ML20035D866
| ML20035D866 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 04/08/1993 |
| From: | Horn G NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20035D869 | List: |
| References | |
| QAD930261, NUDOCS 9304140069 | |
| Download: ML20035D866 (15) | |
Text
/
GENERAL OF FICE rys;% ;, -.
P O BOX 499. COLUMBUS. NEBRASKA 69602-0499
!$( Nebraska Public Power District
- i"J&"!n"d?lsT"_
w x-QAD930261 April 8,1993 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 t
Gentlemen:
Subject:
Cooper Nuclear Station Quality Assurance Program NRC Docket No. 50-298, DPR-46 This letter transmits to you Revision 9 of Cooper Nuclear Station's (CNS) Quality Assurance Program. This program document is referenced in Appendix D to the USAR and is being submitted in accordance with 10CFR50.54(a) and 10CFR50.71.
Attachment "A" is a summary of the changes made and submitted herein. None of the changes represent a reduction of commitment in the CNS Quality Assurance Program.
I Previous revisions to this program document which have been submitted are: Rev.1, 4/29/85; Rev. 2,5/16/85; Rev. 3, 3/27/87; Rev. 4, 4/5/88; Rev. 5,4/19/89; Rev. 6,4/6/90; Rev. 7, 4/10/91; and Rev. 8, 3/27/92. Should you have any questions or comments concerning this revision, please contact me.
- Sincyely,
'4.a' orn i
Nuc r Power Group Manager l
GRH/dtr:Im Attachments cc:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regional Administrator - Region IV Senior Resident Inspector 1
Cooper Nuclear Station i
/j{!
l 120G73 9304140069 930408 PDR ADOCK 05000298 l
U I
P PDR mmmmmm-nyamns v7;tyn ~
2;77~~gemymryymyyv gammmmm
%gsam2,gu
/
SUMMARY
OF CIIANGES Attachment "A" Page 1 of 8 COMMITMENT PAGE CIIANGE REDUCTION iii Title changes in the Table of Contents. This change is No necessary due to management reorganization at the site.
This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that the reorganization maintains the ame level of management responsibility.
iv Added new section to Table of Contents. This change is No necessary due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover i
activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
v Added additional identification of oversight No responsibilities for the on-site and off-site safety review committees. This change is necessary to clarify organizations with oversight responsibility. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that it provides clarification and does not reduce oversight activities.
1-2 Editorial changes in Sections 1.1 and 1.2.
No 1-3 Editorial changes.
No 1-4 Editorial change.
No 1-5 Added Nuclear Quality Procedures in the first paragraph. No This change is necessary due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
1-9 Changed Essential to Quality to reflect redefinition of No that procurement classification. This change is necessary due to process upgrades taken in response to the NRC Inspection of the Procurement Program. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that it resulted from upgrades in the procurement program.
1-15 Added the definition of Nuclear Quality Procedures.
No This change is necessary due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these rew procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
SUMMARY
OF CIIANGES Attachment "A" Page 2 of 8 COMMITMENT j
PAGE CIIANGE REDUCTION l
l-17 Added Nuclear Quality Procedures in the first full No paragraph, clarified the purpose of Quality Assurance Instructions. This change is necessary due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
l-18 Retitled from Essential Commercial Grade to Quality No Commercial Grade and changed the definition to reflect i
current practice. This change is necessary due to process upgrades taken in response to the NRC Inspection of the Procurement Program. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that it resulted from upgrades in the procurement program.
j l
l-20 Title change to reflect reorganization. This change is No l
necessary due to management reorganization at the site.
This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that the reorganization maintains the same level of management responsibility.
i 1-21 Added reference to the NQPs. This change is necessary No due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
1-22 Added reference to the NQPs. This change is necessary No due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
2-2 Added reference to the NQPs. This change is necessarv No due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
SUMMARY
OF CIIANGES Attachment "A" Page 3 of 8 COMMITMENT PAGE CIIANGE REDUCTION 2-4 Added the Nuclear Suppon Division to the discussion of No Table 1. This change is necessary due to an oversight in including this Division. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that it clarifies responsibilities.
Added reference to the NQPs. This change is necessary due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
2-5 Clarification added to allow credit to be taken for No approved courses given by the Nuclear Training Department. This change is necessary to allow flexibility in the methods available to meet this commitment. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that the original commitment is maintained.
2-12 Added reference to the NQPs. This change is necessary No due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
2-13 Changed Essential Commercial Grade to Quality No Commercial Grade. This change is necessary due to process upgrades taken in response to the NRC Inspection of the Procurement Program. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that it resulted from upgrades in the procurement program.
2-19 Added reference to the NQPs. This change is necessary No due to the addition of new procedures. This charge does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
y, e-
SUMMARY
OF CIIANGES Attachment "A" Page 4 of 8 COMMITMENT PAGE CIIANGE REDUCTION 2-20 Changed Essential Commercial Grade to Quality No Commercial Grade. This change is necessary due to process upgrades taken in response to the NRC Inspection of the Procurement Program. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that it resulted from upgrades in the procurement program.
Title change to reflect reorganization. This change is necessary due to management reorganization at the site, j
This change does not constitute a reduction in j
commitment based on the fact that the reorganization maintains the same level of management responsibility.
Clarified requirements for the release of nonconformmg items. This change is necessary due to management reorganization at the site. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact i
that the reorganization maintains the same level of j
management responsibility. The second portion of this change is editorial.
2-27 Editorial change.
No 2-30 Format change to add a header for the section on No Nonconformance Reports. This change is necessary to provide format consistency. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that it is editorial in nature.
2-31 Added a discussion of the Deficiency Report Program.
No This change is necessary due to the addition of a new corrective action program which is intended to ensure that deviations which do not meet the criteria for an NCR are also evaluated. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that it adds to the corrective action program.
2-34 Changed the NCR distribution list to reflect No reorganization. This change is necessary due to management reorganization at the site. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that the reorganization maintains the same level of management responsibility.
SU51 MARY OF CHANGES Attachment "A" Page 5 of 8 COM51ITMENT PAGE CIIANGE REDUCTION 2-36 Added a statement concerning scheduling audits in No accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.33. This change is considered an editorial change because it adds a reference to the Regulatory Guide to the text section of the document in addition to its inclusion in Section 2.2.
3-3 Added a reference to the NQPs. This change is No necessary due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
3-5 Title change to reflect reorganization. This change is No necessary due to management reorganization at the site.
This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that the reorganization maintains the same level of management responsibility.
Added a reference to the NQPs. This change is necessary due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
3-6 Title change to reflect reorganization. This change is No necessary due to management reorganization at the site.
This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that the reorganization maintains the same level of management responsibility.
3-7 Added a reference to the NQPs. This change is No necessary due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
SUMMARY
OF CIIANGES Attachment "A" Page 6 of 8 1
COMMITMENT PAGE CIIANGE REDUCTION 3-9 Added a reference to the NQPs. This change is No necessary due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
3-10 Title change to reflect reorganization. This change is No necessary due to management reorganization at the site.
This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that the reorganization maintains the same level of management responsibility.
Added a reference to the NQPs. This change is necessary due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
3-11 Title changes to reflect reorganization. Clarified No i
responsibilities following reorganization. This change is necessary due to management reorganization at the site.
This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that the reorganization maintains the same level of management responsibility.
l Added a reference to the NQPs. This change is necessary due to the addition of new procedures. This i
change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
3-12 Clarified responsibilities following reorganization. This No change is necessary due to management reorganization at the site. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that the reorganization maintains the same level of management responsibility.
SUMMARY
OF CIIANGES Attachment "A" Page 7 of 8 COMMITMENT PAGE CIIANGE REDUCTION 3-13 Title changes to reflect reorganization. This change is No necessary due to management reorganization at the site.
This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that the reorganization maintains the same level of management responsibility.
Editorial changes.
3-14 Title change to reflect reorganization. This change is No necessary due to management reorganization at the site.
This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that the reorganization maintains the same level of management responsibility.
3-15 Added clarification concerning approval of contractor's No procedures. This change is necessary due to an increase in the approval of responsibility for contractor's procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that the level of approval required is increased.
3-16 Added clarification concerning contractors performing No work under the District's QA Program. This change is necessary to ensure that the Policy Document clearly defines District and Contractor responsibilities for work performed at CNS. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that it
]
clarifies existing requirements.
3-17 Editorial changes.
No 4-1 Added references to the NQPs. This change is necessary No due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
j i
4-4 Added discussion of the NQPs and clarified the purpose No of QAls. This change is necessary due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
SUMMARY
OF CIIANGES Attachment "A" Page 8 of 8 COMMITMENT PAGE CIIANGE REDUCTION 4-5 Title changes to reflect reorganization. This change is No necessary due to management reorganization at the site.
This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that the reorganization maintains the same level of management responsibility.
4-7 Title change to reflect reorganization. This change is No necessary due to management reorganization at the site.
This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that the reorganization maintains the same level of management responsibility.
Added reference to the NQPs. This change is necessary due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously i
proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
5-2 Added reference to the NQPs. This change is necessary No due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
5-3 Added reference to the NQPs. This change is necessary No due to the addition of new procedures. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment based on the fact that these new procedures cover activities previously proceduralized in Quality Assurance Instructions.
1 F1 Revised the organization chart to identify current No positions. This change is necessary due to the change in classification of one position from a QA Engineer to a QA Specialist. This change does not constitute a reduction in commitment due to the fact that the functions of the position remain essentially the same.
[10 CFR 50.54 (a) (3)] Does the change reduce the commitments in the program description previously accepted by the NRC?
Yes No 1
If No, submit to the NRC in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71.
If Yes, submit to the NRC in accordance with 10 CFR 50.4.
Completed By Date d JI/, /ff_3 J/4/.fMA y
1
.