ML20035F835
| ML20035F835 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/02/1993 |
| From: | Michael Scott NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Komoriya H INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-L-1318-3, CON-NRC-03-90-027, CON-NRC-3-90-27 NUDOCS 9304220321 | |
| Download: ML20035F835 (7) | |
Text
- M9uq UNITED STATES
[
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 20555 @ 01 4....+$
NAR 311993 International Technical Services, Inc.
ATTN:
Dr. Hideto Komoriya 420 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10170
Dear Dr. Komoriya:
Subject:
Task Order No.16 under Contract No. NRC-03-90-027 Entitled
" Review of Revised Siemens Nuclear Power Corporation SBLOCA Methodology, XN-NF-82-49 REV. 1" PIN L-1318)
You are hereby authorized to commence work under the subject Task Order effective March 31, 1993 with an established ceiling of $26,596.00.
In accordance with Section G.6, Tast Order Procedures, of the subject contract, this letter definitizes Task Order No. 16.
This effort shall be perfortned in accordance with the enclosed Statement of Work and the Contractor's proposal dated February 23, 1993, incorporated herein by reference.
The period of performance for Task Order No.16 is March 31, 1993 through October 29, 1993.
The total cost ceiling is $26,596.00.
The amount of
$24,266.00 represents the total reimbursable costs and the amount of
$2,330.00 represents the fixed fee.
Accounting data for Task Order No. 16 is as follows:
B&R No.
320-19-15-05-0 FIN No.
L-1318-3 BOC No.
2542 Appropriation No.
31X0200.320 Obligated Amount:
$26,596.00 The following individuals are considered by the Government to be essential to the successful performance of the work hereunder:
Hideko Komoriya Paul Abramson The contractor agrees that such personnel shall not be removed from the effort under this task order without compliance with Contract Clause H.1 -
Key Personnel.
3
}
/09' b
9304220321 930402 PDR CONTR j
NRC-03-90-027 PDR
f i
Dr. Hideko Komfrya Contract No. NRC-03-90-027 Task Order No. 16 Page 2 of 2 i
The issuance of this task order does not amend any other terms or conditions of the subject contract.
Your contacts during the course of this task order are:
t Technical Matters:
Amira M. Gill Project Officer (301) 504-1212 t
Contractual Matters:
Brenda J. DuBose Contract Administrator (301) 492-7442 i
Please indicate your acceptance of this task order by having an official,
[
authorized to bind your organization, execute three copies of this document in the space provided and return two copies to the Contract Administrator identified below:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
ATTN:
Ms. Brenda J. DuBose Division of Contracts and Property Management - P-902 Washington, D.C.
20555 The third copy may be retained for your records.
l Sincerely, mcq bK j
i Mary Lynn Scott, Contracting Officer Contract Administration Branch No. I 1
Division of Contracts and Property Management Office of Administration ACCEPTED:
T rder No. 16 h
"*k d TITLG
~
0 A i / fl $
DATEy h..
i 4
STATEMENT OF WORK TASK ORDER 16 i
Title:
Review of XN-NF-82-49, Revised Siemens Nuclear Power Corporation SBLOCA Methodology l
FIN:
L-1318 B&R Number:
1505, 556 Project Manager:
Amira Gill (FTS 504-1212)
Technical Monitor:
Frank Orr (FTS 504-1815)
Estimated Level of Effort:
About 6 professional staff-weeks in fiscal year 1993 PERFORMANCE PERIOD:
March 31, 1993 through October 29, 1993 Contractor:
M83302 NRR Priority No.:
2 1.
BACKGROUND The Siemens Nuclear Power Company (SNP) topical report XN-NF '
49, Revision 1, Supplement i describes the revised SNP.small break loss-of-coolant accident (SBLOCA) evaluation model (EM).
This methodology is for licensing applications, and will be used to support operation of the H.B. Robinson plant, and a reload.at the Shearon Harris plant scheduled for the fall of 1993.
2.
OB7ECTIVE The objective of this technical assistance program is to obtain expert technical sevices from the contractor to assist the staff r
in the review and determination of the acceptability of the submittal discussed above.
3.
WORK REQUIREMENTS The contractor will review the documentation describing the Siemens SBLOCA methodology and provide recommendations with bases on the acceptability of the methodology for addressing 10CFR50.46 In the review, the contractor will consider the requirements.
intended use of the methodology and recommend any restrictions or limitations to be placed on its use.
Expertise in thermal-hydraulics and SBLOCA analysis is required for this review.
Proficiency in the interpretation and The application of empiric 91 data may also be involved.
contractor must evaluate revised assumptions regarding thermal hydraulic behavior and their justifications, which may include r
comparisons to test data.
The contractor will review documentation describing the SNP SBLOCA revised EM and provide questions for SNP response if Upon completion of the review, including resolution necessary.
of issues where possible, the contractor will provide a technical evaluation report (TER) with its recommendations regarding the acceptability of the topical report.
~
i k
Subtasks (and Proiected Completion Dates)
Subtask 1 Initiate Review and Review Questions (June 30, 1993)
The contractor will perform an initial review of XN-NF-82-49, Suppl.
1.
In performing the review, the contractor Rev.
1, should ensure that the revised models comply with previous and/or new restrictions imposed on the code (s) and methodologies according to their intended use.
In the review of the thermal-hydraulic models described in the report,the contractor should consider potential interface problems which could result from the introduction of revised methods and assumptions into the approved l
SNP SBLOCA EM and affect previously accepted models, assumptions, and restrictions on use.
If necessary, the contractor will generate a set of questions to be sent to the vendor.
The questions should be specific and-serve to clarify or obtain information on areas not fully discussed in the report.
The questions should be as complete as possible to avoid the necessity of further questions.
Preliminary discussions with the NRC Technical Monitor bef" ore formal action (e.g. submitting questions) are encouraged.
l l
l i
)
Subtask 2 Final Review (July 31, 1993)
The contractor will thoroughly review the topical report and clarifying documentation provided by the vendo" in response to initial questions.
If necessay, additional qu'estions may be generated to clarify licensee responses which are still not satisfactory or to obtain additional descriptive information to complete the TER.
Such questions, if any, should be minimal, and will be considered deliverables for this subtask if provided. If additional questions are not necessary, a verbal status report and the Draft TER discussed below under Subtask will be provided, 3 will constitute the deliverable documentation for this subtask as well as for Subtask 3.
The review may also involve contractor l
discussions with the vendor, at the arrangement of the Technical Monitor, to clarify all technical issues involved in the review, f
r Subtask 3 Draft TER (August 31, 1993) the contractor shall Based on the results of the above subtasks, prepare a draft TER basedon the review of the topical report and The TER any supplemental information supplied by the vendor.
shall document the review effort, findings, conclusions and recommendations, with bases, on the acceptability of the topical report for referencing in SBLOCA analysis applications.
Care should be taken to a void inclusion of the vendor's proprietary information in the draft TER.
The draf t TER shall be prepared and sent to the NRC Technical Monitor for review and comment.
Subtask 4 Final TER (September-30,1993)
Upon receipt of comments from the NRC Technical Monitor, the contractor shall prepare a final TER which addresses the NRC
[
Technical Monitor's comments.
The TER should be in accordance with NRC Manual Chapter 3202, " Publication of Unclassified Regulatory and Technical Reports Prepared by NRC Contractor."
the contractor will submit one reproducible and four For the TER, reproduced copies of the final report to the NRC Project Manager.
4.
Level of Effort The level of effort is extended to 6 person weeks over a 8.5 i
month period.
l
-7 e
s 5.
Reportino Recuirements i
(a) Review Questions l
I See Subtasks 1 and 2, above.
(b) Verbal Status Report (s) i The contractor will verbally report the progress of each subtask at least once prior to completing the subtask to the NRC Technical Monitor.
This is in addition to the verbal report explicitly specified in Subtask 2.
(c) Draft TER See Subtask 3, above.
(d) Final TER t
Upon completion of the project, the contractor will submit.a TER for the topical report reviewed to the NRC Project Manager as discussed in Section 3, Subtask 4 of this document.
(e) Monthly Business Letter Report A monthly business letter report is to be submitted by the 15th of the month to the NRC Project manager. The report will contain the following:
A listing of any efforts completed during the period, including milestones reached.
l The amount of funds expended for manpower and computer services, both during the period and cumulative to date.
I Any problems or delays encountered or anticipated.
A summary of progress to date, and 1
Plans for the next reporting period.
+
6.
Meetinos and Travel Two trips of one or two people to the NRC' headquarters in i
Rockville, Maryland should be planned and budgeted for meetings to resolve open issues.
If used, these meetings will be of one or two days duration. Dates will be mutually agreed upon between the NRC Project Manager and the contractor.
f
t i
l i
i 7.
NRC Furnished Materials ij The NRC will provide all necessary materials to facilitate successful completion of this project.
This will include topical report XN-NF-82-49(P), Revision 1, Supplement 1.
t r
^
l.
I r
i
)
i h
f f
i t
5 k
i 9
l
(
I a
f l
i l
-I
- - -