ML20035G680
| ML20035G680 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/09/1993 |
| From: | Cordes J NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| To: | Bevill T, Jeanne Johnston, Lehman R, Lieberman J, Sharp P HOUSE OF REP., HOUSE OF REP., APPROPRIATIONS, HOUSE OF REP., ENERGY & COMMERCE, SENATE, APPROPRIATIONS, SENATE, ENVIRONMENT & PUBLIC WORKS |
| References | |
| CCS, NUDOCS 9304290062 | |
| Download: ML20035G680 (5) | |
Text
i
/
'o UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
{
E WASWNGTON, D. C. 20555 o
s.,
/
March 9, 1993 l
The Honorable Richard H. Lehman, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources j
Committee on Natural Resources l
United States House of Representatives Washington, D.
C.
20515 Re:
Nuclear Information and Resource Service v. NRC, No. 93-1164 (D.C. Cir., filed Feb. 19, 1993) i
Dear Mr. Chairman:
l Petitioner seeks judicial review of the Commission's revisions of Part 52, issued in December, that were designed to conform the Commission's regulations to the recently-enacted j
Energy Policy Act.
S_qta 57 Fed. Reg. 60975 (Dec. 23, 1992).
Petitioner has not yet filed a docketing statement specifying the issues it intends to pursue, but press reports suggest that j
petitioner will argue both that the Commission should have followed a notice-and-comment process before issuance of a revised Part 52 and that the revisions misconstrue congressional intent.
We will keep you informed of any significant developments in this case.
S
- cerely, h.Cordes,Jr.if 82 licitor cc:
The Honorable Barbara Vucanovich l
l
&"&?862 mg MI PDR
/p>* arcoq'o UNITED STATES
[" ),
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~
- C WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
'?
o March 9, 1993 The Honorable Philip Sharp, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Power Committee on Energy and Commerce United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C.
20515 Re:
Nuclear Information and Resource Service v. NRC, No. 93-1164 (D.C. Cir., filed Feb. 19, 1993)
Dear Mr. Chairman:
Petitioner seeks judicial review of the Commission's revisions of Part 52, issued in December, that were designed to conform the Commission's regulations to the recently-enacted Energy Policy Act.
Egg 57 Fed. Reg. 60975 (Dec. 23, 1992).
Petitioner has not yet filed a docketing statement specifying the issues it intends to pursue, but press reports suggest that petitioner will argue both that the Commission should have followed a notice-and-comment process before issuance of a revised Part 52 and that the revisions misconstrue congressional intent.
We will keep you informed of any significant developments in this case.
Sincerely, h
72 t
n F. Cor es, Jr.
licitor cc:
The Honorable Michael Bilirakis
I La** *'4<,%,,
f UNITED STATES i
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIMlON
{
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%...**/
j March 9, 1993 4
1 1
The Honorable Joseph T.
Lieberman, Chairman Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Regulation Committee on Environment and Public Works United States Senate Washington, D.C.
20510 Re:
Nuclear Information and Resource Service v. NRC, No. 93-1164 (D.C. Cir., filed Feb. 19, 1993)
Dear Mr. Chairman:
Petitioner seeks judicial review of the Commission's revisions of Part 52, issued in December, that were designed to conform the Commission's regulations to the recently-enacted Energy Policy Act.
Egg 57 Fed. Reg. 60975 (Dec. 23, 1992).
Petitioner has not yet filed a docketing statement specifying the issues it intends to pursue, but press reports suggest that l
petitioner will argue both that the Commission should have followed a notice-and-comment process before issuance of a revised Part 52 and that the revisions misconstrue congressional intent.
We will keep you informed of any significant developments in this case.
Sincerely, o
F. Cordes, Jr.
S licitor cc:
The Honorable Alan K. Simpson 1
i l
[
'o UNITED STATES
~g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
{
E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
- s March 9, 1993 The Honorable J. Bennett Johnston, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development Committee on Appropriations United States Senate Washington, D.t.
20510 i
Re:
Nuclear Information and Resource Service v. NRC, No. 93-1164 (D.C. Cir., filed Feb. 10, 1993) 1
Dear Mr. Chairman:
Petitioner seeks judicial review of the Commission's revisions of Part 52, issued in December, that were designed to conform the Commission's regulations to the recently-enacted Energy Policy Act.
Egg 57 Fed. Reg. 60975 (Dec. 23, 1992).
l Petitioner has not yet filed a docketing statement specifying the issues it intends to pursue, but press reports suggest that petitioner will argue both that the Commission should have j
followed a notice-and-comment process before issuance of a-revised Part 52 and that the revisions misconstrue congressional intent.
We will keep you informed of any significant developments in this case.
- incerely, A
hn F.
Corde, Jr.
Solicitor
/
cc:
The Honorable Mark O. Hatfiel 1
l l
i i
- pa as og
/
'o UNITED STATES
~,,
['
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
- j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 March 9, 1993 The Honorable Tom Bevill, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development Committee on Appropriations United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C.
20515 Re:
Nuclear Information and Resource Service v.
NRC, No. 93-1164 (D.C. Cir., filed Feb. 19, 1993)
Dear Mr. Chairman:
Petitioner seeks judicial review of the Commission's revisions of Part 52, issued in' December, that were designed to conform the Commission's regulations to the recently-enacted Energy Policy Act.
Egg 57 Fed. Reg. 60975 (Dec. 23, 1992).
Petitioner has not yet filed a docketing statement specifying the issues it intends to pursue, but press reports suggest that petitioner will argue both that the Commission should have followed a notice-and-comment process before issuance of a revised Part 52 and that the revisions misconstrue congressional j
intent.
We will keep you informed of any significant developments in this case.
Sincerely, nf John F. Cordes, Jr.
j/ Solicitor cc:
The Honorable John T. Myers l
l
4 c=usREssIoNax, CommEspowoEuCE sYsTEx DOCUMENT PREPARATION CEECEI.IST
~ tin checklist is be submitted with eask dosuneat (or group of Cs/As) sent for.
ing into the CCS.
/
p M 1.
BRIEFDESCRIPTIONOFDOCUMENT(5)[
TV 4/e JM sh
~,
/
V,orrespondeses>
Rearingen(Osynah 2.
TTFr orDoom C
.1.
DOCUMENT coNTsar, sensitive (NRC caly)
Non-semaitive 4.
CONGREssIDN11. COMMITTEE and sUSCOMMITTEES (if applicable) congressional committee subcommittee 5.
SUBJECT CODES (a)
(b)
(c) 6.
SOURCE OF DOCUMENTS (a) 5sse (document naas (b)
Seaa..
(c)
Atlashments (4)
Rakey (a)
Other 7.
sYsTEE 148 DATES (a) b [3' Date OCE esat desuaeat to CCS (b)
Data CCS-receivees desumaat (a)
Data returned te och for additional information (d)
Data resubmitted by-0C1 to CCS
~
(e)
Data entered into CCS by (f)
Date OCK notified that document is in CCS 8.
COMMENTS