ML20035H801

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-445/93-10 & 50-446/93-10 on 930315-19 & 0407 & Notice of Violation
ML20035H801
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  
Issue date: 05/03/1993
From: Collins S
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: William Cahill
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
Shared Package
ML20035H802 List:
References
NUDOCS 9305070149
Download: ML20035H801 (6)


See also: IR 05000445/1993010

Text

\\

.

j,P hf cg

UNIT E D ST ATES

,

[

k,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[l

/

j

REGION IV

c,.

[

611 RY AN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 400

C

_

e

AR LINGTON, TE XAS 76011 8054

+.e

MAY -31993

Dockets:

50-445

50-446

Licenses: HPF-87

NPF-88

TU Electric

ATTN:

W. J. Cahill, Jr., Group Vice President

Nuclear Engineering and Operations

(

Skyway Tower

400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81

Dallas, Texas 75201

SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-445/93-10; 50-446/93-10 (NOTICE OF

VIOLATION)

This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. M. Runyan, and the inspectors

identified in the enclosed report, of this office on March 15-19 and on

April 7,1993, during which a supplemental exit meeting was conducted. The

inspection included a review of activities authorized for your Comanche Peak

Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, facility. .At the conclusion of the

inspection, the findings were discussed with you and those members of your

staff identified in the enclosed report.

The inspection examined the program implementing your comitments to Generic Letter 89-10, " Safety-Related Motor-Operated Valve Testing and Surveillance."

Within this area, the inspection consisted of selective examination of

representative records and interviews with personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, certain licensed activities appeared

to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of

Violation (Notice). Violation A is of concern because the failure to evaluate

the recomendations of vendor technical documents could affect the operability

of safety-related components.

Two unresolved items were iden'.ified during the inspection. One involved an

incorrect calculation of torque limits for a valve test and the subsequent

failure to independently verify the calculation. The other involved an open

stroke dynamic diagnostic test that appeared to have been performed without

the valve being in a fully closed position. These issues are discussed in

Section 1.2 of the enclosed inspection report. At the exit meeting, you

comitted to provide additional information on these two issues by April 2,

1993.

Based on the additional information you provided on March 30, 1993, and the

supplemental information you supplied during a telephone conversation on

April 5, 1993, between Mr. Runyan and Messrs. O. Bhatty and R. Withrow, the

9305070149 930503

M

PDR

ADOCK 05000445

/

G

PDR

f

4

-

.

.

.

4

i

TU Electric

-2-

i

failure to follow procedures and to provide an independent verification of

motor-operated valve test input data has been identified as Violation B as

t

specified in the enclosed Notice. As a result of your accomplished and

committed corrective actions in response to the identification of this issue,

i

you will not be required to respond to this violation.

The other unresolved item identified during the inspection, concerning

apparent nonconservative initial test conditions, has been reclassified based

i

on further review as an inspection followup item.

The inspection revealed that you are relying on a study conducted by Kalsi

Engineering of the structural thrust capability of certain Limitorque

u.'uators, as discussed in Section 1.6 of the enclosed inspection report. The

r

aff's position regarding the use of this study to increase actuator thrust

ratings will be provided separately by the staff.

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions

,

specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.

In your

response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional

actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this

!

Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future

inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is

necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

~

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of

this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC's Public Document

Room.

The response directed by this letter to the enclosed Notice is not subject to

the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget, as required

by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96.511.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased

to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

,

JC

irector

ivision of Reactor Safety-

Enclosures:

1.

Appendix A - Notice of Violation

2.

Appendix B - NRC Inspection Report

!

50-445/93-10 w/ Attachments

50-446/93-10 w/ Attachments

cc w/ enclosures:

(see next page)

. -

- - - - - - - - - - . - . - - - - -

- - - - - -

-

--

. - - - - -

j

,

-

. .

~.

.

-

. . .

.

-

.

,,

i

l

-

c

! TU Electric

-5-

NRC Inspection Report 50-445/93-10; 50-446/93-10

f

bec to DMB (IE01)-

bec distrib. by RIV:

J. L. Milhoan

Resident Inspector (2)

'

DRP

Section Chief (DRP/B)

i

Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, MS: MNBB 4503

MIS System

DRSS-FIPS

RIV File

Project Engineer (DRP/B)

Section Chief (DRP/TSS)

DRS

F. Jape, RII

i

M. Runyan

P. Eapen, RI

R. Vickrey

D. Danielson, RIII

l

T. Scarbrough, NRR

.

M. Holbrook, Consultant EG&G Idaho

!

C. Myers, RV

T. Westerman

-

_

plu -

RIV:ES*

RIV:ES*

C:ES *

DD:DRS*.

NRR:EMEB+ NP

DM)

!

MRunyan

RVickrey

TWesterman

ATHowell

JNorberg

Mach

[SJCollins,-

!

^

/ /93

/ /93

/ /93

/ /93

/ /93

fM93

  • Previously concurred

_f

+ concurred by telephone 4/29/93

r

?

-

r

f

060105

.

!

.

.

.

. . -

4

TU Electric

-3-

cc w/ enclosures:

TU Electric

ATTN:

Roger D. Walker, Manager of

Regulatory Affairs for Nuclear

Engineering Organization

Skyway Tower

400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81

Dallas, Texas 75201

Juanita Ellis

President - CASE

1426 South Polk Street

Dallas, Texas 75224

GDS Associates, Inc.

Suite 720

1850 Parkway Place

Marietta, Georgia 30067-8237

TU Electric

Bethesda Licensing

3 Metro Center, Suite 610

Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Jorden, Schulte, and Burchette

ATTN: William A. Burchette, Esq.

Counsel for Tex-La Electric

Cooperative of Texas

1025 Thomas Jefferson St., N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20007

Newman & Holtzinger, P.C.

ATTN: Jack R. Newman, Esq.

1615 L. Street, N.W.

Suite 1000

Washington, D.C.

20036

Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation

ATTN:

G.-R. Bynog, Program Manager /

Chief Inspector

Boiler Division

P.O. Box 12157, Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711

Honorable Dale McPherson

County Judge

P.O. Box 851

Glen Rose, Texas 76043

J

'

,

4

<

.

.

'

.

TU Electric

-4-

Texas Radiation Control Program Director

r

1100 West 49th Street

Austin, Texas 78756

Owen L. Thero, President

Quality Technology Company

P.O. Box 408

-

201 West 3rd

Lebo, Kansas 66856-0408

1

3

.

.

.

.

-

.

TU Electric

-5-

NRC Inspection Report 50-445/93-10; 50-446/93-10

bec to DMB (IE01)

bec distrib. by RIV:

J. L. Milhoan

Resident Inspector (2)

DRP

Section Chief (DRP/B)

Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, MS: MNBB 4503

MIS System

DRSS-FIPS

RIV File

Project Engineer (DRP/B)

Section Chief (DRP/TSS)

DRS

F. Jape, RII

M. Runyan

P. Eapen, RI

R. Vickrey

D. Danielson, RIII

T. Scarbrough, NRR

M. Holbrook, Consultant EG&G Idaho

C. Myers, RV

T. Westerman

RIV:ES*

RIV:ES*

C:ES *

DD:DRS*

NRR:EMEB+

h$hP

DM)

HRunyan

RVickrey

TWesterman

ATHowell

JNorberg

MBIach [SJCollinsf '

/ /93

/ /93

/ /93

/ /93

/ /93

[ Aj/93

  • Previously concurred

+ concurred by telephone 4/29/93

,

o

. -

.

.