ML20034B783

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests That Proprietary Rev 4 to WCAP-11239, Westinghouse Setpoint Methodology for Protection Sys,Sequoyah Units 1 & 2 Eagle-21 Version Be Withheld from Public Disclosure (Ref 10CFR2.790)
ML20034B783
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/1990
From: Wiesemann R
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
To: Murley T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19302E069 List:
References
CAW-90-013, CAW-90-13, NUDOCS 9005010005
Download: ML20034B783 (10)


Text

7-1

.l Y

\\

/-

%./

h l

W6Silngh0USe Energy Systems Nuclear and Advanced

      • 5*

Electric Corporation Box 355 Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15230 0355 March 2,-1990 CAW-90 013 Dr. ' Thomas Murley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 i

APPLICATION FOR WITHHOLDING PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

Subject:

Westinghouse Setpoint Methodology for Protection Systems, Sequoyah l

Units 1 and 2, Eagle Version (WCAPs111239 and 11626)

Dear Dr. Murley:

+

The proprietary information for which withholding is being-requested in the enclosed letter by Tennessee Valley Authority is further identified-in.

Affidavit CAW-89-052 signed by the owner of the proprietary information, Westinghouse Electric Corporation. The affidavit, which accompanies this letter, sets forth the basis on which the information.may be withheld from public disclosure by the Commission and addresses with specificity the.

considerations listed in paragraph (b)(4) of 10CFR Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations..

Accordingly, this. letter authorizes the utilization of the accompanying.

affidavit by Tennessee Valley Authority.

Correspondence with respect to the proprietary aspects.~of the application for withholding or the Westinghouse affidavit should reference this letter, CAW-90-013, and should be addressed to the undersigned.

Very truly yours, F

AA

/RobertA.Wiesemann, Manager Regulatory & Legislative Affairs Enclosures i

cc:

E. C. Shomaker, Esq.

Office of the General Counsel, NRC i

9005010005 900423 PDR ADOCK 05000327 P

PDC

Y PROPRIETARY INFORMATION NOTICE i

L TRANSMITTED HEREWITH ARE PROPRIETARY'AND/OR NON-PROPRIETARY VERSIONS OF' DOCUMENTS FURNISHED TO THE NRC'IN CONNECTION WITH REQUESTS FOR GENERIC AND/0R PLANT SPECIFIC REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

IN ORDER TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10CFR 2.790'0F THE COMMISSION'S REGULATIONS CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION S0 SUBMITTED TO THE NRC, THE INFORMATION WHICH IS PROPRIETARY-IN THE PROPRIETARY VERSIONS.

IS CONTAINED WITHIN BRACKETS AND WHERE THE PROPRIETARY INFORMATION HAS~BEEN DELETED IN THE NON-PROPRIETARY VERSIONS ON THE BRACKETS REMAIN, THE-INFORMATION THAT WAS CONTAINED WITHIN BRACKETS AND WHERE THE. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION HAS BEEN DELETED IN THE NON-PROPRIETARY VERSIONS ONLY THE BRACKETS REMAIN, THE INFORMATION THAT WAS CONTAINED WITHIN THE BRACKETS IN l

THE PROPRIETARY VERSIONS HAVING BEEN DELETED.. THE JUSTIFICATION FOR CLAIMING j

THE INFORMATION S0 DESIGNATED AS PROPRIETARY IS INDICATED IN BOTH VERSIONS BY MEANS.0F LOWER CASE LETTERS (a) THROUGH (g) CONTAINED WITHIN PARENTHESES LOCATED AS A SUPERSCRIPT IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE BRACKETS ENCLOSING EACH ITEM 0F INFORMATION BEING IDENTIFIED AS PROPRIETARY OR IN THE MARGIN OPPOSITE-SUCH INFORMATION. THESE LOWER CASE LETTERS REFER TO THE TYPES OF INFORMATION.

WESTINGHOUSE CUSTOMARILY HOLDS IN CONFIDENCE-IDENTIFIED IN SECTIONS (4)(ii)(a) THROUGH (4)(ii)(g) 0F THE AFFIDAVIT ACCOMPANYING THIS TRANSMITTAL PURSUANTTO10CFR2.790(b)(I).

i 0319M

..w

g.

j j

CAW-89-052 l

AFFIDAVIT j

1 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:

ss COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY:

[

Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Robert A.' Wiesemann, who, being by me duly sworn according to-law, deposes and says that he is authorized to execute'this Affidavit on

)

behalf of Westinghouse Electric Corporation ( Westinghouse")-and that the averments of fact set'forth in this Affidavit are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief:

i l

hl U Gdf/ GR1L Robert A. Wiesemann, Manager-Regulatory and Legislative Affairs I

Sworn to and subscribed i

before me this 28 day of 74'IO,1989.

i t

Notary Public NOTADAL SEAL LORRAINE M PIPLICA, NOTARY PUBLIC I

MONROEV:LLE 8040. ALLEGHENYCOUNTY MYCOMMIS$!ON EXPmE3 OE0 H,193:

. Mertber, Pennsylvania Ass:mnc '

.i

l L

L.

CAW-89-052 4

l (1) I am Manager, Regulatory and Legislative Affairs, in the Nuclear and Advanced Technology Division,- of the Westinghom Electric Corporation and as-such, I have been specifically-categated the-function of reviewing the proprietary information sought to be withheld-from public disclosure in connection with nuclear power plant licensing and rulemaking proceedings, and am authorized to apply for its withholding on behalf of the Westinghouse Energy Systems Business Unit.

(2)

I am making this Affidavit in cc ormance with the prov'isions of 10CFR Section-2.790 of the Commission's regulations and in.

conjunction with the Westinghouse application for withholding accompanying this Affidavit.

(3)

I have personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by the Westinghouse Energy Systems Business Unit in designating-information as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial or financial information.

(4) Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph-(b)(4) of Section 2.790 of.

the Commission's regulations, the following is furnished for consideration by the Commission in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure should be withheld.

(i) The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.

'b

.~.

h

^

l i CAW-89-052-i (ii) The information is of a type customarily held _in confidence by l

Westinghouse and not. customarily, disclosed to the public.

Westinghouse has a rational basis for. determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that i

connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of~information in confidence. The application of that system and the-substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational' basis

'l required.-

1 k

Under that system, information.1s held in confidence if it fills in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows:

1 (a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of. a -

process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors 1

without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.

(b)

It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a l

competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or L

improved marketability.

v e

n-

,. +

=

-e

i 1

E q CAW-89-052-3 (c)

Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of o

resources' or improve his competitive position in the l

_ design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality,_ or_ licensing-a similar product.

(d)

It reveals cost or price information,-production l

capacities, budget levels, or commercial-strategies of Westinghouse, its~ customers or suppliers.

(e) _ It reveals aspects of past,.present, or future Westinghouse-or customer funded development plans a~nd programs of I

potential commercial value to Westinghouse.

(f)

It contains patentable ideas, for_ which patent protection may be desirable.

1 l

(g)

It is not the property of Westinghouse, but must be treated as proprietary by Westinghouse according to agreements with the owner.

There are sound policy reasons behind the Westinghouse 1 system i

which include the following:

(a) The use of such information by Westinghouse gives Westinghouse a competitive advantage over its competitors..

l It is, therefore, withheld from disclosure to protect the Westinghouse competitive position.

a CAW-89-052 (b)

It is information which is marketable in many ways.- The extent to which such information is available to competitors diminishes the Westinghouse ability to sell products and services-involving the use of the information.

(c) Use by our competitor would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing his expenditure of resources at our expense.

(d) Each component'of proprietary information pertinent to a-particular competitive advantage.is potentially as valuable l

as the total competitive advantage.

If competitors acquire components of proprietary information, any one component may be the key to the entire puzzle, thereby depriving-Westinghouse'of a competitive advantage.

l (e) Unrestricted disclosure would jeopardize the position of prominence of Westinghouse in the world market, and thereby l

l give a market advantage to the competition of those l

l countries.

(f) The Westinghouse capacity to invest corporate assets in research and development depends upon the success in obtaining and maintaining a competitive advantage.

4 i

i

-6 CAW-89-052 I

i (iii)

The information is being transmitted to the Commission in-l' confidence and, under the provisions of 10CFR Section 2.790, it is to be received in confidence by the-Commission, l

(iv)

The information sought to be protected is not available in public sources or available.information has not been previously. employed in the same original manner or method-to the best of our knowledge and belief.

l_

(v)

The proprietary information sought to be withheld in this submittal is that which is appropriately marked in "Setpoint Study, Revision 1 - Final Version", WCAP-12123 l

(Proprietary), for Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, being transmitted by the Texas Utilities Electric Company (TV) letter and Application for Withholding Proprietary -

Information from Public Disclosure, R. Walker, TV, to Attention Dr. Thomas Murley, March,1989.-.The proprietary information as submitted for use by Texas Utilities:

Electric Company for the Comanche Peak Station is expected to be applicable in other licensee submittals'in response to certain NRC requirements for justification of-instrumentation and system uncertainties.

L

q t-r t

] CAW-89 052 1

2

- This information is part or that which will enable Westinghouse to:

j (a)

Provide documentation of the analysis, methods, used for determining technical specification setpoints, l

utilizing the instrumentation uncertainties.

(b) Calculate the instrumentation uncertainties for the Technical Specification'setpoints.

(c)

Establish systematic and random uncertainties in providing Technical Specification setpoints.

(d)

Provide the methods in determining the instrumentation uncertainties.

(e) Assist the customer to obtain NRC approval.

1 Further this information has substantial commercial value as follows:

1 (a) Westinghouse plans to sell the use of similar information to its customers for. purposes of meeting

~

NRC requirements for licensing documentation.

l

. ~

. g. c.

L

? CAW-89-052 j

(b) Westinghouse can sell support and defense of the technology to.its customers in future spent fuel rack

orders, i

Public disclosure of this proprietary information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive-position of Westinghouse because it would enhance.the ability of competitors to provide similar analytical documentation 'and licensing defense services for commercial power reactors without commensurate expenses. Also, public' disclosure of the information would enable others to use the information.

to meet NRC requirements for licensing documentation f

L without purchasing the right to use-the information.

The development of the technology described in part by the information is the result 'of applying the results of many.

years of experience in an intensive Westinghouse' effort and f

the expenditure of a considerable sum of money.

In order for competitors of Westinghouse to duplicate this information, similar technical programs would have to be performed and a significant manpower effort,'having the requisite talent and experience, would have to be expended for developing analytical methods and performing tests.

Further the deponent sayeth not.

-