ML20035C343
| ML20035C343 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1992 |
| From: | Burski R ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| W3B4-93-2110, NUDOCS 9304070086 | |
| Download: ML20035C343 (2) | |
Text
. V,
- _P y.;. :
Entergy Operations,inc.
cr~ENTERGY.
m ax e -
. Kdre LA 70D66 Te!$04 739 6774 -
- R. F. Burski Deemar.
. thta $fssy.
W#mkao 3 W3B4-93-2110
~
A4.05 QA April 1, 1993 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l
. Attention: Document Control Desk l
Washington, D.C.
20555 l
t
Subject:
Waterford 3 SES N
l Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38
'i Annual Environmental Operating Report 1992 j
i
Dear Gentlemen:
Attached.is the Annual Environmental Operating Report for the subject I
facility. This report is submitted pursuant to section.5.4.1-of the Environmental Protection Plan (Appendix B to the Operating License).
Shcold you have any questions regarding this report, please contact j
M.L. Layton at (504) 464-3454.
]
Yours very truly, j
R.F. Burski l
Director, Nuclear Safety RFB/MLL/jsf f
Attachment r
cc:
J.L. Milhoan.- NRC Region IV D.L. Wigginton.- NRC - NRR l
N.S. Reynolds l
R.B. McGehee
-[
M.L. Knudson - EPA J.D. Givens - LA DEQ l
NRC Resident Inspectors-Office J
~
'9304070086 921231L W
I 1
PDR. ADOCK 05000382~
//-
'R
- PDR-.
v l
i
~.
w ass 1992 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT This report describes implementation of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for the calendar year 1992, and provides the information required by the EPP.
I A.
Summaries and analyses of the results of the environmental protection activities reouired by EPP subsection 4.2:
This section of the EPP provides protection of the two cultural resources areas on the Waterford 3 site.
There were no activities which affected either the Plantation Overseer's House site or the Plantation Quarter's site, both eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, during this reporting period.
B.
EPP noncomoliances and the corrective actions taken to remedy them:
There were no noncompliances with the requirements of the EPP during this reporting period.
i C.
A discussion of chanaes in station desion or operation. tests. or experiments made in accordance with the EPP subsection 3.1 whish involved a potentially sionificant unreviewed environmental cuestion:
There were no changes in station design, operation, tests, or experiments conducted that are reportable under this section during this reporting period.
O.
Nonroutine reports submitted in accordance with subsection 5.4.2:
There were no nonroutine reports submitted in accordance with subsection 5.4.2 during this reporting period.
i L
f l
$