ML20032E980

Request for OMB Review & Supporting Statement Re Reporting & Recordkeeping Requirements of Ltr Request for Info on Emergency Notification Sys.Estimated Respondent Burden Is 912-h

ML20032E980
Person / Time
Issue date:	05/29/1981
From:	Besaw W, Scott R NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:
Shared Package
ML20032E968	List: ML20032E967 ML20032E973 ML20032E980
References
NUDOCS 8111230571
Download: ML20032E980 (14)

Text

RECUES's FOI. C:J.L T,EV1

~

(U%

the Papersork Reauction Act en: Executsve Order 12291)

Important - Fea: c e'udes (SF-83 A1 t,efore completmg inis Ctfice of Information cc N gumtary Aff airs f orm Suom>t the recs ec n.-der # cop.es c'SF 63 togetner Omce of Management anc Eudget with the matena: for anc ru ew is reaues%ro Wasnegton.D C 20503 Department ' Agency a c Eu eau 'Othce originating reauest 3 Nameist and te:epnone nur-Leris) of personW who can best 1

r ans er auestions regarding recuest UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Pat Woolley (301) 492-8137 2 6-d. git Agency:Bursau number (first part of 11-digit Treasury 4 3-digit f unctional code liast part of 11-digit Treasury Account Account No )

No)

_ 3_

1.

_0._.

_2._

A

.0_

.2_

Z

_6_

5 Tstle of information Conection or Rutemaksng C is thus a rutemakong submission unaer Section 3504th) of P L 96-511'(Check one) 1%I No (Section 3507 submission)

Emergency Notification System 2: Yes NPAM. Expected date of puta:at.on 6 A Is any unformation cot'ection (reporting or recordm eeping) 3 C Yes. final rute Enpected date of pubhcation onvolved' (Check one)

[t'e:t ve date

'XXVes and o'cocsat is attached for review D At what phase of rulemaking is this submission made?

0"'I 2 ves Out ct :sa'is n:t attached - soup to cuestion D 3 No - s= p tc c.est on 0 1 X Not a phcable S Ar'e the respondents primarily educatoonala gencies or 2: Valor rute at NPRM stage onstrtutions or is the purpose related to Federaleducation 3 C vapor Fmat rule for +bich no NP AM sas pubushed prcgra ms 7 4: Vajor Final ru'e after pubhcahon of N A AM C Yes

% No 5 C Ncomaior rufe. at NPRM stage 6 C Non naior rufe. at Final stage CCMPLETE SHADED PORTION IF INFORM ATION COLLECTION PROPOS AL 15 ATTACHED 7 Current (or former) OYB Number E Recaester!

12 Agency report form number (si Exp, ration Date Espiration Date 13 Are respondents only r deral agencies?

e 12/81 O Yes a No 9 is prcposed informat cn coPection hsted in 14 Type of 'ecuest IChem ene!_

Ine iMormat.0" conec' 0* Oadget ?

O Yes X No 1 C p W ea", man

' 3.* iii tn's c'ODOseC m'o' "3tiCG CodeClion 2M N w DWM aN5

• e" P f *! TO M N 0 % 9 chse !Pe C genC) t0 e n Ceed it! 'Ofo'mation agei c LDecDC- :. dget J 0 6 5 M e ? it! yes attach O Yes

% No 3

raw s 0, g ~e.m"me"*

• e p es! '?:m

• gen C p nla d I 4: e,:e s c- (a a s !.~ c ~r r: t J'2C ' C "IkI 1* NJcer C' recOrt fo"ms subm ited f or approval 5 C e= te".on m cnavel N/A 6

re ~s'a'e

~ ' e w 'ec + ' = E r' o r 's '

16 16 C!assacatien of Change in Burden /eap'am en scoperting statementJ a arremes'e saa e' n.'s.

• er*'

76 M c' ne s ec "se s No C N W ;:'":t's CesMe Re f W c e 34, v w r.

a in inventory 5

c,,..,..e,w,, y b Ascic00:ed 76 l

9]2

!5,]2Q 9

m : *ct"s ~

~

l m e-e -*:cu r".a r j

c Differenct (b-a!

!5 ere.,e f.n,e' Exoranation o' difference Ondcate as reany as app %i re spaam

.e ~ ; f 26 Adjustments g

, T e v, ~.g

.4 - m *

• yg P-b5 d Correct;cn-error o en u e ::c e Correction-reest' mate.

l-l*s

• t. - veca.= e N A

+

,J. r..,e m.

l f Cha ge in use

& 5 12 l

r c....,,,

M Prog.'a'" c n3"Qel g Tp wv.3* '.

• v s y,*y-

{

g increas*

76 912

^ 59.320

^

8111230571 810808

~

l

{

912 i

(Decrease

-s PDR ORG EUSOMB of Standard Forni 83. Aev 3 8 *

..y,..P Db,'need d,Y7unei12FJ98p m for use seg.nning 4 i s-

- Te,

MW ;.afof " d ae d

n L: met Gee ~os ano usec 50%.2 5 5rEssT

~

~ "

~ ^~

~

NRC 'has* ah ' Emergency Notifhotion System which is a dedicated telephone system used by licensees to report' events that may endanger the public health and safety.

Data needs to be collected to upgrade the capabilities of the system.

1 E Re ec report form (si /g.e OM5 number (s). lACursi.

20 Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numt+

3 mte.:.als gency report form numDeris 6 or symbol (s))

M/A

21. Small business or orgsuzation O Yes H No 19 Type of affected public (Check as many as apply) 22 Type of activity of affected public-indicate 3-digit Stand 5 in s a ss c co&s) % to W - d om 1 O individuals orhouseholds 10 check O Multiple or O All 2 O state orlocalgovernments 3 O farms AM businesses or otherinstitutions (except farms)

__4 _ _ 8_ _ 3 _ _ _

23 Brief description of aflected public (e g."retailgrocery stores.' " State education agencies.' "householas un 50 largest SMS A s")

NRC Licensees 24 Pu pose (Check as maru as apply. If more than one. ondicate 26 Ccifectsor' method _(Check as many as acc'y) pectomina nt by an asterssk) 1 Qmai: sel'-a dministered 1 O application for benefits 20 other self-administered 2 O program evaluation 30 te!eonone interview 3 0 generalpurpose statistics 4 O personalinterview tXX regulatory or compliance 50 reccrdkeeping recuirement 5 O prog *am planning or management Reauired retention period.

years 6 0 research 6 0 other-describe:

25 Frecuency of Use

27. Collection agent (Check one) 1H t.ontecurring 1 Rrecuesting Department: Agency Recurring (check as manyas apply) 2 O other Federal Department!Agen.Cy 2 O cn occasion 6O semiannually 3 O private contractor 3 0 v.eekly 70 annually 4 O recordheep.ng reQu:rement 4 0 rnsnthly 80 biennia!!y 5 O otner-describe:

5 O cuarterly 90 Cther-describe:

28 Aetnority for agency Mr it' formation collection or 30 Do you pr mise con'icentiality?

rutema ning-ind.cate s;pute. regJiation. Judicial decree.

(II yes. e,p se eas>s for preece etc.

on suppothng statemer*t )

O Yes 5N ERA Act of 1974 AEC Act of 1954

31. win tne prcoosed informatien conect o, create a new v become part of an existirg Privacy Act system c' re:cm '

~9 resconcent s cb!rgation to rep'y (Chech as manyas app %)

(11yes. attach FeocralRegister nonce orprop se: cre r /

I XX vobntary notice )

O Yes E No 2 O rearre:: to chta.n or rf.tain tenet:t 32 Cost to FederalGovernment of

~~

3 0 mandstory-cite statute.nct CFR (attach copy of information collection or rulemaking SLOOO statsf ory authority)

COMPLETE ITEMS 33 THRU 35 ONLY IF RULEM AKING SUBMISSION 33 Ccmphance costs to the public 34 is there a regulatory impact 35 is there a statutory or judicial analysis attached?

deadline affecting issuance?

s_9,120 j

O Yes

!X No O Yes. Enter date l

Q No CERTIFICATION BY AUTHORIZED OFFICI ALS SUBMITTING REQUEST-We certif y that the information cohection or rutemasung sutmttec fo-j rev.ew is necessary for the proper performance of the agency's functions. that the proposal represents the minimom pubhc Darden and Fe:: era' ces:

i Consistent with nEed and es Consistent with apphcable OMB and agency pokcy directives Signature and title of.

apssachG poxv gacat som a3g*.cv Darf sLe. 63 08 8 scia.

Ca?E

// &~

/k L

_ W._A saw 5/ /81

/

L Stephen _S t

S/ /81 v

v

.,,.. ~.

..s-1.

Justification Following the event at Three Mile Island, the Emergency Notification System (ENS) was installed and operational on June 1,1979, at all operating power reactors and selected fuel facilities. The ENS is a dedicated telephone system, inaccessible to individuals without an ENS (" hotline") telephone, and intended a be used by licensees to report to the NRC all events or condi.tions t: 2t may endanger the public health or safety. The system is also used as the continuous and dedicated communications link to the site throughout the NRC's involvement in the response to an incident.

Due to the short time allowed for the system design and installation of the ENS nationwide, certain problems were not properly addressed.

These include problems such as false rings, lack of circuit assurance, and reduced voice quality when multiple extensions are in use. Although a number of modifications have been made to the ENS to improve its capabili-ties or alleviate some imediate problems, a major system upgrade is required to raise the reliability of the ENS to the level necessary for its vital use. This upgrade is now reaching the stage of implementation, and AT & T needs infomation concerning support facilities at the sites to interface with the new station packages being installed. To supply this information, the NRC intends to survey all licensees that have, or will soon have, ENS service and determine the availability of these support facilities as outlined in the enclosure to the draft letter to the licensees.

AT & T has proposed initiatin~g the upgrade in August 1981 with a projected completion date of October 1981.

Scheduling the sites to receive this upgrade depends on the existing or future availability of the necessary support facilities. Therefore, it is necessary to expedite the collection of this information to enable AT & T to effectively schedule the installation.

2.

Description of Information Being Requested Seventy-six sites will be surveyed.

In general, the information needed relates to cable and wiring requirements of the ENS upgrade and the space available for placement of the associated equipment.

In add _ition, the

-7 survey will detemine the availability of backup 4Tectrical and identify scme adminstrative requirements necessary to accomplish the upgrade.. The enclosure to the draft letter specifies in greater detail the information being requested and provides details about the upgrade.

3.

Tabulation and Publication Plans l

The infomation collected in this survey will be used only for the ENS upgrade, but the records will be kept as part of the permanent file on emergency communications.

4.

Time Schedule for Data Collection and Publication There is no intention to produce a specific publication based on this infomation request. The letter will be sent to licensees in June 1981 and the response is expected to be completed by July 1981.

2 5.

Consultations outside the agency None 6.

Estimation of Respondent Reporting Burden Based on NRC experience from the original installation of the ENS and discussions with AT & T representativies, the reporting burden on the

. licensees is estimated to be 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> per site for a total of approximately 912 hours0.0106 days <br />0.253 hours <br />0.00151 weeks <br />3.47016e-4 months <br /> on a one-time basis.

7.

Sensitive questions None 8.

Estimate of Cost to Federal Government Total time spent by government employees to collect and tabulate this information is estimated to be 0.10 years or a total of 200 hours0.00231 days <br />0.0556 hours <br />3.306878e-4 weeks <br />7.61e-5 months <br />.

9.

Practical Utility The information collected will specify the following:

~

o availability of protective power, o number and kinds of cabling and conduit facilities to interface with AT & T equipment, o names of licensee personnel to serve as contacts during implementation of ENS upgrade, I

o listing of existing and proposed locations for all ENS instruments, o indication of any planned station moves or installations to be completed at the time of the ENS upgrade, and o indication of any temporary ENS station locations and the expected date and building / room number for relocation to permanent locations.

10.

Necessity The Emergency Notification System serves as the primary means of initial notification for licensees reporting emergency conditions at their sites and continuing communication from a site during an emergency. Therefore, 1

the reliability of the ENS is an integral part of the NRC's ability to 1

respond to suqh emergencies and perform the agency's-statutory responsibility of protecting the public from nuclear accidents and assuring the licensee take. appropriate actions to mitigate the impact to the public of any accident.

_Y

,w-'

e

~

w

+a p-wg

.m 4

~

3

-l

11. Copy Requirements This report requires one copy of the infonnation being gathered from licensees.

12.

Record Retention Although the primary need for this information is to allow the modifications necessary to upgrade the ENS, the data will become part of the permanent and essential record of the licensees' communications configuration.

O er I

l l

l A

~ - + - -,

--,.--,w-..,.#

..m_,,._,,,._,,,,,_,v.,

_,,,w,,,

p_

r m

.w

.p p.

w

/ "s MEMORANDUM FOR:

G. H. Smith, Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness and Operational Support, RI i

J. P. Stohr, Acting Director, Division of Emergency

~

Preparedness and Operational Support, hII C. Norelius, Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness and Operational Support, RIII i

G. Brown, Chief, Technical Inspection Branch, RIV 1

R. G. Gilbert, Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness and Program Support, RV FROM:

Brian K. Grimes, Director 1

Division of Emergency Preparedness

~

Office of Inspection and Enforcement

~

SUBJECT:

DRAFT LETTER TO LICENSEES REGARDING COMMUNICATIONS REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR UPGRADING OF THE EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION SYSTEM (ENS) i The attached draft letter provides Licensees a comprehensive outline of those actions they need to take regarding the ENS upgrade.

Since the letter also requests Licensees to provide information for planning the upgrade, we must obtain clearance from OMB before it can be dispatched.

Please prepare the letters for transmittal to all power reactor f acilities which have an ENS-system on site by June 12.-

l Do not dispatch until we call to inform you of the OMB Approval No. and the date that a response should be returned to your office.

1-s,q Each region is requested to assign a project of ficer to be responsible for i

i interfacing / coordinating the upgrade described in the enclosed Letter with licensees, j

the telephone company, and headquarters.

_ ~.. _ _.. _ - _ _ _ _ _. - _... _.. _ _,. _ _. _ _ _, _. _ -. _ _ _ _ _... _.

^

_2-Hopefully, the upgra[wiLL begin in early August 1981, with a projected completion L

~~

date of October 1981. ALL information requested in 'the enclosed Letter should be forwarded to Stuart Cohen, 492-8070, Telecommunications Branch, as soon as it is received.

Any questions or ccmments concerning the upgrade and the names of the project officers should be transmitted to Dick Rosano, 492-9583.

Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness Office of Inspection and Enforcement

Attachment:

As stated e

h A

..~

~

DRAFT LETTER TO LICENSEES Immediately following the accident at Three Mile Island, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission installed a nationwide Emergency Notificatio System (ENS or System) to facilitate notification to the NRC of events and conditions at Licensed activities which may af fect the public health and safety. The ENS is basically a dedicated telephone system connecting selected nuclear facilities to the NRC Operations Center. While the ENS is currently in use, it experiences a number of operational problems including false rings, lack of circuit assurance indication, and reduced voice quality when multiple extensions are in use. A system modification has been developmed by the NRC and AT&T to overcome these difficulties and additionally, to provide ringing in the Resident Inspector's office when the ENS circuit is activated by Licensee personnel.

The NRC staff is currently developing a recommendation to revise NRC regulation to require use of the ENS as the primary means of reporting events and conditions specified in 10 CFR Part 50.72.

The current timetable has October 1981 as the target date for when the revisions would become effective as final rules.

In prder to facilitate scheduling of the system upgrade, the NRC needs information from the Licensee on support which will be available at Licensed activity sites prior to actual implementation of the upgrade.

Additionally, NRC str.ff members wish to coordinate our planned actions to upgrade the system with appropriate licensee telecommunication planning personnel.

Accordingly, licenseel-tre requested to notify

, NRC regional project

..s 2

officer, by close of business on

, 1981, of the availability of the following support:

s timely access for telephone compnay representatives to make a site survey o

and subsequently for installing station packages for the upgrade; power for the station packages; o

adequate cable facilities (cable pairs);

o telecommunications-planning personnel to serve as primary contacts during o

the modification; a listing of each existing and proposed ENS station location based on o

generic name (e.g. Control Room, TSC, EOF., etc.), building name and address, ro6m' number (NOTE: Stations not identified as required may be removed by the NRC);

indication of any planned station moves or installations to be completed o

at the time of the ENS modification; indication of any temporary ENS ste. ion locations and the expected data and o

building / room number for relocation to permanent locations; indication of anticipated problems in meeting a system upgrade start date o

of approximately August 1, 1981.

NRC witL schedule actions to upgrade the ENS on a priority basis for those facilities where support is available and will coordinate closely with Licensee contact personnel in resolving problems where the support is not planned to be available at the beginning of the upgrade implementation.

s A

Enclosura

.. - *- t SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED UPGRADING OF THE EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION SYSTEM A.

Station Locations:

ENS stations are to be located as follows:

Power Plants Control Room Shift Supervisor's Office (Optional)

Technical Support Center (TSC)

Emergency Operations Facility (EOF)

Alternate Emergency Operations Facility (AEOF) (Where applicable)

Resident Inspector's Office Specific locations may vary due to site-specific conditions. The primary location at each power plant is the Control Room. The station package for the ENS colocated with the Control Room wiLL normally serve the TSC and may serve other extensions.

This station package also serves the-auxiliary packages for the site.

It is designated the Main Control P,ackage and is described in further detail in a subse-

~

quent paragraph.

B.

Facility, Cable and Wiring:

1.

Facilities: A four-wire facility (two cable pairs) wiLL interconnect the : serving ' Central Office to the main control package on site.

An additional two cable pairs wiLL interconnect the main control package l

to each onsite and of fsite auxiliary package.

2.

Station Wiring:

Six cable pair wiLL interconnect wach package (main or auxiliary) with each station.

One additional wire wiLL support each station equipped with' an alarm or monitoring system (spokesman).

This cable is to be terminated on a 25 pin amphenol connector.

• k C.

Capacities:

1.

Main control Package:

O 3

The enclosure outlines in greater detail the nature of the upgrade and the support facilities, which the NRC Staf f presently considers necessary to implement

~

the proposed changes in the ENS.

In view of the upgrade modification of the ENS and the proposed rule changes that the Staf f will be recommending, changes to the current ENS configuration TIyj!

be held to an absolute minimum until the proposed upgrade is actually implemented.

Requests for modifications to the current system configuration should be accom-panied by a detailed justification and forwarded to the NRC Regional Office such modifications may be approved at the discretion of the NRC.

Thi,s inTormation collection is authorized by law under Section 161 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. While you are not required to respond, your cooperation is needed to facilitate the uograde of the ENS so that the system may better serve the public health and safety.

Note: The reporting requirements contained in this letter have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget; OMB Approval No.

Regional Director i

l l

l

\\ 4 l

l l

l

.8 2

To insure maximum system integrity, the main control package should be installed in the same building, and as close as possible, to the Control Room's ENS instrument.

- A maximum of four stations can be fed off his package.

Extension stations are limited to a cable distance of LOO ohms or approximately 1,000 feet from the main cor. trol package.

Typical stations--Control Room (s), TSC, Shif t Supervisor's Office.

2.

Auxiliary Packages (except ALT, E.O.F.):

A maximum of four stations can be ' fed by each auxiliary package:

- Normally, stations should be within 1000 ohms or 10,000 feet of main control package.

3.

Emergency Operations Facility (EOF or ALT.

E.O.F.):

A maximum of three stations can be fed off this package.

- No resistance or distance limits.

D.

Physical / Hardware Considerations:

1.

Main Control Packas s:

Equipment will be encased in an apparatus cabinet (16C case).

Dimensions: 18 inches high 9 1/2 inches deep 26 1/2 inches wide.

Weight (,,approximately 80-90 lbs.

2.

Auxiliary Packages -- EOF, Resident Inspector's Of fice, ALT. EOF:

e

.s 3

Equipment will be encased in an apparatus cabinet (16C case).

Dimensions: 18 inches high 9 1/2 inches deep' 26 1/2 inches wide.

Weight: approximately 50 lbs.

E.

Power:

1.

The upgrade equipment cannot be powered at any Licensed facility by the telephone company central office and requires access to local power.

2.

Main control package: Two 110 volt, 60 cycle, 4 amp, A/C power outlets.

3.

Auxiliary packages:

One 110 volt, 60 cycle,1 amp, A/C power outlet.

4.

Protective Power: The Main Control Package will be located as near y - as feasible to the Control Room and will be served w.th critical power

~

of the same' reliability as the Control Room itself.

ALL other packages

'will be provided reliable power to the same degree as the facility which they support.

No ENS station can operate unless the Main Control Package and (whera applicable) the Auxiliary Package. serving that station has power. Therefore, the power reliability, including back-up systems, should be the same for each ENS station package as for the continued operation of the facility itself.

N.(

i

~

cut requesting the additi:nd data from OP-MCB-85 tha vessel operator.

On occasion Businesses or ctherinstitutions.

• Letter requesting corifirmation thst e Bush 2 esses orctherinstituti ns Commerci-1 nucirr power plants SIC:483 certificate is desired New & existing motor carriers seeking FMC-348 (rev) pennits Energy informatfor, policy, and On occasion Businesses or other institutions hma dok8 hours: $3,000.000 Federal cost.1 form:

regulation.13 responses, P11,200 s nesses o i

e

,p sp Foreign and domestic vessel operators 60 h rs 1 fonn:not applicable not applicable under3504 (H) using U.S. waters d

(I SIC:441,442 Corrinne Hayward,202-395-7340 Water transportation,300 responses. 75 This form is filed by applicants following the accident at Three Mile Extensive investigations and reviews hours:1 form: not applicable under 3504{h) seeking to operate as a motor carrier Island indicated the necessity for William T. Adams,202-394-4814 under the temporary authority additional requirements for nuclear provisions of the ICC Act.This data power plants.The issuance of these When evidence ofinsurance'is -

furnished must establi-h that there is an requi:ements, including the submittal of received by the FMC for a vessel which immediate and urgen; need for the certain evaluations and reports, is vital has not received a certification of service within a territory having no to the NRC's mission to protect the financial responsibility (water carrier service capable of meeting that health and safety of the public, pollution), the applicant already has need.

certification for other vessels. %e applicant completes the reverse' aide t f

• Special application for authority to the letterand returns it with the sell securities without competitive Agency dearam OfBW bidding Celese-5254-7970 neceseary fees.

OP-F-210

• Certificate of Mnancial ResponsibiHty Nonrecurrmg Extension (No Change)

(Water Pollution)

FMC42g Businesses ccotherinstitutions

• Action / Peace Corps Volunteer Nonrecurnng Privately owned rail carriers A-35 Application Form Businesses or other institutfons Ground transportation.15 responses,450 hour0.00521 days <br />0.125 hours <br />7.440476e-4 weeks <br />1.71225e-4 months <br />s:1 form: not applicable under On occasion Foreign and domestic vessel operators 3504(h) using U.S. waters Corrinne Hayward. 202-395-7340 Individuala orhouseholds SIC:44L 442 Citizens who apply for action or Pesca Wa ter transporta tion. 2.850 responses.

Form OP-F-10is an appIIcation filed Corps volunteer serv.

237 hour0.00274 days <br />0.0658 hours <br />3.918651e-4 weeks <br />9.01785e-5 months <br />s:1 form:not applicable by railroads for authority to sell Foreign economic and financial under 3504(h) securities without competitive bidding.

William T. Adam,202-395-4814 Generally railroads are required to sell asestance,15.600 Responses,15,600 their securities through competitive

- hours: $180.000 Federal cost,1 form:

Once an operatorhas demonstrated to bidding but there are times when this not applicable under 3504 (H) the FMC proof of financial responsibility, a certificate of financial may not be feas' ;Ie, his form is an Phillip T. Balaza,202-395-4814 application for exemption from these The Action / Peace Corps volunteer responsibihty is issued. Hat certificate rules. /

is presented to U.S. Customs er Coast application is used to collect data to Guard upon request.

""" "" 888ULafoav Co*888888*

evaluate an iddividual applicant's eligibility and suitability for Peace arranovava commence --=gio" Agency Clearance Officer--Stephen Corps volunteer service. Peace Corps Scott-et-4sz-asas has no othermeans of obtaining the Agency Clearance Officer--Canoll Stear = m 33-4204 y,,

required qualifying data.

N8"

• Emergency Notification System Nonrecurring

• Certificate of notification under 49 Businesses or otherinstitutions.

Whitt-202.Jas-2146 Agency Clearance Officer--R. C.

U.S.C.11301(c)(1)-issuance of Short NRClicensees Term Notes OP-F 230 SIC:483 REVISIONS On occasion Energy Information, policy, and regulation. 78 responses,912 hours0.0106 days <br />0.253 hours <br />0.00151 weeks <br />3.47016e-4 months <br />;

• ApplicationforOrdinaryLife Businesses or other institutions

$2,000 Federal cost,1 form: not

' Insurance (at age 70)

Privately owned regulated carriers applicable under 3504(h) 28-8485A Cruund transporta tion.100 responses, Jefferson B. Hill 202-395-7340.

On occasion 300 hour0.00347 days <br />0.0833 hours <br />4.960317e-4 weeks <br />1.1415e-4 months <br />s:1 form: not applicable Individuals or households under 3504(h)

NRC has an emergency notification Insured veteran Corrinne Hayward. 202-395-7340 system which is a dedicated telephone

. Income security for veterans,1,000 Regulated carriers issuing short term sysum used h licensees to report events that may endanger the pubhc respor.ses,83 hour9.606481e-4 days <br />0.0231 hours <br />1.372354e-4 weeks <br />3.15815e-5 months <br />s: $4.330 Federal securities submit notice ofissuance health and safety. Data needs to be cost 1 form: not applicable undert within 10 days after disposition as collected to upgrade the capabilities cf 35G4(11) regmred under49 U.S.C.11301(c)(1).

the system.

Robert Neal. 202-395-C880 Extensions:(Burden Change)

REVISIONS Th'e c mpleted o is equired by

• Application for temporary authority

• Amendment to 10 CFT. 50: Additional collected is used to process the insured's I

y undst section210A(a)of theInterstate TMI Related Require cents Commerce Act Nonrecurring request for replacement insurance for his/her modified life policy.

p' 8

i

?

.i

..I E