ML20035A076
| ML20035A076 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 03/17/1993 |
| From: | Beach A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Yelverton J ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9303240029 | |
| Download: ML20035A076 (43) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:(- a.RRfcp UNITED STATES g,_ fg NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ' M(.j [hi f! i REGION IV o 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 400 .....f w4 AR LINGTON, T EXAS 76011-B064 MAR 1T 19E Docket: 50-313 50-368 License: DPR-51 NPF-6 Entergy Operations, Inc. ATTN: J. W. Yelverton, Vice President Operations, Arkansas Nuclear One Route 3, Box 137G Russellville, Arkansas 72801
SUBJECT:
MAINTENANCE PROGRAMS MEETING This refers to the meeting conducted at your request in the Region IV office on March 15, 1993. This meeting related to maintenance programs at Arkansas Nuclear One and was attended by those on the attached Attendance List. The subjects discussed at this meeting are described in the enclosed Meeting Summary. It is our opinion that this meeting was beneficial and has provided a better understanding of your maintenance programs. In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice." Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you. Sincerely, ff, MJ LL A. Bill Beach, Director Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosure:
Meeting Summary w/ attachments cc w/ enclosure: Entergy Operations, Inc. ATTN: Donald C. Hintz, President & Chief Operating Officer P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, Mississippi 39286 s 9303240029 930317 PDR ADOCK 05000313 P ppg
~ Entergy Operations, Inc., Entergy Operations, Inc. ATTN: John R. McGaha, Vice President Operations Support P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, Mississippi 39286 i Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway L ATTN: Robert B. McGehee, Esq. P.O. Box 651 i Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Entergy Operations, Inc. ATTN: James J. Fisicaro Director, Licensing Route 3, Box 137G Russellville, Arkansas 72801 Honorable Joe W. Phillips ~ [ County Judge of Pope County Pope County Courthouse i Russellville, Arkansas 72801 Winston & Strawn ATTN: Nicholas S. Reynolds, Esq. I 1400 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-3502 Arkansas Department of Health 7 ATTN: Ms. Greta Dicus, Director Division of' Radiation Control and f' Emergency Management 4815 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3867 j B&W Nuclear Technologies ATTN: Robert B. Borsum Licensing Representative i 1700 Rockville Pike, Suite 525 i Rockville, Maryland 20852 Admiral Kinnaird R. McKee, USN (Ret) 214 South Morris Street 0xford, Maryland 21654 -{ t
y Q-9 Entergy Operations, Inc. ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Power ATTN: Charles B. Brinkman Manager, Washington Nuclear Operations 12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 330 Rockville, Maryland 20852 i ? i i ) 1 l l
Y EENS Entergy Operations, Inc. bcc to DMB (IE45) bcc distrib. by RIV: l J. L. Milhoan Resident inspector DRP Section Chief (DRP/A) i Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, MS: MNBB 4503 MIS System DRSS-FIPS RIV File DRS Section Chief (DRP\\TSS) Project Engineer (DRP/A) i
r: Entergy Operations, Inc. bcc to DMB (IE45)- bcc distrib. by RIV: J. L. Milhoan Resident Inspector DRP Section Chief (DRP/A) Lisa Shea, RM/AlF, MS: MNBB 4503 MIS System DRSS-FIPS RIV File DRS Section Chief (DRP\\TSS) Project Engineer (DRP/A) RIV:AC:DRP/A__ D: IMP ADGaines:dh ABbhach 3/C/93 3/37 /93
-t
- j i
I i MEETING
SUMMARY
l I Licensee: Entergy Operations, Inc. j Facility: Arkansas Nuclear One License Nos.: DPR-51 and NPF-6 -Docket Nos.: 50-313 and 50-368
Subject:
Maintenance Programs i The licensee summarized for NRC Management the status of Arkansas Nuclear l One's maintenance programs. Topics that were discussed were: the maintenance i organization; 1992 maintenance performance; maintenance assessments; areas.for improvement; and maintenance initiatives and strengths. r Attachments: 1. Attendance List 2. Licensee Presentation (NRC distribution only) l t i i i ? l 4 4 i i f l k 6 i I t-l
rn' - t 1 ATTACHMENT 1 { a ATTENDANCE LIST Attendance at the maintenance meeting between Entergy. Operations, Inc. and NRC on March 15, 1993, in Arlington, Texas: { t Enteroy Operations, Inc. l R. K. Edington, Plant Manager, Unit 2 1 J. L. Fisicaro, Director Licensing i J. R. Douet, Maintenance Manager, Unit 1 .j M. R. Harris, Maintenance Manager, Unit 2 NRC j A. B. Beach, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP) l W. D. Johnson, Chief, Project Section A, DRP j D. A. Powers, Chief, Maintenance Section, Division of Reactor Safety i T. W. Alexion, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation L. J. Smith, Senior Resident Inspector, DRP
- S. J. Campbell, Resident Inspector, DRP
- i A. D. Gaines, Acting Project Engineer, DRP
- By telephone l
l t l 1 b i I l + w w v
g. I i l ARKANSASNUCLEAR ONE I I I I ANO/NRCMEETING I TO' DISCUSS MAINTENANCE I I I I I g MARCH 15,1993 I I I I
I" I I AGENDA g I. INTRODUCTION JIM FISICARO I II. OPENING REMARKS RANDY EDINGTON I III. MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION RANDY EDINGTON l IV. 1992 MAINTENANCE RANDY DOUET PERFORMANCE I V. MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS RANDY EDINGTON g VI. AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT RANDY DOUET l VII. MAINTENANCE INITIATIVES & RANDY DOUET STRENGTHS I VIII. CONCLUSION RANDY EDINGTON I I I I I s I
g. I I I I I. INTRODUCTION I I I-I I ~ I l Jim Fisicaro I I I I I I e I
J :, I I I II. OPENING REMARKS I i I I I I I l Randy Edington I I I I I I I-
I' I I F I I III. MAINTENANCE I ORGANIZATION i I I I I I l Randy Edington I I I I i I I I
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE Vice President Operations J. Yelverton m General Manager Plant Operations M. Sellman m I l Plant Manager Plant Manager Unit 1 Technical Manager Unit 2 J.Vandergrift Assistant Standards R. Edington D. Johannes W. Perks Project Project Manager Manager Outages Manager Outages T. Brown Central Vacant Support R. Gillespie Manager Manager Operations Operations Unit 1 Unit 2 C. Zimmerman Manager C. Anderson Rad ProtI Radwaste phv.e?WNDN$g S. Cotton T@ightenageriplg@g d$MehttenaN2N4. @#(h62DiWiif&< $ elftlepanceCG M M C 0hilidg75 /
- id.jd. R_it,A_iUpG.h[k.Y b
NM" O +! ~^ Superintendent Manager Chemistry "*9 W* McKelU System Engineering System Engineering Unit 1 Unit 2 B,. Day D. Mims i --m ,.m .ve.-,-.-+e. e -t--s.---..*-..xe -r---...-ww.-a -r e.-.e.-
- .-w,..--
+....
- .m
Maintenance Unit 1 Manager Maintenance R. Douet Coordinator Technical Assistants Maintenance F. Daubenheyer B. Haylock Superintendent Superintendent Superintendent Mechanical Electrical I&C m' O. Allen D. Higgins J. Waxenfelter Housek p g T. Ragsdale 57 Authorized 35 Authorized 43 Authorized 54 Onboard 35 Onboard 42 Onboard i i e -...-..+r- .--.._,,----wwr*,w -,e.,.
- ,-c,
,,-----:---w-vw --e....., - - -., ~,,_ ,,w., m m m .___-__a______,-=w--4~,_.m,,,...--em-e s.r
Maintenance Unit 2 Manager Maintenance M. Harris m Administrative Technical Assistants Technicians J. Bailey L Davison B. Beatrd C. Touchard i Superintendent Superintendent Superintendent Mechanical Electrical I&C Supervisor A. Morgan D. Gregory M. Chisum Housekeeping J.Terrill 46 Authorized 31 Authorized 42 Authorized 46 Onboard 31 Onboard 41 Onboard t e .r. ~-.rr.. -,,-..i<=.cc. .. wm-.- .. -.....m.. ..,.-.,..,~,.,w,, ,---.,m,-.-.=,-%v7w ,%....-m --..e. .,..,w. ..-...w -v w,.. - -, - - ~. -. ..r,.-, .-,e c. r. r-,,
{ I I STAFFING I
- Fully staffed
- Turnover rates negligible I
- Personnel rotation I
No base-loaded contractors Less than 5% overtime for both units (non-outage) I I I I I I g I I
5 I I j I IV. 1992 MAINTENANCE 1 PERFORMANCE i i I I I l i Randy Douet i 9 I I i l l
g. g PERFORMANCE I IMPROVEMENTS I I Capacity factor improvements One unit trip since May 21,1991 Decrease of maintenance backlogs I Back-to-back system record breaking plant runs I Successfully met all plant availability goals ~ for 2 years Successful completion of two refueling outages I Improved regulatory performance. I Personnel contamination events / personnel exposure I trending downward [ I I I I
I w w o o M M m o o E O w O Ut O Ut O U1 O Jan-90 r Feb-90 l 'i l l l l i i e i Mar-90 e i i i i i e i i i i i i i j E Apr-90 l l l l l l l l l l ir l l j May-90 e i i e i i Jun-90 -- o e i i i o i e r e i i i i i i i Jul-90 i e i i i i e o i i e i Aug-90 -- ij l l lo l l_ l l Sep-90 -- l 4 l l l ln l l l 4 I i i e Oct-90 -- i i i i i ,j Q i e i i i e i Nov-90 i i c i e i i i i a l l l l l l g Dec-90 -- Jan-91 l l l l l hl i c i i i z i 2 i i i g q Feb-91 i e i i i 1.i i i i i e i F i e i N Mar-91 -- L i 5 i i i i i e i i i i j Apr-91 -t l l l l l l l l g ~ h Jun-91 i i i i ie i e % b Jul-91 -- f !k b i i i i i l I Aug-91 l l l l \\' l 5 i i i i i l. i Ji Sep-91 i i i i i i Q i l i i i i i ,I i Oct-91 e i e i i i e i i i i i i i i S50 Nov-91 -- i e i i i i i i i i c ug 5-45 Dec-91 l l l l l il l MN O Jan-92 -- l l l l l k' D a i i i 3E Feb-92 -- i e i i i )i h i -f a i i e i i gc Mar-92 i '/ m i i i i Apr-92 l l l l l l i i e i i i i i May-92 i i i i i e i i i i i i i e i Jun-92 -- i e i i i i i i i i i i Jul-92
- t i
l i i I i Aug-92 l l l l gn i 8c Sep-92 i i i i i i i i i i m >m i e i i i e i 2E Oct-92 -- i i i i i i i e i i i i ig 4 Nov-92 i a i i i i i qg y l l l il l iii o Dec-92 e i -c 3 e i i i Jan-93 i e i i i i a i i i e i i i-i i 2< Feb-93 i i i i i i r I I
M M 1 = a M 39 9 P' 1 L M AO 2 R ij M9 G 9 Y 1 M T 1 S 9 U { 9 D 1 M I T N 0 S 79 5 9 9 P 9 1 I M R N
- 9 I
1 8 T 9 1 M R 88 O1 9 1 T M T 7 CI 8 9 AN 1 M EU 68 R 9 1 M D O )l 5 EN 8 9 1 NA M N 4 8 9 A 1 a-f M P g-L i 3 l 8 9 N 1 M U _28 9 1 s M a-1 8 9 1 ^ M 08 9 lJ 1 '~ 1 ~ /_ 0 9 8 '6 5 4 3 2 1 0 M 1 pi& o5$E E M M jll! ll ll! 1I! l
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M -m W UNPLANNED REACTOR TRIPS ANO UNIT 2 25 0 20-p 1995 INDUSTRY GOAL -- <=1 g 15-8 l,,, Z l 1980 1981 1982" 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 - -.......... ~.
m m m m m m m m' W m m m m m m m m m W UNIT 1 NON-OUTAGE BACKLOG PRIORITY 1,2, & 3 600 571 567 1R10 11/91 .1/92 3/92 5/92 7/92 9/92 11/92 1/93 Prosont
m m m M m m m m m M M M M UNIT 2 NON-OUTAGE BACKLOG PRIORITY 1,2, & 3 600 530 523 508 = l 496 ws 3 W4
- TOP OUARTILE BACKLOG <500 5
r ~ 500 - en 4es~ n,c e.,s m w 'la jdjy ', }..;.l...; - g i 420 427 m ::. ,.. m w- .u.
- p 3g5 400 fL.L-
- c 1. W ~ w'P " =, h . f c. g; .71-. y ~.. m k, '. b
- .Ls (g~ -
.l s, 300 y; 4 L - Of:1 264 _ g. ...w 228 223 .....T 236 237 3 g.: ' 7- .L g:. gl 206 I@@ 193 192 200 - 5* = e-EJ a' + wm + a. w - ve 3 ;;,.. s :; w.e. yg .c. { g_;S. - g + '..
- p-
+ - w i g 37 gy 5
- p..
100 -$,f: ^ _ if ~ h n 1, w .R l_ .. ?' ',Y ' l _ [ '_. ) i ~ u : ?.: - - l. i :: l i;; [ . s v. -a..
- +
c.
- a;
. ~. d\\ _ p n 10/91 12/91 2/92 4/92 6/92 8/92 -10/92 12/92 2/93 11/91 1/92 3/92 5/92 7/92 9/92 11/92 1/93 Present
sum uma num uma num uma num mum amm amm amm amm amm sua sus amm sus amm ums ANO MAINTENANCE VIOLATION / LER HISTORY BY SALP PERIOD SALP PERIOD [ 10-1-89 to 11-30-90 y 12-1-90 to 2-29-92 E 3-1-92 to Present 22 20 18 16 14 12 12 10 8 7 g 1 i LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS VIOLATIONS
ANO UNITS 1 & 2 t REFUELING OUTAGE EFFECTIVE DOSE RATE 5 1000 4-- - - 800 g t s r@ 3.32~ % g~ ~ % 6 e50 OIE m k -- 600 o m U) 3 - g g 2.s2 223 y A 2.1s 2.11 F2-- 1.n 4 -- 400 f , @. A. k m ~ m 0] 1 --
- o O'
es2
- 6 6
-- 200 150 O*. ,y,o*226fS 0 ~ 0 i i i i i i i i i 1 1R7 1R8 1R9-1R10 2R6 2R7 2R8 2R9 MR/RWP-HR PERSON-MREM RWP MANHOURS --b-- ....o... Effective dose rate is a measure of the millirem expended per RWP manhour l $57s'b
t e. u um u ? g1 4 a b m 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0, 0, 0, 0 0 0 0 0, 0 5 0 0 e 2 1 1 5 O su a sus S R a 8 U 2 u O s H 3 0
- 9 N
s ~ : 9 AMA 1 u G / u s L N A U KE I u T C _ m CC A u ARN-E . em TA R U EN a S O RE P UT 3 Ee s X u S a ON 8 L P I 0 2 u XA e , 9 A 9 U 1 T EM . u C - m A E 3 9 VE E 9 ITT R a 1 mu CI U S 3 ES Oi F P h m F X c r u E E a s M E N f u C i o u 9 T m 8 s E o F 1 0 e , 9 F e 9 E r a 1 a n y s u e ru e ig f 3 9 ~ 9 - u 1 E 8 6 4 2 0 E 2 . E 1 0 0 0 0 e h ia aj5 T uu . m sNE R ,1LII l ll ,1 t flll;
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 9 PCE HISTORY 2,000 l 1,470 1,500 / to LIJ O ( CL. J 1,000 4F-O I-1 387 500 351 / 280 142 0 py ha 1R8 1R9 1R10 2R7 2R8 2R9 OUTAGE 12 92
g. F I I I g V. MAINTENANCE g ASSESSMENTS I I I I 9 I Randy Edington .g i I I I 1.
g. I I MAINTENANCE g ASSESSMENTS I I CORPORATE ~ I g INPO ASSISTVISIT I SELF-ASSESSMENT I ~ I I I I g I I .I.
g-I I MAINTENANCE I ASSESSMENTS I CORPORATE ASSESSMENT I Utilized a nine person assessment team Utilizing criteria from INPO guidance documents I (INPO 90-014), assessment focused on maintenance programs and practices Included both units and central maintenance g I INPO ASSIST VISIT Utilized a three person assistance team I i Utilizing criteria from INPO Guidance Document ~ l (INPO 90-014), visit focused on balance-of-plant (B.O.P.) work packages i I I I I
.g. I g WAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS I (Continued) I SELF-ASSESSMENT g g Performed by maintenance staff l Assessment period: 3-1-92 to 1-31-93 l Assessed maintenance management, programs, and practices
- Includes data from condition reports, QA audits and I
surveillances, violations and LERs, craft interviews, i and other inputs Self-assessment board met with both maintenance managers to review assessments Conclusions are documented and provided to the Vice g President - Operations l ~ I I I
I-I i I I VI. AREAS FOR I IMPROVEMENT. .I 1 I I I I ~ I I Randy Douet I I I g I i I I
4 l-I g AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT I Work Process Efficiency Gains I - Work process flow - Closure documentation and event descriptions g - Planner feedback process - More attention to administrative detail g - Streamline work control process i l - Streamline materials process. t l Cleanliness controls ~ l l l Continued improvement in radiological worker practices l Productivity study shows gains in efficiency can be realized l - Work control process changes - Use of craft for non-traditional task.s (trammg, i l planning, procedure development, project management) I - Shift schedule changes being evaluated i I I I
11 1 I I AREAS FOR IMPROVERNT (Continued)- I Unitization of preventive maintenance procedures Continued emphasis to ensure maintenance craft is I consistent regarding procedure implementation l - Maintenance Procedure Users Guide - Self-check program Training Program I - Expanding craft continuing training program l - Increasing emphasis on OJT - Involving craft in training development l - Increasing maintenance management involvement I I I i I ~ I I I
L l'. - I .I I I VII. MAINTENANCE I INITIATIVES & I STRENGTHS I i I I I Randy Douet I I I I L L I
l' I I MAINTENANCE g INITIATIVES & STRENGTHS I Conducted Maintenance Rule NUMARC verification l and validation l Developed 5-year Strategic Plan g - Allows maintenance management to lay out the long term goals for maintenance department g improvement l Management expectations i - Developed a handbook to issue maintenance
- g management principles g
- Developed Supervisory Expectations Guide which clearly establishes management expectations Active peer group involvement , l t Successful implementation of Shutdown Operations l Protection Plan l-Upgrade key programs such as cleanliness control, preventative maintenance, post maintenance testing, work flow and self verification l L .l
g. I g MAINTENANCE g INITIATIVES & STRENGTHS (Continued) l I g Developed Radiation Worker Practices Improvement Plan to increase craft ownership and involvement I ~ Increased maintenance department ownership and g involvement in training development g- - Developed planner training program - Management ownership g - Craft-to-craft training - Developing a craft recertification program l - Use of mockups g Purchased several critical training mockups g - Reactor coolant pump seals (both units) - Instrument & Controls loop test simulator g - Fire pump / security Cummins diesel engine - Terry turbine (EFW pump) g - Instrument Air compressor - EDG air start compressor I ~ Continued support of Plant Painting Project and plant l g material condition improvements 1 I
g-I MAINTENANCE I INITIATIVES & STRENGTHS I (Continued) I Developing a program for contractor training / development oflocal outage workforce I Maintenance facility improvements l - Consolidated storeroom and converted empty storeroom space to offices for maintenance staff which eliminated several trailers - Upgraded the maintenance shop (i.e., refloored, I repainted, refurbished, etc.) g - Constructed a shop fbr mechanics - Consolidated three satellite libraries into one -g centralized library - New office building planned for 1993 Effective Plan Of Day and Scheduling meetings Diversification of craft resources - Procedure Writmg i - Modifications g - Minor maintenance j g - Project-based maintenance I J l 1
g. I l MAINTENANCE g INITIATIVES & STRENGTHS (Continued) l Implement the S.T.A.R. self-check program j (_STOP, THINK, ACT, I1EVIEW) Aggressively pursue system outages - Postjob evaluation / debrief for multi-discipline l jobs - 84 day schedule Performed Craft Productivity Study I - ANO completed during the summer of 1992 l - Entergy wide in the future l Minor Maintenance Program improves efTiciency l Managed non-outage overtime rates to <5% l Unitization l - Enhanced ownership - Improved material condition l- - Increased selfsufficiency l J I
E' I l MAINTENANCE g INITIATIVES & STRENGTHS (Continued) l I Maintenance Procedure User's Guide l - Defines procedure compliance expectations l Maintenance participation in operations training l - Sixteen maintenance personnel attended operations auxiliary operator class i l - Two currently attending senior reactor operator class l - Eleven planned for waste control operator training i this spring Attitude and spirit of cooperation based on feedback l from: l - Corporate assessment - INPO assist-visit team l - INPO senior managers - Operations department l- - INPO evaluation debrief I I t-I
g_. I I I I VIH. CONCLUSION I i i l I I I I l Randy Edington I E I I l l w
g.- I I CONCLUSION I Improved material condition I - Continuous improvement in Unit I capacity factor g - Unit 2 remains a top quartile performer in capacity factor l - Effective refueling outages - Effective management of backlogs I Management expectations and involvement i I - Increased ownership and accountability of craft l - Communicated to craft via Supervisory Expecta-tions Handbook, Maintenance Management l Principles handbook, and 5-Year Strategic Plan - Continually improving communications Aggressive and proactive training I - Ownership and involvement of craft l - Use of mockups - Development of new programs l - Maintenance involvement in operations training I I I I
p... F I .I CONCLUSION (Continued) I Self-critical, questioning attitude g - Probing self-assessments - Active industry involvement l - Continuous pursuit of new initiatives and innovations ANO people: spirit of teamwork, cooperation, and I ownership I ~ I I I I l .I I I a m I ,}}