ML20032E423
| ML20032E423 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png |
| Issue date: | 11/18/1981 |
| From: | Semmel H ANTIOCH SCHOOL OF LAW, WASHINGTON, DC, BIER, MILLS, CHRISTA-MARIA, ET AL |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OLA, NUDOCS 8111200543 | |
| Download: ML20032E423 (4) | |
Text
_
" ELATED COCrronDIUCE c
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOCKETED NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IqNpc BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BQARD of ~NOV 18 P4:18 In the Matter of
)
Docket No. 50-155-
~ ct UAR Y
)
A in SERVICr~
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY
)
(Spent Fuel Poo Mpa
)
S (Q
(Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant)
November 18, 1981p
'//
l p
O /Sgg RENEWAL OF MOTION TO DEFER INTERVENOR'S.;,
u, RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY
DISPOSITION -
PENDING COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY b<!Io Intervenor's renew their motion served October 21, 1981 to defer this response to summary disposition pending completion I
of discovery and incorporate that motion and the affidavit in support thereof herein. 'This Board did not rule on the motion, granting instead Intervenor's alternate motion for an extension until November 20, 1961.
By order dated November 13, 1981 this Board directed the parties to confer and seek to reach agreement on the status of pending interrogatories.
In so doing, the Board stated (Order, par. 3) :
"Our study of the filings suggests that some of the interrogatories are, in fact, not relevant and should be dropped, while others are relevant and call for information that cannot reasonably be obtained from any source except the Licensee.
Additionally, in some instances where Licensee claims to have already provided answers, it has not done so.
Therefore, we expect significant concessions by both parties."
pSSo,q 8111200'543 811118 l
PDR ADOCK 05000155 C
PDR L
It is therefore apparent that additional information will be forth coming relating to at least six of the contentions which are the subject of the motions for summary disposition.
It would be premature for Intervenors to be forced to respond without the additional information "that cannot reasonably be obtained from any source except the Licensee."
Nor could the Board decide the motions for summary disposition until the additional information becomes cvailable.
Accordingly no delay will ensure by the granting of thir motion for deferral.
Intervenors will file their response to the motion for summary disposition within twenty days after receipt by Intervenors of the replies to Interrogatories.
[N
\\-
f
/
,(
~
Herbert Semmel (
Attorney for Intervenors Antioch School of Law 2633 16th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20009 (202) 265-9500.
E A
I CERTIFICATE OF SFAVICE I hereby certify that copies of Intervenors Renewal of Motion to Defer Response to Motion For Sumraary Disposition were served on the following by delivering copies to their offices or by mail, first class postage prepaid, this 18t day of November, 1981.
C n
r
/
HERBERT SEMMEL o
Ate.ie safety and Licensing JeespF Calle, T. squire E:ard Panc}
Inha, Linen 3n and Beale g
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 1220 Connecticutt' Ave, N.W.
Comm ssien Suite 325 washingte..:
D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C. 20036 Herbert Grossman, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington D.C.
20555 Dr. Oscar H. Paris Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Docketing and Service section Commission Of fice of the Secretary Washington D.C.
20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commis sion Mr. Fredrick J. Shon Washington, D.C.
20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel John O'Neill, II Reute 2, Box 44 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Maplo City, MI 49664 Commission Washington D.C.
20555 Janice E. Moore. Esc.
Counsel for NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cor.ission Washington, D.C.
20555
__.