ML20033F051

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Re Reinvestigation Program at Plant That Included Psychological Evaluations & Background.Util Standardizing Background Data for Access Authorization Program & Implementing Employment History Requirements
ML20033F051
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/05/1990
From: Taylor J
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Hastert J
HOUSE OF REP.
Shared Package
ML19332G850 List:
References
CCS, NUDOCS 9003150322
Download: ML20033F051 (2)


Text

3 7

q-y 1

[

o UNITED STATES

-,,[ "

I,,p NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t,,

E WASHING TON, D. C - 20555 k..~...,o!

March 5, 1990

]

The Honorable J. Dennis Hastert Member, United States House of Representatives 100 Lafayette Street Ottawa, Illinois 61350

Dear Congressman Hastert:

I am responding to your letter of February 7,1990, in which'you forwarded a constituent's inquiry' concerning a reinvestigation program that had been-implemented at the LaSalle County Station that included psychological evaluations and background investigations.

We understand that the Commonwealth Edison Cem,:pany,'the utility that operates the plant at which your constituent is empicyed, has changed several: access requirements at its six nuclear sites. One change involves the use of the:

" Industry Guidelines for Nuclear Power Plant Access Authorization Programs" (NUMARC 89-01), published by the Nuclear Management'and Resources Council, Inc.

The Connission has no objection to the utility using these-guidelines'in the implementation of its access authorization program.

Commonwealth Edison Company is also staudardizing background data for the above access authorization program and for implementing the employment history requirements of NRC's fitness for-dut; rule (10CFRPart26).

The utility's program changes are intended to establish a consistent data base to facilitate exchange of background information and apply 'to all contractor employees and-newly hired Commonwealth Edison personnel.

'his should expedite future-processing of contractor access at nuclear power plant sites.

In response to the other question your constituent raised, there has not been-a change in the NRC view of the threat level with respect to U.S. nuclear plants.

I trust this response adequately addresses your constituent's inquiry.

Sincerely,

/

R J es M. T or xecutive Director for Operations W aTEM A O eg p{

Enclosure:

NUMARC 89-01 y-I O o oW 5e%2rp w

I March 5, 1990 1

1

)

The Honorable J. Dennis Hastert United States Member,f Representatives L

l House o j

100 Laf ayette Street L

Ottawa, Illinois 61350

-l I

1

Dear Congressman Hastert:

1 I am responding to your letter of February 7,1990, in which you forwarded a l

constituent's inquiry concerning a reinvestigation program that had been implemented at the LaSalle County Station that included psychological evaluations and background investigations.

We understand that the Commonwealth Edison Company,:the. utility that operates-the plant at which.your constituent is employed, has-changed several access requirements at its six nuclear sites.. One change involves the use of the-

" Industry Guidelines for Nuclear Power l Plant Access Authorization Programs"-

(NUMARC 89 01), published by the Nuclear Management and Resources Council, Inc.

The Commission has no objection to the utility using these guidelines in the implementation of its access authorization program.

Consnonwealth Edison Company is also standardizing background data for the above access authorization program and for implementing the employment history requirements of hRC's fitness.for duty rule (10 CFR Part 26). The utility's program changes are intended to establish a consistent data base to facilitate exchange of background information and apply to all contractor. employees and newly hired Coninonwealth Edison personnel. This should expedite future processing of contractor access at nuclear power plant sites.

In response'to the other-question your constituent raised, there has not been a change in the NRC view of the threat level with respect to U.S.-nuclear plants.

I trust this response adequately addresses your constituent's inquiry.

Sincerely, Onginal Signed By:

hmes M. Taylor.

James M.. Taylor Executive Director for Operations

Enclosure:

NUMARC 89 01 Distribution:

See next page

  • See previous concurrence OFC
R5GB:NRR
R5GB:NRR h
BC:R5GB:NRR
TECH:ED
D:DRIS:NRR FADT:NRR l......:................:.....p_ g...:..............:..............:..............:.............

l NAME :LLBush*......:................ p g.L.....::

PFMcJeg RS kelton*
MMejac*
BKGrimes*
FMiralia*

DATE :2/23/90

2/23/90
2/23/90
2/23/90
2/26/90
2/26/90 i

0FC

D p.............::ED
0CA g

a.......:......................__...................

NAME TLMurley

JMT l r

'DATE :

/90

%/ W90
?/ //90

""~

Utt1GIAL Kt.LUND CUPT Document Hann: LTR..TO REP. HASTERT 4

- -, - -,