ML20033C896

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Test Results,Auxiliary Bldg (Part 2),Soil Boring & Testing Program,Midland Plant-Units 1 & 2
ML20033C896
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 11/24/1981
From: Jackie Cook
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20033C897 List:
References
14874, NUDOCS 8112040474
Download: ML20033C896 (3)


Text

- - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _

E Consumem Power Josees W Cook Vice President - Projects, Engineering

.=nd Construction i

General offices: 1945 West Parnait Road, Jackson, MI 49201 * (517) 788 0453 November 24, 1981 i t Nf c

.he03aff[ reb 9 S-gIA "It' Harold R Denton, Director k~

4

%u,,D' oar Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Y

M l

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission i

Washington, DC 20555 e

1 Col

\\s/

/%\\

MIDLAND PROJECT MIDLAND DOCKET NOS 50-329, 50-330 RESULTS OF SOIL BORING lad TESTING i

PROGRAM FOR AUXILIARY BUILDING (PART 2) 1 FILE 0485.10, B3.0.1 SERIAL 14874

REFERENCE:

JWCOOK LETTER TO HRDENTON, SERIAL 13774, DATED SEPTEMBER 22, 1981 ENCLOSURE: TEST RESULTS, AUXILIARY BUILDING (PART 2), SOIL BORING j

AND TESTING PROGRAd, MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 We are providing thirty (30) copies of the encined Woodward-Clyde Consultants 1

(WCC) report (Part 2) dated October 26, 1981 which documents the soil boring and sampling program and the subsequent laboratory testing program for the foundation soilt: at the auxiliary building. The results of these programs are presented in the form of logs of borings and in both tabular and graphical data summaries of index property, strength and compressibility testing of the l

foundation soils. This data is found in the appropriate appendices of the enclosed report.

Similar index and engineering property results for the auxiliary building foundation soils were presented in the WCC report of August 28, 1981 entitled,

" Test Results, Foundation Soils, Auxiliary Building (Part 1), Soil Boring and f

Testing Program, Midland Plant - Units I and 2," which was previously I

forwarded to the NRC with the referenced correspondence of September 22, ?.o81.

For completeness, all test results from the Part I report are included in the enclosure to this correspondence. Hence, the re:ults of the testing programs presented in the enclosed Part 2 report are the combined results of those previously presented in the referenced Part I report and additional tests on soil samples of fill material and the natural foundation soil below 3OOI Elevation 540'.

5 The Borings COE-17 and COE-18 penetrated the granular and cohesive fill l

O material from the existing ground surface at approximate Elevation 634' to an approximate depth of 51 and 52 feet, respectively. The ranges and average values of the results obtained from the laboratory tests performed by WCC on 4

oc1181-0483a100 2

8112040474 811124 PDR ADOCK 05000329 A

PDR

2 the fill soil samples from both these borings are presented in the WCC report, Part 2.

It can be seen from the index properties that the fill materials consisted of low plasticity silty sandy clay, clayey sand and fine to medium sand.

The WCC index propertie; and strength test results performed on undisturbed founcation soil samples obtained from the Borings COE-17 and COE-18 yielded the following averaga values at three selected thicknesses of natural sail stratum below the planned underpinning foundation elevations.

Unorained Shear Strength (S ), Ksf Stratum Between Undrained Shear Elevations Strengt5 (Ksf)

(FL)

Range Avg 4 Undrained Unconsolidated (UU) Tests 570 to 560 5.18-7.66,2 6.9 1

5 (UU) Tests 560 to 540 7.24-10.39 8.7 11 (UU) Tests 540 to 436 6.61-10.88 8.3 1

One UU test at Elevation 560.3' gave shear strength of 2.57 ksf and was not considered because the laboratory noted that sample disturbance took place.

2 Another UU test at Elevation 581.4* gave shear strength :f 2.62 hsf and was not considered because a depth of fill found in both the borings was to Elevation 582'.

Probably this sample represented fill material.

The shear strength values presented in the above table includes those values of shear strengtn for the elevations of 570 ' through 540', previo"rly presented in the referenced letter dated September 22, 1981, and u.

values of shear strength obtained from the additional tests on foundation soil samples between Elevations 570' and 436'.

It can be seen from the above table that the average shear strength for the stratum above Elevation 560' was about 6.9 ksf and the average shear strength valuas were slightly greater than 8 ksf l

below Elevation 560'.

Consequently, the avarage values of shear strength reported in our letter of September 22, 1981 are of the same approximate value as those based on the complete test program which are reported herein.

It is seen from the foregoing discussion that the allowable bearing capacities based on the average shear strengths obtained from WCC tests are greater than the conservative values of allowable bearing capacity which were based on ESAR l

shear strength data.

Four consolidation tests were previously reported in the referenced Part 1 i

report. These four consolidation tests along with two additional tests are reported in the enclosed Part 2 report. These six consolidation tests were performed on soil samples obtained in the natural soils to determine a preconsolidation pressure value. The values of preconsolidation pressure from oc1181-0483a100

3 the resulting log compression curve were evaluated using Casagrande's construction.

Based on this evaluation, the preconsolidation pressures ranged from 26 ksf to 84 ksf. This range is much higher than the previously estimat_d range of 15 ksf to 20 ksf given in FSAR Subsection 2.5.4.2.9.

This substantiates the leavily preconsolidated nature of the natural deposits in the area of the auxiliary building.

These conclusions and the data results attached as an enclosure should provide the NRC with the information necessary to evaluate the soils conditions at the auxiliary building.

d a%K G

/

JWC/RLT/dsb.V CC Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board, w/o CBechhoefer, ASLB, w/o MMCherry, Esq, w/o FPCowan, ASLB, w/o RJCook, Midland Resident Inspector, w/o RSDecker, ASLB, w/o SGadler, w/o JHarbour, ASLB, w/o DSHood, NRC, w/a (2)

DFJudd, B&W, w/o JDKane, NRC, w/a FJKelley, Es], w/o RBlandsman, NRC Region III, w/a WHMarshall, Esq, w/o JPMatra, Naval Surface Weapons Center, w/a W0tto, Army Corps of Engineers, w/a WDPaton, Esq, w/o FRinaldi, hPC, w/a HSingh, Array Corps of Engineers, w/a BStamiris, s/o oc1181-0483a100