ML20035G698

Ack Receipt of Providing Info on Initiatives to Support Licensee Nuclear Safety Review Board W/Four Standby Committees.Initiatives Will Be Reviewed During Future Insps to Determine Their Effectiveness

ML20035G698
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	04/26/1993
From:	Milhoan J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Cottle W HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.
References
NUDOCS 9304290095
Download: ML20035G698 (4)

Text

UNITED SVATES f*>RREcg<>?g PdUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION L_

~ E,I d(

j REGION IV

• k i [Pf sit RYAN PLAZA DRIVE. SUITE 400 o

AR LINGTON, TE XAS 760118064 g' ' V

• ...+

Wd 2 619%

Docket: 50-498 50-499 License: NPF-76 NPF-80 Houston Lighting & Power Company ATTN:

William T. Cottle, Group Vice President, Nuclear P.O. Box 1700 Houston, Texas 77251

SUBJECT:

NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-498/92-99: 50-499/92-99 Thank you for your letter of March 30, 1993, which provides information on your initiatives to support your Nuclear Safety Review Board with four standby committees.

These initiatives will be reviewed during future inspections to determine their effectiveness in addressing performance issues that were identified in the most recent Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performante report and have been identified in recent inspection reports that have been discussed with you in enforcement conferences.

Sincerely, 2%. i. fl l61 441 troan

/ James L.) M L Regional-CC:

Houston Lighting & Power Company ATTN:

William J. Jump, Manager Nuclear Licensing P.O. Box 289 Wadsworth. Texas 77483 City of Austin Electric utility Department ATTN:

J. C. Lanier/M. B. Lee

'P.O.

Box 1088 Austin, Texas 78767

[( '

h

/ Is

{I 9304290095 930426 PDR ADOCK 05000498 0

G PDR

Houston Lighting & Power Company !

City Public Service Board ATTN:

R. J. Costello/M. T. Hardt P.O. Box 1771 San Antonio, Texas 78296 Newman & Holtzinger, P. C.

ATTN: Jack R. Newman, Esq.

1615 L Street, NW l

Washington. D.C.

20036 l

v Central Power and Light Company I

ATTN:

D. E. Ward /T. M. Puckett l

P.O. Box 2121 i

Corpus Christi, Texas 78403 i

INPO l

Records Center i

1100 Circle 75 Parkway Atlanta, Georgia 30339-3064 j

i Mr. Joseph M. Hendrie

{'

50 Bellport Lane Bellport, New York 11713 i

Bureau of Radiation Control State of Texas 1101 West 49th Street Austin, Texas 78756 Judge, Matagorda County Matagorda County Courthouse l

1700 Seventh Street Bay City, Texas 77414 Licensing Representative l

Houston Lighting & Power Company Suite 610 Three Metro Center o

Bethesda. Maryland 20814 i

t

. Houston Lighting & Power Company

-t ATTN:

Rufus S. Scott, Associate General Counsel P.O. Box 61867 l

Houston. Texas 77208 t

[

l t

i i

Houston Lighting & Power Company APR 2 61993 i

bec to DMB (IE40) bcc distrib. by RIV:

J. L. Milhoan Resident Inspector JRP Section Chief (DRP/D)

Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, MS: MNBB 4503 MIS System DRSS-FIPS RIV File Project Engineer (DRP/D)

R. Bachmann, OGC,MS: 15-B-18 DRS Section Chief (DRP/TSS) e 1

1 1

[

l l

i i

I i

l t

f A

s !b

! :DRP/A C

D:MP DRAk[t1 RA

[

l RIV:PE:DRP/A MSatorius:dlf WDJohnson ABbch JMM'odtgomery JLMilhian 4/ M 93 4/7193 4/@/93 4/9d/93 4/ /93

/

/

l 1

i

5 i

1 Houston Lighting & Power Company APR 261933 1

i bcc to DMB (IE40) i i

bcc distrib. by RIV:

J. L. Milhoan Resident Inspector DRP Section Chief (DRP/D)

Lisa Shea. RM/Alf, MS: MNBB 4503 MIS System DRSS-FIPS RIV File Project Engineer (DRP/D)

R. Bachmann, OGC,MS: 15-B-18 DRS Section Chief (DRP/TSS) i

?

1 l

l f

I a

P

~

..)

b The Light company linuston L...ignting & Power South Toas Prnicc Occeric Generatine Star.on P. O. Bos 289 Wadimorth Teus 77483 hA9 3 01993 r

ST-HL-AE-4342 File No.:

G32.01.09 10CFRSO Mr. James L. Milhoan Regional Administrator, Region IV U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Cennission E-611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlingtcn, TX 76011 South Texas Project Units 1 and :

Docket Nos. STN 50-498, STN 50-499

2.. e

. _ p a a,n. a.; n.n

n., ~., o_ n_.-

~.

c <

<-n

_a.o_m.

=. c,,4 o_ u noava

n. 4. *. 4. a. 4... a c r

._o

Reference:

Ccrrespondence frc:

D.

P.

Hall, HL&P, to Janes L. Milhoan, NRC, dated January 14, 1993, "First Report Regarding HL&P Performance Initiatives"

\\ c. _.u.a _n.r _ '. wD )'

r s t. <

n 3

w e u.r

.= N.. 7.k. 3...

v In the referenced ccrrespondence, Hcusten Lighting & Pcwer r.u..r. a p i

--.'4"a.".

e e

s a ~. n' ' ~. e e s. e.~ ~ ~..a.

..".a. a c ~. 4 ". 4. 4 ea ".de-.'.ke7..

v 4... r.-,.. a_. e "....-.. e a

• C ~..D.

n' s a c

• ^

initia ; ces of the Nuclear Saf ety Revie-.#.'.-"m'e' c7

.b. e y e. '.... a... e Ecard (NSRB), the NSRB has e s '.b..'.... e

c.~.~a.."..'.....

. - -.... 4.. t c o ass. stance to the NSR3.

The purpcse

' -"a.#~..

- e y. -v i d _i..~

.ev ew 4

se standing cc_ ittees e

,,.. y e.:.o e.<...

u, t.en,

4...,

w4,w a..

e

..y..

, eve.l c". e _ _e e, ' e y-

.. o e s

.=..4 o c.,..d " c 4.

.....e.c..s e.#.#.4

.4e.n

• 1 "..

~.". e s e

.e e

u of spec-fic areas of Nuclear Grcup perf:rrance, standing acrrittees are e v

including the area of radielegical controls which is undergcing a major trans; tion to i Olenent the new 10CFR20 chanc.es.

n., w eu.m.

<.,,..wu.... e.- a ee..w...-ec

..w. n.,. u.a,. e

,v., e h e. e..:.3,..w. e current nenbership, NSRB's s

implementation status of these cetritteesstanding cerrittee structure, and the a brief description of the major areas of expertise of the current provides NSRB recrers.

Scre of the issues identified during 1992 by the NSRB for highlights to the Grcup " ice President, Nuclear are

- cr c e a..4.w v,.4 4n n.., s... e.m.,

,s

'7 M-

+

k k

g be N

pgk

{

g g

..e--

9 The Light c o m p a nySouth Texas Project Dectric Generating Station P.O.Bom289 Wadsworth. Texas 77483 Houston L...ignting & Power R9 3 01993 re:

ST-HL-AE-4342 File No.:

G32.01.09 10CFR50 Mr. James L. Milhoan Regional Administrator, Region IV U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Cc= mission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 South Texas Project Units 1 and 2 Decket Nos. STN 50-495, STN 50-499 Recer Rocardina Nuclear Safety Peview Board Initiatives

Reference:

Ccrrespondence frc=

D.

P.

Hall, HL&P, to James L. Milhoan, NRC, dated January 14, 1993, "First Report Regarding HL&P Perfcr=ance Initiatives" (ST-HL-AE-4295)

Dear Mr. Milhcan:

In the referenced correspondence, Ecuston Lighting & Power (HL&P) provided a progress report on the activities undertaken to improve perfor ance at STP.

As a fcilcu-up on the perfernance initiatives of the Nuclear Safety Review Ecard (NSR3), the NSRB has established fcur standing cc =.ittees for providing revieu assistance to the NSR3.

The purpcse of these standing cc=ittees is to allow NSR3 to perfor: effective high level oversight of safety issues and to ccnduct its business efficiently.

These standing Oc=rittees are expected to provide a = ore focused everview of spec:.fic areas of Nuclear Grcup performance, including the area of radicicgical controls which is undergoing a najor transition to implemen the new 10CFR20 changes.

Attachmen: 1 further describes the charter of the NSR3, the current renbership, NSRS's standing cc =ittee structure, and the implementation status of these cc mittees. provides a brief description of the najor areas of expertise of the curren:

NSRB nenbers.

Scre of the issues identified during 1992 by the NSRB for higF i ghts to the Grcup 'Ji c e President, Nuclear are-descrihed in

.achment 3.

r8

. Qd _ _ _ C '

I *,,

~v i-

-a j r.,

\\ U %3 IEAf f h LIlI A 41]I lI' kl% e

!IbMI l dI (

s

Houston Lighting & Power Company South Texas Project Electric Generating Station ST-HL-AE-4342 l

File No.:

G32.01.09 l

i 10CFR50 i

e HL&P considers the NSRB to be one of its vital resources for j

safe and reliable operation.

We will update the NRC periodically regarding progress nade in implementing the NSRB initiatives and their effectiveness.

i If you have any questions, please call ne at (512) 972-8434 j

or (713) 229-7253.

i 4

V i

l F

e

/

7 i

• J.

P. Hall Group *.' ice President, Nuclear

(

1 MKC/nl

}

i 3

Attachments i

3 a

?'

ii i

i s

\\

\\

?

i 1

t i

i j

I t

I, k

l 1

k

)

j i

I 1

4 1

l l

1 i

i i

I 5

1 4

5 i

i i

a.

i Houston Lighting & Power Company ST-HL-AE-4342 South Tezu Prefect Electric Generating Station File No.: G32.01.09

'i Page 3 CC:

i h

l Regional Administrator, Region IV Rufus S.

Scott r

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Associate General C0unsel 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Ecuston Lighting & Power Company j

Arlingtcn, TX 76011 P. O. Box 61867 Ecuston, TX 77208 l

l Project Manager

)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission INPO Washingten, DC 20555 Records Center f

1100 Circle 75 Parkway l

J.

I. Tapia Atlanta, GA 30339-3064 Senior Resident Inspector l

c/o U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Dr. Joseph M. Hendrie i

commission 50 Bellport Lane P.

O.

Sex 910 Bellport, NY 11713 l

1 Bay City, TX 77414 t

C. K. Lacker J.

R. Newnan, Esquire Bureau of Radiation Control l

Newman & Holt:inger, P.C.,

STE 1000 Texas Department of Health 1615 L Street, N.W.

1100 West 49th Street Washing cn, DC 20036 Austin, TX 78756-3189 D. E. Ward /T. M.

Puckett U.S. Nuclear Regulatcry Comm.

Central Pcwer and Light Cc pany Attn:

Document Control Desk j

P.

O.

Ecx 2121 Washington, D.C.

2C555 Corpus Christi, TX 78403 a

I I

J.

C. Lanier/M.

3.

Lee City of Austin Electric Ttility Departnent

]

P.O.

Ecx 1088 Austin, TX 78757

]

K. J. Fiedler/M.

T.

Hardt City Public Service Scard j

P.

O.

Ecx 1771 4-San Anten o, TX 78296 i

1 J

i I

.i 1

1 i

Revisec 02/03/ 2 7

y

--_v,

l l

.I l

s d

I i

I

'l 4

1 a

i 4

1 i

e I

d i

k i

1 1

4 I

i n a. n' C"u". ~.."< ~a O6 e.h..m..-e rJwc d

I n

d i

I 1

I i

i a

1i 1

h l

(

1 1

J i

i A

A s

i.

1 i

a 4

i

)

d E

i

5 NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW EOARD i

I Charter i

i STP's offsite review group, the Nuclear Safety Review Board (NSRB) j reviews station perfor=ance for safety and reliability issues and i

progress. The NSRB is an advisory group to the executive in charge l

of the nuclear program.

The NSRB is responsible for conducting i

independent reviews and audits of potentially significant activities that relate to nuclear safety and advising the Group l

Vice President, Nuclear of the results of their activities.

l Nuclear Group Policy describes the responsibility of the NSRB.

j r

t Membershio r

t r

i Currently the NSRB is composed of five senior level managers frc I

within the HL&P nuclear group and three recc~nized industr"2 w

consultants with expertise in plant operations, engineering and l

radiatien protection.

The NSRB is chaired by one of these l

independent consultants.

A short biography of each member (noted

. j as consultant or utility employee) is provided in the Attachment i

showing major areas of expertise and the nu=ber of "Jears of nuclear ri experience.

r NSRB Accennlishments t

f During 1992 the NSRB had eleven meetings.

At these meetings, the r

Board reviewed current plant problems and events as. ell as i

Technical Specification =andated items.

To enhance its ability to nake the NSRB concerns nore risible, the Board routinely previces j

to the Grcup Vice President, Nuclear the teeting highlights after i

each meeting.

Examples of sene 1992 highlights for the Grcup Vice l

President are included in Attacnnent 3.

To aller integration of cutstanding significant issues discussed at previous meetings and to remain focused en then, the Scard routinely reviews the NSRB Uaten List centaining the top ter active i

concerns of the NSRB.

+

4 i

Use Of Standinc Cennittees L

i PURPOSE:

To enable USRB to perform ef fective high level cversight of safety issues and to conduct its business efficiently, the NSRB 4

has established f our Standing C-4 **ees (Operations & Maintenance, L

Radiolcgical, Encineerina, and Quality Security).

T*rse

)

cc=mittees have been structured to ensure cbjectivity, openness and

'ield crientation.

i g.

l L

ny y

a-cr-.

..m.

.--+

-i--.

y w-.

m

-i-

- = +

a

h L

-4.

m.

a,

)

-.4.2_,

.w_..a pm

_,4 A

ma_

-d+

_ad;,me._--4.tA_.-_1.

--_vA

_s v

.AJ

...4_

r

~

1

~

NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW BOARD Pace 2 1

+

SCOPE:

Each standing co==ittee will provide a more focused

. l cverview of specific areas of Nuclear Grcup operation as well as review the Technical Specification mandated items in their areas of responsibility.

The standing cc==ittees report to the NSRB.

The l

Chairmen of the standing co==ittees provide highlights to the NSRB i

Chair =an af ter each meeting and reports to the full NSRB about the co==ittee activities at each NSRB =ceting.

The NSRB Chair =an, after each NSRB =ceting, provides highlights to the Group VP, y

Nuclear.

The minutes of NSRB and standing co==ittee meetings are provided to NSRB members, the Group VP, Nuclear, and cognizant l

=anage=ent and staff.

5 STANDING COMMI* TEES:

1 r

1

<adiolecical:

This standing cc==ittee provides overview in the areas of radiological centrols, chemistry, radwaste, environmental j

controls, e=ergency preparedness including training in these areas.

J It also routinely reviews the Technical Specification mandated s

items related to its overview areas.

2, Encineerinc:

This standing cc==ittee provides overview in the i

areas of configuration =anage=ent, engineering assurance, life s

cycle engineering, =cdification and =cdernication programs and engineering support to operations including training associated a

with the engineering areas.

It also routinely reviews the l

l Technical Specification mandated ite=s related to its everview I

i areas.

t i

i ainte ance-s standing co==ittee provides i

Ccerations and Overview in the areas Of operations, =aintenance and material readiness, includinc trainin~ da ^ese areas.

It also routinel"1

)

reviews the Technical Specification mandated inc=s related to its f

cverview areas.

i f

Ouality and Security:

This standing cc==ittee provides everview of

)

Octal quality culture and nuclear security issues at STP.

It also l

routinely reviews the Technical Specification mandated itens related to its overview areas and assures that the audit functions required by the Technical Specification are performed effectively.

- t CURRENT STAT"S:

Each standing cc=nittee held its first i

organizational =eeting en November 11, 1992. They held their first business meetings in January, 1993.

A special subco==ittee =et in 1-February (in lieu of a full NSRB meeting) Ic address the auxiliary 3

feedwater turbine issue.

In March meeti.cs of the full NSRB and

~

two of its-standing cc==1ttees were held.

4 1

a n

i q

v i

3

ATTACilMEllT 2 ST-llL-AE-4 3 4 2 11SHil 11Et1BERSHI P EXPERIEllCE File flo.: G3 2. 01. 09 '

^

(Page 1 of 1)

!! EMBER TYPE MAJOR AREAS APPROX.

OF EXPERTISE YEARS OF 110 CLEAR EXPERIEtiCE Consultant #1 1:nqineerituj, op. r a t. iinin, l<atl i o l og i ca l flore than 30 years.

Serves on t_he Chairman Safety, Quality Corporate fluclear Safety Review Boards for fourteen different nuclear units.

Utility Employee Engineering, Operationn, Radiological More than 21 years.

- Vice Chairman Safety Currently V.P.,

fluclear Engineering and formerly a Vice President with I!1PO.

Utility Employee operations, Engineering, Chemistry &

More than 24 years.

Currently V.P.

- Member Hadiochemi nt ry, Emerrp ncy fluclear Generation and previously was Preparedness, the STP Plant Manager.

Environmental Impact Uti1ity Employee Engineering, Traininy More than 23 years.

Currently Genera 1

- Member t1anager, Nuclear Assurance and formerly senior reactor physicist at Yankee a

Atomic Electric Company.

Utility Employee Ope ra t. i o n s, Engineering More than 18 years.

Currently Plant Member Manager and previously a nuclear

_..._ _i n e e _r w i _t h TV A.

eng Utilit.y Employee operationo, 1:nq i nee r i ng, Rail i o l og i ca l More than 17 years.

Currently General

- Member Safety

!1anager 1,icensing and previously an outage management manager and startup manager at Arizona Public Service.

_ Consultant #2 Operations, Radiological Safety, More than 30 years.

Retired in Dec.

l Training, Emergency Preparedness 1990 fron GPU, Nuclear as VP & Director, Three Mile Island Unit 1.

Serves on various nuclear oversight groups.

l Consultant #3 Operations, Engineering, Radiation More than 35 years.

Retired in Dec 1990 Protection, Emergency Preparedness, from GPU System.

Held positions of VP &

l Director Site Services Division, Env i r onmen t.a l I mpa c t.

Radiological and Environmental Control Division, and others.

l 6FBuaI'iRft4

(

ATTACllMUtiT 3 ST-IIL-AE-6342 SAMPLE OF 1992 flSRB llIGi!LIGIITS File lio.: G32.01.09 (Page 1 of 4)

Issue llow Idontified Status Material Condition The Board noted this issue while This issue is an tiSRB Watch List i m;)rovement campaign not reviewing t.he monthly station Issue.

Improving Material bringing the desired reports and IriPO evaluation.

condition is a specific 1993 Master result.

Operating Plan (MOP) goal.

The liSRB expects to hear from the station management further on this issue.

Station Overtime (OT).

This is a long standing observation This is an NSRB Watch List Issue.

of the 11 SRB.

tiSRB developed this flSRB la monitoring the concern from a report of the Plant effectiveness of station measures 11a n. e p ' r, Irenn review of Station in this regard.

An administrativo Overtime (OT), and conversation with Policy (AP03-11) has been Station employeca during plant developed.

NSRB will monitor tours.

Implementation.

1993 Station MOP has an OT performance goal (#41).

Expected Plant Response to While reviewing the trip reports and Plant Manager and General Manager, uncomplicated reactor the issue of routinely closing the Engineering coordinated the effort trip.

MSIVs following a trip, the IISRB to resolve this issue and briefed raised this lusue.

The !! SRB was the Board at meeting #92-11.

concerned that operators have not During 1RE04 a modification was been provided with a clear picture added to help control of the post of what the plant response ought to trip cool down rate.

This name be during an uncomplicated trip.

modification will be installed during 2RE03.

Station management will report to NSRB if the results of post modification testing are not acceptable.

Scope of Modification This innue surfaced during review of Station management briefed the control Procens.

a Station incident.

One of the board on the measures taken to causal factors had to do with a address this issue.

Station temporary system change that decided to adopt a broader appeared to have not been controlled definition of temporary

properly, modification.

'RB % Cort.92

I N1'TAClif4EliT 3 ST-IIL-A E-4 3 4 2 SAf1PLE OF 1992 liSRB llIGIILIGIITS Filo tio. : G32.01.09' (Page 2 of 4)

Issue llow Identified Status Station effectiveness in This issue surfaced during tiSRD's Station management briefed the l bringing the technical and review of TS Containment Integrity Board on the actions taken to regulatory knowledge to violation ( I,liR 1-92-002) and address this issue.

Operator bear on Station LER 1-92-001 involving essential training program will be enhanced operations.

chi 1ler operation.

to include more information regarding the general design criteria and the safety analysis l

basis.

llow the focus on audit This issue surfaced during Board's Quality Assurance (QA) is taking j activition can be review of f4aintenance audit reports.

initiatives to address this issue.

redirected to recognize While the material condition of the QA 1993 initiatives will be problem areau before they plant continueu to be a key issue, reviewed by the quality and are identified by outside the audit report did not make this security standing committee.

tiSRB organizations or before point with the degree of clarity will continue to monitor this they become a nignificant neerhw l.

lasue.

issue at STP.

Clarity of post trip The Board expressed this concern The Plant 11anager said that he will review documentation with while reviewing post trip review advise the PORC and the Trip regard to the disposition reports (#2-020, 2-021 & 1-020).

Prevention Team Task Force to of abnormalities address this issue.

The fiSRB will experienced during the monitor effectiveness by its review trip including the of future post trip reports.

, criteria for restart I constraints.

Supervisory effectiveness.

While reviewing ISEG reports the This item in an liSRB Watch List tiSRB was concerned at the number of issue and is monitored by the liSRB.

events having supervisory A Dasic Supervisory Skills Training effectiveness an an underlying Program was completed by more than causal factor.

180 people during 1992.

19 8%C0f'E.92

. ~ _ _, -. _ _ _ ~ ~

_. _ _. _, _ _ _ ~.. -. - -.... -

.. ~..

A T T A CllM Uti T 3 ST-IIL-A E-4 3 4 3 SA?!PLE OF 1992 IISRB llIGilLIGIITS File lio.: G32.01.09 (Page 3 of 4)

Issue llow Identified Status lot promptly reporting to liSRH identilied thin i ncident as a Station management subsequently

- sppropriate management retaa l t of i t. :. review of I.e v e l 2 SPR reported this event to the liRC an a

.evels the incident in (SPR 920101).

voluntary LER.

ihich all four Auxiliary

?cedwater fIow control ta1 von remained c1oned ior

aur days.

The condition of the During plant tour by a liSRB member.

Station management is improving the leutralization Basin area condition of the lieutralization i tay be an industrial Basin.

11 SRB will monitor the

.alety hazar<l.

condition via follow-up tourn.

sbility of the Emergency 11 SRB raised this issue while Station management is addressing lesponse Organization reviewing the results of Emergency this issue currently.

liSRD's 4

• ERO) to meet regulatory Preparednenu audit reports and flRC radiological standing committec

ommitments on timely irs 92-09 and 92-10.

Will further monitor this issue and staff augmentation.

advise !! SRB.

i laintenance training Plant flanager alerted the Board Station management is taking icered i ta t i on incues.

about this issue which was action.

The Board will be advised identified by IllPO.

of the corrective measures including potential generic implications.

Station 1993 milestone' plan includes resolution of this issue.

socked valse program may While reviewing a QA DR (#92-016)

Operations and Engineering will lot be based on rational, the Board raised this concern.

work together on this issue and

)ounded, and report back to the Board.

inderstandable critoria.

1 The Board identified a The 11oa rd rained t.h i s issue while Station management i s looking into

>otential design issue reviewing SPR 92-0335.

the rationale for association of

related tc, resetting the resetting Safety Injection with the reactor scram breakers in reactor trip breaker.

3rder to "re-arm" the safety Injection ictuation.

unwrra w I

_.-,.--.___.c%,,.,.#.

-,,, -..,m,....w..,.-.--m. vee 4,v.w.e.-.,,-..w,-,-.--,,,-.w..w-,-ww.,----,-.,,r r

,,_---,-m%,-,.yw..w.,,,

m-

+w---

____-.________n.m-.,,,,,_

m ___

ATTACllMEllT 3 ST-llL-AE-6342 SAMPLE OF 1992 IISRB HIGilLIGilTS File flo.: G32.01.09 (Page 4 of 4)

Issue llow Identified Status Ifforts to resolve The lloard noted this i ssue while This is an liSRB Watch List issue.

{mergency Diesel generator reviewing neveral special reports Station management will review this (EDG) problems are not invoiving 1:DG tai 1ures.

issue from a fresh perspective.

tielding positive results.

oncerning Station's plan The board rained this issue while Station management will provide a for addressing industry reviewing STP's plan to address tiRC follow-up report.

oncerns on Solenoid Generic Letter 91-15.

3perated Valves (SOV) there is a concern as to abether the priority is on the most risk significant valves addressed earliest.

Board raised :) question as The Board raised this issue while A task force has been established to what i s being done to reviewing t he semi-annual effluent to address this issue.

The 1993 reduce the volumo of r c l o.ine repor t.

MOP is also tracking this issue.

1iquid effluent release.

!ISRB's radiology standing committee will further monitor the status and i

report to the !! SRB.

The issue of lack of The Plant 11anager advised the Board Plant Manager conducted seminars credibility between uhlft during his report.

with the Plant Manager's and operations management Supervisors in this regard.

due to ineffective communication.

Issue of polar crane and Documented as a result of a 1RE04 outage critique addresses refueling machine problems backshift tour conducted by an liSRB this issue.

liSRD's operations and experienced during 1RE04.

member.

maintenance standing committee will look further into this issue and report to the NSRB.

Implications of Fort The Board asked this question while The Plant Manager will provide a Calhoun less of coolant reviewing the industry incidents.

coordinated Station response to the incident of C,.ly 3, 1992 IISRB.

on STP.

,RB\\Stort.92 w t-w r.,

m-.-7,~.n u-,-,--.-non.--.

_.-.--.,-+w..e m

e s,...#

--. -....m...

-%.w...-.

ew...

..w-,---

,,,,._m.-

m..

--