasonably assist an developmg a sound record" a should sca cut with as much paniculanty as passible the precise issues it plans to sover,idemify its pmspecove witnesses, and sianmarire their proposed tesumariy. l L Bamng the most compo!!ing --% considerations, an mescusably aardy smerventaon pounon stands linie chance of success if hs grant would likdy occasen an abersuan an heating schedules i er de estabhshmers of an emuely new heanng. M Section 2.734(b) of 10 CIA requins that a motion to reopen the record must be accanpanied j by one or more afLdavns which set fath the factual and/w technical basis for dec movant's claim. If a i peudaner fads to comply with this requuernent, the Commasion may deny a request to reopen the reccrd because of this defect alone. N Once the Commisman has dcsernuned that a pensioner cannot become a pany to a proceeding j based on the secord before it, a peuuaner cannat seek to scopen the record of that prn~*Amg. i O ne nmelmens"requimnern of 10 CFA 12_734 is not whether a mmian se reopen is Eled widdn a 24 bars of a peution for late irmerverates; insiend. the test is whether the inforrnatie upon which the naarn niier could have beco piumamed to the NRC at an earher date. P The purpose undedyms a gma of conLdentiality is t puserve the eDeger's idemity inan public dsclosure where such dudasure could cause harm to de aneger. Ilowever, even a known alleger can be gramed omfidanaality by the NRC Staffif that person can danansuate that same hann might otherwme befall thern or their sources. Q A grara of nonLdetiahty is pat dependern m an individuars success in seeking a gram of imarvenie or reopenmg of de record. i R A pannoner may not request suspension d an operating twense as part d a pesidan for late intervenian. Dome maners are mas propedy placed before the NRC nnder the pocochires F"Eified iD 10 CSA 5 2.206. CL192-13 SAM UG1!T CORPORATION et at (Bloomsburg Site Decorammination and License Renewal Demals), Docket Nas. 03045980 MLAE2,03005912-MIAE2; MA7T.RIA13 UCENSE; August 12. 1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A On seriew of an order. I.RP-92-13A. 35 NRC 205 (1992), whidi consolidated an informal proceedmg mder Subpan L of 10 CSA Patt 2 with a formal pmcoedmg under Subpan G, the Commission determines that the lacensing Board and the Presidmg Of5cer escended their autheruy by not sacking prior Commissian authomarian far censabdation in view of the sequirement in 10 CIA $11209(k) (1992) that the Commisman appeme applicanan of shernauvo hearing proceduns fw Subpan L prMngs. 7he Commissian authorites, however, the ennsolidation of the pmcendings. B Even in the abaance of a pentim for seriew, the Carrmussian sesams its supervanry power over adjudications to step in at any stage of a proceedmg and decide a mauer itself. C in the imerest of readting an expedinous resohaian of a nowd issue raised in a pm6sedmg the Corrmussim may grant a petition far seriew without swaitmg a aply frorn any scapandmg party. Iiecause the grara of a peutice only indicates that an issue is worthy of Commissian consideration,respondema ate not prejudiced if they are pmvided a subsequers appteumity to presera their views on the ments of the issue scarted for seview. D Ahhough the Cwnrnission conducts aview d nuerlocutory arders of presidmg officees aparingly, the Commusian may take review of an 6 L, order to semove doubt as to the proper resolunen of an unusual or novel gem er to cure an ermr. pasticularly when the matter beats on de tmderlymg authonty of the presidmg officer to take senain action an a prMng. i E Ahhough the Commission's supervmory power ettends to cucumstances that do not meet the standards for revsw specifed in 10 CJA 12.786(b) and (g) the Commission adheres as a general rule to the standards codified in those regulatiarm. i 5 [ i ) r

~, - .. ~. i f DIGI 3TS IMUANCFS OF Tile NUCIE AR RFGUI.ATORY COMMIMION f i i F The uy. ~J, M cmsuhdanon of a Subpan G and a Subpan L pnecedirig raised a subcanual i and imputant junsdsumal quesnur. and affected the Subpan L pmocedmg in a pervasive and unusual marmer sa:h that discreumary imedocuinry review by the Cornmission of the consoladanun order was l warramed. O A heanng on the denial of a materials 1mense is onlinarily gmerned by dw informal hearing. i pmceduas in subpan L of to CIA Pan 2; Commission appnwal is required far the applicanon of shernanvc proceduses in such paceceLngs. 11 Ahhough protadures a Sutgun G of 10 CFA Pan 2 may have general applicanon to m3 types of Comrrussmn proooodinp other than sulernaking, applicauan d Subpan G must be daarmined in the s,orucat d the special sules that are apphed to other proceedmp. In any confhet between a general wie in ) Subpan G and a special mle in archer subpart, the special rule governa. See 10 CJ168 2.2,23 (1992). I Ahhnugh the canoept of consabdation of pWmas embodied in 10 CJ181716 (1992) is not in inacif inconsistent with Subpan L procedures, conversian of a Subpan L pnxeedmg imo a Subpan G proceedma ihmugh ennschdatim of pr=wdmgs requins Commission autharizauon in order to give proper c!!act to hmitanon specified in 10 CFA $2.1209(k) (1992) with respect to the adopion of alternauwe hearing pacedares in Subpan L puccedings. I J As a gancral practice, the Comnussian defers to de lacensmg Board's judgment on the consoh. dation af prosmodings, absat the' man unusual cirannstances. 1 K The common Ltigarus, the potanial -my of issues, and the avoidance of unnecessary i hrsgation over pucedural mauers weighs in this case in few of conschdatian of a Subpan L proceedmg with a Subpart G pmoced.ng. i t t 5 i i b 1 1 h 7 5 k f f ? ~

.m_. .m .m__. l l. i l I i I i i i I I DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOh0C SAITTY AND UCENSING BOARDS 12P-92-15A LOUISIANA ENERGY SERVICES, l_P. (Claiborne Imnchmeau Cemer), DoAct No, ~70-3074 ML I (AS!EP Na g l 91-641-02-ML) (Special Nuclear Wterials thense), MATERIALS UCENSE: July 8,1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Ruhng en Dacovery Disputes ibrtauung to Contentions L and M) g l A Secunty plans are to be withheld imrn pubhc daclomre,irrespecuve of utethcr dacxwery of the i 3 documema is sought frera the Nuclear Regulatory Cmmussion or the appheam. I B An appbcam has no chtigation to establish that the securny plan is privileged or confidential. J Section 2.790(d) of 10 CJ R. deems it to be_ k 7 C An applicant has no obligation under 10 CJ.R. 6 2.790(b)(1) to submit an affidavis for having j the secunty plan wahheld frorn public daclosure. Sectusi 2.790(b)(1) mpares such an a5 davit when a person "pmposes" that the documens be wahheld because it contains confidmtial commercal or fmancial i { informauan. In the case of a security plan, it has aheady been deemed to be auch informauan under section ~ j 1790(d1 @C D Where an applicara has snade a poma facie case dat the secunty plan should be withheld frorn puhhc dischnure and that an in camera proceeding is requimd in order to fashion an appropriate praective arder under which pardans of Ibe accurity plan could be made available to the intervennr, the refusal d ths Z intervmor to participsie in the in camera prMg is an effective waher ofits right to funher consideranon l d na dacovery request of the rnauer. he applicam should not respond to the dacovery mjurst, and the ] motion to compel shall be denied. l 12P-92-16 PIPING SPECIAUSTS,INC., and FORREST 1. ROUDEBUSit d.b.a. PSI INSP!r!10N, and 5 d.b.a. MPING SPECIAUSTS,1NC. (Kansas City, hiissouri), Docket Na 0342962&OM&OM-2 (ASLBP Nas. 92-653-02-OM, 9246246-OM-2) (Bypmduct Maranal licesise Na 24-2482601) (EA 91-136,92-054) (Ucmse Revocanon, Ucense Suspensiank IMORCEMENT; July 10,1992; MEMORANDUM AND E ORDER (Pmpaned Resolunon of de Csac) A After an evidmdary hearir:g had eeen conducted and proposed fmamgs were pedmg in this crdararnent action, the licensing Board d awwured language in the license making the Radadon Safety ~, Okcr " completely responsible" for compliance with safety regulations. CaseguerrJy, the Board issued a propused resolution of the caec under which the license would be revoked without any funher deternunauon of the degree of responsibility of the sole pmpnetar af Lumsce. %c Board scheduled oral argurnent on this proposinon, whwh had not been addressed by the parties. l B 7 When a licenamg Board discovered grounds for decision that had not beczi argued by the par 6es, I it decided to announce a pmposed decision and to invite aral argumern by the parties. U5P-92-16A l SAllTY UGifT CORPORATION, at al. (Bioamsburg Site Decommasiorung and License Re-j ncwal Deruals). Docket Nos. (DO 05984 MIAMI-2,03045922-MLAML2 (ASLDP Nm 92459-01 MI, 92464-02-MI,2), MATT 21AIJ UCENSE; July 17,1992. MEMORANDUM 12P-92-17 NORTIIEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY (MJ1stane Eclear Power Station. Unit 2), 1 Dodet No. 5033&OIA (ASLBP Na 92465-02-OLA) (IOL E. DPR45) (Speat Fuct li.ol Design); I I OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; July 29,1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Lstabhshing Pleadmg Schedule) LiiP 92-18 RANDAll C. OREM, D.O Dociet Na 03431750EA (ASIEP k. 92456 01 -LA) (EA 91-154) (Dyproduct Wierial IJcense & 34-26201 411 ENIORGMENT; Augus 6,1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Appnwing Seulerners Agmement and Terminating Pmceedmg) I 7 l l l i ) l .. ~

^ i DIGESTS ISSUANCFS OF Till: ATOMIC SAIETT AND LICENMNG BOARDS LSP-92-19 01110 EDISON CDMPAhY (Perry Nudcar Power Plam, Una 1) and C11V!2AND lll4TRIC ElUMINATING COMPAhY and TOLIDO EDISON COMPANT (Peny Nuclear Power Piam, Unit 1; Davis Besne Nuclear Power Stanan, Unit 1), Dada Nos. 54444 A,5434&A (ASIEP Na 9N.44-01-A) (Suspesen of Antarum Condnions)(!scilny Operaung Uomses Nos NPF-58, NW3); ANITTRUST; Au-gum 6,1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Grammg Cuy of Bmak Park Manon im IJte lmervenuon) f A In piis Menorandan and Order, de Licensmg Board grams a late irnervmtion pc66ca. The Board l emcludes that (1) recena dewelopmems have ewed a pwmusly idenufted dehcaency in the Petinaner*a standmg to intervene a the paceedms, and (2) a balancing d Go five factors na forth in 10 Cf.R. I 2.714(aXI)(t}(v) governmg inte imervenuon favors grandng om Pennanar party staus. B A murucipal ordmance that makes provmons for a!! the clanerna essmual to carrymg out the { ormstruenon, opezadan, and masnumance af a mumcipal elocincal system danestrates that the enar%g munwipahty's imenst in es prtMmg as a customer and competnar d a udlity applying for suspaman ofits facihty's operstmg Immse antitrust curuhuana is tangible annugh to afford the muracapality standing C Although a municipahty's electrical systen is in its incipiese stage, tne mumcipalny's indicanon that t .it ultzmately mey w%h to invoke the panectmn afforded by operstmg heense anntrust canditions imposed [ pursuant so seeds 105 d the Atomm Energy Act (AEA),42 U S C. 6 2135, makes its espressed imaran r in preserving those anutrum provinians one that falls widun the " sane of irnertma"er:sind by AFA section 105. D in.he 10 Cf.R. I 2.714(aX1) five-factor balancing test scwermna late imervendan, the first factor of "[g}ond osume, if any, fu faDure to fils an time"is imponant because,in the alamce of " good cause" there generaDy must be a compellms showmg se:gardag the other four faciars. See ISP-91-38,34 NRC 229,249 & a 60 (19911 li Beanns in mind the Appeal Board's ohnervaban Gat " newly acqmred" standing is gmeraDy unsuitable as a basis fu *gned cause" Camlms Ibwer and Lig}s Ca (Shenran llams Nucicar Power P.sm, Units 1-4), A1AB-$26,9 NRC 122,124 0979),an sa d indepanders udhty occumng after the filmg deadhne that, only carmequerrJy, has the effea af affordmg standmg is not no unmentanous as to permit imervatuon only upon a substannally enhanced shewing en the other late unervenuan factors. F in determmmg whaher " good cause"esists foe a lawfJed imervenuan peutian, the sigid6cance to be placed en the amours d delay " sill generaDy hmge upon de pusune of ths pmoeeding at the sme the petinan surfaces." Washmgton Pablic Power Supply System (WPPSS Nuclear Project No. 3), AIAB 747, 18 NRC 1167,1173 0983E G "[Tjhe distinctive nature of De Commasion's authority to consider and address the validity of the anutrust enndadons it imposed leeds us to agree with [dz 1%utiencr] that no caber forum a means inw evallable can provide equivalera pnaccdon far its imenst in namng that de cansting bcense condaions are l mensained." 1EP-9138,34 NRC at 247. 11 Challenge to e late imervennon peuuan that seeks so equane the duplantaen af issues with a similanty of de existing perucipants'imerwis is minduected. See Duke Power Ca (Amendmas so Materials a license SNM-1773 -Tansponsnan af Spera Ibel from Oconee Nuclear Stauan far Storage at McGuire Nuclear Stanon), AIAB-528,9 NRC 146,150 0979) Rather, em quesuon is, given the maners at issue, will the existing perdes c!Tecnvely repnment the Petitioner's irnensia zladve to those maners. I Argument Out a Pctnioner's interens can be adequainly stpresemed by de exisdng panies because hs wanesses would be available to those panies fails to affed proper somsniunn to the value of per6cipenanal sigtes erGt.yed by a pany,includmg conducung cmssenaminatiert See Duke Power Co., l A1AB-573, aupra,9 NRC at 150 & a7 J !aio cames to the agency *a adjudicatory process generally must take the pr-img as Gry fmd it See, e g, lemg Island ligh6ng Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Ptwer Staden, Urst 1), AIAB-743,18 NRC 357, 402 0 983). Nonetheless, the add 46an of a laio-comer brings the possih3py that its part cipation will broeden ene issues = otherwsse slow the proceedmg This prospect is assessed in the fifth laio.fi ed factor, niuch quite properly has been denomir,sted as

• 4 smmenac imponance in the overall belancing process."

Id. 12P-92 20 UMETOO MINERALS CORPORATION, Dr.cket Na 44066El-MIA (ASIEP Na 92-66H1-MIA) (Saurce Materials license No. SUA 1358); MATERIALS IJCENSE AMENDMLhT; August 5, i 1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Request im Ilearing and $tsy of license Amendment) 8 i

DIGPSTS 1%SUANCf3 Ol' Till* ATOMIC SAITTY AND 1JCE'NSING ltOARI S IEP-92-2! ALABAMA POWER COMPANY Oaseph M. Ihrley Nacieur Nm, Unns I and 2), Ducks Nas. 54345CvP,543MCivP (A51EP No. 91426 02CvP); CIVIL PINALTY; August 12, 1992; MEMORANTRIM AND ORDER (Appmving Se:Jament Agreemern and Termmatmg Pmceeding) 1EP-92-22 UME1100 MINERALS CX)RPORAllON, Docket No. 40 066si-MLA (ASIEP No. 92 66M)l-MIA) (Source Matenals license No. $UA-1358); MATLRIALS IJCIWSE AMINDMENT; August 12, 1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Amendmesa) 1RP-92-23 SACRAMENIU MUNICPAL IJnIJ!Y DISTRICT (Rancho Seco Nuclear Generstmg Statusi), Dmiet No. 54312-DCOM (ASLBP No.9246342-DCOM) (f'--. - Nn) O'ucility Operstmg Licmne Na DPR-54); DECOMMISSIONING; August 20,1992; PREitEARING CONTERENCE ORDER Ucrmmatmg Pmenedmg) A in a pmceedmg concerning a pmposed decamndssianmg gian for a facihty, the liccramg Board rules that, because the smgle petuaaner for imervention lacks standmg to pardcipate, has submined no proposed comentaars adequate for adjudicanan and, for that rease, also does not warrara discretianary intervation, the pennan should be denied and the pmceedmg scrusnatcJ. B. To perdeipate as a pony in an NRC adpdu. story pmcoedmg, a pennaner must ininally demonstram both that it has standmg and has proffered at least one viable carnemian.10 C.F.R. Il4714(a)(2) and (d)(1)(iii). C The Commission ambes cornempmaneous judicial concepts'ef standing, whach mquire a pendoner to dernanstrate that (1) it has suffesed or wiD likely suffer *'anjury in fact" tram the acnan under review, an inpry that would be redressable by a fewarabic doaissan in the prMmg; and (2) the irdury falls withm the "sene of interests" at least argushly saught to be prcsected by the matute being enforced. D la determmmg whahm irdury in facs has been adequaiety sa farth, a licensing Board is hmited to assertions M1y pleaded by the peutaaner; it may not assume er presume facts not aaually pleaded. Ii A Lemsee must save relevant documems an other parnes, not upe petideness forirnervenhan.10 CJJL 612.701,2.712. Adjudicatary documems filed by panies sesponstve to er bearing upon irnervention pendons must be served on the reunancra. F An ergenizanon may gain standing in two ways: (1)in its own nght, sasummg me of its own irneresta has been er ersy be adversely affected, w (2) as a sepresemative of one or amre of its members, assuming that such meniners otherwise have standing, the imarests it seeks to pratmet are germane to the organiza6an's purposes, aruf neither the claim assened nar the rehef requested equire the indwidual member's participatian in the lawsuit. G In seeking repnzentational standmg, an organization normally must prwide affidavits of mambers who authorire the organiza6an to apresent ther irnerests. 11 An organizulan plesdmg injury.o informationalimerests, such as the failure to reccave informatmn appearu g in an envimnmarnal impact staternern, must allege explicit environmemal harm with a dutet impset upon the puitioner. A genershzed claun is not smough. 1 The yvesumption of standing for thnee living or working within 50 miles of a facility amlas unty in pmceedings involving nactor construedan permits, operstmg licarmes, or sigruficant amendments thnreto, where there is clear impliendans for the offsne envinnrnent er a clear pmendal fw effsite consegumcat In other situations, a petitimer must allege same specific injury. J Pmtecnan of fmancialinterens such as excessive electric rates er higher fuel ccsts is not within the rane of imeresis protected by the Atamic Energy Act er the National T.-_. i.:1 Puhey Aa. K The mast importara criterian far evaluaung whether discretionary standmg should be granted is the essers to whi5h the parncipara's participadan may ressanably be expected to assist in devclopmg a sound seemd. L The NRC may apply collaieral estappel pnnciples, where sppmpriate. Collateral estoppel requira an identity of issues. It is an equitable doctnne, not requued as a matter of law, d,at should be appbed only with a smsiuve negard for any changed circumstances or the possible existance of aame public imerest factors. Alaheena Ptmer Co. Oaseph M. Turley Nuclear Plars Units I ant 2), CtJ.7412,7 AEC 2C8; ALAB-182,7 AEC 210 (1974) M Inonrporating by refererx:e Staff quesuans to a Lcensee, withmn explaming their sagruficance, fails to canicem to the plesdmg mm, c far cameru ana 9

DIGESTS IS$0ANCI'S Of TIIE ATOMIC SAITTY AND UCE.NSING BOARDS N As amended a 1989, the Rules of Practice seguire, with respea to comenuana, a specific statement of law or fact o be raised or cornmvened, a brief explananan d the basca, a amette statemert of suppanmg

• ' facts or capert opmion,"ingether with referencca to specdc sources and documems d which the peu6aner is aware and upon wluch the peu6mer intends to rely, and sufficican informanan to show a genume dispute with the apphcant (or licensee) sm a rnatarist issue. If prmed. the contendon must mtide the pai6aner to

'I m1ief. O he d- , envimnmemal eview supplements the opernung Lceme review and thus need only sc5ect new informane er significara envimnmemal change associated with dommmaarunting or l storage of apers fuel.10 CFA 5 51.53(b) i P %e envmmmanal impset of ""% can normally be dehneated in generic terms through sclerence to the Genenc Environmemallmpset Statement on Decomrrussuming of Nuclear Scilines (NURIB4586). To the extent that impaas from decommissioning a panicular plant are significartly dJferera frorn the genene imgects, they may be ewemd in a supplemental impset sisteman. i Q De scope d a " ' ' Lg action must be cararasted with the scope of an actum to discontmue facihty operadan (for which no license is seguiredl Need for power and the envuonmemal effeas of spiacemem powa plate to censms operariana, not to decarnmissioning. R An agency need consider only ahernatives that lead to the objecove of a proposal. For deennums-siarung, the NRC need consider ordy ahernate forms of decamnuasionmg. together with the "no acnon" abernadvs. Resumed cperation is an ahernative ordy to the cessation of opersuans, nat to decommissianing. LEP-92-24 BABCOCK AND WILCOX (ApoDa5 Permsylvarda Fuct Tabrication Facility), Docka No. 70-135-DCOM (A52P No. 92-667-m-DCOM) (Deconmussioning Pian) (Maurials license No. SNM-145); DECOMMISSIONING, sepiember 4,1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDDt (Anowing Peuunners to Arnend er Su;plement heir lleadng Request) A in this 10 CFA Part 2, Subpan L informal paceedmg, the Presiding Of5cer genra the Peuneners an opportunity to supplercent or amend their bearing request to address quesuans about their sumams and whether they have preserned htigable h== B Unlike a formal adjudwatory ps==a4g under 10 CFA Pan 2, Subpan G, in an infcamal proceedmg under Subpart L the peunaner requesting a hearing does not have the right to amend or supplement an otherwise timely hearing petincan once the deadline specified in 10 CSA $ 2.1205(c) for submining hearing requests has passed. l i C in an informal shudication smder 10 CEA Part 2, subpart 1, a petitianer may smend or supplement e tunely hearir;g nquant ordy as permined by the presidmg officer, who is afforded this discresionary ausharny under the general powers grsmed by 10 CJA $ 2.1209 to regulate the ocurse of an informal proceedmg_ ne pmsidmg of5cer reisina that discre6en at least up through the point at which he er she makes a fmal ruling upon the sufficiency of the hearing request. D in addressing the maner of standmg in a decommissianing proceedmg, to enabbsh" injury in fact" it naast be shown how any aueged harmful radiological, envimamemal. er other legally engn. sable effects that win arise from activtties under the ?- - ing plan at issue wiU cause injury to each individual or organizanunal petidoner or, in the case of an organsr.ation relymg upon., - a. ' standmg, the members it upsenerna. See, e.g., Sacramerno Municipal Unlity Distnet (Rancho Seca Nuclear Generadng Station),1FsP 92-23,36 NRC 120,127 30 (1992); Northern States Power Ca (Pathfmder Atomic Plant), GP 89-30,30 NRC 311,314-17 (1989). r E in contrast to the mies governing the admissian of caramnans in formal adjud. canons, see 10 CFA 5 2.714(b)(2),in specifying their anas of concern about the licmung activity that is the subject manw of the proceeding, see 10 CFA (2.1205(d)(3), the petinaners do not have to pta fonh a comprehensive caposinon in support of the issues they wish tolatigate. Nanaheless, to provide the presidmg dficer with a bener ^ '

d their claims to aid him er her in snaking an informed determination abens wheiher 3

those mances are " germane" to the proceadmg, see 10 CFA 5 2.1205(g), the petinoners are well served by pmviding as much substanuve informanoa as possible reCarding the basis for the concerna specifice in their heanng pennan. F In submitting an amended or supplememed hearing pendan, if the painaners wish to raise and i provide informa6an regardmg mouers that were oat specified in their ininal hearing pention, they must i rrake a showing that win aansfy the laie-films tegmrtunents of 10 CFA 6 2.1205(k). 18 i l ? S i

} P DIGESTS ISSUANCI'S OF Tile ATOMIC sal'ETY AND L1CI'NSING ttOARDS l t I LBP.92-25 PIPING SMICIAUSTS, INC., and IORREST L. ROUDEBUSII d.h.a. PSI INSM!CHON, and d.h.a. PIMNG SPECIAUSD INC. (Kansas City, Missauri), Dodet Nm. 030 29626-OM&OM-2 (ASLBP %s. 92453 02-OM, 92462-0GOM-2) (Ilmense Revocanan, Imame Suspension) (Bypmduct mierial - i Ucmae No. 24-24826-01) (LA 91-136, 9244); ENFORCEMENT; Sepember 9,1992; HNAL INTRAL ~ i DECISION (Revoking Licerme) I A The Ucensing Buard sustains a Staff order sevaking the bcense of a company that employed one Loensed radiographer (its Radiation Safety Offar) under the supervision of a perse who had no emperienm j l with saeography and no training in NRC segulations. Fnun the ' - surrounding the issuance uf this hcense and frorn its wording, the Boant inferred tha the owner-licensee was responsible for all { the actiors d its Radiation Safety Officer, to whom the hcense delegated " complete responsibuity and authority" i B The Board also concludos that there have been eximaive falhues by bcensee and its owns to I canply wuh NHC regulanars. Licmsee has failed to act as a seasonable manager of housed maivines. [ failed to danct and currect violanons caused by an erryloyee, wulfuDy suernped to canceal violanuns frorn - i NRC Staff, and givsn untruthfulinformanon to the Staff dunns ha inspecamns and invesuganans. Moreover, the Imennee's owner was tauruthful in sane aspects d his tesnmany both dunng a formal investiganon and before the Ucesing Board. C Frnrn the cucumstances surmunding the issuance of its hcense and imm its wordmg, the Board r inferred that the owner licesee was respansible for aD the saians ofits Ra&ation Safety Officer, to whom i the limnse delegated " camp 1me sespasibility and authority." j D The Board susiains the revocatie of a byproducs anatenal hemse far extensive failures by the , I bcensee and ha owner to cornply wnh NRC segulanes. Ilicensee has failed to act as a seasurabic manager d Lcensed acuvtuss; failed to desact and carrect violanans caused by an employee; willfuDy anempied to { emccal violatusa fran NRC Staff; and given unnuthful informaim to the Staff dunna hs inspecuans and innstigations. Marerwer, the bcensee's owner was unmnhfut in some aspects of his sesumany both during a formal inwsngauan and before the Uansing Board. j E It is n a lamly that, after a lengthy evidentiary hearing, a board would agme with the Director in every detail d an order sevakmg a Lcense. Nor is that --y in oder to austain the Dunciofs decismat Atlannc Reseanh Corp. (Alesandna Virginia), A1AB-594,11 NRC $41,548-49 (1980) (the adjudicatory hearing in a civil pmahy pmceedmg is essenuaDy a tnal de novo, subjesa ansly to the pnnciple that the } board army not amess a gmaict penalry than the Staff); compare Hudey Mee-i ' enter (One Hudey Plaza, P1mt. Michigan). ALT-87 2,25 NRC 219,224-25 (1987). IEP-92 26 NORITIEAST NUCLEAR I'NERGY CX)MPAhY (MiDatane Nuclear Power Stanon, Unit 2), i Docket No. 50 336-OIA (ASIEP Na 92-66542-OIA) (5 pent luel Pool Design) (IOL No. DPR45); [ OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMEhT; Septanber 17,1992. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Imposing 'l Esncuens upon CCMN and Striking Peunans) IEP-92-27 PACIFIC GAS AND I2ILTRIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Pbwer Plant, Usuts 1 f and 2), Dacks Nas. 50 275 CIA-2,54323-OIA-2 (ASIEP Na 924694B-OLA-2) (Construenan Period Recovery) (Facility Operstag bcenses Nas. DPR-80 DPR-82); OPLRATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; Sepember 24,1992, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (ths Schedulse and Prehearing Confe ence) A in a pmmedmg cancerning the proposed extension er operating licenses to secover er secapure ? iran thuse hcenses the period of consuucuen d the renaars, the Ucensing Board desernunsa that a peunan requesting a hearing and Icave so irnervene is deficient but permits,in accordance with the Rules of Practim, L the Putinener to file an amended pczine, ether parncs to respond, and schedules a pchearing conference. f B A petinaner for imervemian sney smmd its intervenuan peution without leave of the Lcensing I board up to 15 days prior to the inst preheanns conference. The licensing board insy aher that 15-day pened.10 CJ.R. H 2 714(aX3),2 711(a). C Merely because a petinaner may have had standing in an earher proceeding does not automatically grant stan&ng a subeapent procum6ngs, even if the soape af the earher and later pmceedings is similar. 1EP 92 28 NORTTIEAST NUCIIAR ENERGY COMPANT (MIDanane Nuclear Power Stanon, Unit 2), Docke No. 54336-OLA (ASIEP Na 9246502-01A) (Spera FucI Puol Design) (IOL No. DPR45), l OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; Sepember 3D,1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Rulzng on Peunons for Imave to lmervme) 11 t i i F t

d i i l l l 1 l I l n i i l DIGESTS l i j ISSUANCE Ol' DIRECTOR'S DECISION ss i DD 924 l ARIZONA PUB 1JC SERVICE COMPANY, et al. (No Verde Nudar Onmeranng Stenon, Units 1, 2, and 3). Dockes Nos.2528,54529,54530t REQLT.ST FOR ACIlON; August 12,1992; FINAL l DIRECTOR *S DECISION UNDER 10 Cf.R. I2.206 A The Dunciar of the Offus of Nucicar Reactor Reguistian dmies die remainder d a Paition subsnined by Mrs. linda E. Machen (Patitimed requesung action wah ngard to the Palo Verde Nuclear 1 Genermung Sw. ion of Amma Public Serviac Cornpany, es al. (Imunscel B in har Peunen, Petitionar succed that ser2aus violadons exisied at the Palo Verde facitay in de 8 I sysurns im amergency hghtmg and firs protecum. In a Pardal Director's Decision issued an October 31, C 1990 (DDL947,32 NRC 273). Gus espect d PedtWs request im action punuam to 10 Cf.R. I 2.206 5 l was deniod. T. i C Petitioner had also aDegod irngwopnenes by Lirmsoe personnciregardmg NRC inspecsian activides 3-specificaUy that Ilcensee personnet aaed improperly to " water dawn" inspection fmdings, suppress serious viola 6ans, and decreds an NRC inspector. Based on an investiganon by the NRC's 05ce of the Inspecta -2 l General, these alleganons were immd so be without rnent. Acerdmgjy the Director denied dus aspect d [ [ the Painaner's request far action pursuare to sec6an 2.206. I L~ F I I r I i i l I l l l t l i i l l i l 3 13 ? l l l, f l l l l 1

i t I i ) I i DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF DENIALS OF PETITION IUR RULEMAKISG i i t l DPRM 921 DANIEL BORSON m Behalf of PUBLIC CTTIZEN, Docket No. PRM 5454; July 27,1992; DENIAL OF PETTI10N FOR RLTEMAKING A he Nuclear Regulatory Commmaan (NRC) is denyms a peduan far rinemaims (PRM 5454) from Damel Barson on behalf of the Public Ciurmet he Petinoner aquested that the NRC amend its reguladans regardmg the licasing of independem power producers to carsuuct or operate commercial nuclear power nectors. he petitie is being denied en the basis that arrant NRC reguladens prtwide authority for the bcensing of art Independern Powcr Produmr (IPP) abould such an applica6an be submined and for a eview of the apphcam's fmancial qual &cauons to consuuct and operase a cenmarcial power reactor. B he esisung regulations in 10 CJJL Part 50 provide autharuy to rnquest the necessary informadon imm norHatibty applicants to perform a fmas:ial quahfmauars review, as weJ1 as requue the appheams to acs aside funds for decommissioning of the reacts. C Each hommee, unlity or non-unlity,is required by 10 CJ.R. I140.21 so maintain adequate marues. l through arveral approved methods indicated in that secum to guaiemme paymera of deferred premiums to i antisfy its responsibility under the Price Anderson Act i DPRM 92-2 GENT.RAL UICIRIC STOCKIIOIDER$' ALUANCE, et al., Docket Na PRM 2419. July 27, i 1992; DENIAL OF PEITIlON KJR RUIIMAKING A he Nucleat Regulmary Commissaan (NRC)is denying e peuuan for rulemaking (PRM 2419) from Beny Schroeder on behalf of the General Doctric Stodholders' Alliance, e al. The Pedtioner requested that the NRC issue a reguladen to require that a detectable odor be injected imo the ernissians of nuclear power plams and other nuclear pmcesses over which the NRC has junsdicuart he petinon is bemg denied I m the basis that the proposed actim is not necessary because: (1) cunent monitoring and emergency I response procedures provide an adeguate level of safery; (2)it would not resuh in any increased prosecuan of the public henhh and safety and as a resuh would not meet the Commmian's "hackfit Ruler 10 CJ.R. i $ 50.109, (3) the pnposed acuan is not technically feasible; amt (4) 6e injection of odors in detectabic ] j concenuanons over the Emergency Plannirs Zone for a nuclear power plant or suitable ama for other nuclear facihty would likely be detrunmtal to the environment. ] B he followmg technicalissucs are h==~4 lanergency Plans; Emuunmema! Effects of Odor-ams. Ileakh 12fects; low-level Radiadan Releases; Radioacuve Plumes; Radiological Mtuutonna i l .l l I l l l 1 l i 1 15 1 \\ i i 1 3 1 t ) i i l k - - - - - ~ - - ~ - - - * - ~ - ' - - ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ " ' ~ - - " ~~ ~ r

~~~ a s i t i 1 I l l i t i a LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES L ( g Advanced Nuclear Ibels Corp. (Import of South Afncan Ennched Uranium !!casfluonde), C13-87-9, 26 l NRC 109,112 (1987) l basis for denial of roquasts for oral argument; C1192-1136 NRC 68 (1992) Air Couner Cmference of Amence v. Amenran Por,a1 Workers Urnon, AFLCIO,498 U.S. _ 112 L Ed. 2d 1125,1134 (1991) injury-in-fact and zone-etunerests tests for standmg to imervene; IEP-92-23, 36 NRC 126 (1992) Alabama Ptwer Co (Alan R. Banan Nuclear Plant, Uruts I, 2,3, and 4, Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unita 1 and 2), CLI-75112 NRC 373 (1975) y l Commission practice to defer to bcensing board's judgment en consoudaden of pnscerximgs; CL1-9213,36 NRC 89 (1992) ^ Alabams Pt+cr Co. 00$ M. Isricy Nuclear Plant Umts 1 and 2), ALAB 182,7 AEC 210, renanded { on other grounds, C117&117 AEC 203 (1974) l appbcabihty of consteral estoppel where similar claims have bem asserted as basis for stan&ng in l another promeding; IEP-92 23,36 NRC 12627 (1992) C l Anzana Public Service Co. (Palo Verde Nuclear Gmerunns Stanon, Urtits 1,2 end 3), Q191-!% 34 C 1 NRC 149 (1991) l spect5cary seguired d comemions; IEP-92-28,36 NRC 215 (1992) C l Arinna Public Service Co. (Palo Verde Nudear Generating $tation, Umts 1, A and 3), CLI-91-1134 L NRC 149,155 n.1 (1991) pleadmg requiremerus for comennons; IEP-92-17,36 NRC 28 (1992) 7 Anrona Pubhc Service Co. (Palo Verde Nuclear Generaung Stanon, Units 1,1 and 3), C11911134 g NRC 149,155-56 (1991) board hmitanons in determming whether injury-in-fact has been adequately set forth; IEP-92-23, 36 ~ NRC 127 (1992) Arizona Public Service Co. (Palo Verde Nuclear Generstmg Stadon, Units 1,2, and 3), IEP-91-19,33 NRC 397 (1991) apectficuy vsquired of contentions; IEP-92-28,36 NRC 215 (1992) Armed Ibstes Re& ology Researd Insutute (Cobah-60 Siorage Facihty), AIAB-682,16 NRC 150,154 (1982) geographic proximity as bas 2s for standmg in operstmg license arnandment pmceedings; IEP 92 21, l 36 NRC 212 (1992) l A:lantic Research Corp. (Alcsandria, Yzrginia), ALAB-594,11 NRC $41,845-49 (1980) l need for licensing board's agrerrnmt la every detail in order to sustain director's decisiart; l ISP-92-25,36 NRC 187 n45 (1992) l Atlantic Research Cuep. (Alexandria, Virginia), C1180-7,11 NRC 413,426 (1980) responsibility d licennees for acts of their employces; LDP-92-25, 36 NRC 173-74 (1992) Benotti v. Nuclear Regulatory Cornmission,725 F.2d 1380 (D C. Cir.1983) Commission authority to defmc and tunit the scope of a proceedeg; IEP.92-28, 36 NRC 210 (1992) BeDoru v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,725 F.2d 1380,1383,1386 (DC. Cir.1983) dependence of third-party heanng rights on licensee's request for a hearing. C1192-11,36 NkC 54 l n19 (1992) l l l 17 l l l 1 l l l 1 1

1 l b LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CAS13 Boston 14 son Co. (Pilgrim Nuclear Puwer Station. Unit 2), IEP 74 63, 8 AEC 330, 331-32,335-36, al'd, A1AB-238,8 Air 656 0974) .t newly acquired standmg or orgamzadmat existece as tussa for imervenuan; IEP 92-19,36 NRC 105 0 992) Camtma Poect and light Co. (Stearm Hams Nuclear Power Nat, Uruts 1-4). AIAB 526,9 NRC 122, .j 124 0 979) newly soquired standing a organiza6 anal existance as basis fa imervendm; IEP-92-19,36 NRC 1 105 (1992) .r ? Ques of statesville v. ALC,441 F.2d 962 (D.C Gr.1969) Camrrussion sulnarity in enface license condaiens; CL1-92-11,36 NRC 56 m.30 0992) Otirens Against Burhngsan, Inc. v. Busey. 938 F.2d 190,195 (D.C. Cir.) een. dmind, U.S. 116

1. Ed. 2d 638,112 S. CL 616 0991)

+ ahernatives so ' ming to be considered under NEPA; 1EP-92-23,36 NRC 135 (1992) Oty of Angoon v. Ilodel,8(D F.2d 1916,1020 22 (9th Or.1986) (per cunam), cert denied,484 U.S. } 870 (1987) t shernatms so decomnussiming to be considered under NEPA; LBP-92 23, 36 NRC 135 (1992) Oty of West Ciscago v NRC,701 F.2d 632 (7th Cir.1983) adequacy of Subpart L to satisfy hearing mguiranets or due procais in lia:ense renewal proceedmg; C1J 9213,36 NRC 90 0992) Ocveland Dectric Illuminating Ca (Perry Nuclear Power Nnt, Unit 1), LBP-92-4,35 NRC 114 0992) board limitations in desarrmnmg whether injury-in-fact has been adequatcJy set fanh; IEP-92-23, 36 i') NRC 127 (1992) Geweland Deetrie 111uminsung Ca (Perry Nuclear Pomer Nnt, Unit 1), IEP-92-4,35 NRC 114,125-26 I (1992) standmg in an cadier proceeding as basis for standmg in a subsequent proceedmg; ISP92-27,36 NRC 195 (1992) Devoland Doctnc 111uminating Ca (Perry Nuclear Power Nnt Unita 1 and 2), IEP-82-114,16 NRC 1909.1914 0982); IEP43-77,18 NRC 1365,1396 0953) quality assurance violadans and management competence; IEP-9225,36 NRC 1710992) t Commercial Capital Corp. v. SEC, 360 F,2d 856, 258 (7th Or,1966) good 4:suae emmpuan to transcript ris!ns; QJ-9710,36 NRC 3 0992) Dairyland Power Cooperative (La Cmaso Boiling Water Reactor),IEP-8026,12 NRC 367,371 (1980) responsibility for determmation of bearing request in show*ause proceedms; CtJ-92-11,36 NRC 60 nA7 0992) Deliums v. NRC,863 F.2d 968,971 (D C Cir.1988) injury-in. fact and reno-of-interums tesis for standmg to intervene; IEP-92 23,36 NRC 126 (1992) Detrtat FAsan Co. (Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plars Unit 2), AIAB-?M,16 NRC 1760,176445 j (1982) decovery a information that was publically avaDable 6 months prior to the date of the petition as l' good cause far late interventust; CLJ-9212,36 NRC 70 (1992) Detrat Ediam Co. (Enrico Fermi Atonue Powcr P1arn, Unit 2), IEP-79-I 9 NRC 73,77 (1979) authorizatian seguised for repmsetstimal standing; IEP 92-27,36 NRC 199 0992) Duke Power Co. (Amendmera no Materials license SNM 1773 - Transponatie of $pers Fuel imm Oconee Nuclear Staunn far Stange at McGuire Nuclear station), ALAB-528,9 NRC 146,150 0979) abihty of other parnes to myresera late intavenuan petitioner *a interests; IEP-9219,36 NRC 109 0 992) Duke Power Ca (Amendment to Materials Licese SNM-1773 - Transporta6an of $pers Fuel imm Oconee Nucia. t Stadon im Sunuge at McGuae Nucicar Stanon), AIAB-528,9 NRC 146,1510979) i demonstration of suprescraanoral standmg; LBP-92-27,36 NRC 200 0992) Dae Power Co. (Catawba Nuclear 5: stim. Unlis 1 and 2), Ctj 8319,17 NRC 10t10983) status of ournentions filed after the fust preheanns confermse; ISP-92-23,36 NRC 140 0992) d 18 h l I ~

. = ? i 1 I si LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX I CAWS t Ikke Power Co. (Perkins Nudear Stanon Uruns 1,2, and 3), AIAB431,6 NRC 460,462 (1977) ahowmg necessary on other factors where good cause has not baan demurstrated for late intervenbec i CU 92-12,36 NRC 73 0992) { Duquesne Ught Co. (Beaver Valley Ibwer Statum Und 2), LBP444,19 NRC 393,4ll (1954) i - sundard for organiraumal standms; CU 92-12,36 NitC 76 m9 0992) Imuncare of Utah, Inc., IEP-92-8,35 NRC 167,182 83 (1992) standant for datereuonary intavenuun; IEP-92c23,36 NRC 1310992) i Ihde Ibwer and Ught Co. (St brie Nuclear Ibwer Nra, Unit 1: Turkey Jbut Nuclear Genersung Mant Unus 3 and 4), AIAB428,6 NRC 2210977) { C4=nmisman subrity to conduct pastimensing araiuust review; CU42-11. 36 NRC 510992) j i Ibda Power and Ught Co. (SL 1mcie Nuclear Ibwer Mant. Unit 1; Turkey Ibint Nuc1 car Gwerating Mant, Units 3 and 4), CU-77-26,6 NRC 538 0977) Camnusman authority to decline seview of appeal board decisians; CU-92-11,36 NRC 57 n.32 (1992) Ihos ibwer and Ught Co. (SL 1mcae Nuc1 car Ibwer Na, Untis 1 and 2), CU-89-21, 30 NRC 325, 329 0989) applicability of 54 mile presumptum of standmg in decommiss unmg pmendmas IEP-92-23,36 + NRC 129 0992) applicatie of judicial emcepts of siandmg in NRC proceedmss; 12P-92-28, 36 NRC 208 (19/2) [ Morids Ibwer and Ugla Co (St. bacie Nuclear Ibwer Piant, Ursits 1 and 2), CU 89-21,30 NRC 325, 329-30 0 989) I gengre;Aic ponimity as hans far standmg in operating license anandment pmceerhngs; IEP 92-27, l 36 NRC 200 (1992) Thde Power and Ught Co. D'urkey IWrs Nuclear Generating Plata, Unins 3 and 4), AIAB 952,33 NRC 521, 529 0 991) bass int organiranonst standing; IEP-92-28,36 NRC 213 0992) Isrt herte Utilities Authority v. United States,606 F.2d 986,1901 a.17 (D.C. Cir.), cert derned,444 U.S.142 0979) Cummmman auttunity to review antitrust maners; CU-92-11,36 NRC 58 (1992) kndatim an Eonnards Trends v. Lyng,913 F.2d 79,84 (DC Cir.1991) standmg a the bass of informatimal injury; IEP-92 23,36 NRC 126 0992) Guardian Federal Savirigs and Imsn Ass *n v. FSUC, $$9 F.2d 658,663 (D.C. Cir.1978) procedural gmaectanns to persons subject to agency investiganons; CU 9210,36 NRC 3 0992) Gulf Suus Utihues Co. (River Band Stanna. Units I and 2) AIAB-183,7 AEC 222,223-24 0974) I geogre;6ic pronunity as bass for standmg in opers6ng bcense amendmera pnosedmgs; U6P-92-28, 36 NRC 212 0992) l Gulf States Utihues Co. (River Bend Stanon, Unsw 1 and 2), AIAB-444,6 NRC 760,768 78 0977) I ireurporsum, by refennce, of the questies asked by Staff cancernmg the envirannsnal report as [ basis for enruenuan; IEP-92 23,36 NRC 136 0992) 6' Gun South, Inc. v. Brady, 877 F.2d 858, 86243 01th Car.1989) Comrrdssion authority to modify hcerne conditions that prrwe unjust afts time; CL1-92-11,36 NRC j 59 0 992) lloustun Ugh 6ng and Power Ca (Allens Creek Nuclear Genersung Station, Urut 1), AIAB.535,9 NRC .i 377, 392 97 (1979) l standard far demonstrating repreeeras6 anal impry; IEP-92-27, 36 NRC 199 0992) } Ilouston Ughung and Power Ca (Allens Creek Nucican Genar..ing Station Unit 1), AIAB 535,9 NRC 377, 393-97 (1979) i affidavn acquirement to estabhsh orgamzananal mandmg; UlP-92-23,36 NRC 126 (1992) l Ilouston Ughnns and Power Ca (Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Staticst, Unit 1), AIAB471,15 NRC 508,513 a.14 (1982) counsel's legal abiluy as basis im laie imerven6m petitioner's showirg of abihty to amtribuw to e sound recard; IEP-92--19,36 NRC 107 (1992) l I 19 f i l t V. B t I~ l f l

i I i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX [ CA553 i Ilounon lighung and Power Ca (Sanh Texas Nject, Units 1 and 2), CL1-77-13,5 NRC 1303 0977) f Commission authonty to conduct ponheensing snutrum aview; CLJ-92-11,36 NRC 510992) Iloustan Lightes and Power Ca (South Teams Project, Units 1 and 2), IEP-79-10, 9 NRC 439,447 48, af!~d, A1AB-549,9 hTC 644 0979) showmg sequimd to demanarate injury-m-fact; 1EP-92-27,36 NRC 199 (1992) { llum v. Washington Smc Apple Adverusma Comm*n,432 U.S. 333,343 0977) 6 individual member's parucipenan regartenema where organizananal standmg is gramed on the basis j of mpnmemanan d that member; 1Elt92-23,36 NRC 126 0992) Iludey Modacal Cmter (One Hurley Plaza, Flint Michigan), A1J-87-2,25 NRC 219,224-25 (1987) Innha on boata powers in civil penahy pmceedings; 1EP-92-25,36 NRC 157 nA5 0992) l Ingary Imo nroe Mile taland Unit 2 Mk Raie Data l'ulsifmanmi,IEP-87-15,25 NRC 6710987), aff*d, CLJ 88-2,27 NRC 335 0988) preprmderance of the evidence mandard fer weighms evidence; IEP-92-25,36 NRC 186 0992) laseph J Macktal C1J-89-12,30 NRC 19,23 a.1 (1989) ( standard for obtaimng arul a gument; CLJ-9212,36 NRC 68 0992) -l Kansas Gas and Doctric Ca (Wolf Creek Generadng Stadan, Unit 1), AIAB-327,3 NRC 408,413-18 0 976) t standards for discovery d secunty plans; IEP-92-15A,36 NRC 8 0992) l Kerr McGre Chenucal Cup. (West Odcago Rare Eanha Facility), C1J42-2,15 NRC 232 (1952), a d T sub narn. Chy d West Odcago v. NRC,701 F.2d 632 (7ih Cir.1983) appropiate fanan for myiew of amendment request; C1J-9211,36 NRC 60 nA8 (1992) j lag Island lighung Ca Gamesport Nuclear Ptmer Sta6an, Units 1 and 2), A1AB-292,2 NRC 631, i 650-51 0 975) weight given to paennat for delay of proceedmg in deternuning late innervenuan requans; C1J-92-12, 36 NRC 75 0992) + Img Island lighung Co. (Sanreham Nuclear Power Stanon, Unit 1), AIAB-743,18 NRC 387,397 j 0 983) specifsity required in supprat of factor (iii) far late intervenan; CJ4212,36 NRC 74 0992) 1mg Island lighting Co. (Shardiam Nuclear Power Station, lhdt 1), ALAB-743,18 NRC 387,402 j 0 983) l impact ef 1 sic intervmtion painoner's participanon on bmedening er delaying a pmceeding; } IEP 9219,36 NRC 110 0992) Img !aland lighting Co. (Shonham Nuclear Power Stanon, Unit 1), CL1-89-1,29 NRC 89,9344 0989) -l affidavit requiremera for mouans to reopen; CLJ-92-12,36 NRC 76 0992) Img Island ligh6ng Co. (Shoreharn Nuclear Ptmer Stanan. Unit 1), C1J-90-8. 32 NRC 201,207-08 j 0990), reconsidersnan denied, C1J41-2,33 h1C 61 (1991) unsupponed gecral refenmces to radiological consequences as basis for standing; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 130 (1992) Img Island Lighung Ca (Sharuham Nuclear Power Statum, Unit 1), CLJ-92-4,35 NRC 69, 77 0992) l pme!! activeness hearing far decommissioning; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 137-38 0992) lausana I:nergy Services LP. (Caibons Ennchmera Center), IBP-91-41, 34 NRC 332,346,357 58 (1991) inemporadan, by reference, the questians asked by Staff connernieg the envunnmental report as hemis for contendon; IEP-92-25,36 h1C 136 0992) 1misiana Power and light Ca (Waterford Siesm Dectric Station, Unit 3), A1AB-812,.22 NRC 5,48,51 0 985) weight given to bcasce's candar in danding whether to newake hs license; IEP.92 25,36 NRC 163 [ n6 0992) i 1.ujan v. Nananal Wildhis Federsnet,497 U.S. 871, 882-83,1111. LL 2d 695,712-13 0990) standmg an the basis of informanonal injury; 1EP-92 23, 36 NRC 126 (1992) i l 2e j i i l l l i i t

l1 i-LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES Marnpuhtan E& san Co. Ohree Mile Island Nuc! car Stanon, Und I). ALAB-772,19 NRC 1193.1207 (1984), rev'd in pan on other grounds CU 85 2,21 NRC 282 0985) Commissum ruthonty to consider a licesee's character and imegnty in occidmg whether no revoke its license; 1EP-92-25,36 NRC 163 0992) Metrupnhtan Edison Ca Ohree Mile Island Nuclear Sianon, Unit 11 A1AB407,21 NRC 1195.1214 (1985) in camera casmmstian d safeguards informauon, IEP-92~15A, 36 NRC 13 0992) l Metropohtan Edison Ca Ohree Mile Island Nucicar Stanon Unit 1), AIAB415,22 NRC 195,202 0 985) immimens seguirernent for motions to semen; CU-92-12,36 NRC 76 0992) Maropohtan Edman Ca Ghree Mile Island Nuclear Statian, Unit 11 CLI 83-25,18 NRC 327,331 n.3 0 983) five-factor test far late intervenuan; Q192-12,36 NRC 69 0992) Metropolitan Edison Ca Ghree Mile Island Nuc1 car Stanon, Unit 1), CU43-25,18 NRC 327,332 (1983) apphcane of judicial concepts of standmg in NRC pr~ a4gs; LDP 92-23, 36 NRC 126 -(1992); 12P-92-27,36 NRC 199 0992);IEP 92-28,36 NRC 208 0992) Metrgolitan Edison Ca Ohree Miie Island Nuclear Stanan, Unit 1), CU-85-2,21 NRC 282,316 (1985) injury-in-fact and zone.ct-interests tessa for standing to unervene; LBP 92r23,36 NRC 126 (1992) ~ Metropohtan Edman Co-Ohree MJe Island Nuclear Stanon, Unit 1), CU45-9,21 NRC 1118,1136 37 0 985) sandard to desermme licensee's character and iruegrity; 13P-92-25,36 NRC 163 n.6 0992) - Musissippi Power sad Usht Ca (Grand Gulf Nuclear Statim, Unita 1 and 2), AIAB 704,16 NRC 1725 0 982) weight given to lack d another party to represent late intervenuun petitioner's interests; CU-92-12, 36 NRC 74 0992) Northern Indans Public Service Co- (Bailly Generanna Sistian, Nuc1 car 1), AIAB419,12 NRC 558,564 0 980) showing of itqury-in-fact for intervenuon in operstmg hoense esumsian proceedmg; LBP-92-27,36 NRC 200 (1992) Northern Smas Ibwer Ca (Pathftader Aiornic Plant), IEP-89-30,30 NRC 311,314-17 (1989) t -hi authority of presuhng effacer in informal proceeding to allow amendment of hearmg sequest; IBP-92-24,36 NRC 152 0992) Ohio Edson Ca (Perry Nuclear Pter Plant, Unit 1), CU-91-15,34 NRC 269 0991), reconsideration dmied, CU 024, 35 NRC 16 (1992) Commission supervisory authreiry in absence af a pennan for seview; CU 92-13,36 NRC 85 0992) Paci6c Gas and Doctne Ca (Dablo Canym Nuclear Power Nrn, Uruis 1 and 2), ALAB-410,5 NRC 1398, 1402 0 977) NRC authanty to limit access so secunty plan doeurneras; 1EP-92-15A,36 NRC 8 0992) Parklane Ilasiery Co v. Shose,439 U S. 322, 331 n.15 0979) applicability of collateral esioppel where subpart G and Subpart L proceedings are consohdated. CU-92-13,36 NRC 88 0992); IEP-92-16A,36 NRC 21 (1992) Philadelphis Dectric Ca (Penda Bastora Ausnic Power Stanon, Units 2 and 3). AIAB-540,9 NRC 428, 434 0 979) beans scr ~-w% af pmceedmgs; QJ-92-13,36 NRC 89 (1992) Pardand General Decaric Co- (Pebble Spnngs Nuclear Nrn, Units I and 2). AIAB 333,3 NRC 804,806, aff*d, CU-76-27,4 NRC 610,614 (1976) u g; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 131 financial intcasts es basis for intervenuon in deonmmasiming pr n (1992) L Pratland General Deatnc Co. (Pt:bble. Springs Nucicar Plant, Unisa 1 and 2),017tr26,4 NRC 608 0976) i standards for interlocutory review; CU 92-13,36 NRC 85 0992) { t i 21 f ) r 5 1 i ,{ n>

~ t f -l l ? ~ LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CA$1% 1%tland General Decaric Co UWble Spnngs Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2), CU-76-27,4 NRC 610, 612-13 0 976) [ I none of inteests for materials license amendment heanngs; 1EP-92 20, 36 NRC 115 0992). Portland General Learic Co. QWble Sprmas Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2), C13-7627,4 NRC 610 f 613-14 (1976) [ injury-in-fact and zonodimerests tests for standing to mtervene,1.BP-92-23,36 NRC 126 0992) l Portland General

Dearic Ca (lette Spnngs Nuclear Mant Units 1 and 2),

CU-7627,4 NRC 610,614 h 0 976) appbranan d W1 concepts d standmg in NRC proceedmas; 2P 92-28,36 NRC 208 0992) f' Pubhc Service Ca d Indiana (Marble lh11 Nuclear Generating Stanen, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-316,3 NRC 167,170'73 0977) } sonpo of licensing board's and pesuhng efficer's powers; CU-92r13,36 NRC 86 0992) { Public Servios Ca of New Ilampshire (Seabrook Stanart, Unit.1), CU-91-14, 34 NRC 261,26647 0991) i argury in-fact and sono 4 interests tests for intervention; DP-92-27,36 NRC 199 0992) Pubbe Service Ca of New Ilampshire (Seabrouk Stanan, Units 1 and 2), QJ 943,31 NRC 218,229 0 990) Comnusaim supervisory authority in absence of a peut,an for review; CU 92-13,36 NRC 85 0992) f I%get Sound Power and Light Ca (SkagiVilanford Nucluar Power Pmject, Units 1 and 2), A1AB-700,16 3 NRC 1329,1333 34 0982) sandard for organizananal standms; CU-92-12,36 NRC 76 n.9 0994 Sacramento Wrucipal Unhty Distda (Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Statian), CL192 2,35 NRC 47,56 .t 0 992) -f applicanon d judicial cemcepas d standmg in NRC proceedings; !JIP-92-27,36 NRC 199 0992); 1EP-92-28,36 NRC 208 (1992) Sacramerso Enicipal Unhty Distria (Rancho Seco Nuclear Generndng $sse, GP-92-23,36 NRC 120, [.; 127 30 0 992) standing to intervene in decomrmsaioning pmceedmgs; IJIP-92-24,36 NRC 153 0992) Safmy light Corp. Ollomisburg Sise Decamamination) QJ-92-9. 35 NRC 156,158 0992) standards far imerlocinary review; CU-92-13,36 NRC 85 0992) San 1 mis Obispo Mothers fw Peaco v. NRC,751 F.2d 1287,1314 (D.C. Or.19841 aff'd esi banc,789 F.2d 26 (D.C Cir.1 cert. denied,479 U.S. 923 (1986) Commission authority to uscind a suspension d an anutrust liccuse condition; C13-92-11,36 NRC 59 0 992). Slic v. Sprecher,594 P.2d 317, 319 (2d Cir.1979) determination, priar to interview, of good <ause exciption for nicane d transenpt, CU-9210,36 NRC 4 (1992) f Shelly v. NRC,651 F.2d 780,791 (D C, Cir.1980) (per cunam), vacated as maat and scenanded,459 U.S.1194 (1983) dependence af third-party heanns rights e limsmec's request for a hearing; CLJ 9211,36 Ntc 54 m19 0992) South Carolina

Dearic and Gas Co. (Virgit C,

Sumrner Nuclear Sianon, Unit 1). ALAB-642,13 NRC 881, 894-95 0 981), aff'd sub norn. Fairfield United Acuan v. NRC,679 F.2d 261 (DC, Cir.1982) weight given to lad of another party to supresent late irnervenuan pennoner's imerests; CU 92-12, 36 NRC 74 0992) i Statement d Phlicy on Cmduct d lacensmg Pmeendmgs, CU-81-8,13 NRC 452,454 0981) sanctions for failure to comply with imervenuen mparements; DP-92 26,36 NRC 195 0992) 6 System Federanan v. Wright,364 U.S. 642,647 (1%1) Cammission authority to modify limnse condtuans that prove unjust af:er nme; CU-9211,36 NtC 59 0 9921 f Tennessee Valley Authomy (Browns Ferry Nucicar Plant, Uniu 1 and 2), GP-7610,3 NRC 209,216 0 976) incorporation, by aference, d the qucanons asked by Staff concermns the erwaranmemmi regn as basis for comenuan; OP-92 23,36 NRC 136 0992) l 22 l 1 i l l 1 1 I

' LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CAWS Tennesace Valley Authomy (Waus Bar Nuclear Piam, Unns 1 and 2), A1AB-413,5 NRC 1418,142421 0 977) fmancial imemsta as basis for imervennon in deonmmissioneg pnweedmg; GP-92-23,36 NRC 131 0 992). Tcans Unknes Doctnc Ca (Cananche lhak Steam Doctric Stauan, Units 1 and 2), ClJ4812,28 NRC 605, 606419 (1988), aff*d, Citizens for liir Unhty Regulanon v. NRC, 898 F.2d 51 (5th Car.1990), cerL denied,111 S. Ct. 246 (1990) Eve 4sciar test far law intervention; QJ-92-12,36 NRC 69 0992) Teams Utilina Doctric Ca (Camanche 1%ak Steam Dectric Stadm, Units 1 and 2), CLI-92-1,35 NRC 1 0 992) cmcria far mopmung a recard; C1J-92-12,36 NRC 66 0992) Toledo Edison Ca (Davis-Base Nuclear Pbwer Station, Umts 1,2, and 3), A1AB.560,10 NRC 265 (1979) auspensian d andtnan conditions at a licensee's request: CU-92-11,36 NRC 58 0992) Unie d Concerned Scutasta v. NRC,711 F.2d 370,3810983) hmits en agency's imerpetanan d its own rules; IJ3P-92 20,36 NRC 114 0992) Uniat d Concerned Scianusts v. NRC,711 F.2d 370,3E2-83 (DC. Cir.1983) scope of Commisman enfonement authority; C1J-92-11,36 NRC 57 n.310992) Unian of Concerned Scieraists v. NRC,735 F.2d 1437,1446 (D.C. Cir.1984), cert. denied, 4MI U.S. 1132 (19E5) dependence of third-psny hearing righu en licensee's request far a hesnng; QJ.92-11,36 htC 54 n.19 0992) Umied Gas 1.,._- Co. v. Cmnery Propenics,382 U.S. 223,229 0965) Commissian authonty to rnadafy beense conditions that paw urdast after tune; QJ-92-11,36 h1C 59 (1992) United States v. Murrey,297 F.2d 512,821 Od Cir.1962) 01 policy to withhold voluntary interview transcrips undt end of investigatwn; QJ-92-10,36 NRC 3 n.1 0992) Umted States v. Swift & Co.,286 U.S.106,11615 0932) Commissian authonty to modify licese canditaans that prove urnust she time, CLJ-9211,36 NRC 59 0 992) Vermant Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power State), AIAB-138,6 AEC 520, 523 al2 (1973) tunchness requimnent far matuna to reopen; QJ4212,36 NRC 76 0992) Vermara Yankee Nuclear hwer Cap, (Vermant Yankee Nuclear Powa Station), LEP-90-6,31 NRC 85, j 90 0 990) showing of injury-in4aa far imervemann in operating Lcerne enerzian pmceeding; IJ1P-92-27,36 NRC 20L v't) Vargmia Doctne ans s w Ca (Nonh Anna Nuclear hwer Stanan Uniu 1 and 2), A1AB.522,9 NRC I 54, 56-57 (1979) geographic poximity as basis for standang in operstmg hcense amendmera p-thngs; 1J1P-92-28, 36 NRC 212 0992) Wanh v. Seldm. 422 U S. 400,5110975) bass for organizadorial standing; IJIP 92 28,36 NRC 213 (1992) Washington Public Poma Supply Systern (WPPSS Nuclear Pmject No. 3), AIAD-747,18 NRC 1167, 1I73 0 983) signireance to be placed en amours of delay in determuung admissibility of lais :ncrvention praition; IJIP-92-19,36 NRC 106 (1992) .I t a 1 J l l ) I t l I

d i~ i l a i 1 4 4 1 i l 1 1 l l LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX RF.CL1ATIONS i l

• Ii j

10 CIR 2.2 determinams of applicab;1uy of Subpast G pmcedures; CU-9213,36 NRC 57 (1992) q 10 CFA 2.3 g gwernmg rule in confheta between geneml rule in Subpart G and a special sie an another subpart; i CU 92-13, 36 htC 87 (1992) l 10 CFA 1101 l Staff denial as a fmal Comnussum decision; CU-92-11,36 NRC 60 (1992) i 10 CJA 1101(c) standard for a signifwant changes review; QJ-92-11,36 NRC 60 n45 (1992) k 10 CIA 1103(b),2.105(d) } fmaluy d Staff decision when hearmg is not requestod by appbcant far limnse amendmcrn, CL2-92-11, 36 NRC 54 (1992) i 10 CJ.R. 2.105(d) respasibihty for determmauan of heanng voguest in show-cause proceedmg; ClJ-92-11,36 NRC 60 n 47 (1992) 10 CFA 2105(d)(1) responsitahty of luensee or apphcara no request a hearing on soverse hansmg decisions; C1J 92-11,36 NRC 53 (1992) 10 CIA 2.10&(b) fmalny d Staff decision where hearing is not requesad by applicant im Lcense amemiment; Cll-92-11, 36 NRC 54 (1992) ( 10 CF.R Part 2. Subpan B enforcement action rather than license renewal denial for vioistion of sectim 3035; CU-92-13,36 NRC 90 (1992) 10 CJA 12001204 forum for handling requests fw modifmation of license condtuans; C13-92-11, 36 NRC 58 n35 (1992) 10 CFA 2.202 i Y f forum far addressing bcensee's falhue to cenply with fmancial assurance requiremems as basm for limnse danial; C1J-92-13, 36 NRC R2 (1992) forum for challenges to operaung beansas; QJ-9212,36 NRC 67 (1992) { impuauion of decornmissorur:g requim through an er:forcemant action; CD 92-13,36 NRC $6 n 16 (1992) impmpneues by NRC personnel regardmg NRC inspecuan activines; DD924,36 NRC 144 (1992) i I prncedures for harmen on mforcemern ordars, QJ-92-13,36 NRC $3 (1992) 10 CIA 2.202(a)(3) responsiklity of licensee or apphcara to request a hearmg on adverse hceruirg decisions; C12 92-11, 36 NRC 53 (1992) 10 CFR 2.203 pu< pose d hoard review of settlement agreernems, IllP-9118,36 NRC 93 (1992); IJ1P>92-21,36 NRC 119 (1992) I termination of proceedmg on basis of satiement agreement; LI P-92-18,36 NRC 94 (1992), LDP-92-21, 36 NRC 118 (1992) I l 25 l l l l I I I i,,. -, ,,. _ -.. - - -. ~.. - - - - - - - - - -

1 ~~ S / e l it l LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX j REX 1tLA110NS ^j l ( I i 10 CIA 2.206 omergency hghting and fue pnmacaian systems at I%10 Verde, allegadans of violauons m; DD-924 36 h1C 1A4 (1992) faum far chabengts to operating licenses; Cll-92-1136 NRC 67,77 0992) forum far handhng sequemis far modificanon of hcenac endines; QJ-92-11,36 NRC 58 n.38 0992) ferum far naquesung enfon:ement actist; QJ-92-12,36 NRC 710992) 10 CIA I%n 2, subpart G contrast d Subpart L sules with; IEP-92-24,36 NRC 151-$2 0992) i pmcatures apphcable far consahdated Subpen G and Subpart L pmceedings; CLJ 02-13,36 NkC 52 0 992) 30 CIA 1700 pmceduits for heanngs an enforcement menen; CJ-9113,36 NRC 86 0992) f 10 CIA 2.7042.790 establishment of Lcensmg board and pmcedunn far beanng en Lcense daual; QJ-92-13,36 NRC 83 f 0 992) pmcedures man soutinely avaDeble in mformal r A+=. QJ-92-13,36 NRC 82 (1992) 10 CJ.R.1701 l faanse of petinaners no comply with semce sequuemems; IEP-92-17,36 NRC 29 a.10 (1992) respansibasty of petinaners for semm of dacuanmts;IEP 92-26,36 NRC 192 0992) { 10 CIA 1701(b) i soupe d documen service to painanen; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 138 0992) 10 CIA 1701(c) i basis far daarmming campietian af filmg; IEP-92,28,36 NRC 205 0992) .l 10 CFA.*,711 sequonse and tirning af the fihng of amended and supplemanal penties; IEP-92-17,36 NRC 29 0 992) 10 CJJL 1711(a) board authority to aber deadhne for films contenunns; IEP-92 27,36 NRC 198 0992) 10 CIA 1712 service of adjudicatory docummis en peuuoners; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 138 0992) [ 10 CIA 1713(b) i standards for infarming presidmg officar of motice of appearanas of enunnel; ISP42r24,36 NRC 154, i 155 (1992) i 10 CIA 2.714 i deadhne far beanns sequests and anunvenuon peunans en spem fuel pool ammdment; 1EP 92-28,36 NRC 204 (1992) scope of opponunity to inuuvene; IEP-92 28,36 NRC 2110992) atendard for admission of applicams as imervenars; QJ-92-11,36 NRC 54 0992) standmg and earnenuan requienems for iniorvemnan; IEP-92-27,36 NRC 198 0992) 10 CIA 2.714(a) standing seguircenant far imervention; IEP42 23. 36 NRC 126 0992) 10 CIA 1714(sX1) five factors to be addressed by untimely intervenuan peunans; IEP-92 28,36 NRC 204. 205 0992) { imerest requirirnent far imervaiumt; IEP-92-27,36 NRC 199 0992) t regumaners far wrium imervenunn peduon; IEP-92-28,36 ERC 207 0992) a to Cf.R.1714(aXIXI)-(v). I five-factar ses for admission of late-fded comenuans; IEP-92-17,36 NRC 28 0992) i Eve-faaar aest far laic irnervenuan; QJ-92-12,36 NRC 69 0992); IEP-92-19, 36 NRC 101,104,111 I 0 992) Eve-fsaar test far monumely fdmps, need for painance to addrums; IEP-92 26,36 NRC 192.194 [ 0 992) i 10 CIA 1714(aX2) cnteria to be addressed far late imervenuan; Q3-92-12,36 NRC 69 0992) l t 1 24 l i t f t

i ) l LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX RFGULATIONS imerest aspect of assadmg to imervens; IEP42-23,36 NRC 126 (1992) paniculerny m;mred of imervenuun peunans; 1EP-92-28. 36 NRC 207 (1992) i parucularuy required to estabbsh standing; IEP-92-23. 36 NRC 127 0992) 10 CIA 1714(s)(3) amendrners of hearms penncsa, deadline for, IEP-92-24,36 NRC 152 0992) .t amendrmra af intervenuan panne wnhas prior approval d licensmg baard; ISP-92-23,36 NRC 125 l 0992); IEP-92-27,36 NRC 198 0992) amendmers of imervenuon petinan withms pra approval d presidmg officer 1EP-92-17,36 NRC 27 0 992) provisim for late-filed imervers.on pouuans; IEP-92r28,36 NRC 207 0992) -{ L vested sight so amend annenans; 1EP-92-23,36 NRC 140 0992) 10 CIA 1714(b) cassenue requimnera for irnervemmn; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 126 0992) specificity sequimd of cemennons;1EP-92-28,36 NRC 214 0992) { standuds fu adnussian of carnemians; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 132 (1992) 10 CIA 1714(bXI) comannan requaemera for imervenuan; IEP-92-17,36 NRC 27 (1993; 1EP-92-2R,36 NRC 205 0992) l; deadlme for filmg imervmuan peunan supplemers that earnams enrnanuan list; 1EP-92-17,36 NRC 27 0994 10 CIA 1714(b)(2) carnent d enrasnnons; IEP-92-27. 36 NRC 200 0992) commum segunemers for imervenncm;IEIL92-17,36 NRC 27 0992) 'i specifcity seguised for admasaan of cornennans in formal pmanedags 15P-92 24,36 NRC 154 0992) { 10 CIA 1714(b)(2)(ii) imerpsetation of; 1EP 92-28,36 NRC 215 0992) 10 CIA 1714(d) iryury-in fact standard for imervenuon; 1EP-92-19. 36 NRC 103 0992) standards fw admissim of exanmuons; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 132 (1992) 10 CIA 1714(d)D) g factors considered by boards in ralmg en admissibilny of caracenians; 1EP-92,27,36 NRC 2010992) y factars to be addressed by intervenuan pecuans; 1EP-92-25,36 NRC 20B 0992) l 10 CIA 1784(dXIXiii) l effect of an arder that dermanstrates irnerest far purposes of imerversion; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 126 0 992) 10 CIA 1714(d)(2) -{ factars considered by boards in ruimg on admissibility of crusanions; IEP-92,27,36 NRC 2010973 10 CIA 1714a appealability of order denying irnervenuan; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 141 (1902) { appeals d irmervenuan orde;1EP-92-28,36 NRC 220 (1992) { sppeals d licerning board decismns; CL1-92-11. 36 NRC 50 0992) i desigrauen of pennanen as parnes; IEIL92-23,36 NRC 138 a.310992) { 10 CIA 1714a(s) appeals d irnervannan arders; 1EP-92-19,36 NRC 1110992) 10 CIA 1716 autharny far liomsing board and gresidmg effacer to cansalidaie Subpart G and Subpset L prWaign C1J 9213,36 NRC 87 (1992) basis for amsalidanan d Subpart G and Subpart L proceedmg: as Subpart G pmoemdmg; C1J4213, 36 NRC TL4 0992) cormalidanan d Sutynn 0 and Subpart L proceedmas; 1.EP-92-16A. 36 NRC 20 n.6 (1992) cansaladanan d Subpan G pmecedings;IEP42-16A,36 NRC 20 0992) } 10 CJA 1718(!) Camrmssmo supemsary authority in absera af a petition far review; CLJ 92-13,36 NRC 85 0992) t h 27 ? ^ I f ( b i k I, h

~ - - f f t 4' LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX RECUIATIONS i 7 ? 10 CJA 1718(m) sequmco and smung af the fihng of amended and supplememal peutians; 1EP-92-17,36 NRC 29 0993 10 CIA 1734(b) affidavit requimnent for manans to serpen; C1J-92-12,36 NRC 76 0992) f 10 CIA 1734(c) requesu for pnuective aders for named and unnamed penmns; CU-92-12,36 NRC 77 0992) 10 CIA 1740(b)(1) matum no compel d schmee d evidena ermiaming privileged er confidenhal canmercial mformanon; IEP42-15A,36 NRC 9 (1992) standards for discovery d security plans; LEP-92-15A,36 NRC E (1992) 10 CIA 1740(c) spplicabilay of paneenvs orders to secunty plans; IEP-92-15A,36 NRC 110993 l 10 CIA 1740b l' esempuan far propneury snfamanon; IEP92-15A,36 NRC 13 0992) 10 CJA 1741(c) applumbility in privnicly passamed documents; IEP-92-15A. 36 NRC 9 0992) { NRC authwity to Innit access to secunty plan documerns; 1EP 92-15A,36 h7C 8 0992) l 10 CIA 1744 l pnxaduns fa etnauung domunents not ava3able under section 2.790, IEP-9215A,36 NRC 7 0992) l 10 CJA 1744(c) { basis for accuus no safeguards informanon; IEP-92-15A,36 NRC 12 0992) 10 CIA 1751s amedmont of heanns petnians, desdime for; IEP-92-24,36 NRC 152 0992) j 20 CJA 1760 l' imality d ininal decnian; IEP 92-25,36 NRC 187 0992) 10 CIA 1763 daerenan d Comnussian to allow eral argument; CU-92-12,36 NRC 68 (1992) farm d request for eral a gument; CU-92-12,36 NRC 69 n4 0992) i 10 CJA 1772(i) [ aferral d liamsee's heanna sequest en license dernal and contagern order so Chief Admimstrative Judge of licesing bnant panel; CU-92-13. 36 NRC $3 0992) 10 CIA 1786 i i appeals d ininal decision; IEP-92-25,36 NRC 187 0992) cuension d Commissian supemsory powers to circumstances that do nas meet the standanis far review; CU-92-13. 36 NRC 56 (1992) 10 CJA 1766(a) Commissaan suremsary authority in absence af a pendan is review; CU-92-13,36 NRC 85 0992) { 10 CIA 2.786(b)O) petition for seview mandated prior to seeking judical zeview; IEP-92r25. 36 NRC 118 0992) l 10 CIA 1786(b)(2) length and camera of pesnians im seriew; IEP-92-25,36 NRC 155 (1992) 10 CIA 17E6(b)(3) considerstaan d Staff views Clod in response no licensees

• opposidan to its pcunan far review; i

CU-92-13,36 NRC 85 n B (1992) [ 10 CIA 2.766(b)(4) deadlme for appeal of ininal decision; IEP-92-25,36 NRC 187 0992) y cuension d Camnussian supervisory powers to cin:umstances that du not enes the standards far seview; CU 92-13,36 NRC 56 0992) 10 CIA 1786(b)(4)(ii), (iii) junsdusianal spuanons ramed by sensolidation of Subpart O and Subpan L proconEngs; C214213,36 NRC 66 0992) 28 l - t l l l-Ij;

I

• b I

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX RIEUI.ATIONS { 6 k T 10 CIA 178&.g) l stancards far imerlocutory aview; QJ4213,36 NRC 25 0902) i 10 CIA 1766(g)(2) j c!fect of consolidation order far gwrpames d imerlocutory seview; CLJ-92-13,36 NRC $6 (1992) 10 CJ.R. 2.788 cnteria for grara of a stay; LBP-92-20,36 NPC 116 (1992) 5 10 CIA 1790 l spplumbility so pnvswJy possessed documents; LBP-92-15A,36 NRC 9 0992) { burde to estaWh pnvilege and smnfulentiabty of documents; LBP-9215A,36 NRC 10 (1992) i ducksure d applicara's physical pmteethm and material control and accoumaM1hy program for special l nuclear matenal; 2.BP-92-15A,36 NRC 7,11 (1992) l NRC autherny no lunit sopess to security gaan documerna; LDP-92-15A,36 NRC 8 0992) } 10 CIA 179a(s) j possession of secunty plans by appbcans and htC; LBP-92-15A,36 hTC E (1992) t 10 Cf.R.1790(bXI) I barde en pany assertmg privilege and confidentahty; LBP-92-15A,36 NRC 10,11 (1992) -l 10 CIA 1790(d) burde to estabh pvilege and con 6 den 6alny of documems; LBP 9215A. 36 NRC 10,11,12 0902) f 10 CFA 2.790(d)(1) stams of appbcata's physical protection and maienal enntral and acoaumaM1ity pngram for special nuclear material; LBP-92-15A. 36 NRC 7,10 (1992) ? 10 CIA 1802(c) _{ standard for dmiairig a petition far rulemaking; DPRM-92-2,36 NRC 410992) ~i 10 CJ.R. 2.803 t insutuuan of pmizedmgs that are without mern and a waste of public renausons; DPRM-92-2,36 NRC [ 41 0 992) } 10 CIA 2.905 i pmcedum for obtaming necess to safeguards informat m; LBP 92-15A,36 NRC 12 (1992) i 10 CIA Ibn 2, Subpan L i pmcedmes applicable far ournalidaied Subpan G and Subpan L psa~=d%r C1192-13,36 NRC 52 { 0 992) pmcedures apptwnble so materials licesing matters; QJ-92-13,36 NRC 53 0992) 'l 10 CIA 11201 { appbcable rules whers Subpart G and Cubpsn L gmweedmgs are conschdaiad; LEP-92-16A,36 NRC 20 m.6 (1992) .[ pecedures far hamnngs on materials Lcense matters; QJ42-13,36 NRC E6 (1992) 10 CIA 112012.1263 passduns applicable for consolidated Subpsn G and Subpan L pmecedmss; C13-92-13,36 NRC E2 (1992) 10 CTa',,11201(a) ~ age.wie d pmoeedags on Lcense denial and emamgers order; QJ-92-13,36 NRC 83 0992) l stannery language d snandauny duectim and exclusivity; LBP-92-16A,36 NRC 20 n.6 0992) 10 CIA 11201(b) f s pmceduns for hesnnas on enfarcerners orders; QJ-92-13,36 NRC 13 0992) 10 CIA 21205 1 6nality d Staff decision where hearms is na sequestad by applicars for license amendment; QJ-92-11, l 36 NRC 54 0992) naparaibihty far desermmndw of hearing sequesi in show-cause proceedmg; C12-9111,36 NRC 60 [ n.47 0992) 10 CJA 11205(b) rigia d licensee so sees pmcmduns other than Subpan L wbm a hearing sequest is made; C1J-92-13, 36 NRC 86 a.15 (1992) - f t t 2e f I t i 3 I l 5

- - - - ~ '- t t I + l l IJGAL CITATIONS INDEX - R1'Gt1AT10NS ' 10 Cf.R.11205(c) amendmmt or supplementanon of heanna requests; LBP-92-24,36 NRC 152 0992) l i 1. 10 CIA 11205(cX2) t I= umenness of heanns requests, LBP-92 20,36 NRC 113 0992) 10 Cf.R. 2.1205(cX2X0 and (i0 deadline for f4hng hearing requets; LBP-92-20,36 NRC 113,114 0992) r 10 CIA 11205(d) { standmg and enracnhan el-- far imavennan n informal proceedmgs, IEP-92-24,36 NRC 151 J 0 992) [ 'h 10 CJ.R.11205(g) mgulatory sequarenusus far grant of heanng request un maurials licase amendmem; LBP-92-20,36 j-NRC 115 0992) I spamficity seguired im admissma of in informal proonadmgs; LBP-92-24,36 NRC 154 l 0 992) P 10 Cf.R 2.1205(k) .{ i showmg secouary on lateEind heanns agucsts; LBP42-24,36 NRC 1$4 0992) Stats Suff docuumans en license amendment as good see is untancJy haanns aquest; IEP-92 20, i 36 NRC 115 (1992) } 10 CIA 11205(n) appent of order grannng heanns request and daymg stay sequest; LBP-92-20,36 NRC 116 0992) i 10 CIA 11207 [ enception far sansabdauan d Subpan G sad Subpan L pmceedmgr, CLJ42-13,36 NRC 37 n.20 (1992) 10 CJA 11209 &acrenmary authanty of presidmg effuxu; LBP-92-24,36 NitC 151,152 0992) '[ 10 CIA 11209(d) J Commission supervisory authority in absence of a patinan far review; QJ 92-13,36 NRC E5 0992) i 10 CIA 112094) authority to apply aiher pmcoduns in Subpan L prMw;gs; C1J42-13,36 NRC 57 0992) -i Carmn-a approval of use of alterranws pr=+ Awes; QJ 9213,36 NRC 87 n.20 (1992) 10 CIA 23213 I Staff particapsnan in informal proceedmas; LBP-92-24,36 NRC 152 n10992) statamma of basis fa sentawyer) authonty no act in a represemananal capacity IEP-92-24,36 NRC i 155 0 992) 10 CIA 11231 basis far piesidmg officer's decision in informal prwings; C13-92-13,36 NRC E2 0992) to CIA 11233 basis for presidmg offiocr's decimien in informal proceedings; QJ-92-13,36 NRC S2 0992) j 10 CIA 11237(b) l burde en pmpancra of a stay;1EP-92 20,36 NRC 116 0992) 10 CIA 11261 sefatut of licensee's hearing seguan en license deial and cannngers order to Chief Admuustranve Judge of licensmg boant panct; QJ-92-13,36 NRC 83 (1992) 10 CJJt 2.1263 stay of bcense amendman pendmg complenan of adjudication;IEP42r20,36 NRC 116 0992) 10 CIA M 2, Appendia C,1 seancns int revocanan af a license; IEP-92 25,36 NRC 163,187 (1992) f 10 CFA N 2, Appendia C, V.A responsibility of hoensees for acts of their employeen; LBP-92-25,36 hTC 173 0992) 10 CIA Part 2. Appendia C, Vf(3Xe) masons for revocanon of a license; LBP 92-25,36 NitC 163 0992) j I 'k y i I i t

4 IIGAL CITATIONS INDEX mrct1AnONS 10 CFA 9.17(a)(4) status of appbcant's physical praecnon and mau: rial control and accxuntabilsy pmgram for special nuclear material; 1EP-92-15A,36 NRC 7 0992) 10 CJA 919 -- material that is exempt frurn disclosure; IEP-92-15A,36 NRC 10 0992) 10 CFA 19.11 iaDuse to pnst required documents; 12P-92-25,36 NRC 165,190 0992) 10 CFA 30.9 material false statement by lictruee an his role as ndiographcr's assistant, IRP-92-25,36 NRC 170 (1992) 10 CIA 30.9(a) failure to record use of NRC-liomsed bypmduct mau: rial; 1RP-92-25,36 NRC 164,188 (1992) falso eral information an unlizanon logs; IEP-92-25,36 NRC 164,168,188 0992) 10 CFA 3035 applicanon of Subpart G pmadures to maieziallianse denial to permit captaration of posible arbitrary and dilatory action by Staff; CU 92-13,36 NRC 88-89 0992) commanaEty of haues between fundmg requzrancais fu decommissiumng under one order and faDure to mes fundmg obliganans under anather; CU-92-13,36 NRC E8 0992) failus of limnaec to comply with financial assuranos requiremona as basis for lwerme deial; C13 92c13,36 NRC 52 (1992) 10 CIA 34.11(c) deleganon of complete rapansibihty and authonty to radiataan safcry officer;13P-92-25,36 NRC 172 0 992) 10 CIA 3420(b)(1) failure to mark adiographic caposure devices with licensee *a address and phans number; IEP-92-25,36 NRC 164 (1992) 10 CFA 34.26 ' failure to mamtain earnplete roomda of quanarly 3*iysical invananes of scaled sources; IEP-92-25,36 NRC 164,190 0992) 10 CIA 34.27 falsifianon of unliranan logs; IEP-92-25,36 NRC 164,167,188 0992) 10 CIA 3431(b) failure of bcensee to pnmde copies of operstmg and emergency pmcedures to adnographer,12P-92r25, 36 NRC 169,189 (1992) unauthorized use d radiographic equipment; 12P-92-25,36 NRC 170 (1992) 10 CIA 3433 faDme to wear personnel rnanitanns devices; IEP-92-25,36 NRC 164,167,169,170,189 (1992) licensne*a mio as a radiagnpher's assistars in violatim d; 1RP-92-25,36 NRC 164,169-70 (1992) 10 CIA 3433(c) faQuae to perform surveys whm radiographic caposure devices were placed in stange; 1EP-92,25,36 NRC 164,167 (1992) 10 CFA 34A2 faDure so pcst high radiation areas;IEP-92-25,36 NRC 164,190 0992) 10 Cf.R. Part 50 apphcabDity of financial qualifu:stims sequtrernents to indepmdern power pmducers; DPRM 921,36 NRC 33,35 0992) 10 CFA 50.7(f) parventma of "coereed" acatlemera agreemersa; C1J-92-12,36 NRC 73 (1992) 10 CIA 5033 NRC suthonty to request information imm nu-unhty applicants to perform a financial qualifications review; DPRM 92-1,36 NRC 33 0992) e j 31 i ' i - 1 l 1 1

3 .. p t- .b; i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX RFGift.ATIONS t f 10 CF.R. 50.34fc) passession of secunty plans by appbcant and NRC,IEP 9215A,36 NRC 8 (1992) l 10 CIA 50.39 passession of secunty plans by applicars and 1 *C: IEP-9215A,36 NRC 8 0992) f to CFA 50.49 civil penahy far violation of environmema! quahficauan sequimness for clearical equiprnent impenant to safery; IEP-92-21,36 NRC 117 0992) 10 "FA 50.57 demaestralian of fmancial quahficanons by non-stility sylicams for aperating Econnes; DPRM-92-1,36 i NRC 35 0992) 10 CF.R. 50.58(b)(6) junsdinian for pre <1Tcotiveness heanng en decommissioning; ISP-92-23,36 NRC 137 0992) f 10 CFA D.75 }' fundmg plan mquimnems far deccenmissioning; 1EP-92-23,36 NRC 136,137 0992) NRC suthority to request information frtrn non-udlity applicams to perfonn a fmancial quahfications aview; DPRM-92-1,36 NRC 35 0992) 10 CIA 50.75(d) 4 decrrnmissioning repon requirements for non-utihty applicants; DPRM-92-1,36 NRC 35 0992) 10 CSA 50.75(e)(2) acceptable financial assurance snechamsms for decamnussioning by a non-utIhty licensee: DPRM-92-1, r 36 NRC 35 0992) l 10 CIA 50.80 demorstration d financial qualificauons by non-utility applicants for operating bcenses; DPRM42-1,36 { NRC 35 0992) i 10 CIA 50.82 l nlease of site fw unrestricted use after ---i. ISP-92-23,36 NRC 124 0992) 10 CIA 50.90 Commtasian.suthonty to amend anuuust license conditionr, CU-9211. 36 NRC 510992) [ Commission authority to amend licenses; C1192-11,36 NRC 53 (1992) 10 CFA 50.91 junsdurum for pre <ffecuveness heanns en decemmissioning; IEP 92-23,36 NRC 137 (1992) 10 CFA 50.91(aX4) issuance of heense amendment pdor to heanns contesting amendment; IEP-92-17,36 NRC 25 (1992) 10 CFA 50.92 l Camndssion authonty to amend hcenses; CL1-92-11,36 NRC 53 0992) f jurisdiedam for pre <ffectiveness headng on decomnussioning; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 137 0992) l no mismficam hazards dcierrnination on heense amendmers incorporating proposed changes to spent fuel { pool technical specifications; IEP 9217,36 hTC 24 (1992) Staff issuance d hcense amendmera following consideradrei af enmmcens imm intervenuan petiuaners; } IEP-92-28,36 NRC 204 (1992) 10 CFA 50.109 addition d adorants to radioactive emissions frorn nuclear power resetors; DPRM-92-2,36 NRC 43 i (1992) 10 Cf.R. Part 50, Amendia R deficiencies in emergency lighting systern at Palo Verde; DD-92-4,36 NRC 145 (1992) I 10 CFA 51.45 mandatory requirements for environmeraal repons; LEP-92-23,36 NRC 133 0992) -l 10 CIA 51.53(b) r I camers of envmmmernal report far decommissaming; IRP-92-23,36 NRC 134 (1992) 20 CFA 71.5 de!icimwaas in shipping paper requmanems far ndiosaive materials; IEP-92-25,36 NRC 164 0992) I failure to pmperly marit radioscuve snaienal shipping cantainers, IEP-92-25,36 NRC 164,190 0992) { i i 32 .t t q 1 i t .i l _i

l LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX R EGt' TAT 10NS i 10 CFA 73.2 ' i, defmid<wi d safeguards anformation; ISP-92-15A, 36 h7C S (1992) defmia d securuy plan sa safeguards infamsuun; LBP.92-15A,36 NRC 12 (1992) 10 CF.R. 7321 duelosure of safegwaid mformonan; LBP 92-15A,36 NRC 9 (1992) 10 CFA 73.21(c)(1) and (2) basis fm access to safeguards informantut; IEP-9215A,36 NRC 12 (1972) { 10 CFA 73.2)(cX2) penalUrs fa breach d a praecum order, IEP-9215A,36 NRC 12 (1992) 10 CIA 7433 material corarol and accoumatility documems as safegaards informanon; ISP-92-15A,36 NRC 8-9 (1992) -f 10 CFA 9535 disclosure d docarnensa mamaining, in part, con $datel.wtumal accurity infamation; ISP-9215A, 36 hTC 9 0992) 10 CFA 9535(a) lirmtanno en access to security P am; LBP-92-15A,36 NRC 12 (1992) l 10 CFA Part 140 appkahany of Enancial quahfacatmns sequmanes:s v n.imemLut power pmduces; DPRM-92-1,36 h7C 33 (1992) 10 CFA 140.21 saisfaction of fmancial sesponsibihues to guam premiums under Pnce Anderson t Aa; DPRM-92-1,36 NRC 35 (1992) 10 CFA 140.21(r) ahernsnve mahods d guaranteeing pymera of defn mder Prm:e. Anderson Act; } DPRM-92-1,36 NRC 35 (1992) 49 CIA 171201(d) and 172.203(d) t deficamcws ir shippmg ppa seguiremems for radioacdve mau: rials; LBP-92 25,36 NRC 164.190 4 i (1992) ,y 49 CIA 17325 j falhue in pmperty mad radioacuve mau: rial shipping ceamerr, IEP-92-25,36 57C 164,190 (1992) I 49 CIA 177t17(a) detusencies in shippang paper requin:merna far radiosaive matenals; I.RP-92-25,36 NE 164,190 .j I (I*9T e e i t t ? ? I i i I e 33 ) i t t r r t f i i c I

i l i i 1 l l i i 1 i l I i I LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX l sTATvri;s l l Admmistrauve Promhne Act. 5 U.Sc 551(c) procedura! pur.ec6cns to perses subjecs to agency investigeucms; C1J-92-10,36 NRC 3 0992) Atomic Imergy Aa,11,42 U.S C 2014 0988) heaks nghts d licanm:s er app' cams; QJ-92-11,36 NRC 53 0992) s Atomic Ene gy Act, 81,42 U.SC 2111 l incorporanan c1 secticsnan a;mwnent imo order approving agn:ement and dismssamg pmcmdmg; i ISP-92-18,36 NRC 93-94 0992) l Atomic Imergy Act,103,42 U.SC 2133 I y annuust review requimnants is commacial nuclear power piams; QJ-92-11,36 NRC 56 (1992) l Commisexm audumry w sapend amurust hcase conds. ions; QJ-92-11,36 NRC 59 0992) C. a l termmodon of pnxadmg becausa d scatleman agreemmt; IEP-92-21,36 NRC 118 (1992) / ~ Atorme Energy Act.103c,42 U.SC 2133(c) i estensian of term of operating hcmse w maquare ennstrucdon period; IEP-92-21,36 NRC 197 (1992) [ Atenue Energy Act,1(4b l hemsing of plams wnhaut anntrust revier, QJ-92-11,36 NRC 56 0992) p Atonuc Imcrgy Act,105,42 U.Sc 2135 I knuts on Canmission antarust jurisdienon; QJ-92-tl,36 NRC 51,52,56 (1992) b { aanst-imeamis tat for imervenuan; IRP-9219,36 NRC 1(M 0992) L Atomic 1:ncrgy Act,105c,42 U.SE 2135(c) 4 Commtssum suuwmty to amend anytrust license condinons; QJ-92-11,36 NRC 55,57 0992) 2 posthcensirg arnitrust miew to daermme adverse antitrust aspens of a becnse; QJ 92-11, 36 NRC 56 C; 0 992) Atomic Energy Act,105c(2),42 U.SC 2135(c)(2) ~ forum for damnuung signifiance of changes that have occuned smce crismal amitrust miew, C1J-92-11,36 NRC 56 0992) Atorme Energy Act,161,42 U.SC 2201 Cernrmmon authmity m ammd hcenses; CLI-92-11,36 NRC 53 (1992) Commission authonty a saspend amitrust hcense condinons; QJ-92-11,36 NRC 59 0992) incorporaban of setticment agmemes imo order approvirig agreemem and dismissing prtecednig; 13P-92-18,36 NRC 93-94 0992) Atomic Imergy Act,161(bl (o142 U.SC 2201(b), (o) termins6cn of proceeding because d ser.lcment agmnmem; ISP-92-21,36 NRC 118 0992) l Atomic Energy Act,182, IE3,42 U.SC 2232,2233 0988) Canmission authority to amend luznsa; CLJ-92-11,36 NRC 53 0992) Atomic Energy Act,186,42 U.SC 2235 reasons fa revocation of a license; ISP 92 25,36 NRC 162,163 (1092) Atonde leergy Act,187,42 U.Sc 2237 0958) Cemnussion authonty a amend Ecensa, QJ-92-11,36 NRC 53 0992) Atomic Energy Act,189,42 U.Sc 2239 098E) l Comrmssion authonty to ammd limnses; CLJ-92-11. 36 NRC 53,59 0992) l Commission aunumry to suspend anutrust hceroe conditions; QJ 9211,36 NRC 59 (1992) i l I 35 b ,.-.,.--=e--*--w -ww" - ~ "'-'N*----*'"~- "F"

F i f LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX STARTES i Atomic Energy Act,189(a) Camnnssaan authonty to dcEne and innit the scape d a proceeding; IEP-92-28,36 NRC 210 0992) irnerest neguuwners fw irnerver,tuut; IEP-92-27,36 NRC 199 0992) Atarruc Imergy Act, 189 0),42 U.SE. 2239(a)O) 098E) i hearing rig}ss d licensees or a;yhcaras, CU-92-11,36 NRC 50,53,54 (1992) rnervunnan rights in NRC proceedings; ISP-92-28,36 NRC 2tTI 0992) Atomic Ene gy Act,191. 42 U.SC 2241 termination d procecda:g because d scattement agreernent; 13P-92c21,36 NRC 118 0902) Atomic ImeTy Aa,191a,42 U.5C 2241(a) i asuance d dncommissianmg orde pnar to comple:xm d adjudicatory bcanng; IEP-92-23,36 KTJC 137 (1992) Atornie Energy Act D4,42. U S.C. 22t2 l purpose of licarming board nyiew d setfJcment agauna 13P-92-21,36 NRC 119 0992) Otuo Cormitet% Art. XVIII, 664 5 F establishrnent d e :nurn6 pal udley; IEP-92-19,36 NRC 103 0992) s ? e l i } i 6 - i, O N k i l -i i r l r . f E

m _. _. _ _ _ 4 4 i i 1 1 1 j l - l I i 1 I l l l l I I LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX OT1tfRS l l i 1 1 3 Am. Jur. 2d, Agency (1986) Q. at 509-10 mporsibiluy 4 Iwennees for acsa of their employets; IBP-92-25. 36 h7C 173 (1994 Au*y Gene-ars Manual m the Admuustrative Pmondure Act 67 (1947) I OI pdwy no withhdd voluntary irnerview transenpts until end of snvestigauart; CU-92-10,36 NRC 3 n.1 (1992) ILR. Rep. No. 1980, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 265 0946) i trarmenpt r@us on voluntary tesumany; CU-92 *0,36 NRC 4 n2 (1992) 3 i 1B 1 Monre, J. Lucas & T. Curner, Wee's Federal Procuce,10 441p.- 3] (2d ed.1985) / a;%cabibty of colisieral estoppel where Subpan G and Subpan L pmceedings are consdidated. iSP-92-1M,36 NRC 21 (1994 i PreLccusing Anutrust Rmew of Nuclear Four Plams: Ileanngs before the Jomt Committac on Atomic -y Energy,91st Cang.,1st Seat 37-38 (1969) (remarks of Rep. Ikdifu JCAE O. airman) 7 purpnee d pnduhuon against pns: licensing antinust review; CJ-92-11, h, '*RC 56 (1992) S. Rep. No. 752, 79th Cong.,1st Scan. 206 (1945) f / trarscript eghts on volumary testimony; QJ-92-10,36 NRC 4 n.2 (1992) i y ~^ I A N. Singer Sutherland Staunary Construction 15 2234.35 (4th ed.1985) t applicable mies dere Subpan 0 and Subpan L poceedess are consohdated; LEP 9216A,36 NRC 20 [ U n6 (1992) 2A N. Singer Sutherland Stannory C<rstruction 148.06 (4th ed.1984) at 308 I wmght gnert to legalative histarw; CIJ-92-10,36 NRC 4 rL2 (1992) j Sutherland Statuury Cmstmcuan 146.05 (4th ed.1984) 7 l sppbcable nues where Subpan G and Subpan L poccedmgs are consolidated. LBP-9216A. 36 NRC 20 ) V i s,6 (1992) i l 18 C. Wnghi. A. hUier & E. Cooper, Federal Practice and Pmcedure 54423 (1981) ) applicabihty of collateral esioppel where Subpan G and Subpart L pmceedman are consclidated; LEP-92-1M,36 NRC 21 (1992) j 4. I t J l l 5 i i I i i 'I r l i l 37 i ) l l i i i I 1 1 i. 1 I I 5

i i 9 A i i l SL'BJECT INDEX l i 'O l ADMIN 15TRATTVE JUDGES advocanon 4 a posine tefore a supenar appeliste tribunah MP-92-16A,36 NkC 18 0992) I ADMIN 1STRATTVE PROCI'DLT.E ACT l tood<ause excepwn to transenpt rights; CU-92-10,36 NRC 10992) l transenpt rights on voluntary tesumory; CU-92-10, 36 NRC 1 (1992) 4MTDAYTT requunnent far havmg securny plan wi:hheld from the pubic, IEP 92-15A,36 NRC 5 0492) AMENDMENT of snuuust Lcense condinons: CLI-921L 36 NRC 47 0992) of beenng peutian in informal heanng; IEP-92-24,36 NRC 149 0992) of imavenuan petitions, deadlme for; DP-92 27,36 NRC 196 0992) of regulatons regardmg bcensing of indepeders power producers to construct or operate commercia! nuclear power reactors; DPRM42-1,36 NRC 310992) ( Sne also Materials Ucense Amcedment; Operanng Iloense Amendment O AN"ITTRLTT / l bcense candinen, amendment ef; Q.J-92-II,36 NRC 47 (1992) ~- f bcense cmd:nnn, amervenuan in proceeding a suspension of; IEP-92-19,36 NRC 98 (1992) i APPEALS l denial of request far sisy; GP-92-22, 36 NRC 119 0992) } ) j ATOMIC ENERGY ACT au:honry to amend operaung licerses; CU-92-11,36 NRC 47 0992) 7 l hearing rights of a;plicams or licenseer, CU-92-11,36 h7C 47 0992) I injury 4n-fact standard for standing to imervene; LBP-9219,36 NRC 98 0992) l BYPRODi1CT MATERIAL IJGNSE revocanon of; GP-92-25, 36 NRC 156 0992) BYPRODUCT MATERIALS i failure to secord sees of; IEP 92-25,36 NRC 156 0992) l CML PINALTIES ) fa violanon of ennronmemal quahficanon seguiremems fw electrical equipment impcrnam to safety; l IEP-92-21,36 NRC 117 (1992) g l CVIL PfNALTY PROCEEDING j as a tnal de novo; IEP-92 25,36 NRC 156 0992) 1 j limas on board powers in; LBP-92 25,36 NRC 156 0992) l CD11ATERAL LSIDPPEL I apphcability whoe Subpan G and Subpan L pmocedmgs are consolidated; LBP 92-16A,36 NRC 18 0 992) standards fcr appucannn in NRC proceedman; LBP-92-23,36 NRC 120 (1992) l l COMMISSION l authorny to defmc and hmit the scope of a pmceedmg; LBP-92-28,36 NRC 202 (1992) superviswy authorny over adjudications; ClJ-9213,36 NRC 79 (1992) l l See also Nuchar Regulamry Commissim t CONITDENTLAL INFORMAllON panecnon from disclasme; CU-9212,36 NRC 62 0992) i i 1 t i ) 3' l i \\ i l i I i l l l I I a

i ? i SUIUECT INDFJ t CONI 1 DENTAL NATIONAL SECURflY NORMATION status of secumy plan and matenal emtrul and accoumability program as; 1EP-92-15A,36 NRC 5 0 992) j cuNnDEsTlauTY p burde to estahh; 1RP-92-1%A,36 NRC 5 (1992) CONSOUDATION OF PROCEEDINGS l standard for imerlocutary sview of; CU-92-13,36 NRC 79 0992) Subpart L and Sutpan 0; C119213,36 NRC 79 (1992); 1EP-92-16A,36 NRC 14 (1992) CONTENIlONS pleadm3 4. c for ISP-92-23,36 NRC 120 0992) speuficity required of; ISP-92-2g, 36 NRC 202 0992) .7 COUNSI2. I nonac of appearance ef;IEP-92 24,36 NRC 149 (1992) t CRITICAUTY ANALYSIS { ca)culatico cmns far spcra fuel pool; IEP-9217,36 NRC 73 (1992) DECISIONS See 1mns! 1haima [ DECOMMISSIONING {' considersnan of shamstiws to;ISP-92-23,36 NRC 120 0992) envimnemnial smew far, IEP 92-23,36 NRC 120 0992) DECOMMISSIONING PROCEEDLNG eensahdaten with licene renewal denial pmceedirg; ISP-9216A,36 NRC 18 0992) gengraphic pmmamity as basis far standing in; IEP-92 23,36 NRC 120 0992) standmg to imavene in: 12P-92-24,36 NRC 149 0992) { DEFICIENCIES t in emergency lighting systems at Palo Verde; DD-924 36 NRC 143 0992) f DISCOVERY of secatrity plans; 1BP 92-15A,36 NRC 5 0992) waiver of right to; LEP-92-15A,36 NRC 5 (1992) DOCUMEhTATION [ de6ciencias in shipping papers ic radianc6ve materials; LBP-92-25. 36 NRC 156 0992) l faDum to record uses of bypmduct material; 12P-92-25,36 NRC 156 (1992) DOSIMLTI25 failus to wear,12P-92-25,36 NRC 156 0992) .I ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT important to safery, civD penshy is violation of environmemal quahficauan equiremmta; 1RP-92-21, 36 NRC 117 0992) } EMERGENCY UOlflTNG SYSTEM defnencies at Palo Verde; DD-92-4,36 NRC 143 (1992) i t EMERGENCY PLANS ~ adequacy as a safery measure over the additim of adorama to radioactive emissims; DPRM-92 2,36 NRC 37 0992) l ENIORCEMENT POUCY .l revocation of license; 13P-92-25,36 NRC 156 0992) EN\\lRONMENTAL UTECTS of adorama added to radioactive emissions; DPRM-92 2,36 NRC 37 0992) ,{ ENYlRONMENTAL QUAUf1 CAT 10N { seguiremuras far electrical equipment impanara to marczy, civil penaby for violation ef; 12P-92r21,36 NRC 117 0992) ENTIRONMENTAL REVIEW far dommmisammng; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 120 0992) EVIDENCE prepanderance-of--the-evidence standard for weighing; IEP 92-25,36 NRC 156 0992) l 4. .I s i 1 i 1) . ? I t

i i SUHJECT INDEX f FALSI11 CATION k of utdiranon loss; IEP-92-25, 36 NRC 156 0992) 11UNGS basis fa decrmining crenplenan d; 1EP-92-25,36 NRC 202 (1992) [ 11RE 1ROTIC110N SYSTLM def cancies at Palo Verde, alleganons d; DD'92-4. 36 NRC 143 0992) 11EALDI DTiffS of odoraras added to radioactive emissens; DPRM-92-2. 36 NRC 37 0292) IIEARING Staff canaidersnan of Applicaras* amendmera sequen as; CU-92-11,36 NRC 47 (1992) IILARING REQUESTS deadline far fding;IBP-92-20,36 NRC 112 0992) e lawfiled, un ir.farmal prMngs; DP 92-24, 36 NRC 149 0992) .[ an matenals liceme amendmers; LEP-92,20,36 NRC 112 (1992) supplernentanan sa amavaners of. IEP 92-24,36 NRC 149 0992) { tonelincus ef; 1EP-92 20,36 NRC 112 0992) IIEARING P$3rf3 i d apphcants er 16:xmseea; CU-92-11,36 NRC 47 0992) IMPARTIAIIIT. of adnumeranvu trial judgas; IEP-92-16A. 36 ATC 15 0992) IN CAMERA l'ROaEDINGS sefusal of irmervmor so panicipate in; IEP-92-15A 36 NRC $ 0992) INDITENDENT POWER l'RODUCERS Anancial qualificanons seview for construcuan and operanon of carnmercial nuclear power seactors. DPRM 92-1,36 NRC 310992) INIORMAL I! EAR!NGS amendment of hearing petine in; IEP-92-24,36 NRC 149 0992) specifying areas of concern in; IEP-92-24,36 NRC 149 (1992) 5ee also Subpan L Pmceedings INTIIAL DECISIONS l fmalny d; ISP-92-25,36 NRC 156 0902) { INSPECI1ON l See NRC inspeman t INT:RPRETADON of 10 CIA 2.763; CU 92-12,36 NRC 62 0992) of 10 CIA Pan 54 DPRM-921. 36 NRC 310992 of 10 CJ.R. Pan 140; DPRM-92-1,36 NRC 310992) of agency's own rules. lunits at; IEP-92-20,36 NRC !!2 0992) IN'T12VENORS penalry for refusal to parucipate in in camera pmesedings; ISP-92-15A 36 NRC 3 0992) IN'!TEVENTON contentim requimnent far.1EP-92 23,36 NRC 120 0992) innerest requminera far; CU42-12,36 NRC 62 0992) INT 2VLSTON PETITIONS amendment of;1EP-92-27,36 h1C 196 0992) - deadime for films; 1EP-92-28,36 NRC 202 (1992) deferral d mhngs pedmg amavimera ar supplemernation of;1EP-9217,36 NRC 25 0992) good cause for late Eling d; LEP-92-19,36 NRC 98 0992) panicularity required of; IEP-92-28,36 NRC 202 (1992) sancuans far nanoamphance with picadmg : for; ISP-92-26,36 NRC 1910992) INTEVENTON. IATE adequacy d caistmg sepresentation: 1EP 9219,36 NRC 95 (1992) assistance in developing a sound secord; CD-92-12,36 NRC 62 0992) ^ s i 41 I ~ i 1 t l i .h 4 1 a

SUIUECT INDEX availabihty d other means to pmtect peunoner's imerests; GP-92-19, 36 NRC 98 0992) bmnderung af assuem er delay of pmceedmg: UlP-92-19,36 NRC 98 0992) deley of pruczedmg. puerusal fcr. CU-92-12,36 NRC 62 (1992) derual 4 quest far. Q192-12, M NRC 62 0992) five factors so be addressed by peutiarur, GP-92-28,36 hTC 202 0992) good <ause test fr. C1192-12,36 NRC 62 0992) other means to praect irnervenor's imereme; CU-9212, 36 NRC 62 0992) other panies to permect intervenor's imerest; Q192-12,36 NRC 62 0992) JUDGES See Admuustradve Judges JUR15DICHON anutrust; CI192r11, 36 NRC 47 0992) 112GSI.ATIVE 11LTIORY weigla g!ve to, in staunary Gs, C19210,36 NRC 1 (1992) UCENSE "snguage making radiatian safety effuzr ecmplew2y respansihie far emnphance with safety reguladans; U1692-4 36 FRC 15 (199Q UCENSE CONDTHON anutrust, authority so amend; Q192-11,36 NRC 47 (1992) antitrust, imervenuen in pmeeedmg on suspennon of, GP-92-19,36 NRC 98 0997; UCENSE RENEWAL denial, consolidanon with decommissierung pra=Ang; GP 92-16A,36 NRC 18 0992) UCENSEES responsibility for acts of employees; GP-92-25,36 NRC 156 (1992) UCENSES am-unhty, fmancial qualificadens under PruwAnderson Act; DPRM-921, 36 NRC 310992) UCENSING of independent pc-r pmducers to emstruct or operate commercial na:1 car power zactors: DPRM 924, 36 NRC 310992) UCENSING BOARDS responsihihty to seek Commission authanzauon for cansalidation of proceedings; CU-92-13,36 NRC 79 0 992) UGTnNG See Emeramey lightmg Symems MANAGEMENT OIARACTER AhT) COMPETENCE Commission authority to corsuler, GP-92-25, 36 NRC 156 0992) standard for daerraming; GP-92-25,36 NRC 156 0992) weight given in lumnsee's cands in desernuning whether w revoke its license; GP-92-25,36 NRC 156 (1992) MATERIAL CONTROL AND ACCOLSTABI!JTY declosum d applicans's plan for; GP-92-15A,36 NRC 3 (1992) MATERIAL FALSE STATEMEh7 by liamsee on his role as radiograpids assiszara; GP-92-25,36 NRC 156 0992) MATERIAIS U NSE AMENDMENT stay pedmg annpletaan of adjudication; GP-92-20,36 NRC 112 0992) to perform plars pmcassing tests an feed canairdng source material; LBP-92-20,36 NRC 112 0992) MATERIA 13 UCENSES pmoedures applicable to beanng en denial of; C1192-13,36 NRC 79 0992) See also Bypmduct Matmal liznse MUNIQPAUTY demonstestian d injury-in-fact for standing to imervene in antitrust proceedmg: GP 92-19,36 NRC 98 0 992) d2 A l-, A

i f ? i ~ SUBJECT INDEX i NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PolJCY ACT I corsideranan d ehernanwes ao decommissiarung; 1EP-92-23,36 NRC !20 0992) .a . ; I revww far 14; IEP-92-3,36 NRC 120 0992) NO SIGNIFICANT ILAZARDS DETERMINADON bcense amendmcra no incorpornie spent fuc0 pool redesign in tecimical specifwations; IEP-92-17,36 i NRC 23 0992) NCTTICE OF APPEARANCE [ of counsel, s:andant for naufymg t.oant af; GP-92-24,36 NRC 149 0992) NRC INSPILTION impmpneues at Palo Verde, suegatwns of, DD92-4,36 NRC 143 0992) NtK3, EAR REGUIATORY CI)MMISSION authority to amend licenses; CLJ 92-11,36 NRC 47 0992) See also Comnussim ODORAh"!3 addinan to radescove amasseans as a safery messme; DPRM-92-2. % NRC 37 09W) OPI RAHNG UCENSE AMFNDMEST autharny to appnwe; CL1-9Mi,36 ERC 47 0992) ' assuans gnar to hearing varatsurg amendmet; IEP-92-17,36 NRC 3 0992) spent fust pool redesign: UtP 92-17,36 NRC 23 0992) to modify admmisumt;ve caramh mw use of spent fuel pool; IEP-92r28,36 NRC 202 0992) OPERATING IJCENSE AMENDMENT PROGHXNGS geographic pmumity as basis far sunding to irmervec in; ISP-92 28,36 NRC 202 0992) OPERARNG IJCEh1ES l catension to recapune constmenan period. IEP-92 27,36 NRC 1% 0992) l forum fa diaumges in; QJ-9212,36 NRC 62 0992) ORAL ARGUMENT cause for denial of; ClJ-92-12,36 NRC 62 0992), ORGANIZATIONS standmg to irnervene; 1EP-92-23,36 NRC 120 0992) PENALTY I for Incadi d protecuve crder; IEP-92-15A,36 NRC 5 0992) See also Civil halnes i PRESIDING OmCER disaedmary authority of; 1RIL92-24,36 NRC 149 (1992) zesponsihility to anck Commission smharization for consolids6an of procaadmas; CLJ-9213,36 NRC 79 0 992) PRICF, ANDERSON ACT financial quahfcations aquinrnerna for non uniny twensens under, DPRM-92rl,36 NRC 310992) j PRIVIII:GE burden to establish; IEP-92-15A. 36 57C 5 0902) PROTIC11VE ORDER demal af request far; QJ-92-12,36 NRC 62 0992) [ pmahy for tresdh of;IEP-92-15A,36 NRC 5 0992) RADIATION RELIASES loelevel, addinon of odorams no facilitate 4csecuan af, DPRM 92 2,36 NRC 37 0992) I RADIATION SAir!Y OmCER delegauen of compkse uponsibility and authonty an; IEP-92-25,36 NRC 156 0992) remcation d license for defeiencies by; IEP-92-16,36 NRC 15 (1992) RAD 10AC11VE EMISSIONS addinan d odosums as a safety measure; DPRM-92-2,36 NRC 37 (1992) [ RAD 10ACIIVE PLUMES 'i sechmcal discussion af; DPRM-92-2,36 NRC 37 (1992) { f u r e ii 6

3 m f I SUBJECT INDEX j i h RADIOGRAPilER failuse of licenser to pnwide operaung and crnergency procedurca to; 1RP-92-25,36 NRC 156 0992) [ t perfamance d unlicennai acnvines as asustant act 13P-92-25,36 NRC 156 (1992) RADIOGRAPIDC EXPOSURE DEVIC 23 failure to mark with licenses *a addreas and phone number, IEP-92-25,36 NRC 156 (1992) l failure to perfem surveys at anne of storage of; IEP-92 25,36 NRC 156 (1992) i 4 falsification of utamance logs: IEP-92-25,36 NRC 156 0992) unauthorized une er; 13P 92-25,36 NRC 156 0992) ? RADIOIJDGICAL MONTTORING use of adarurna no facihtste; DPRM-92 2,36 hTC 37 0092) } REGUI.AllONS imarpnsation of 10 CJR.1763; C1J-92-12,36 NRC 62 0992) iracrpruaraan of 10 CIA. Pan 50; DPRM-92-1,36 NRC 310942) irsupreutitm d 10 CJ.R. Pan 140: DPRM-92-1,36 NRC 310992) j 5ee s% R, des of Practice f RSOFENING A RTCORD a'f.das requirement for, CLI-92-12,36 NRC 62 0992) l ae;ual of regaest far; QJ-92-12,36 KRC 62 0992)- timelinces requirement far; CIJ4212,36 NRC 62 (1992) s REVIEW imerlocutory, standard for grant of; QJ-92-13,36 NRC 79 0992) ' of conschdation order;12P-92-16A,36 NRC 18 0992) .l ef initial decizians; 1RP42-25,36 h1tc 156 0992) 6 af seulernent agreemerna, purpose ef; 1RP-92-18,36 NRC 93 0992) .f standant for Canumssion grant of, withcr.rt awaiting a reply inna any respondmg party; QJ-92-13,36 1 KRC 79 0992) REVOCATION OF IJCENSE far deficiencies by radiation safety of5cer where that officer is made comple:ely esoannible;13P-92-16, t 36 NRC 15 0992) reasons far;ISP-92r25,36 NRC 156 0992) RU11 MAKING standard for docketing peunana for: DPRM-92 2,36 NRC 37 0992) RU115 OF PRACDCE. affdavit requirement for verpaung a secord; QJ42-12,36 KRC 62 0992) t amendment of hearing petince in informal hearing: IEP-92 24,36 NRC 149 0992) j amendrners of inservernaan pennans; 12P-92 27,36 NRC 196 0992) T callateral estnppel; 1BP-92-23,36 NRC 120 0992) supervisory authnrity over adjudicanons; C1J-92-D,36 NRC 79 0992) rum corsenuan requuemers for innervention; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 120 0992) l discmery of accurity plans; LEP-92-15A,36 NRC 5 (1992) discretaonary L&L-._, review of consolidanan erder; QJ-9213,36 NRC 79 0992). j discreumary standing to imervene; IEP-92 23,36 NRC 120 (1992) five-faam test for late intervennnn; C1J 92-12,36 NRC 62 0992) r forum far challenges to eg.asting licenses; QJ-92-12,36 NRC 62 (1992) good cause for delay in filing intervenuan petitiart; C1342-12,36 NRC 62 0992); IEP 9219,36 NRC .g f 98 (1992) 'I governing rule in conflia between a subpan O rule and a special rule in another subpan; CLJ-92r13, 36 NRC 79 (1992) injury-in fact standard far standing to intervene;13P-92-19,36 NRC 98 0992) imerest requawnent far innervention; C1J-92-12,36 NRC 62 (1992) !.I imerincutary review standard; QJ42-13,36 NRC 79 (1992) late-filed areas d concern in informal hearings; ISP-92-24,36 NRC 149 (1992) aral argument; QJ-9212,36 NRC 62 0992) ) b i .l 1 q i

- i i SUIUECT INDEX f i F orgsmanmal standing to amervane, IEP-92-23, 36 NHC 120 0992) pleadmg mpaimnerus for comerr.uma; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 120 (1992) procadunn appleable to beanng an materials Izense demal; C1192-13,36 NRC 79 0492) propnetary determmanans; IEP 92-15A,36 NRC 3 0992) pnsectum of emfwiemial information inra disclosure; CU-92-12,36 NRC 62 0992) savios of documems en petinana; IEP-92-23, M NRC 120 (1992) spectfymg areas of corrern in infannal beenngs; IEP-9124,36 NRC 149 0902) [ standard for Comsnimen grant of senew sht miting a aply frorn any wrspedmg pany; C119213,36 NRC 79 0992) sunding to irnervane; IEP-9123,36 NRC 120 0992) standu;g to irnervene in decomnusmanmg ginceed.ng; ISP-92-24,36 hkC 149 0992) standmg to ienervem en basis of starmling in an earlier renceedmg; IEP-92-27,36 NRC 146 0992) timeliness avguiremern far seopming a record, C13-92-12,35 NRC 62 (1992) i sone of irnerasts for s:andire so imervene; GP-923,36 KRC 120 0992) SANC110NT far nucampliance with picadmg ma._ fur irnervenuca petinans; IEP-92-X,36 NRC 1910992) SEAIJD, SOURCES mventones d; IEP-92 25. 36 NRC 156 0992) SECURI1Y PLAN 5 dmoovery of; 12P-92-15A,36 NRC 5 0992) SERVICE OF DOCUMENT 3 on petinmers;IEP-92-23. 36 NRC 120 0*y2) sancnon far failure in comply with seguirements far; GP-92-26,36 NRC 1010992) SETT11. MENT AGREEMENTS I purpose of licensing board review of; IEP-92-18, 36 NRC 93 0992); IEP 9121,36 NRC 117 0992) SIEPPING (DNIAINERS for radioactive material, faDure to pmperly mark; 1EP 9125,36 NRC 156 0992) SPIX 2AL NUC11.AR MATERIA 1, a con 5dennahty of material carnrol and acoaurnability program; IEP 92,15A,36 NRC 5 (1992) SPENT IVEL POOL crincality analysis M~ -': d errass; IEP-92-17,36 NRC 23 0992); GP-92-28,36 NRC 202 0992) licmse amcadment for sedesign of, IEP-9217,36 NP4 23 0992) I STANDING 10 IN"!TRVENE appbcation of jud cial annerpts in NRC proceedings; GP-92-23,36 NRC 120 (1992); IEP-92-28,36 NRC 202 0992) abscreuanary; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 120 0992) t fmancial irnerests as basis for, IEP 92-23,36 NRC 120 0992) geographic proximity as basis in operaung 1xense amendmcra proceedmgs; IEP-92-28, 36 NRC 202 0 992) gensrephical proximity as basis in decarnmissioning proceeding; 12P-92 23,36 NRC 120 0992) injury-in-fact in deonmmasianing pmceedmg; 12P-92-24,36 NRC 149 0992) injury-in-fact showing far; IEP 9219,36 NRC 98 0992) irajury to informatimal i:ncresta as basis for; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 120 0992) newly acquired, as basis far late imervenuan; IEP 92-19,36 NRC 98 (1992) organinnmal, npresemstian inqumxnets fur; IEP-92-28,36 NRC 202 0992) organistianal, ways to establish; IEP-92-23,36 NRC 120 0992) pleadmg requimnerns no establish; IEP-9123,36 NRC 120 0992) standmg in an earlier proczeding as bass fcr; IEP-92-27,36 NRC 196 0992) STAT 1! OF ITTAI1 beanna request an materials licmse amendment; IEP-92 20,36 NRC 112 0992) { STA1LTORY CONTTRUCIlON language of mandamry direcnan and excluarvity; IEP-92-16A 36 NRC 15 0992) weight giveri to legislanve history; CU-92-10,36 NRC 10992) - 45 r 4 8 s

l SUIUECT INDEX 9 .t i } STAY appeal d deia! d request for. IllP-92-22. 36 NRC 119 0992) [ burden on progenent of roguest for 1]lP-92-20,36 NRC 112 0992) critena for para of; LBP42-20,36 NRC 112 0992) of matenals license amendment pendmg compicuan of adpdwanon, denial of request for. LBP-92-20, 36 NRC 112 0992) SUBPART G 11tOCIIDWGS consolidsum wr.h Subpart L procexdtep; CU-92-13,36 NRC 79 0992); 1RP-92-16A, 36 NRC 18 ON2) Sl5PAKT L PftOCEEDINGS Carmumsico opprmal ricaded for m;5sicati.m of shernedve heanns pmcedue for. C13-9213,36 hMC I 79 0 992) carmahdanan wr.h Sahpan G pmceed r:p; GJ-92-13,3G NRC 79 (1992); LitP 9216A. 36 NRC !! 099D SCBPOENAS f maion to quash er sc4fy; CU-9210,36 NRC 10992) i SUSPINSION OF UCENSE denial of request fcr. CU42-12,36 NRC 62 0992) 9 TEGINICAL SPECDICATIONS i Lemse amedmers to incorporate spera fuel pool mdesign in; LEP-92-17,36 NRC 23 0992) TutMINAT10N OF PROCf1 DING saticeers agreement as basis for, L11P-92-18,36 NRC 93 (1992); 1RP-92-21,36 NRC 117 0992) TESTIMONY voluntary, trarmenpt rights at; CU-92-10,36 NRC 10992) TIULNSCRIPTS i of enmpelled interviews, right d wimess ur. CU-92-10,36 h7C 10992) l r VIDIATION of en,'.- - ' quahfmauon requirements for clocuial equigenent impanars to saicsy, civil penahy far, IEP-92-21,36 NRC 117 (1992) ETTNESSES. transenpt rights af; CU-9210,36 h1C 10992) i ZONE OF INTERESTS for materials license ammarrers hearinp;IEP-92-20,36 NRC 112 0992) ? l i Ii i a i i 1 o i 1 I)

......... -..~. l r i I l l I { u I I - %[ '. TACILIIT INDI;X .b l A1011D. PENNSYLVANIA FUEL FABRICA110N TACI11TY; Dodet No. 74135-DCOM DECOMMISSION 1NO; Septanhar 4,1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Allowing Pentioners to Amed or Suppitznent Der lleanna Regaea); LBP-92-24,36 NRC 149 (1992) CLAIBORNE ENRIGIMENT CENIIR; Duciet No. 70-3074 ML MATTRIALS UCENSE; July 8,1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Rulmg on Dacovery Duputes Pennining to Cmtm6cns L and M); IEP-92-15A,36 NRC 5 0992) COMANOIE PEAK STEAM E!ECTRIC STATION, Units 1 and 2; Dodet Nos. 50 445-01ACPA, 50-446CL OPERATING UCENSE AND CONSTRUCTION PERM.T AMENDMENT; August 12, 1992; g MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; CU-92-12,36 NRC 62 0902) l DAVIS-BESSE NUCIIAR POWER STA110N Unit 1; Docket Nas. 50-440 A,5434& A j AVITTRUST; August 6,1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Grantmg Gty of Bnua Park Mo6an far Im laterventaan); LBP-9219,36 NRC 98 (1992) y l ANITTRUST; August 12, 1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; CU-92-11,36 NRC 47 0992) O g DIABLO CANYON NUQIAR POWER PIANT, Urms I and 2; Dodet Nos. 54 27501A.2, ( 543230!A-2 OPERATING UCENSE AMENDML T; Seguenber 24, 1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ( 0=iling Schedules and Pmbearing Conferece); LBP-92-27,36 NRC 196 (1992) JOSEPIl M. TAR 11Y NUCLEAR PLANT, Units 1 and 2; Docket Nos. 3434SCivP,543%CwP =s CIVIL PENALTY; August 12, 1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Approving $cttlemmt h Agreement and Temunating Proceeding); LBP-92-21,36 NRC 117 (1992) MIIJ STONE NU(LEAR foWER STATION, Unit 2; Docket No, 54336CLA OPIRATLNG UCENSE AMENDMENT; July 29, 1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDIR i (Establishir:s Pleadmg Schedule); LBP-9217,36 NRC 23 0992) l OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMIAT; September 17, 1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 1 Omposing Sanctions upon CCMN and Striking Peti.ians) U3P-92-26, 36 NRC 1910992) l OPERA 11NG UCENSE AMENDMEAT; September 30,1902; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Rulms en Ptsitions far Imve to Imervene); 1.EP-92-28,36 NRC 202 0992) PAID VERDE NUCLIAR GENERATING STATION, Units 1,2, and 3; Docket &s. 54528, 54529, i 54530 f REQUEST ICR ACTION; August 12,1992; }INAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDEP. I'l CI R. 8 2.206; DIL924, 36 NRC 143 0992) PERRY NUC11AR POWER PLANT, Unit 1: Docket Nos. 50444A,54346-A AN'ITTRUST; August 6,1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Grantmg Oty of Unxa fu Madon for Eate intervernian); IEP-92-19,36 NRC 98 0992) ANTITRUST; August 12, 1992, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; QJ 9211,36 NRC 47 0992) RANQlO SECO NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION; Dudet Not 50L312-DCOM DECOMMISSIONINO; August 20, 1992; PkDIEARING CDNTERENG ORDER (Tenninsting Proceeding); IEP-92-23,36 NRC 120 0992) SOLTIl1EXAS PROJECT, Units 1 and 2; Docka Nos. 5H98,54499 y l ENTORCEMIST: July 2,1992, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; CU-92-10,36 NRC 10992) i 47 l l I i e i s J i li . a}}