ML20033G581

Ltr Contract,Task Order 1, Review of Public Svc of Colorado ISFSI Application for Fort St Vrain Plant, to Fuel Cycle Licensing Technical Assistance, Awarded to Science Applications Intl Corp

ML20033G581
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Saint Vrain, 07200009
Issue date:	02/28/1990
From:	Hagan T NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:	Rodehau T SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP. (FORMERLY
Shared Package
ML20033G577	List: ML20033G576 ML20033G581
References
CON-FIN-L-1507-0, CON-NRC-02-90-009 NUDOCS 9004100340
Download: ML20033G581 (6)

Text

_-

( h ' I ' i-M g_

e

'N w;rgt v

,,, ev:%

3 UNIHDMTNItS 8 ...

NUCLEAR HEGULATORY COMMISSION I

WAS6HNot ON. D. C. 20s%

?

. ~ ' -

a Scier.ce Applications International Ccrporation Attn:

Thomas Rodehau, Contrr.ct Representative Environmental Technology Group 1711 Goodridge Drive, M5 G-5-1 McLean, VA 22102

Dear Mr. Rodehau:

"ubject: Tasi Order No.1 Under Contract No. NRC-02-90-009 This confirms. verbal ~ authorization provided to you on February 14,--1990, to commence work under Task Order No. 1 on February 15, 1990,;with'a temporary ceiling of $181,000.00.

In accordance with the task order procedures of the subject contract, this' letter definitizes Task Order No.1.

This effort shall be performed in -

1 accordance with the enclosed Statement of Work, and the Contractor's~

proposal dated February 13, 1990, which is. incorporated herein by reference.

Insk Order No. 1 shall be in effeet from February 15, 1990 through October 1,1991, with a cost ceiling of $275,?64.00 ($181,000.00 of which

.was authorinti verbally).

The amount of $253,466.00 represents the-total estimated retr. : rsable costs and the amount of 521,798.00 the fixed fee.

The amount presently obligated by the Government with' respect to this' task.

order is $181,0LD.00, This amount should not be exceeded until notice is provided to you that additional funds are available.

It is estimated tha.t this oblignted amount will cover perf ormanca through February 28, 1991.

Accountir.g Data for this Task Order No.1 are as'follows:

B&R No.:

050-19-31-010' Fin No.:

L1507-0 OBLIGATED AMOUNT: $181,000.00 The following individuals are con.idered to be essential to the successful performance of the work hereuader:

J. Stokiey, 1. Albert, R. Slevers, Jr.,

S. Mirsky,.D. Prelewicz, M. Ebert, R. Belanger.

The Contractor agrees that such personnel shall~not be removed from the effort under the task order without compliance with Contract Clause.H.1,. Key Personnel.

The issuance of this task order does not amend any terms or conditions of the subject contract.

9004100340 900404 PDR CONTR NRC-02-90-OO9 PDC L:

p e,

Science Applications International Corp. Your contacts during the course of this' task order are:

Technical Matters:

David Tiktinsky Froject Officer (301) 492-0056 Contractual Matters:

Barbara Meehan-Contract Administrator (301) 492-7310 please indicate your acceptance of 'this task order by'having an official, authorized to binJ your organization, ext. cute three copies of this document

- in the space provided and return two copies to.the Contract Administrator.

You should retain the' third copy for your records.

5incerely, l Timothy F./ Hagan,' Contracting Officer gNi Contract Administration Branch Division of Contracts and Property Management Office of Administration-

Enclosure:

As stated ACCEPTED:

!Y Jii. L%ruxck GD l

TITLE

_b.

v.,.

i l

i

i s

s i

1D

• %'R :UI lt:: (("

1. : LF n% 1':6 ? f. D el F ?.L

) i /c j ju int Ni V ! " O' I;

Vim M 1.Wi iN: rprtn. i J, ;' i it ' i s mM,0 ' * :!; ' /d i A i ; J N C r1 I fO.

/2 O,

I!N 1IS i.O Pg,Olr p a tw Pud: ;

Beretci of ^olorado :PSC) is sub.ntttinq an applicatinn for a naterials

r ov i t. n on s.

vt 10 CFR Pa t ?2. te n o t, s e s ', + p e n t fuel at 1;ec,

,e.

"' r t?

other ractoat.tive materials associated with spent fuel in an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI).

The ISFSI will be located on the fort St.

Vrain stte in Weld County, Colorado.

Ii will utilite a modular vault system.

Tw J,afe'. Analysis Report (SM) and Environmental Report (ER) to be included in PSC's application, upon receipt and acceptance for docketing should provide sa tisf ac tory framework for the initiation of-the detailed reviews.

I 2.0 Work Required

't i to P hv i tle I t c eo s. i n a technical assistance to the NRC in its

u,

'n.-

~

M sut.ntttee nf P '., fJ.

The ' cope of the review :<

r

nt

n !!* Dases on 10 Cr4 Part /T.

• ne review is a cultidittiplinary activ:ty c u i.u n a t i n g in a written record that will clearly demonstrate the appl cant's compliance and non-compliance to the requirements and criterla specified in 10 CFR Part 72.

The written materials furnished by the Contractor

+hould be suitable for inclusion in the KRC's Safety Evaluation Report.

i.I Lyt f i : <q l

ine principal investigators represent the technical expertise provided by the Con t r ac tor and provide technical <.ontinuity during the entire review orocess,.

They should have pr o f essiona l credentials in the technical areas assigned to

• hem that will qualify them as espert witoesses for tet.tifying at public hearings.

They should have a clear understanding of the depth of review

enerally required by the NRC and specifically required by the type of activity of '* tno 5 m i i t. a n '. ?er toe d i a.c 101 i n e' they rep e,<mt.

• - areas that can be best accomplished by less caperienced personnel, the principal investigators may act as overseers, providing contractor Quality f

control to t a si. atttvities, 1

i

e I

d the reviewers wall tic responsible for a timely technital review of castrete

. > i h ei ?tu. ent4re r e.r i e - e r f o, t.

E evi.

s c.. a be ;4ee f e' ned

r.

't

i for m

.y a pr a n(1y i

,ot,

• 1."'

sapport Iaff iw a h a r. Dut ev4 n !.y fhe pru1ert ne.Jo

'i;n*.

(

• u i

.ha!l pr i V t i!t < h t a r '. c d ?4 Ii. res,newert v!u pt'r 1 ar a tI e a c t u.i !

r et or ds of t ht' thethods used to evajuate all asperts of thets areas t-n p u re, 4 ; ; c r espons i bi l i ty.

Upon completion of an evaluation. the reviewer or i

3 r i n c i p a l investigator will distill this recor d to suitable documen t.i t i on fc

nclusion in r$C reports.

2*2 bel'1 The requirements of 10 CFR Part 72 will dictate the oveiall scope of the safety review. All evaluations performed by the Contractnr should be based uNn in Subpar % 0 and i f ul filling speci f ic requiremen ts and cr i ter t a es tablishen of 10 CFR Part 72.

Within Division 3 Regulatory Guides ti ere are applicable methods acceptable to the NRC for implementing some 10 CFR Part 72 reouirements and criteria.

If adopted by the applicant these regulatory cuides cah be usec to qualify discrete review areas.

8/ n c l o sett is a topical work breakdown s t r uc ture for the safety rev:cw. ' ' a Lr c on t r J t e.wdu l e ISFSI.

For this task, the Contrar. tor is not fesporwtriv the review of 4.3 Safeguards and 'l.4 Ouality /us s u r a n c e, but ts respow tbio all remaining areas shown on the wor k Dr eakdown s t ruc ture.

The ve.tew of 1.

i Site will consist of assuring the range of site parameters developed and evaluated for the f or t St. Vrain si te under Docket No. $0-267 is appropriateiv identified. summarized, updated and applied to the ISfSt.

It is not necessary to pe r f o r a. A basic reevaluatien of site characteristirs previously establis!'ed Dy the fart DO review.

The review of those portions of 3.1 fuel Transfer that take place within the reactor facility will consist only of assuring general c oair.i t i bi l i t y for the reactor facility equipment and operations wath ISFS! requirenents.

PSC is proceeding wi th decommissioning of the for t St. Vrain plant.

When full decommissioning occurs, the Part 50 Operating Licence (OL) will be terminated.

T her e f o r e, this review will addrov operation of an ISFSI on thP Pt 'i t Vraan site before full decommissioning and after the OL. av 'erminut m.

lhe scope of this task does not include any participation in a publit hearing nor any additional review effort that could evolve f rom suc h participation.

2.3 S C hetf ujg Ihe following schedule is based on estiv.ates of time intervais to a(complish steps in the revtrw process through the NRC documeniatton stage rev:ew.

apalics to the safeti review and to t rie envi r ona en t a l rovicw.

f,

'no everaiI schedule is dependent on the..ppl i con t 's response tutNC e et nes t 5 tv 1

l

l #f s( # A > 4 r.'

.is D d

.e s /

r

' * ' tt l i s t) ' f H i t f * * 'i 's.

s

)-

G f; t a r t u p and Coordination Nectings 2 weeks

'as'.

l

.+ q m. a. t-t

/id d i t i o i a l

.f-

• i-to. ;

, p;t '.e i o l aa t tem,

m isfy-

. wee tt

.r :'; o c i.r m, er m i.

.oa' fvalt.atten 6 woi ca

.. r..te are..s within t.i t.&

atliville', wo l d be t r ea ted on the i n d ; v i d u o ',

'evne.es level.

If a ditrrete area of review is satisfied by the inatial

,. t.t x t t 1 ' r oin the applicant, its final evaluation and documentation should be

- ' !

• ut tr

'he earl; stage <, of t he r i.' i e w and chould nc.t watt for tha rev:ew

, t t. ;

require, far a core difft ult crso.

l 3.0 lask Reports M t y;ies of reports are requiredt reports on discrete areas of review and untniy repor ts iden t i f ying the overall pr og t e'.s of the task.

f ot each

.: t stre te rev tew area, the Contractor shall provide details of the review xethod, requests for information i ti a form suitable to trantmit to the acul: cant, and documentation summariting the evaluation and findings suitable to include in NRC reports. The last of these shall be submitted for each

.iew tast in draft and final form that is, for the safety review. A. copy of the trans-

' tal lett(c for each final report sN11 be c.utwitted to the NRC rentractiv. Officer.

terdat.cc w i t t.

the terms Onc cot.d.'

o n <.

< r pe t t shall be 'ut;mitted.i i t s, m it c on t r a c t,

t.0 Ravel l

t is espected that there will be monthly coordination meetings betwech the

.;'r a ter and NRC staff t hr oug hou t the t'ura rien of the task.

T h i r. should te of the C o n t r a c f o r

• t.

offaces a:id vadtly occe uodated b e c a.i s e of the pr cairis t-j WC offices in hockville, f1a r y l a nd.

i* during the review process <an area of review requires technical discussions ietween the Contractor and the applicant, the Contrattor may t>e requested to attend meetings with the applicant.

It as anticipated this could involve three meetings at NRC's of fices in Rockville, f1aryland.

Depending upon their ir ea of responsibility, it is expected t ha t selec ted reviewers will make two ev;<tt.

ast.cr>.ted wia: t i.o <af

• s r.w i. m.

'0

@C_ Furnished f1ateriald ISe f1RC w i l l furnish the Con t r ac tor copiet of documents docketed under Dot. ke l 77-i. pertinent topical reporl'. i!'h! 's f 15 a n d El F for the fort 5t, t/ r a i n e'l o n t nd appropraate porttous of duc h e t ma ter ial.

l l

l i

j

{

e s

e e

i I

t

?

I 6.0 Cogg!! plip!LJy.it f

I t.o 0 s. 4 e e d i ua oli t ici o.i t e for t h1' t e t. hn i t a l a *.s i s t.iti r.- f.. <J

<. P t.:"-

W 1.

if requi ed, a.eparate t a 'A.

o r d e r sill b t.

I n i t i.i t ed

'o utilti se:>cted r t. v 1 +. ' f r or-t h i <,

t.u,L in p o til i i he.u intp

.it. sot:ati,3 with t'

I s t o n *. i n g a t t i on..

7.0 T e c hn i t:_.tJ_El e e r. t i on S. R. Ruffin 15 de"ignated t he N*iSS Pr oj ec t I'lanage r.

{et hn i ca l Instructions-lie 1 st,ued f r om time to. t ime dur ing the duration of ( fii u t a t. L.

1 c c '.n i t a l

<n a y instructions shall not constitute new assignments of work or changes of such nature as to justify an adjustment in cost or period of performance.

Directions for changet. in scope of work, cost or period of performance shall.e IS5ued h

only by the NRC Contrac ting Of ficer.

8.0 Level _of Effort The level of effort estimated for this task is 1.0 person years.

.q Cnclosure:

Work fir ea k d own Structore f: '

(

J f

.