ML20035B614
| ML20035B614 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000083 |
| Issue date: | 03/25/1993 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20035B607 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9304020225 | |
| Download: ML20035B614 (2) | |
Text
.
osuco
'o UNITED STATES 8
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{
n,E w AsmNGTON. D. C. 20555 t
..... v 'f o
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT
- 0. 18 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. R-56 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA DOCKET NO. 50-83
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated September 28, 1992, the University of Florida (licensee) requested an amendment to their Technical Specifications (TS) for the University of Florida Training Reactor.
The licensee requests that one additional month be allowed to submit the routine annual report covering activities of the reactor facility during the previous calendar year. Also, i
the licensee has updated the addressee to which this report must be sent to correspond with the current Nuclear Regulatory Commission mailing requirements.
2.0 EVALUATION Technical Specification 6.6.1 requires that the licensee submit an annual report covering the activities of the reactor facility during the previous calendar year within three months following the end of each prescribed year.
The prescribed year ends August 31 for the licensee. The licensee is-requesting that the end of the three month period, i.e., November 30,- be i
changed to a four month period, i.e., December 31, because November is normally a high activity month at the licensee's facility and because a number of other commitments also come due in November.
The staff finds that a one month extension for submittal of the annual report will not affect the timely review of the annual report and therefore is acceptable.
3.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION This amendment involves changes in the category of recordkeeping, reporting, and administrative procedures and requirements. Accordingly, this amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
9304020225 930325 DR ADOCK 05000083 PDR
.q i
a i i
4.0 CONCLUSION
l The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor: Theodore S. Michaels Dated: March 25, 1993 I
i r
b t
t
[
c