ML20034B165
| ML20034B165 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Reed College |
| Issue date: | 04/18/1990 |
| From: | Michaels T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Ruby L REED COLLEGE, PORTLAND, OR |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9004260107 | |
| Download: ML20034B165 (4) | |
Text
-
- April 18,1990 k
Docket No. 50-288 Dr. Lawrence Ruby, Director Reed Reactor Facility Reed College 3203 SE Woodstock Blvd.
Portland, Oregon 97202
Dear Dr. Ruby:
SUBJECT:
REED COLLEGE RESEARCH REACTOR EMERGENCY PLAN We have reviewed the draf t emergency plan, dated December 1989, for the Reed CollegeResearchReactoragainsttherequirementsof10CFR50.54(q)andused guidance criteria found in Regulatory Guide 2.6, NUREG-0849, " Standard Review Plan for the Review and Evaluation of Emergency Plans for'Research and Test Reactors," and ANSI Standard 15.16-1982. -Our review indicates that the draft emergency plan decreases the effectiveness of the currently approved emergency plan and does not maintain compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix E.
Please-revise your emergency plan in accordance with our enclosed coments.
If you have any questions, please call me at 492-1102.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
Theodore S. Michaels, Senior Project Manager Non-Power Reactor, Decommissioning and Environmental Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
l As stated i
l DISTRIBUTION-RDocketdile :s TMichaels NRC & Local PDRs OGC PDNP r/f EJordan WTravers ACRS'(10) l
' EHylton-Plant file t
[TM LTR2 LRuby/2]
PO)NP PDNP:PMk PDNP:D l@ f n TMichaels:dmj SWeissi" l
47/ /90 4//f /90 4// y/90
/0 9004260107 900418 PDR ADOCK 05000288
/ \\
F PDC
,e if
- UNITED STATES '
f
- [g g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.
j g
ij
- WASHINGTON, D. C,20666
. April 18; 1990
+*
Docket No.'50-288 Dr. Lawrence Ruby, Dirketor-Reed Reactor Facility Reed College 3203 SE Woodstock Blvd.
Portland, Oregon 97202
Dear Dr. Ruby:
SUBJECT:
REED COLLEGE RESEARCH REACTOR EMERGENCY PLAN We have reviewed the draft emergency plan,- dated December 1989,.for the Reed CollegeResearchReactoragainsttherequirementsof10CFR50.54(q)-andused guidance criteria' found in Regulatory Guide 2.6, NUREG-0849. " Standard Review.
+ ")
Plan for the Review and Evaluation of Emergency Plans for.Research and Test Reactors," and' ANSI Standard 15.16-1982.- Our review indicates that the draft emergency plan decreases the effectiveness of the currently approved emergency; plan and does not maintain compliance with 10 CFR'50, Appendix E.
Please
- revise your emergency plan in accordance with our enclosed coments.
If you have any questions, clease call me-at 492-1102.
Sincerely, d.
M
-Theodore S. Michaels, Senior Project Manager Non-Power Reactor, Decommissioning and l
Environmental Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects --III..,
IV, Y and Special Projects.
Office of Nuclear ^ Reactor Regulation y
..l
Enclosure:
As stated 1
..a,
.i._
Enclosure 1
J Comments on the Reed Reactor Facility.
Emergency Plan (12/89 draft)
Section 3.1.
Removing written agreements with support groups from the 1
)
Emergency Plan is unacceptable. The plan should contain the~
j arrangements, confiriaed in writing with local support i
organizations that would augment and extend the capability of the f acility's emergency organization.
Section 3.0 Organization and responsibilities J
l The revised section on organization and responsibilities is confusing and unclear. The relationship between the-RRFj J
management and the Director of RRF is not defined. The person who has the non-delegable responsibility for notification'and 4
[
protective action decisions should-be specified.' A block diagram showing the organization would be helpful.
Section 3.1.1 An Emergency Notification Call' List (ENCL) with five positions is mentioned in the plan; however, only three of-the five posi-1 tions are given. The actual list with telephone' numbers is._not-provided nor is the reader directed to the location of the list.
Section 3.1.2 The ENCL mentions a Reactor Supervisor; however, the position is not mentioned in the role of. Emergency. Coordinator.
b
- 1 Section 3.1.7 The relationship between the RRF Reactor Review Comittee and the emergency organization is unclear.
-l Section 3.1.10 It is unclear as written what is " Reed College Comunity Safety."
- l l
.. m m,,
v-c.
<.p,,
]
+..
l-2
't s
Miscellaneous Removing emergency implementing procedures entirely from the i
plan is unacceptable. Emergency implementing procedures should J
be listed by title.in the annex to the plan. These procedures should include names, telephone numbers, specific equipnent, and supplies.
j The size of the EPZ should be addressed in the emergency plan.
i' 4-Section 8'.1 The location of the Emergency Support Center is not specified.
It is stated that.it is located in the Director's office which is not specified in the plan.
i t
f l
1
{
l L
4 ge 4
--