ML20033F554

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1990 for Seabrook Unit 1.W/
ML20033F554
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook 
Issue date: 02/28/1990
From: Feigenbaum T, Nardone P
PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NYN-90074, NUDOCS 9003220027
Download: ML20033F554 (6)


Text

~

',{

FT

5 J

'New H.ampshire

' Ted C. Feigenboum Senior Vice President and -

Chief Operating Officer t

NYN-90074 March 15, 1990 1

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission L

Washington, DC-20$55

' Attention:

Document Control Desk

References:

. Facility Operating License NPF-67. Docket No. 50-443

Subject:

Monthly Operating Report Gentlemen:

Enclosed please' find Monthly Operating Report 90-02.

This report addresses the. operating and shutdown experience relating to Seabrook Station r

Unit 1 for the month of February 1990 and is submitted in accordance with-i the requirements of Seabrook Station Technical Specification 6.8.1.5.

Very_truly yours,

{dwh Ted C. Feigenbaum Enclosure cc Mr. William T. Russell Regional Administrator United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr.' Noel Dudley NRC Senior Resident Inspector P.O. Box 1149 Seabrook, NH 03874 9003220027 900229

{DR ADOCK 05000443 PDC

\\

New Hampshire Yankee Division of Public Service Company of New Hampshire P.O. Box 300

  • Seabrocsk, NH 03874
  • Telephone (603) 474 9521

-1.

OPERATING DATA REPORT 4

DOCKET NO.

50-443 UNIT Seabrook 1 DATE 03/15/90 COMPLETED BY P. Nardone TELEPHONE (603) 474-9521 i

(Ext. 4074) i t

' OPERATING STATUS

1.. Unit Name:

Seabrook Station Unit 1 2.-

Reporting Period:

FEBRUARY 1990 3.

Licensed Thermal Power (HWt):

'3411 4.

Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe):

1197 5.

Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe):

1148 6.

Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross HWe):

1197 (Initial design value) 7.

Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe):

1148 (Initial design value) 8.

If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3 Through 7)

Since Last Report, Give Raasons:

Not Aeolicable 9.

. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any:

170 MWt

-10. Reasons For Restrictions, If Any:

License issued on 05/26/89 is a low power license authorizinn operation at reactor core power levels not in excess of 170 megawatts thermal.

This Month Yr..to-Date Cumulative

'11. Hours In Reporting Period 672.0 1416.0 29545.0 12.-Number'0f Hours Reactor Was Critical 0.0 0.0 194.4

13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours 0.0 0.0 0.0
14. Hours Generator On-Line 0.0 0.0 0.0
15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 0.0 0.0 0.0

~16. Groso Thermal Energy Generated (HWH) 0 0

1090

17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (HWH) 0 0

0

18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (HWH) 0 0

0

19. Unit Service Factor 0.0 0.0 0.0
20. Unit Availability Factor 0.0 0.0 0.0
21. Unit Capacity Factor (Using MDC Net) 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.. Unit' Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) 0.0 0.0 0.0
23. Unit Forced Outage Rate 0.0 0. 0 __ __

0.0

-24. Shutdowns Scheduled Over Next 6 Months (Type, Date, and Duration of Each):

Reactor shutdown as of 06/22/89 for indefinite duration.

l

25. If Shut Down At End Of Report Period, Estimated Date Of Startup:

Indefinite j

26. Prior to Commercial Operation:

Forecast Achieved i

INITIAL CRITICALITY 1989 06/13/89 L

INITIAL ELECTRICITY 1990 Not Applicable L

COHHERCIAL OPERATION 1990 Not Aeolicable 1

i 1 of 5 l

i

7-

.]

i i.:

AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL

]

6:

DOCKET NO.

50-443 UNIT Seabrook 1 j

DATE 03/15/90 COMPLETED BY P. Nardone TELEPHONE (603) 474-9521 (Ext. 4074) i MONTH FEBRUARY. 1990 l

i DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL-DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL 1

(MWe-Net)

(MWe-Net) 1 1

0 16 0

.\\

l.

2-0 17 0

3 0

18 0

4 0

19 0

5 0

20 0

6-0 21 0

i

.7 0

22 0

8 0

-23 0

9 0

24=

0

'10 0

25 0

11 0

26 0

12 0

27 0

13 0

28 0

14 0

15.

O INSTRUCTIONS On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe-Net for each day in the reporting month. -Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.

2 of 5

IJNIT SHlHDOWS Af0 POWER REDUCTIGES DOQQtt NO.~

50-443

-- ~!

INIT Sentrook 1

~

DPGE 03/15/90 REKRP MJNDI FEBRUARY, 1990 O[MPIMED BY P. Nartkme TE MPM]NE (603) 474-9521

._ Ext. 4074)~-

(

l 2

Method of Licensee Cause & Cuuec.i.ive No. Date Type Duratim h

(Hours)

Shutting Event Action to Down Reactor 3 Report #

Frevad. Recurrence 10 ENIRIES KR 'DIIS MNDI l

1 2

3 F: Forced Reason:

Method:

S: Scheduled A-Equipnent Failure (Explain) 1-Manual B-Maintenanm or Test 2-Manual Scram C-Refueling 3-Automatic Scrima D-Regulatory Restriction 4-Continued fran E-Operator Training & Li nse Examination previous nonth F-Administrative 5-Power Redtu: tim G-Operational Error (Explain)

'(Duratim = 0)

H-Other (Explain) 9-Other (Explain) f i

3 of-5

DOGWT MO3 50-443 L.

INIT M-uA1 DME 03/15/90 l

i QNIECTIVE MINIDRNCE

SUMMARY

KR SAETTY REumD BQUIPMENT COMPIEIED BY P. Nardone I

REPG E 20NIH EH EUARY, 1990

'IEEEPEDE (603) 474-9521 (Ext. 4074)

Page 1 of 1 l

IRTE SYSTEM (DfEGENE

)RIN1HENCE ACTIGE 02/03/90 Reactor 1-RC-P-1A Time delay relay fcr ptmp wavultage Coolant Reactor Coolant p.vbsctica ci=n==l operatrs erratically.

Ptap W W relay.

02/05/90 Various Limitorque Replaced thirteen IE liidtorque actuator Actuators notar pinion keys with new keys per IRC Information Notice 88-84.

02/15/90 Resichel Gold Iag Check valve leakage 0 c.uu.M during Heat Injection 5% testing. Rewacked each valve's disc Removal Check Valve and seat.

Icops 1,2,3,4 i

4 of $

V:

,..s DOCKET 10.

50-443 t-I INIT h hrook 1 DATE 03/15/90 CCMPLETED BY P. Nardone i'

L TELEPHONE (603) 474-9521 (Ext. 4074) p

1. Name of facility: h hrook Unit 1
2. Scheduled date for next refueling shutdown: -Not Schedcled
3. Scheduled date for restart following refuelino:- Not Scheduled
4. Will refueling or resunption of open. tion thereafter require a technical specification change or other license amendment?

Unknown at this time..

5. Scheduled date(s) for sulmitting licensing acticn and supporting information:

L Not Applicable 1:

6. Inportant licensing considerations associated with refueling, e.g.,

new or different fuel design or supplier, unreviewed design or perfonnance analysis methods, significant changes in fuel design,

.new operating s d ures:

None i

7. The number of fuel ass a blies (a) in the core and (b) in the spent L

fuel storage pool:

(a) In Core:

193 (b) 0

8. The present licensed spent fuel pool storage capacity and the size of any increase in licensed storage capacity that has been requested or l

is planned, in number of fuel assemblies:

l Present licensed capacity:. 1236 l

No increase in storage capacity requested or planned.

1

9. The projected date of the last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity:

j Licensed capacity of 1236 fuel assa blies based on sixteen refuelings and full core offload capability.

The current licensed capacity is adequate until at least the year 2010.

5 of 5 l

i