ML20034C136
| ML20034C136 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 04/23/1990 |
| From: | Davis A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20034C131 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-483-90-04, 50-483-90-4, EA-90-028, EA-90-28, NUDOCS 9005020093 | |
| Download: ML20034C136 (2) | |
Text
l i
Union Electric Company Docket No. 50-483 Callaway County Nuclear Power Plant License No. NPF i EA No.90-028 During an NRC inspection ~ conducted on January 22 and February 8,1990,- violations of NRC requirements were identified.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix'C.
(1989), the violations are listed below:
10 CFR 73.21(d)(2) requires, in part, that Safeguards Information be stored in a locked security storage container while unattended.
The Callaway physical security plan (PSP) and safeguards site contingency plan (SCP) are considered Safeguards Information as described in 10 CFR 73.21(b)(1)(i)and(b)(1)(viii),respectively.
A.
Contrary to the above, from approximately 4:45 p.m., October 18, 1989 to approximately 3:00 a.m., October 19, 1989, a-security storage.
container storing copies of the PSP and'SCP, located in the_ quality ~
assurance office, was unlocked and unattended.-
B.
Contrary to the above, from approximately 4:00 p.m., December 6,1989 to approximately 1:40 a.m., December 7,1989, a. security storage container storing copies of the~ PSP:and SCP, located in the quality '
I assurance office, was unlocked and unattended.
l C.
Contrary to the above, from approximately 4:00 p.m. to approximately
~
l 6:30 p.m. on December 13,-1989, a security storage _ container storing l
copies of the PSP and SCP, located in the _ security section office, was unlocked and unattended, f
This is a Severity Level III problem (Supplement 111),
b Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Union Electric Company is-hereby_
required to submit a written statement of explanation to the Director, Office.
l of Enforcement, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, within 30 days of the date of this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply; should be clearly marked'as' a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each' alleged violation:
(1) admission or denial of the alleged violation, (2) the. reason'for the violation if admitted, and if denied, the reasons why, (3) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the' corrective steps-that' will be taken to avoid further violations,-and (5) the date when full compliance 9005020093 900423 PDR ADOCK 05000483 Q
~
4 x.
a
-i
- i Notice of. Violation.
12L will b'e achieved.
If an adequate replyfis notireceihed within;the-time l
specified in this Notice, an order may be. issued to:show cause why the license.-
lJ should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or.why:such other action.as may,.
be. proper should not be taken._ Consideration may be given-to extending the.
a
-response: time for good cause shown._ Vnder: authority of Section 182 of the Act,
'42-V.S.C.,2232,_this. response shall be submitted under oath br affirmetion.:
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- {
, a QCh :
- ct fjx k xi m
~
A. Bert Davis-Regional: Administrator t Glen Ellyn,-lilinois Dated a/ day of April 1990.
this;3 da m-9'
+
h vi
'b r
i i
~
l:
u e