ML20033F403

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final SALP Repts 50-254/89-01 & 50-265/89-01 for Oct 1988 - Nov 1989
ML20033F403
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/12/1990
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20033F401 List:
References
50-254-89-01, 50-254-89-1, 50-265-89-01, 50-265-89-1, NUDOCS 9003200342
Download: ML20033F403 (18)


See also: IR 05000254/1989001

Text

gy,

.

..

,=

,

w

,

_.

..w

3;;;)j:g%, ;; x

.

y W:'g .

._

>

" n_. ; ;,.;.

.

ng

.

--4. . i -

.,

f[l hih

-

-

-

'; '

e

c;

-

Enclosure 1:

-

g.

?

,

--

n

W.

.

SALP 8

v:-

ri

k,

.

ET

~flNAL..SALP REPORT-

p,;

_

4

p

4:n

W,

k

-

'

,,

.h. ..,3

,

_

.U.

S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION-

.

,

h% '

' "n

REGION III'

Q

1

s

x

-

.

t

u-

j.

4

i -j :

'^;.'

'

SYSTEMATIC) ASSESSMENT,0F LICENSEE PERFORMANCE

{y

n

,

y

254/89001; 265/89001

?.

-Inspection Report Nos.

s.

-m

..

.

s

3.~

Commonwealth' Edison company-

~

Name of Licensee

,,

,

u

'i

AT.

Quad Cities. Nuclear Power Station'

cc

.

.

-

Name of Facility

g;p--

'1

i

,

y

,

October 1, 1988 through November 30, 1989

Nm

Assessment Period.

+

7

%

i

,-v

,

,

1

'

!

&

l9003200342 900312

%

'. .ih)

ic

-PORI ADOCK 05000254

-u

,gj

- -

PDC

'h

9-

t.'cL; .

-

c.,-

.

a.

.

_

.

___

.

..

..

.

2nclosure 1

Ouad Cities _ Nuclear Plant

A.

Sunn,ary of Meeting with Commonwealth Edison on February 22,19y

The findings and conclusions of the SALP Board are documented in Report

-

No. 50-254/89001; 50-265/89001 and were discussed with the licensee on

Februa ry 22, 1990, at Quad Cities Station.

_

,

While the meeting was primarily a discussion between the licensee

and NRC, it was open to members of the public as observers.

The following licensee and NRC personnel were in attendance, as well

as the noted observers,

t

Commonwealth _ Edison

l

C. Reed, Senior Vice President, Nuclear Operations

D. Galle,.Vice President, BWR Operations

N. Kalivianakis, General Manager, BWR Operations

R. Bax, Sr., Station Manager, Quad Cities

T. Kovach, Nuclear Licensing Manager

--

R. Robey, Technical Superintendent

D. Gibson, Regulatory Assurance Supervisor

M. Turbak, Performance Improvement Manager

R. Stols, Licensing Administrator

K. Brennan, Regulatory Assessment Administrator

J. Swales, Oper. Asst. Supt.

T. Gilman, Supervisor, Emergency Preparedness

P. Behrens, Chemistry Supervisor

J. Wethington, Quality Programs Superintendent

M. McQuade, Industrial Relations Supervisor

J. Sirovy, Services Director

K. Leech, Seixrity Administrator

J. Neal, Tcaining Supervisor

_

R. Bees, Information Management Supervisor

W. McGaffigan, Assistant Superintendent Work Planning

L. Petrie, Construction Superintendent

a

J. Fish, Master Mechanic

_

T. Tamlyn, Site Project Manager

--

R. Tuetken, BWR Projects Manager

K. Schmidt, Emergency Preparedness Instructor

,

D. Hoogheem, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator

i

s

G. Powell, Lead H.P.

,

R. Carson, Corporate Emergency Preparedness

-#

J. Dierbeck, Technical Staff Supervisor

-

D. Rajcevich, Master Instrument Mechanic

'

G. Price, Maintenance Supervisor

C. Smith, Quality Control Supervisor

T. Barber, Regulatory Assurance

_

-

_ . . .

__

_ - - _ ._____ __-_____ ,

-

..

2 4<

Nuclear Regulatory Comission

C. Paperiello, Deputy Regional Administrator

W.=forney, Deputy Director, DRP

L

W. Shafer, Branch Chief DRP

['

T. Ross, Project Manager, NRR

L. 01shan, Project Manager, NRR

R.' Higgins, Senior Resident Inspector

R. Bocanegra, Resident inspector

p

'J. Shine, Resident inspector

Other

.J. Roman,L1111nois Department of Nuclear Safety

B. Pittenger, Reporter

J. Shaff,-lowa Resident

S. Suiter,10wa Resident

.

J. Mathewson, Reporter

!

-E. Ferris, Reporter

,

!

j

B.

Ccmments Received from Licensee

Commonwealth Edisons response dated March 6,1990, to the Quad Cities

,

Initial SALP 8 Report dated February 6,1990, had no comments requiring

F

revision to the specific content of the report.

Because'there is no

revision, the Initial SALP Report is considered the Final SALP Report.

y

c:

.*

L

2

._

.

- - -- - - - _ _ _

---

- - _ ---

'

-

..

..

-

.

U.S. XRC

.

i

.

.

.

. .

. . . .

,

q ..

. . .

J LI . . U . .

1.

. .

.

'

l

QUAD CITIES

)(UCLEAR POWER STAT /0)(

,

F

$$$

1

S/LP 8

PRESE)/TATIO)(

-

I

?ebruary 22,
9E0

l

r1uorc. ova, :::.:.inois

.

y

,,, . - - --,.--

y-

y,,

-~~,+-----.,-..--*-----we

--++--e,v---a

--v-

- - - - - - - - - - ~ - = - * ' " ' ~ - - ~ " - ~

^ - - - -

- -

- " - - - -

-

.

.

AGENDA

-

QUAD CITIES SALP 8

February 22, 1990

_

Opening Remarks

C. J. Paperiello, Deputy RA

1

SALP Process

W. L. Forney, Deputy Dir., DRP

.

SALP Presentation

W. D. Shafer, Br. Chief, DRP

L

T. W. Ross, Proj. Manager, NRR

Summary

W. L. Forney

'

Licensee Comments

C. Reed, Sr. Vice President, CECO

Closing Remarks

C. J. Paperiello

l

Inquiries

Public and Media

l

\\

l

. _ _ .

-

-

---

~

I.

.

-

..

..

.

i

SYSTEMATIC ASS'ESSMENT OF LICENSiE PERFORMANCE

.

(SALP) OBJECTIVES

,

EVALUATIONS OF UCENSEE PERFORMANCE

-

NORMALLY PER ORMD EVERY 12 TO 18 MONTHS

'

FOUR PERFORMANCE RATINGS ARE USED BY NRC:

-

CATEGORY 1

=

HIGH LEVEL

-

CATEGORY 2

=

SATISFACTORY

.

2

-

CATEGORY 3

=

MINIMALLY SATISFACTORY

-

NOT RATED

,

  • TRENDING (when used)

-

IMPROVING

-

DECLINi4G

.

L

I

j

.

'

-

..

..

~

SA_3 g/A_UA"Oh

CRITERIA

MAh AG EV E NT

NVO _V EM E N

~

s ASSU R N G QUA _ITY

AP3ROAC

~0

RES0_U~ 0s Or TEC- slCA_

SSUES

FROV A SAr Y S AN P0 s~

,

RESPONSIV.EN ESS TO NRC

hlTIK~lVES

EhFORCEM ENT F STORY

o

0 3E RA~ 0h A

_

EVE 4 S

STArF 4G (INC_UDING MANAGEMENT)

o

E77ECTVEs ESS 07 "RA N NG & QUA_ r CATION

PROG RAVS

l

-

.

.-

-

_

.,

~

..

..

.

b~}

SALP BOARD

  • V0 TING MEMBERS OF THE BOARD INCLUDE:

DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF RADIATION SAFETY AND

-

SAFEGUARDS (Chairman)

v; RECTOR, DIVISION OF REACTOR PROJECTS

-

DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF REACTOR SAFETY

--

BRANCH CHIEF, DIVISION OF REACTOR PROJECTS

-

SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

-

DIRECTOR, NRR PROJECTS

-

NRR PROJECT MANAGER

-

THE BOARD EVALUATES THE FUNCTIONAL AREAS

A RATING IS ASSIGNED TO EACH FUNCTIONAL AREA

-

,

RATING ASSIGNMENTS ARE BASED ON MAJORITY VOTE

-

CONCLUSIONS BASED ON FACT & SUBJECTIVE JUDGEMENT

i

-

r

  • THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR HAS FINAL APPROVAL OF

BOARD RATINGS

i

L

i

_.

..

..

..

-

1

. \\C

0 \\ A_ AR AS

EXAM s 0

>

l

3 AN ~ 03 E RA~ 0 \\ S

_

RAJ O_0G CA_ C0\\~R0_S

VA \\~EsA\\CE/S RVE __ANCE

1

)

EVERGE\\CY 3RE3AREJ\\ ESS

  • SECJY

ENG N EER NG[~EC-N CA_ S

330F

SA EY ASSESSV EN~/Q

A_~Y VER

CA~0N

.

_-

-

-

_

..

..

.

..

.

QUAD C TIES SA_) 8

'

PLANT OPERATIONS

.

RA"ED 2 i

STR sGT-S

,

3rofessiona ism

_icensed Operator

Plant Material Condition Program Accountability

Control Room iabitability

Reduced Personnel Errors

Enhanced Operations Staffing

WEAKNESSES

Procedure Compiance and Adequacy

_

.

---

.

.-

.

-

--

.-.

-

'

.

..

.

'

QL A) C

ES SA_3 8

'

RA) 0_0G CA_ C0 s

RO _S

RA

EJ

'

,

S"REsG -S

  • S:o" Quo i ico: ions onc

~~raininc

3ersonne

Con: amino: ion

Jecreasec

Van-Rem Jose /A_ ARA

.

Con irmo:ory Veasuremen:

roc ram

3

C,emico

Jecon

3

.

roc ram

WEAG ESS ES

Je oy in

ycrocen

nlec: ion Sys:em

l

r

.

'

.

m 3 emen:o: ion

.

.

.

.

j

"

.,

..

j

-

QUAD CITIES SALP 8

MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE

i

RATED 2

STRENGTHS

Reduction in Personnel Error Events

Improved Reliability Centered Maintenance Program

Predictive Maintenance Program

WEAKNESSES

)

Procedure Compliance and Adequacy

i

Control of Contractor Work Activities

.

Responsiveness to Inoperable Control Room Equipment

Performance of Maintenance Work

'

Resolution of Recirculation Pump Seal Failures

.

.

OTHER

Improvement in PM

1

1

4

-

. - , .

'

..

..

.

Q. AD

C T ES SA_3 8

,

EMERGENCY

3RE3ARE]sESS

RATE)

'

S REsG FS

.

Se -Assessmen': o' Onsi:e

E3

3 rog ram

Cla enging

Exercise, We

Execu:ec

Onsi:e

raining

WEAO ESS ES

\\o SignFican: Wea<nesses

cen:i'iec

u

L

,

_

. _ _ _ .

.

_

_ _ . .

. .

_ . - _ _ .

. . .

. .

_

.

-

.-

.

.

.:

.

..

._

~

QUAD Cl"lESLSAL' 8

SEC JRITY

RA"ED

1

i

STRENG"HS

'

_

n':rusion

Je:ec': ion Sys:em

3crace

Jeaar: men':a

n :er ace

ra ininc

,

Si:e Vanacemen:

_essons

_earnec

i

l

WEA(N ESSES

1

l

No SicnFican~: Wea<nesses

cerr:Fiec

l

l

., ., .,

,

,

,.-~,,.------w,

-

,

, - -

- - -

- - - - - ~ ~ - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - ~ ~ ^ ^ ^

.

.

.

!

4

.

..

..

4

Ql A) Cl"lES SA_3 8

'

E N G N E E R NG/"EC-

s CA _ S

3 30 R"

RA D 2

>

.

STREsG~

S

_icensec 03 era:or

~

ining E"ec:iveness

ra

>

Voci'ica: ion Overview

WEA(s ESS ES

Recua Fica: ion

Examina: ion

3 rocram

S~a"inc.

E03

ro owu]

!

!

'

_-

.

.

-

..

.

'

QUAD Cl" ES> SA_3 8

-

SATE"Y ASSESSMEsT anc

QUA_

CA" Os

VER

CA" Os

i

RA"ED 2

S"RENG"-S

-

_icensee/\\ RC Communico; ions

F

"ec1nica

Reso ution of Sa'ety

ssues

3er"ormance

30sec Auciting

WEAG ESSES

Res30nse :o Se f- den':ifiec

roa ems

3

3 ior 3 anning 0: -ig, 3 iority

'

r

r

l

_icensing Ac: ions

Qua ity of _icensing Ac;ivities

' O C 150.59

Review Jocumentation

Quo ity of

SAR U3 cates

--

  • '

s

e

'

QL AD C " ES SA_3 8

RAT sG C0VPAR.S0sS

1

I

T J N C" O s A _ AR EAS

SA_3 7

SA_3 8

3 A NE 0 3 E RA~ 0 \\'S

2

2i

_

.

RA) 0_0G CA_ CO.\\~RO _S

'

'

WA \\

ENANCE/SURVE __ANCE

2

2

~~

IV ERGE\\CY

3REJAREJN ESS

2

'

SECUR Y

'

'

ENGR /~EC-\\ CA_ SU330T

2

2

SATE ~Y ASSESSV

\\~~ anc

QUA_7Y VER

CA~ 05

2

2

.

1

-

__

_

QUAD CITIES SALP 8

PERFORMANCE BY EVALUATION CRITERIA

.

.

Functional

Mgmnt.

Result of

Response

Areas

invoirnnt.

Tech. Issues

to NRC

Enfore

Events

Staff

Train.

Plant Ops.

+

+

+

+

Rod. Cntris

+

+

+

+

+

Maint/Svri

+

+

+

EP

+

+

+

+

+

+

Security

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

E/TS

+

+

-

SA/QV

-

+

+

Strength

- Weakness

-

.m-

_-

--. . .

.

__

-

Commemsoelth Edleen

.

. ,

~ opos mae.

i

.

/ Downers Grove, Illinois 00615

.

March 8, 1990

Mr. A. Bert Davis

Regional Administrator

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conssission

Region III

799 Roosevelt Road

Glen Ellyn, IL 60137

Subject:

Quad Cities Station Units 1 and 2

Response to the SALP 8 Board Report

NRC Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265

Reference

Letter from A. Bert Davis to Cordell Reed

<

dated February *>, 1990 transmitting SALP 8

Board Report NO. 50-254(265)/89001

Mr. Davia

The referenced letter transmitted the SALP 8 1\\oard Report for Quad

I

Cities Station which sununarized the Station's perf ormance for the period

October 1, 1988 through November 30, 1989.

The purpose of this letter la to

provide Cousnonwealth Edison's conenents on the subject report, as requested in

the reference letter.

'

Cowenonwoolth Edison helleves that, overall, the SALP 8 Report

represents a balanced asacssment of the strengths and weaknesses demonstrated

during the report period. Consnonwealth Edison appreciates the Staf f 's

recognition of the overall itnprovementa in performance at Quad Cities Station

since the last SALP period, especially the recognition of good performance in

the areas of Operation and Emergency Preparedness and sustained good

perfonnance in Security and Radiological Controls.

The goal of the Station as

well as Corporate management in to continue to promote an atmosphere of

professionalism for Station parsonnel and to aggressively pursue improvement

programs in order to achieve a Category 1 periorreance in all SALP categories.

To achieve excellence in all aspects of Quad Cities Station

operation, Conunonwealth r.dison realizen the need for continuing improvements

in all arean including those which have achie/ed SALP 1 performance. An Mr.

Shafer discussed during the February 22, 1990 meeting, the Station has

initiated en extensive Procedures Upgrade Program which entniin both technical

as vell as human factor enhancements to correct the weaknesses identified in

m s-/

o

.-- r v y f %J t/ V I

v

'

a-

r

-

r,

Mr. A. Bart Davis

-2-

March 8, 1990

1

,

..

.-

-

Y

procedural adequacy.

In the area of procedural compliance, upper Station

management continues to stress the importance of adherence to procedures and

has initiated a program in which Station personnel pledge their support to the

philosophy of procedure adherence.

Finally, corrective actions have been

initiated in response to the NRC identified concerns related to contractor

control. Quad Cities Station concurs with Mr. Shafer's observation expressed

during the SALP meeting that better contractr.r control has been achieved

during the current Unit 2 Refueling Outage.

In the area of licensing activities, corrective actions to improve

quality of licensing submittels were initiated in 1989 and will be further

developed during the current SALP period to address NRC concerns.

Improvements in the quality of submittale during the latter portion of the

SALP period were acknowledged by Mr. Ross during the February 22,1990 SALP

Meeting. Continuing improvements to the licensing process should further

enhance the technical and administrative quality and timeliness of submittals.

Commonwealth Edison appreciates the NRC's efforts in their asseenment

of Quad Cities Station performance. Commonwealth Edison acknowledges the

Stait's efforts in anaisting Quad Citlen Station in their pursuit of

exceptional performance.

The SALP report as well as our aggressive

self-assenament activities will namist the Company in the focused allocation

of resources to f urther our pursuit ei excellence.

Please direct any commenta regarding this response to the Nuclear

Licensing Department.

Very truly yours,

L

h

RO

.

D. Calle

Vice President, BWR Operations

cc

J. Craig (NRR)

L. Olshan (NRR)

W. Shafer (Rill)

J. liinde (RIII)

Senior Resident Inspector. Quad Cities

l

!

l

/0716T