ML20034E075

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Cycle 13 Colr
ML20034E075
Person / Time
Site: Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date: 02/19/1993
From:
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20034E073 List:
References
NUDOCS 9302240412
Download: ML20034E075 (7)


Text

~

Zion Unit 2 Cycle 13 Core Ooeratino Limits Reoort (COLR)

I 1.0 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for Zion Unit 2 Cycle 13 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Zic,n Technical Specification 6.6.1.F.

The Technical Specifications affected by this,eport are:

LCO 3.2.1.C.3 Shutdown Bank Inserticn Limit 3.2.1.D.1 i

LCO 3.2.1.C.3 Control Bank Insertion Umit 4

3.2.1.D.1 LCO 3.2.2.A.1.1 Heat !~ tx Hot Channel Factor - Fq(Z) l LCO 3.2.2.A.1.1 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor - F AH N

LCO 3.2.2.A.2.2.c(2)

Axial Flux Difference (A I Target Band) 3.2.2.A.4 3.2.2.A.6.1 i

i i

l i

Zion Unit 2 Cycle 13 COLR '

Jgg221SockoSo$ J4 P

l 2.0 OPERATING LIMITS The cycle specific parameter limits for the LCOs specified in Section 1.0 are i

presented in the subsections which follow. These limits have been developed using the NRC-approved methodologies specified in Technical Specification 6.6.1.F.

6 2.1 Shutdown Bank Insertion Limits (LCO 3.2.1.C.3 and 3.2.1.D.1)

The Shutdown Banks shall be fully withdrawn when the reactor is approaching criticality or is critical.

l 2.2 Control Bank Insertion Limits (LCO 3.2.1.C.3 and 3.2.1.D.1)

The Control Bank insertion Limits are specified by Figure 2.2-1.

The sequence for Control Bank withdrawal shall be Control Bank A, Control Bank B, Control Bank C. and Control Bank D.

Successive Control Banks shall overlap by 50 steps.

i l

l 1

i 9

Zion Unit 2 Cycle 13 CoLR 2-

f Banks A and B Fully Withdrawn fi Bank C 0....................(.2 7. 0 ) -

.. A...............

..............................................................s...............

-i

............................................s............................................

1 2 ;....

..r...............................................................

r (0,2,........................................................................................

..........................................................................4..

an 4...................................................................

n r

S O

t T

6................................................................

t 4

i c3 n

.............L.......................................................................

....L..........................................................................

8......................................................:.........

.....................................x...

i

................................................:.................................................................t...............................

i.

..... r

.~.

10i..

3 20 40

~60 80 100 (0,100)

Power Level (% of Rated Power) i t

Figure 2.2-1 Control Bank Insertion Umits L

vs. Percent RATED THERMAL POWER i

I

.I T

d Zicn1 Unit 2 Cycle 13 CCXLR 1

i 1

i- '

1 i

r

j t

-i 2.3B Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor - F (Z) (FQ Methodology)

{

Q (LCO 3.2.2.A.1.1) 2.3 B.1 RTP 1

Fq

.l F (Z) s

+ K (Z) for-P > 0.5 Q

P RTP 1

Fq F (Z) s ----

  • K (Z) for P s 0.5 Q

O.5 where :

1 RTP FQ

- 2.40

[

~

1 THERMAL POWER p.

RATED THERMAL POWER r

K (Z) is provided in Figure 2.3B - 1 i

i l

1 i

t I

E l

Zion Unit 2 Cycle 13 COLR I

-4 I

I l

r

S

{

i i

-i

?

1.50

-t i

1.40 1.30 1.20 l

1.10 Ng* 1.00 C y o,3o 1.00 1.00

%) 0.925 -

u.

i o 0.80 gu t:i 0.70 a4 0.60 i

lE E 0.50 o

Z 0.40-0.30

'.j 0.20 0.10 i

0.00 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 i.i CORE ELEVATION (FT)

-]

Figure 2.3B-1 K(Z)- Normalized F (Z) as a Function of Core Height l

Q

-l 9

~!

i 1

l Zion Unit 2 Cycle 13 COLR l '

J

r 2.4 Nuclear Enthalov Rise Hot Channel Factor-FNAH (LCO 3.2.2.A.1.1) 2.4.1 FNAH s

FRTP h

AH

( 1 + PFag * ( 1-P ) ).

I where : FRTPAH - 1.65 PFAH - 0.3 THERMAL POWER p

RATED THERMAL POWER i

e l

5

?

l l

v 4

1 Zion Unit 2 Cycle 13 COLR

' i l

_6-5 1

i D

?

P w

a-

--m --

r - - - - - -

m

- mm

2.5A Axial Flux Difference (CAOC Methodology)

(LCO 3.2.2.A.2.2.c(2), 3.2.2.A.4, and 3.2.2.A.6.1) 2.5A.1 The AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE (AFD) target band is +6%, -7%

of the target flux difference.

2.5 A.2 The AFD acceptable operation limits are an envelope bounded by +y percent and -y percent at a power of 90% of PT and increasing by +1 percent and -1 percent for each 2 percent of rated power below P -

T y = 10.8% of PT rounded to the nearest percent Zion Unit 2 Cycle 13 COLR _

, __