ML20034G028
| ML20034G028 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 02/25/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20034G026 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-395-93-03, 50-395-93-3, NUDOCS 9303080079 | |
| Download: ML20034G028 (1) | |
Text
-
l 1
i ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICL OF VIOLATION South Carolina Electric & Gas Docket No.: 50-395 V. C. Summer Nuclear Station License No.: NPF-12 i
During a NRC inspection conducted on January 9 through February 7, 1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the. " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:
Technical Specification 6.8.1.c requires that written procedures be established, implemented and maintained covering surveillance and test activities of safety-related equipment.
Paragraph 4.4.7 of the Operational t
Quality Assurance Plan states that written test procedures shall include test methods and any special test equipment or calibrations required to conduct the l
test.
j Contrary to the above, on January 26 and 27, 1993, relays in safety-related i
switchgear IDBi and IDB2 were tested without written procedures which addressed the connection of related test equipment to the switchgear. Jumpers I
were used to provide the 120 VDC power supply from the switchgear to the test equipment; however, the relay testing procedure did not provide any work l
instructions involving the switchgear.
l This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
i Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, South Carolina Electric & Gas is j
hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC l
20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II', and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, V. C. Summer Nuclear Station, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply i
should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if
{
contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps j
that have oeen taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full-i compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause; is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
1 l
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 25th day of February 1993 N
i 9303080079 930225 PDR ADOCK 05000395 G
PDR e
.,=
,-,.,_,,_~-.,...m-
-