ML20033C635
| ML20033C635 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 11/24/1981 |
| From: | Kintner L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8112030530 | |
| Download: ML20033C635 (6) | |
Text
r f
~
NOV 241981 Docket No.: 50-341 APPLICAliT: Detroit Eoison Company FACILITY:
Fermi 2
SUBJECT:
SUft4ARY Ot CASELOAD F0kt.tAST PANEL Si1E VISIT UN SLPTLtWER 29,-
SEPTEMBER 30 Ahb OCTOBER 1, 1981 Introduction
. Representatives of the hRC (Mr. W. Lovelace Office of Management ano Prograu Analysis Mr. bruce Little, Ferni 2 Resident Inspector, and Hr. L. Kintner fermi 2 Licensing Project Manager) met with representatives of Detroit Edison Company to observe the status of construction of Fermi 2 and hear applicant's basis for its scheduled completion date. Principal participants
.for the applicant were: Mr. W. Fahrner, Nanager, Enrico Fermi 2 Project; tir. R. Vance, Assistant Project Manager for Engineering, and; Mr. S. Hoetzel, Assistant to the Manager. Mr. H. Tauber, Vice President, Engineering and Construction, participated in the sumary meeting on October 1.
All participants in the meetings are listed in Enclosure 1.
Sur. wary The applicant presented information in accordance with the agenda attached to.
the meeting notice. On September 30, applicant conducted a tour of-major-buildings, equipment, and systems.
In an overview of project construction, applicant said that construction is 87%
coupleted. One area, the control room, has been turned over to the operations organization. Mechanical erection of the main turbine generator is essentially complete. The initial core loading has been fabricated. Division I equipment in the residual heat removal building is nearly completed. Power systems have -
been energized. Construction and engineering ' activities that uay impact scheduled completion date (hovember 29, 1982) include; plant t_curityisystem design and -
procurement, modification of liquid and solid raowaste systems, and lydrostatic testing of the reactor pressure vessel. Enclosure 2 gives a sumary schedule for plant completion, showing impact of certain activities on the scheduled plant completion date.
r-The appilcant said that it plannen to recover some ' schedule slippage by using.
2 shifts; for example, for the reactor pressure vessel ' hydrostatic-testing ano completion.of the reactor internals.1 This cepends partly on obtaining State-i approval to-1ssue more bonds to support this increased level of constructioa.
In addition, applicant plans to complete some tasks in parallel, rather than.
In sequence. For example,' checkout and initial operation will be done in : parallel with. paper work for system hyorostatic testing and completion of installation nf hanpre_
Omct>
............... ~.......
............. - ~... ~ ~
.-aaa.a.~~~~*..
~~~.~~aaaaa.a.>
suaname )
K Oh D
oarr )
.......... ~........
............. ~.......
wac ronu va pW uncu ow
~
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY-usoco: mi-m.m
(
W y
n
[
[
r
[
JFerdi -
-' Engineering activities for the orginal scope of work is 93% complete and for new scope of work, including-THI-related work, it is 42% complete; however, all new work has not been completely identified. New engineering work is about 10% of the orginial scope of engineering work. -Presently over 700 engineers and technicians are working on new work such as modifications required for fire protection (Appendix R to 10 CFR 50) and modifications to safety relief valve controls 'and postion indication (THI requirements in hDREG-0737).
The purchasing activities are directed and conducted from the site by about 50 employeese including purchasing, inspection of equipmt.nt, material control, and warehousing. Except for delivery of the uninterruptible power supply for the plant security system, essentially all raaterials are expected to be delivered by the-first quarter of 1982. The Fermi 2 sumulator, which is not required prior to fuel loading, is scheduled for delivery in the first quarter of 1983. flaterial purchases are assured of minimum delays by a dedicated expeditor; for example, radwaste system equipment, cables, and pipe hangars.
Craft workers are projected to increase from about 1400 persons now to about 2280 persons in the first quarter of 1982 and then decrease to about 730 in the last quarter of 1982.. Pipefitters and welders have the largest projected increase, almost double the current' number.. Availability of craft personnel in the area is good except that availability of construction equipment operators is excellent and the availability of pipefitters is only fair. All craft union contracts expire in mid-1982 except the electriciains contract which -
expires May 1. 1984. Applicant expects all contracts will be renewed without
. major work stoppage. Productivity, as measured by work sampling, is slightly above national averages.
The analysis, design and installation of pipe hangars, restraints. and snubbers for the as-built piping system is being done now. Reanalysis of stresses has been completed for 8 of 19 total as-built systems in accordance with IE Bulletins 79-02 and 79-14.- Temporary supports are adequate for initial tests, so that T
testing can be donc concurrently with the installation of permanent supports.
Of 13,000 large bore pipe hangars and other type supports, about 9,760 have been accepted. Of 9,630 small bore pipe hangars about 6,600 have been accepted.
The remainder of reanalysis and installation is expected to be completed within about one year.
The percentage completion of bulk quantities is:
large bore pipe, 99%; small bore pipe, 85%; concrete 99%; electrical cable, 97%: alectrical termination, 85%, and; instrumentation, 85%.
There~ are,a total of 144' preoperational and acceptance tests to be performed after systems are turned over to the operations organization and systeu cher.kout and initial operation is completed. Ninety six percent of the procedures for these tests have been written ^and 89% have been approved for use. Thirty-four of. the 144 systems.have been turned over to operations and are undergoing checkout and initial operation. One peroperational test is underway, but'none have been compieted.
cmce >
sunNAus)
.....mm......
................m...
...... ~.. ~. - -.
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. om )
.-~~.m.......-
~.. - -... ~.. - -.
~ ~ -. - ~ ~ ~. -
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~
unc renu m oo-so> sncu om OFFIClAL RECORD. COPY umm m**a u
- f..
5 u
~
Fermi _
_3-The applicant 1dentified potential schedular problems ' associated with the following THI'(NURG-0737) requirements:
II.b.3 - Post Accident Sampling;.
II.F.2 Inadequate Core cooling and; III.A.I.2 - Energency Response Facilities.
Host potential oesign deficiencies reported in 'accordance with 10 CFn 50.5S(e) have' been completed or are pending NRC review. There appear to be no schedular problems with the remainder.
Conclusion ~
The NRC staff obtainc:1 sufficient information from the meeting and plant taur-to estimate fuel load date. Construction management and control appear to be good; however, it appears to the staf f that it is unlikely that the applicant's scheduled fuel load date (November 1982) will be met.
The WC staff estimates plant construction will be completed sufficiently for fuel loading in February 1984, basco on its estinated completion of hydrostatic testing of the reactor pressure vessel in April 1982 and completion of system checkout, initial operation, and preoperational testing within 22 months after hydrostatic testing. This estimate assuoes applicant will make up 2 months of the 9 months' slippage in the scheoule for tvarostatic tests of the reactor pressure vessel and will complete properational testing at a rate near the upper end of 'the range experienced at other plants.
I Hr. H. Tauber 'strongly disagreed with tne staff's estimated plant completion date and ; stated the plant target date for fuel loading would remain as hovember 1982. Applicant said that their testing program cannot be directly compared -
to that of other utilities because mach of the Fermt 2 system testing will be done during checkout and initial operation and hydrostatic testing. Therefore they consider 13 months to be ample time to complete preoperational ~ testing af ter the hydrostatic tests of the reactor pressure vessel are completed. -They expect to complete the hydrostatic testing in December 19til.
The staff said it will nonitor progress of construction and testing activities closely.
If major milestones are achieved sooner than we-now estimate,'the HRC Caseload Forecast Panel will reassess its estimated fuel load date, so that routine administrative aspects of licensing activities will not impact fuel loading.
Origiani S1;;ned Byt Le. ster L. Kintner L. L. Xintner.. Project Hanager Licensing Branch Ho.1 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated-cc:. See next pageb\\
0 DL:LBf b.... -(.'l
. qL
. omer >
suanue>..LKintner/y.t BJ.Y lno.d
..Q..............
.llM/81...... 31 81.....
.........::..q........
om>
mc FORM M UW NRCM em :
OFFICIAL _ RECORD COPY -
usa m,6-u m
'M
I L
- \\
Mr. Harry' Tauber Vice President Engineering &' Construction DetroitLEdison Company
'2000 S(cond Avenue
' Detroit, Michigan 48226 cc:
Mr. Harry H. Voigt, Esq.
<LeBoeuf,-Lamb, Leiby & MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 Peter A. Marquardt, Esq.
Co-Counsel The Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit, Michigan _48226 Mr. William J. Farner Project Manager - Fermi 2 The Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit,-Michigan 48226 Mr. Larry E. Schuerman Detroit Edison Company 3331 West Big Beaver Road Troy, Michigan 48084'
' David E. Howell, Esq.
3229 Woodward Avenue Berkley, Michigan 48072 Mr. Bruce Little
-U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspector's Office
.6450 W. Dixie Highway Newport, Michigan 48166 Dr. Wayne Jens Detroit-Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue
. Detroit,' Michigan 48226 9
F
~
C-
').
" Enclosure ! -
Attendees for NRC-Detroit Edison Company Meeting-Caseload Forecast Panel Site Visit September 29, 30_and October 1. 1981 NRC L. Kintner.
.W. Lovelace-
= B. Little -
Detroit Edison Company S. Noetzel.
W. Fahrner-L. Schuerman J.~Honkala
-R..Vance H. Ta"5er R. Blok D. Spiers W.'Everett W. Holland H. Arora
. R. Lenart
- t, -
E. Griffing
-r
-a-w i
- w...
,s.
i
.t; i,
)_o$.~,5, d
4_li i
5 _,
s lg r I5 o
g r 8 ;o o
e gll w
!$! l5 U_it
~,
,s a
I o
h
]
8 ::
a e.
e a t:
5
. t :
c r
5 81 t i
.?
1 i
Jo n f:;
r-c- -
c-.-
r G
CS -(1
_____.,'_____,,._-,r i
,--------2--
O J G, O
' O, O
,, G O
on
'GT 8-I N
CO g$
I g
ws UU ad:
l si
- O- - ->
2 "
8- -
~
N er : %m ;
m m
I S
h C
O2 i
e jl r
e i
i A
Q D
w U
Y I
, ire; o
4
- ii i
f de Wd d=
4 g
O E
FoI' j
w y
$7 TE T
y c
e r
L8 T
ng O
w I
Y k
$A g
4 s
BE D
a E
5 SI s
w P2 E.
E E E, W
e w
=
g x
3 g
- ! ac N
t t;'
=
d E, _
i U
N o $,
h t
D 3
W O
g _e G
o e,
e E
d
^
e y a
2 Pg W* I 2
e-=-
r d
w e se w
S at a >
$ 1-S E u
O
- Z C
o f
- - 1 h
d w
r 8
'2 e
e o
g 2
4 w
3 u
31 CO 3
x 3
o a
=
_ *h '5 f
2
.b,
$ hI 5
E N
E E
k D
a u
4
-E,j n
- (g s
t 3
-s ss -,
-~
s.-
v.
-s s
-s ss N
fo
+
10 CD 9
O d
d d-k l
+
9 o
6
~
eo gg no
~
g p.Y s-d r hN i
t.o 0
i;fu
-h.
di h.
H r
-r T'
N o
f C
d-S j
5 h
d~
W Cf T
Cr T
0
NOV 2 4 2 MEETING
SUMMARY
DISTRIBUTION
- Docket Tile" G. Lear W. Johnston NRC PDR S. Pawlicki Local PDR TIC /NSIC/ Tera V. Benaroya Z. Rosztoczy N. Hughes W. Haass LB#1 Reading D. Muller H. Denton R. Ballard E. Case D. Eisenhut W. Regan i
R. Mattson R. Purple P. Check B. J. Youngblood A. Schwencer F. Congel
\\
h
- 0. Parr
/
F. Miraglia D[
F. Rosa J. Miller G. Lainas W. Butler Q/
R. Vollmer W. Kreger 2E R. Houston l-G J. P. Knight h
R. Bosnak g'
2 L. Rubenstein F. Schauer R. E. Jackson T. Speis k#161) # \\
M. Srinivasan Project Manager iKintner J. Stolz Attorney, OELD i
M. Rushbrook F. Hanauer 01E (3)
W. Gammill ACRS (16)
T. Murley R. Tedesco F. Schroeder D. Skovholt M. Ernst NRC
Participants:
R. Baer C. Berlinger K. Kniel WLovelace G. Knighton A. Thadani D. Tondi J, Kramer D. Vassallo P, Collins D. Ziemann bec:
Applicant & Service List 4
- - - - - - - - - - - - _ -