ML20034G188
| ML20034G188 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 02/24/1993 |
| From: | Leslie Hill LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| LRM-93-028, LRM-93-28, NUDOCS 9303090164 | |
| Download: ML20034G188 (5) | |
Text
. _..
l l
Long Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Island P.O. Box 628 j
I Power North Country Road Authority Wading River, N.Y.11792 l
?
LRM-93-028 l
l i
i t
February 24, 1993 l
J i
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 l
t Attn:
Office of NRR Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Re:
Fitness For Duty Program Performance July
- December, 1992 l
i l
Dear Sir:
i Enclosed is the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station's Fitness for Duty Program Performance data for the reporting period of July _-
't December, 1992.
This report is as described in 10 CFR 26.71(d).
Sincerely, v
/
d A
M. Hill Resident Manager s
Shoreham Nuclear Power Station LMH/RWG/dh Enclosure cc:
Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator R. Nimitz Resident Inspector
.I 08000.;
l 3090264 930224 o. j
(
ADOCK 05000322 R
PDR.
f f.
Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 December 31. 100' LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY a h m Ensng Compa9y
~SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWFR STATION LocaDon (51M 924-8300 Fxt. 32rA Robert W. Grunseich l
Pncre pncle area code)
Com.a::t Nat.e Cutoff s: Screert' Confirmation (ng'mi)
Q Appendix A to 10CFR 26
/
lAarijuana
/
Amphetamines
/
/
I Cocaine
/
Phencyclidine
/
/
Opiates
/
Alcohol (% BAC)
Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number wilt Unescoded Access 342 N/A 575 Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Categories 19 0
N/A
'N/A 151 0
Pre-Access l
2 Post accident n
n N/A N/A O
n
}
1 Eg Observed behavior 0
0 N/A N/A 0
n aMom 187 2
N/A N/A 293 1
16 0
N/A
'7 / ?
O O
. er 0
0 N/A N/A O
O Total 222 2
N/A N/A 444 1
Average number of personnel in random selection process.
Qgy,1[h2
- Breakdown of Confirmed Po::itive Tests for Specific Substances Ampbe-Phency.
Refusal Marijuana Cocaine Opiates tamines clidine Alcohol to Test 1
2 3
4 5
Nnsee Employees 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A j
Long. Term Contractors uf3 3f3 3f3 gfg gfg ufg 3f3 gfg g/3 gfg gfg gfg Short-Term Contractors 1
0 0
0 0
0 0,
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A A
Total 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
N/A' N/A N/A N/A N/A 3
t 4
,I e
1 1
(
. _ _..., -,..,...--r
,_m
.,-~
m -,- ~ ~, -.
.,,. ~..,.,... -.., -, -,
.,--,,,_r.-..
,#m.
..-.,..,~....m.,_.....-.~..-.....m.
.,-m...__-_,._,m._
l 1
l
\\
l 1.
Initiatives Taken In the 2nd quarter of 1992, industrial nurses were added to the station complement to provide first aid and other services during the decommissioning phase.
In July, the i
process of urine sample collection was integrated into the nurses' job responsibilities.
Appropriate steps were taken to convert an "c-site lavatory i
for use as a part-time collection facility.
Neessary supplias were obtained, and walk-throughs vv-
ducted utilizing the expertise of LILCO's corporate health Center personnel, prior to actual sample collection.
i Previously, urine sample collection had been conducted at an offsite medical facility approximately 7 miles away.
The L1LCO corporate medical center in Hicksville continues to be utilized as appropriate by badged individuals who are not stationed on-site.
Advantages of this change include the following:
Unproductive time spent by individuals being tested is significantly reduced.
Greater control can be exercised over the l
collection process.
l e
Random sampling can be conducted more frequently i
during the course of a week.
l Risk of car accident traveling to and from collection point is significartly reduced.
i 2.
Effectiveness Evaluation An audit of the Fitness for Duty Program at Shoreham concluded that the program is being effectively implemented.
Included in the audit was surveillance of the new on-site urine sample collection facility.
This collection site was l
found to be in compliance with applicable procedures.
One l
observation was noted; this involved a person entering the collection area bypassing a notice and a traffic cone.
Additional signs were posted in the east and west access l
corridors to correct this situation.
A second observation identified a problem with the use of the MET / PATH blood test kits in that an expiration date is not identified on the outside of the kit (box).
These kits are used for personnel requesting a confirmatory blood test after being intoxilyzer tested and found positive for alcohol.
Contained within this seal wrapped kit is a glass j
vile which does have an expiration date.
Not having the expiration date identified on the outside container creates a problem; kits with expired dates were available for use at SNPS.
Since the use of these kits involves the Chain of
i Custody requirements it was recommended that MET PATH laboratories be contacted and requested to provide an expiration date on the outside of the package.
J A letter was written to the laboratory advising them of the problem.
They concurred and have advised they will stamp the expiration date on the outside of the box.
J During the reporting period, there were no instances of finding drugs or alcohol on preuises, no for-cause impairment tests, and no allega cions regarding drug or alcohol use.
It is concluded t hat the program continues to be effective in meeting its obj ective of maintaining a safe work environment by ensuring a drug and alcohol free work environment.
J 3.
Data Analysis and Actions During this reporting period, pos.tive random drug tests occurred for 2 individuals.
Thert were no pre-access positive tests.
This represents a downward trend from the previous reporting period.
The actions taken during thin period for the positive test results were as follows:
4 l
]
Contractor random positive drug test - Individual was escorted from the site and unescorted access was revoked.
Individual was terminated from work at SNPS.
i Licensee randor positive drug test - see item 4 below.
i 4.
List of Events Reptrted one event was reportt.d during this period.
As a result of a random drug / alcohol tast conducted on 9/3/92, a licensee supervisory person wts determined to be positive for drugs.
Coincidentally, this individual was randomly tested again on 9/9/92.
After the 9c3/92 test was confirmed positive by the MRO, the individual las escorted offsite and his unescorted access was revoked.
The individual was suspended and referred to the appropriate Employee Assistance Program.
The NRC was notifi9d by phone within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
The 9/9/92 test was subsequeatly determined to be positive.
l
-