ML20034H644

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Rev 13 of IST Program,Callaway Nuclear Plant for Review & Approval
ML20034H644
Person / Time
Site: Callaway 
Issue date: 03/12/1993
From: Schnell D
UNION ELECTRIC CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20034H645 List:
References
ULNRC-2778, NUDOCS 9303190157
Download: ML20034H644 (5)


Text

.

M py Ii

Post OHiceBox M9.

5

~'

.: r.

St. Louis. Missouri 53166 :

  • 31tS532650 -

M a

/

DonaldF SchneR YION 5&ar V1x P&nf E::LECTRIC nuacar

'53 i

c March 12, 1993-

'i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

[

ATTN:

Document Control Desk Mail.Stop P1-137 I

Washington, D.C.

20555 i

Gentlemen:

ULNRC-2778 e

CALLAWAY PLANT ll

' DOCKET NUMBER 50-483 "I

CALLAWAY PUMP AND VALVE INSERVICE TESTING-PROGRAM

References:

- 1) J. N.-Hannon lettercto D.. F.: Schnell d

dated April ~.7, 1992 l

.2) ULNRC-2548-dated January. 23, 1992 a

This letter transmits Revision 13'of-the-Callaway Pump and Valve Inservice. Testing '(IST) - Program. -

. Attachment 1 is a brief description'of the-changes, and s 'contains a. copy of revised pages which i

should be inserted Anto the existing-program.. ;NRC' staff e

approval of.this submittal is requested =so that these'

~

changes may be implemented-for Refuel? 6-which is'

. i scheduled to begin in'Septemberi'1993.

Changes ~to the Callaway IST-Program are: subject to the fee provisions;of-10CFR170..Therefore, Union-- '

Electric will accept charges incurred as a: result of the NRC review.

If you have any questions concerning'.this-q submittal, please contact me.

i Very truly yours,

{

Donald F. Schnell.

l

WEK/kea; j

Attachments

. /

l &

O 4

g_

s STATE OF MISSOURI

)

)

SS CITY OF ST. LOUIS

)

Donald F.

Schnell, of lawful age,-being first. duly sworn upon oath says that he is Senior Vice President-Nuclear and an officer-of Union Electric Company; that he has read the foregoing document and knows the content thereof; that he has executed the same for-and-on behalf of said company with full power and authority-to do so; and that the facts therein stated are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.

By

Ind, Donald F. Schnell Senior Vice President Nuclear SUBSCRIBED and sworn to before me this O

day of 7/h te L-1993.

Atkti $? h?$f e

en BARBARA J. PFtJF NOTARY PUBitC. STATE Of MISSOUl?l MY COMMf5SION D:PIRES APRIL 22, 1993 ST. LOUIS COUNTY.

D

- ;;va e.

.-g; -

+2.-

cc:

T..A.

Baxter,LEsq.

~

Shaw,-Pittman, Potts &;Trowbridge 2300 N.. Street, N.W.

o

-Washington,.lD.C~ 20037

.?,

Dr. J. O. Cermak CFA, Inc.

18225-A Flower Hill Way Gaithersburg, MD.20879-5334 L.. Robert Greger Chief, Reactor Project Branch 1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-Region III-799 Roosevelt Road.

Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Bruce Bartlett Callaway Resident ~ Office

~

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

,-i RR#1-9 Steedman, Missouri 65077 i

L. R. Wharton. (2)

Office of. Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1 White Flint, North, Mail Stop 13E21 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, ND-20852 Manager, Electric Department Missouri Public Service Commission P.O. Box 360 Jefferson City,1MO.65102 i

i i

i q

r P

^.'r:'

b ; '.

,.y w

O

^

A

^

'l Attachment [1}

1Page l'of/2-ti

. CHANGES TO:THE CALLAWAY-v.

INSERVICE TESTING-PROGRAM 1cj t

ITEM.1:

Revise Relief RequestJ.#EP-2 to-remove theluse.

l

~

of alternative'testingJin theHform_of acoustic 1

monitoring techniques.'

d BASIS FOR CHANGE / JUSTIFICATION.FOR NO ADVERSE.'

r

~ IMPACT t

Revision-12 of the'Callaway;Pumpiand ValveL.

]

Program allowed either. disassembly or acoustic-1 monitoring to verify full stroke'capabilityfof?

J the Accumulator Dischargeicheck valves.- lUpon' A

further: review, it was discovered that therei was no acceptable method _to' provide flow-j through the Accumulator Discharge Check: Valves j[

(EP8956A,B,C,D) for the purpose-of acoustic:

monitoring.

Therefore, the ability!of these..

d; valves.to'open will-continue _to be verified by-disassembly.

There is no change being'.

]

implemented here just a continuation of.

f former plant testing-- therefore no unreviewed.

~.;

t safety question exists.

ITEM 2:

Revise-Alternative to Check-' Valve Full'-Flow'-

J Testing-Justification.#V07;by removing reference to EP8956A,B,C,D_from._the-list of-valves which are tested by acoustic monitoring..>

r BASIS'FOR CHANGE / JUSTIFICATION FOR:NO ADVERSE IMPACT This is an update to support-the change made?to Item 1-above.

The same basis--forL change / justification 5for'no adverse-impact applies.

a ITEM 3:

Add Justification #V08 for the extension of' the-1 disassembly _ interval of the Accumulator l

Discharge Check Valves.

1 BASIS FOR CHANGE / JUSTIFICATION FOR NO ADVERSE i

IMPACT 1

Justification #V08 provides the basis'for j

extending.the disassembly interval!ofLthe.

-Accumulator Discharge Check. Valves.,.This justification is written based on the provisionsLof. Generic-Letter 89-04. :The(only change'being requested here-is.in regards;.to

~

the_ frequency.at which the subject valves musti

,I

~.

it

b n

az m.

m

11 EAttachmentil 1

Page 2 ofJ2 3

be disassembled and inspected.

This proposedII testing extension does not pose an unreviewed safety question.

ITEM 4:

Revise' Relief' Request;#P07 to allow-the useiof.

-digital vibration meters.

BASIS FOR CHANGE / JUSTIFICATION FOR NO ADVERSED IMPACT Callaway is buying new digital vibrationymeters; that can be used for ASME.XI testing.

Relief!

Request #P07 allows thecusetof analog. vibration.

j meters that do not meet the three' times thei

?

reference value criteria.

These digitalf vibration meters are autoscaling and therefore-1 the three times the reference value criteria is:

i not applicable.

Digital vibration meters are b!

exempted from the three times the reference:

i value range. criteria in the Operations;and.

Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants SectionL6' (O&M, Section 6).

The. accuracy of-:the meters j

will meet the five percent: required bylASME XI.-

This relief request does not introduce:an unreviewed safety question 1as the accuracyand readability of these new vibration meters will-ri be~ equal to or better,than the current 1 analog i j?

vibration meters.

ITEM 5:

Add testing requirements'for the normaliand_ _

alternate chargingfcheck valves-(BB-8378A,B_andM BB8379A,B) to the Pump _and Valve Program,Jand:

I add'new1 Relief Request #BB-12'1which requests ~

f testing the normal and alternateLcharging check-

^:

valves in.the closed direction:on'a refueling:

I frequency'as. opposed to the n'ormal requirement to test on a quarterly frequency.

q BASIS ~FOR CHANGE / JUSTIFICATION FOR NO ADVERSEi i

IMPACT j

1 Adding'these check 1 valves'to the IST Program is a conservative' change as.it adds more testing.

The request.to test on a refuel frequency is j

justified because;1eak. testing'these; valves at!

j normal powercoperation createsjthe possibility of causing-a LOCA if one1of these' valves failsh

-)

This change;does not-introduce =an unreviewed safety question ac it is a conservative: change.

- adds'more testing.

i m

i I

g

>wv n

.