ML20033D269
| ML20033D269 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 09/29/1981 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20033D256 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-328-81-38, NUDOCS 8112070469 | |
| Download: ML20033D269 (2) | |
Text
.
3 APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Tennessee Valley Authority Docket No. 50-328 Sequoyah 2 License No. DPR-79 As a result of the inspection conducted on July 6 - August 5,1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7,1980),
the following violations were identified.
A.
Technical Specification 6.8.1.b requires that written procedures shall be' established, implemented and maintained for refueling operations.
Contrary to the above, on July 14, 1981, written procedures for Unit 2 fuel' load were not properly implemented in that Maintenance Instruction MI-1.2,
" Removal and Replacement of Reactor Pressure Vessel Head," was not being properly signed off as work was being performed and Appendix B to MI-1.2,
" Clearance Requirements'," was not properly in force during the reassembly of the reactor vessel following initial fuel load.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E.).
B.
Technical Specification 6.8.1.c requires that written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained for surveillance and test activities of safety-related equip, ment.
Contrary to the above, on July 15, 1981, written procedures for testing safety-related equipment were not established and implemented in that the 12" Upper Head Injection system check valves were being leak tested without properly reviewed or approved written procedures.
This is a. Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E.).,
C.
Technical Specification 6.8.1.b requires that written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained for refueling operations.
Contrary to ttye_ above, on July 4,-1981 and July 8,1981, written procedures for Unit 2 > fuel ' loading were not properly implemented in that Fuel Handling Instruction 'FHI-4B, " Movement of Fuel Assemblies with the Manipulator Crane" was being conducted by personnel engaged in the fueling activities without benefit of safety lines as required by paragraph IV.A of the instruction.
^
This is a Sever ty' Level V Violation-(Supplement I.E.).
D.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII', and section 17.2.17 of TVA-TR75-1, the licensee's adcepted QA Program, require that' sufficient records ba maintained to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality and that these records be retrievable. ;
/
8112070469.811125 PDR ADOCK CS00(1327
.G-4PDR
.L'.-
e Tznnbssna Valley Authsrity 2 Docket No. 50-328 g' Notice of Violation License No. DPR-79 ) Contrary to the above, as of June 13, 1981, the li:ensee was unable to locate and retrieve the reactor coolant system hydrostatic pressure tracing which was recorded in the control room during the test conducted on November 4, 1980. This is a Severity Level VI Violation (Supplement I.F.). E. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II, and section 17.2.2 of TVA-TR75-1, the licensee's accepted QA Program, require that activities affecting quality shall be accomplished under suitably controlled conditions. Controlled conditions include adequate cleanliness. Contrary to the above, cleanliness of the upper internals as required by Maintenance Instructions flI-1.2, " Removal and Replacement of RPV Head and Attachments", paragraph 9.5, was not implemented in that the upper internals contained pine straw and organic debris between the time the refueling canal was flooded on June 26, 1981 and the date the material was discovered on July 9, 1981. This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E.). Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to l this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written ' statement or i explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged viola-tions; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps a which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will t be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will 3 be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation. 4 The responses directed by this Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511. SEP 2 91981 Da te: i i}}