ML20032E232
| ML20032E232 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 10/28/1981 |
| From: | Baci P, Gilbert E, William Ward NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20032E231 | List: |
| References | |
| HQS-81-005, HQS-81-5, NUDOCS 8111200003 | |
| Download: ML20032E232 (29) | |
Text
.
.po otog
/
'o UNITED STATES
$ c,k" Mh'O
!\\
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 s?--Wy/
'I OCT 2 s 1981 L E OU REPORT OF INVESTIGATION
- LETTER DESIGNATIONS **
TITLE:
Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1/ Investigation of Alleged Improprieties on Operator Examinations CASE NUMBER:
HQS-81-005 SUPPLEPINTAL:
Docket Number 50-289 PERIOD OF INVESTIGATION:
October 19, 20 and 22,1981 STATUS OF INVESTIGATION:
Closed INVESTIGATORS:
h
8 8l Peter E. Baci, Senior Investigat'or Investigations Branch, EI Staff Office of Inspection and Enforcement
~
M C.
io/aa/s Edward C. Gilbert, Investigator
/
Investigations Branch, EI Staff Office of Inspection and Enforcement 1
f!ff REPORT REVIEWED BY:
/*
[ Wi't+fam J. Ward, Mef i'
Investigations Branch, EI Staff Office of Inspection and Enforcement DMY JJ l
8111200003 811028 PDR ADOCK 05000289 o
SUMMARY
An investigat' ion conducted by.the Office of Inspection and Enforcement revealed that cheating had occurred during the course of the April 1981 NRC Operator Licensing Examinations given at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station (see Report of Investigation No. HQS-81-003, dated August 11,1981).
As a result of this revelation, the licensee (Met-Ed) conducted its own investigation to determine whether the scope of the cheating went beyond that identified by the NRC. The licensee's enquiry included interviews by senior management of selected Met-Ed/GPU personnel, including each individual who had taken the NRC examinations.
The interviews yielded certain new information which was promptly made~ available to the NRC.
Specifically, one interviewee related an incident which occurred during the KELLY examinations given in the Spring of 1980. The individual recalled having received a telephone call while the examinations were ongoing; he stated that the caller asked him a question (that he answered) which he later learned had appeared on the exam.
The individual was interviewed by the NRC on October 19, 1981 concerning his recollection of the call.
He could neither identify the caller nor provide any other information which would enable the NRC investigators to further investi-gate the allegation. While he did recall the question he was asked, he said it concerned an area which was stressed heavily in the training program.
Based on the lack of any logical leads, this allegation remains unresolved.
A second interviewee (interviewed by Met-Ed/GPU management) advised that while taking the NRC examinations in April 1981, he had a chance encounter with another examinee at the coffee machine. He stated that while obtaining a cup of coffee, he was asked a question by the other party which he believed was on the NRC exam; further, the individual stated that he answered the question although he recognized at the time that it was improper conduct on his part. This informa-tion was verified by the NRC investigators who interviewed the individual on October 19, 20 and 22, 1981; however, the interviewee maintained that he could not recall either the name of the person who asked the question or the question that was asked.
He told the investigators that it (his answering the question) was a spontaneous act which he knew was improper. At the time, however, he did not consider his actions "significant enough to constitute a cheating incident."
Both individuals provided signed sworn statements to the investigators documen-ting their actions as described above.
Lacking any logical leads, the NRC anticipates no further investigative action in this matter.
a 4
pewe
~
. _ L_.
. _. +
l BACKGROUND The NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement (IE) recently conducted an investi-gation which disclosed that cheating had occurred during both the " mock" and NRC administered Operator Licensing Examinations at Three Mile Island in April 1981 (See IE Report of Investigation No. HQS-81-003, dated August 11,1981).
This investigation resulted in the resignation of two individuals who admitted cheating during these examinations. The investigation also surfaced rumors of additional cheating and established that conditions conducive to cheating existed; however, no substantive evidence of other instances of cheating was obtained.
In view of the results of the aforementioned IE investigation, the licensee (Met-Ed) initiated its own investigation in an attempt to determine whether additional instances of cheating had occurred.
These enquiries consisted in part of interviews by senior licensee management of certain licensee personnel, including all individuals who had taken the NRC examinations. These interviews produced two additional incidents indicative of cheating. The disclosures were promptly provided to the NRC by John WILSON, an attorney representing GPU/ Met-Ed; however the licensee requested that an investigation by the NRC be held in abeyance until management representatives had concluded their interviews.
These interviews were completed on October 19, 1981.
Both of the new allegations pertained to unidentified and/or unrecalled individ-uals, presumably examinees, orally asking questions which apparently appeared on examinations while the exams were in process.
The first allegation was elicited by Richard WILSON, Vice President for Technical Functions, GPU/ Met-Ed, during his interview of WW
Reportedly, claimed he received a telephone call while the KELLY examinations were ongoing in the Spring of 1980.
WV advised he answered a question posed by the unidentified caller, and he subsequently learned the question had appeared on the KELLY exams. The other allegation was made to Henry HUKILL, Director, TMI-1, during his interview of F
, operations engineer.
Reportedly, revealed he had a cha/5 rF nce encounter with an unrecalled individual at the coffee stand while he was taking the NRC examinations in April 1981.
F related he answered a question asked by the individual.
Further, he assu/::d the me other individual was concurrently taking the NRC exam (in another classroom) and the question appeared on the exam they were taking.
_2 6De e -
,** y,e* et 6
i l
i PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION This investigation was conducted to obtain all available facts and circumstances of two additional reported instances of cheating during examinations at Three Mile Island.
I 1
4 1
f I
i :
t i
t 1
INTERVIEW OF M/\\A/
On October 19, 1981, vs/ vv was interviewed by NRC Investi-gators Peter E. Baci and Edward C. Gilbert at the NRC Office at Three Mile Island (TMI).
(v w/
who resides at has been employed by Met-Ed/GPU since June 1977.
V/ 5A/
is currently assigned as a shift technical advisor (STA) working at TMI Unit 1.
VV VJ was interviewed concerning a telephone call he allegedly received during the time of the contractor administered (KELLY) requalification exams was in the Unit 1 shift su\\s/ vV in the Spring of 1980.
stated that he received the call while he pervisor's office and was asked a question concerning the DNB curve. The caller, who did not identify himself, asked 90 (9/
what the indices on the DNS (departure from nucleate boiling) curve were, andtold him that the "Y" axis was the hegt flux and the "X" axis was the Delta / LV (4. "
T NJ h/ 4 told the investigators that he frequently was asked technical questions and that he did not attach any special significance to'this one. He later learned that the question had appeared on the KELLY exams and this made him suspicious that perhaps the caller had been seeking the answer for someone who was taking the test. Nevertheless, he did not report his suspicions to anyone until he oiscussed it with his boss, JTo
. and with Richard WILSON (Vice President for Technical Functions) some time after the September 1981 NRC investigation.
\\N' V/
explained that while the question had reportedly been on the KELLY exam, it was the type of question which was stressed in the training program and one which he felt most operators could answer. He added that he inferred the caller was an operator because of the nature of the question; he did not know this to be the case.
VJ u/
continued that he did not ask who the caller was and the caller did not identify himself. According to NV Lt/, the voice was familiar, but he could not put a name to it, either then or now.
l (Al \\A/
stated that the caller knew who he was because he answered the phone
(
by giving his name.
i vd VJ indicated that he had no knowledge of other cheating beyond the rumors l
which he related to NRC investigators during an earlier interview.
\\\\/VV provided a signed sworn statement which is included as Enclosure (1).
Investigator's Note:
VJ M/
tape-recorded the interview with the NRC.
A copy of the tape was not requested by or provided to the NRC.
l I
eme m em_
y.
INTERVIEW OF F/-
FF '
was interviewed on October 19 and 20, 1981 by NRC Investi-gators Edward C. Gilbert and Peter E. Baci at the NRC Office at Three Mile Island (TMI).
F f*'
advised he has been employed by Met-Ed/GPU since June 1974; that he is and he is a licensed Senior Reactor Operator
- 1RO) assign'ed to Unit 1.
He related he resides at A F sas i.; formed that his interview was necessitated as a result of a question which he was reportedly asked and which he allegedly answered during the course of the NRC administered reactor operator (RO) or SRO examinations smoking classrooms / f stated he took the NRC R0 and SRO exams in the non-in April 1981.
on the first two days they were administered (April 21 and 22,1981). He revealed that on one of these two days he left the classroom briefly to go to the coffee stand; that while he was obtaining coffee, another individual asked him a question which he answered.
/ F averred he could not recall the identity of the individual, the question posed or his response.
l However, he conceded that at the time he assumed the individual was concurrently taking the same examination in the smoking classroom and that the question presumably appeared on the exam they were taking.
He remarked there were no witnesses to this incident and they each returned to their respective class-rooms following the brief exchange.
expla/: described the incident as an unpremeditated encounter. He further f-ined that he had responded to the question spontaneously since TMI personnel regularly ask each other questions for general information and when preparing for examinations.
for his co-worker in the prevailing atmosphere of a close-knit group.He also suggested
/-
stated that at the time he considered this an insignificant event which did not constitute a cheating incident; accordingly he had not previously reported the situation to Company management or the NRC.
He related that he first brought this incident to management's attention during a discussion he had with Henry HUKILL, Director, TMI-1, on October 7, 1981.
He explained he provided this information in response to specific questions by HUKILL concerning his particioation in, knowledge of or facilitation of cheating during any examinations.
F F reiterated that he acknowledged to HUKILL that l
although he had reservations regarding the propriety of the incident, he did not consider it significant enough to constitute cheating.
FF.. concluded that after discussing the episode with HUKILL and Investigators GILBERT and BACI, he recognizes that in view of current events, he acted improperly by answering the question and failing to consider the incident of significant importance to be reported. He averred that he will never be a participant in a similar cituation and agreed to make available to the NRC any additional information which comes to his attention or recollection.
- Further, he denied knowledge of any other cheating incidents which had not already been
~
reported to the NRC.
At the conclusion of the interview on October 19, 1981,
.m.
oftheinterv.iew,whichwouldbepreparedbyInvestigatorGILBERT.f agreed to swea Investigator's Note: At fr/CT request, he was allowed to tape-record his. interview wi'.a the NRC on October 19, 1981.
A copy of the tape was neither requested by nor provided to the NRC.
During the interview of October 20, 1981, f:"/:~ was provided with the written statement incorporating the information he had furnished on October 19, 1981.
with its accuracy.
However, he declined to sign or swear to/:the statement at: f orally After reading the statement and making minor corrections, this time; explaining that he wished to further review the contents and compare them with his tape recargjjn of the interview.
Accordingly, a copy of the state-ment was provided to r r t
m.
-e w - --
-,a w
i REINTERVIEW OF ffc_ _
On October 22, 1981, f#[;
was reinterviewed by Investigators Gilbert and Baci at the NRC Office at Three Mile Island for the purpose of obtaining a signed sworn statement detailing his previous disclosures.
f'f advised that rather than swearing to and signing the written statement which had been prepared by Investigator Gilbert, he preferred to submit a statement regarding the incident which he had written.
fff' 'S unsigned statement is Enclosure (2) and his signed sworn statement is Enclosure (3).
Investigator's Note: The statement executed by./?/:
is similar in contents to the unsigned statement with the exception of his admitting in the signed statement that he realized at the time of the incident that he was acting improperly by answering the question, whereas the unsigned statement indicates he was not sure that there was anything wrong in his or the other individual's actions.
)
\\
om
=-p
-g-m-
- - ~
i CONCLUSIONS OF REPORTING INVESTIGATORS This investigation was conducted to determine the facts and circumstances surrounding reported irregularities in the examination of licensed operators at.the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station (Unit 1).
The first irregularity concerned a phone call made to a shift technical advisor (STA) during the course of the requalification (or KELLY) examinations given in the Spring of 1980.
Received by STA
\\\\/\\r/
in the shift supervisor's office, the telephone call consisted of a question concerning the " indices on the DNB curve" and
\\A/%/ 's answer to the caller. The caller did not identify himself and LV(d could not provide any clues as to his identity.
While VY Vd later learned that the question asked of him had appeared on the
]
KELLY exam, he stated that it dealt with an area which is stressed in the Company training program and he could not say that the caller was improperly seeking assistance while taking the examination.
Lacking any logical leads to pursue, and considering the time which has elapsed since the KELLY exams, the l
NRC plans no further investigative action and this allegation must be considered unresolved.
4 The second irregularity concerned,fFL f97:
who took the NRC R0/SRO examinations given on April 21-22, 1981, told NRC investigators that during a chance encounter at the coffee stand, he was asked (and answered) a question which he assumed was on the NRC exam; further, this action took place while
/950 and the other individual were concurrently taking the license examination.
f/
acknowledged to the investigators that 4
he recognized (at.the time) that answering the other individual's question was j
j improper conduct on his ( f:f" s ) part.
5 ff #'s acknowledgement of his misconduct, he maintained that he was Beyond
/
unable to recall either the identity of the other individual or the specific question he was asked.
Lacking any logical leads, the NRC plans no further investigative action in this matter.
6
- I
~..,
71r-
,w 9 m gi--9 9m,,,.,gy.g%gr.
9,_ ppg, g.q,,_,_,,,,,,
.%p,,,,,,,,9,,._n
,q,.
,,,,,_%,_,,_,_,9-9, u
.,w,,
,,.y.
9
= =.
STATUS OF INVESTIGATION Based upon the infomation gathered during this investigation, and lacking any logical. leads, the Director, Enforcement and Investigations Staff.
IE:HQ, has detemined that no further investigative effort is warranted.
j Accordingly, this investigation is closed.
}
e 4
l 4
i l
l f
9-
- w-w
- * ~ = + -
y w g-w g w-Twv t--'*-
T
F'v=w yvvWM*
w*-
ms---
et--t-
-%*-T W
e -
-tw p-
- /
+
r--
ENCLOSURES (1) Statement of V\\/ W (2) Unsigned Statement of FF (3) Statement of FF e
4 e
l 1
b l
-a em
Page t
of.9 RLace:
Ab--
M7t C < O-M -
d Da t e f (' e_---
7 c'
/W/
l STATEMENT j
l I.
W b/
~
hereby make the follcwing voluntary statement
~
to pcTrn r_ nact who has identified himself to me as an Investigator with the U. S. tduclear Regulatory Co:: mission.
I make this statement freely with no threats or promises of reward having been made to me.
Investigator BACI is writing /typ6ap-this statement for me at my request.
TZo r& J m-n>>
+- Rs u K L.,, X ~
iAu'1? 0
~
u i
ch.-&d.a0 -h AlRc', -w0,ss
'2BS cu) GdAed
<b 6 a-i v a-l0.a -.0eQ A ~
6-b i9 l 9 rei d $~ 't A k 2c' 1
i-ONd nY 'TA~ ta (11 A_ c0<dlt, D. c5l am c$o>ho 1$,.a,S i
M (Mt-M /&pu ^L9w u a d2-taAl-J'aA%-
aP(n '-9 i\\ d-tl iL rC2, cDc0~ D ~P&& c).Jn i
1 4 4 e6 u S rm L 9InNn. 4-A -tAf c) A D<a a A n t. J LA% MALA
~
t a-~0 1. cD u J n bl,A Aw. -
l b
SW C
tz., m _ DAc-11-<.Au o ' b k r.
A t m<Y0 n
a hale ~ ca9 cD ad! nl,A
' -tL oOf J
M &ceo.
r& cA ci s. r>,L tE r2' J' i
% ~aomfn n o -,~ 0:)& ;, ii n d"s ayn n%,
l G a i N i 'A o c o L ~e d c s L I w h & a s i,e f)
EAbten nD nwAn eL+ G -tf % ) Ic/KO.
I MM*n0 bSo hr v c l & E J Y n.,,to A
\\ A A
~ aL n ub<L x &tcL L-sdol. Ten CAL n AJ "sLD m yd, a-ML ~ -th 'b d78X an ? "
c) -~~0 tA
> w a A KLM M A Jlt if tL 4L. cM unB muwd k mA?M <,,09 L
~'
a n. ~ 0 a. x 8 c u i o L.
I I
a]A-tA -%f n D AL,1 ab -ifd fA mk '
&L -
L Un 6AAa LA n s&) ~ +A KELLN3x w.C D9 m m iuhLn -fLf& -
c AAaAA-l<,
n n J e n t h e m a
~
v W
-. ~ _, _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _... _ _. _ -. -.,. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. -
_a u-p h % -+ d. O L'L c 0
- r.,
n, amu, c) && As y
e
-ss_
nkttA cA LxJ)< O' dim 1Uf b
+xsL A G
-so
% Es tA %
A%dG y,2c'L, dad (sest. mi). A
~
- k dL a ~ :,,D < m A J ~ n t el-x
- 1). M i
T Lc x n a n D a +A G,, A ~P h -
% GLw. ~ c1 t u a-c - - sz., L A n A, ~.
AkuEL Y hw0 reithhtw
_ &,..?
As v&L.
Q D,,a n
.#-tD~ J Q ~ 1 ad~n n
<6:t.KL ~ nac.n D
ACn-l& A c
\\
.0 Aa tf c' 01 % d:D c)
A h w eld d 1
l M
M m-D,A 72n cAOca m.<J A L e i iibn1 A
-b?o o-ao2~,.,,. +Af 6 cAn'ts l
3 Lul du6 -tA c20 #u-t c)<s J' Ltd+
4 k meu. efab A X L ad4rAcA '
& 420 e nn, -
Ja w'ztA 1,f 8 iln % -Jocd,. ~
C O
'd w
a 1
cDEAA a w k i dau ~ AJ 1
~
\\W Q%,& ad@R -tA m &/2O9,) AGL, A n?o tu.0/c <w M ia<2,b L 'a % a d in ch~~13~ L m inwAA2h ~ hk Ciut:0 mid&
m C cu n dan D nAD - aA !&+A <#An
~
-+x& c1 u%DD LA--JM nan-tM ad n
~
Qa' asD
'.9 c1 xa, aunaa ePw eink
/dM c~J cAtard
~
~
dze c1 && cDm'Ah. ^u -tkJ M L ri a,A mo m_n c1 m d/~ i-AaAa d ch ' AD 'e im.
cD ls0 L M e & M & & >,, & c - n cLL m wA cD Aeso u A L J <-J T m a m4 Ad 4Ad cD c~.,
39 A J -A. if, m: % iu-aJh,
" COL At 4
r m=y yy+'t
"'ww*W3-wevvi,--wy T'
--ee-.gww---w4m--y-eem.,
um-ey- - - -
-TN e-r-->mm
"-w-mm w
(L1k ok-%
cG k e hwi, x w A &
/J.2 c } '
l'
=
_pxw n
3 LMv 4/n 'eM~l. cD -+h -ff, il.odms
$hn? R_ SEA -
f/
- i }" o Tvme.AA w 0 PAe
~r
$ d, -,.
D e $ n L nD~ oL~
ed ok)d __ W J ' 6 : 4 A fd A
-taa wa
?
cdCdwac-m nA
<gei niter ex
'ufa n EY m2 Y Na A_e c-Pt o 1c.)J],
5 p
x c A'f bo kwMk A:> o
.: c Anc
- ~
CAL, La c d - h A 1 -Q 4;ty cb rp %
o
')
el u
f
/
/
/
~
/
/
/
I
/
/
/
/
/.
/
I have read the foregoing statement consisting of 3
handwritten /1 7 pages.
I have made and initialed-any-necessary corrections and have signed my name in ink in the margin of each page. This statement is the truth to the best of my knowledge and belief.
I declare under penalty.of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on /c/.to/r/
at
/01(-/
date time
\\A'/ [
INTERVIEWEE Db.:
~
0
~
- a+ f c 20 Subscribed and sworn to before me this &
day of c<fC,193/,
/C Y at INVESTIGATOR:
l o af' NAME; M q-IIITNESS:
TMn d C 1 } f ioag NAME:
- M.M
^I'
^
ff}.
..3
,,g,y p s-
, hereby make the folicwing voluntary statement I,
to tJmb' c--m t_ n av '-
who has identified himself to me as an Investigat:r witn tne 0.
S_. tiuclear Regulatory Co. mission.
I make this statement freely with no threats cr promises of reward having been made to me.
Investigator Git nn r is writijg/. typing this statement for me at my re:;ues_t. _....
rMa d.t I %,d '
e e r "t'n [, o
-4 k-
[x,.w : I b t,d J 1 a
a., t B..
ms,4 d
-t,
a ei khs
. c s.t_ rt n T am) i 3.1,s,.\\
T 4
s-iJu d.'\\-
P3h E R A C. I adM a-n n#'n a 2t 4l c; ute ein 'to.A-T6er4d# h hml,
^ sns.
. h.. & -) _ F A l e, y u k ld-kr A n. G be_l k a.
aJ kuk h.n o-w k'e,mlL wh
%, da M u h1
( n. oS A a
+m lon't r-Q T m a m AIL.~1
- h. lose ) ah I(
l ta a sma ud.
-dLo -rs LMn / ta sn) ww; n ' n m, -f A ada / Jr.o i tJEA,.O,mb t M 1 u,-t v a J.,it.,ui dn o)
Imido # MRc.
s\\
1.#Jii a o
td
+h o
.d.o W.nA7 -tun,
- cxx A -- =
..An J
a sxt Ls
_ L, b - wM mm i M bA
_uko to m J.n.c M
- hm s.
E1 cg b
_L A
A.
Tum ue kA \\ nm_..t3IA.
We _ _
- A h
/ Ocidd~
7-MRi\\.
. himlw r n.r - i. kJ
? sic,Je an. noeiet h.. u6
'aA L
~J AG m,,. & l Aleu'a
-dh
.e. - m t - an. 9oEitt[eshJ d h,
m,dLas f.
a kwJ d th MJ M om
~
a cut,)
a armi,,flk. d n.. uEl a
me e,J v m '-
u bM
'N d N 'd '. d_
l'M 01# ed ' h e id e 118 ss eN*Y 8. A A ? f En u[ dA '
d ( hd) lik t II uAile
'a.
ideI;'"t1
-ile u tc' auAm a sadJ m o1 J we-axbI 4::.u, h
~~ E T
+
LO12 h i
P bs C.N1't 11.
s i
4 J Z l Y ifo T.sfi k -
a t-d D a n :
u o I, u_. o -
e a J, 1 R ii n y.L ~. sk,3
,L
_4.:n n-
~
d_, m.mt ##: h a
ud.J
~
adue ecrde,4 J g
y
.:n
~
g
g
_4.
m a.
Pt.
N O k I L I_ *Il M_
d h
4*
I tb d,
, c m, u J W eh J m.3 tb k'E IE o-N a.,,11,. 3 < 41J U-as
.u.w-bmb I
d
.s, LM ' '
- w I
L 1*
\\M D
N 1A 4
i
' [ D ~ r$ d M ri d " W ~- D d 'T b u
i to M.-..=da J..
g... 4
....iti_s nis e, ~
au - '
.t.
- h 1
......=.=.3....-=.g..,.... h-nf* O
- . cm\\_.I'?
_..... 4d_
.,.n.,....
I
( n_I
- 7*\\
d_ U N 'fL li LO*t' A_.% O 1 'ft 1 '\\
d%
%/'
)a rl.;;..c p...
a t1, sb.:..3w(
wA u.
~
.1 t
4.
..v; wygn a Er.. irs S a Ml 4;t e
- D.- ~{t). m ~..bO E'S...G7'I'T7"~hih r a n 'r u C T '.. d.t. IR j
- ~.
- .n.___..
1*
/
O JW I'%n.
A, k# Y
_i a
j l
' g ggig..fyf-y y%. -)_7p.g
- Q
=
.."(th
- 'ld".M. ' "w a
- y,'e,-== - i. y
- h. t Y.,.
a w..
. er-b.:
s m.=
lA N T Mh 9f"% @
b d
t g i _\\
.N
- l. M d
J f
f 5
r d
ik f_
)
L h
.d
\\
L
\\
.' ' I" ~ h
- I p
- t -a*
^
g" ~' g
- y d'*.*.*.*..a.
..J
^...... j
..T
... s.wr 4.~.--
y z,e k
a=.-*-
e
. L'f\\ I*
f N [.) k \\I C S!'
A M4.QT-x = p ':gy g - ;La yL.,.'T M i h. ~. '%Pf f"t,O n
. why,
-w_
N NLS
- 5...mmi u g d R i f -- M 4 F 2' 2 f f i'
- (d,, d. h ~ M J
,,J..JO 7t.th w
A hJ w..,#tl...r.
i a
m.
...E * -
x
(
- 4kB M 'T A,y a.druu M O W w W i
v k
.. i$)1 1A 4
wztk. khd Nb." ".EE'2L
-4 h
'~'
m M E M W xt.4n....s;k:R2-tit ur,o
.. W "uh: 41F Uk.' vo,,,a Kd d - dI;t d =d::d"" mt A.. d.
. b. d.. _LL. _....
4L
.ca,u
- aa h.
m s
~
f
. W j.b. ~
.=.d.... w.
g.
w.
3[.
.l.T $ d '.. II O
' ' h-h Mrs h#h*
- - l..
. +..... M....,n %. u tao.... A... a... A.-. w - h. J... m7.
w.
_Ms m
1
--s".
.4
-....L
.. )
...T~..
i
. %..,,,,.. E
,.' d.. u.
..f.
en
..ans un s m os 3.
n ns v
w em
[," y
.. C '-; GAP b " d L;' dp YhhJ 27 %[,
(
c R G q f W. R. M... h a n w JJ w o. u b n W g u CG;;C '..ARls.;;;2' w n, ah,)
pn e
u,
... ~ -.... u, l 8 d - - *.tLhm*:.. h....
t A h.
Ed
$M
. r t
S N{
- {.
M 3.**- M p' s * - '
- e. u.9.-4 4.. w.*t.W.L..
.ss, ?
s.
.M 12 h NJ
.. hh.E M.A-
}d"U N 4' I N'O Cu 1(h
- p.
...N.Teh.> BL
'M
..., d.. '
a
~ ~ ~.
Y'" f j
.m.-
.~. 5
~~
~
__..m.,
~
~
m c..
...m._.
-- - - h * -tr.* AfN9* "*-- $t; N_R *tirs u
m.4r
....=..-u=4v.,-
. ~ =.:
- w.
..f. -.
l
/
1ca Q "I e t f h f c*.
't i
.W h
~t
]
(2 L t #1 d
11 1
-+2_
rn &
_t LVih b c-L' I,--
w A
kN d
V % h 15 o-
- t$
H,,ud,
4
,1# T-m
- iU sio I mu e s i/rw
<t.sh) erb,v)
-tLa
~t2D 4
enx tw (G~.>-
-JuO
~o m
km,,
ledJ d
usex
- a Ae4 L un
-rJL ed u+
sL,
4 ft)
- surtrola
, Ah d en,' u h, J -J >
~:,
a.s, A i.~ LA F - iui.+
.\\
.\\
.m i A
., r e., d,.. I
- L,
- n.. J, k a
r L.,
mS t_i n I*
M it (-
"' f' ab
{ P r.
v
_dla..-_d>a
',JdL 4
td.
,h a s a mu.&m u.
t ild 6n H ox iti 4
ca.nin #
nor 1J '-tle ' J)M.
v tb mw
'b aAhJ v
tao u estoaw.
rd o
Iohi taldi,J umt u
I4e m JJ taaa
- o. J-J -tlo tta
-t1A 4
bdd riddl li- (
l t
w w k
-tLo Adalx nw '+
ma And '.W r
Ld>
- tbs m.
nA-Ad< des m a-L l
! 6.'no<,i_t.
4
( ny. KJul A4 h., tm.. r 42, i t,,:L, m,m a J k'. a4Au CJ,t l
ni,nu1mr ? -tb 'tM #
k JJ 1.u) a m.
c1, ' t-rom ie eALtza s J zu td a
ruudn.m ilA7 m MAld
-t, num oJ l u,1.o 41s cdnid ums s n uJJ ~ tao c..,d A e m ' d, J s
't.s
\\~
' w a t.,, 3. 1 J s [
axL et - 1A v -t, nn I n,
+ 0 ith ' a tb Jo urta la / m mk 4
1., JA tb 7 u;s, L a
,,rtd LJ
>,,% a h i m
I ti tAa 60: 4,3 J -do L m.,J EJ I M-11JL 4
L3 Jea ar,o d Q u,.runn,
..4 La) E rumm L
tnwmIt tAl A (' (~4 de
'-b nu,meu,,
I I d
-+L Afut J l
th 9
o urss au m,
$nur*1$r h nY.
tAsn yen buinshNutYtk c tw t
<m a4 rLd H'd s kkJ tok r k. rum.tlild h
ths o
g v
i b
4 I, b
M t@
brn_k ) cv > # h.
NTnAfiA O i d -
a AU KJ J Ig h I,,,,3 o M 2 h r Addd,)
r_lu t b J2)
,n d t h,.\\i-a let flh 1M.L.J ' oJ er m LL, a KJ wJ s,v2mst
') &
'd t # +1; eth.if
,1 rle r d s 3,... n5 i.
1
)
i 1
/
A.
.m L
32-
..a Y
. t_
Al R C M
c tamA AA?mL?
a we
,,,-m_,,
a uw sibuJ mi_ C.,J t
, Ao 6 t. L 'l ms 4
mL
(
4.. J 16 n f.,J t
1,, t-1 wm e,4 sW m,J A, ec
/ a-sm ms ei
.m a
.,i)
WLJ K a hs Le s h s e J.
em.
el x '
4 0
+1 J 1A?
a emchk1J
~ \\
.w,,
im m-J 6 cishJ is tkh w b) tm als a n
de 1 r 1.,J dtt. d,'ewl 1 L 4.s LJ La Imdi 6 mM)
Le w
a dW 1,
&J 1 eJM a ' thdo )
en d w 15 M bd i
rk hk L,,
a a, add
',k' 1 i thrL> b a s.
s Mu d $,s_
btve NLL 9 to.)
c' u edt r m _rt.m i L~
k tmJm u
s co - mbu L,D L,~ "t d ann +"
( wo a
a e >m a 4 c,u J
uM dnb t, Lh u,,1 E ab..
rns ( m -A m m h A a 1L, i ts a
l a,nnAu / A oms t/m.
L ~ m,',um1J L,-
l te"la im Otb "
tm nuL a brw-a b,Jt
.d --t L, t b.,
a E4.,J w om (i
m)m
' a -L A
6a cKJ J nJ# i.m) -da o+ J ~ JA m14LL LJ< err m o) J -t h <
- c. L,.
I (I
A A tM '.
imid 9 o x, t. t J wsti,du ait_re aT $ d teui a
w nu11#o -eM 4 sidd)
J w on>+b an om:J -
wat L' l AmL eL, u
%th s
as :,:+ollL di) 3 L
(
+h u a_r a.
s L
JubAw J,,o,L L,d o ct
~ xt s d l
a c
h 4 'o ). ' 4 1
L1,.4 iaffr~
.jmdohdAa
',1J dmd 4,J u eld. ~
. a 1 s
u s
en ~,m x
L aahA a
s uw eLJ J -sLs w l, o
& ~b Ab
?
e toakm a
u1dl iId thi s
/
te.h mw1 Ato t -A unc.
Am E
! nt E n_t_ ) a db 4-2N sdE nttl n.
's E w
j a
j
/
s
..l
_i
m)
L-__,j_,.. d O k M
- r sn eu M.
- h. A ; -e. b l # -
A.
(d
[
f NL ST E 7 '"
a ik%s2JJddalu
++
ch t)
J hm rM m in a
unt
/
0 GM_
Oh h *ws 1stM
'\\ M W
WA_ LW Y )
u h I& I~
on Ed[rdiL Em nrm 2 Db
% (
el mld t1e tr%
% dam i tmd O_ l A o anu,w-O ~ cm h &,h." ' ;-i A. Les 3 a A
m
/
1
?
N-hh't P (tbm M d
khM W Wm I "de tvT ti. t k e's k%h) ran11U
- Lrt, 5{A rs t.n a~
as Leww Ew I s f.
A b s A,u
.4 e
msv (
e m e,m,C
, L ' A
.m
\\
i l
[
I have read the foregoing statement consisting of handwritten / typed l
pages.
I have made and initialed any necessary corrections and have signed my name in ink in-the margin of each page. This statement is the truth to the best of my knowledge and belief. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tme and correct. Executed on at ' ~
cate time l
I INTERVIEWEE:
NME:
1 l
Subscribed and sworn to before me this' day of'
, 19_,,
a+
INVESTIGATOR:
NAP.E; WITNESS:
l NAME:
}-
...-:-~~
l h _<_. (Vt.L4. T 4.M e d f"Y ' V to[92/9 l b v % dre_ k Eb3 r,.'
gg.. _
q ab g
pW.w. e a A b
E4.mo ),
c 6.s w A e s.o pb Asse d O(
-b u b
sMtp -
ak% N o
% w R a % c ~ est m.
g s_
~6 sad u.s.
wk h1 qu e w.i m 4
p_wa>,3 6
.Ss.Rg m
Wea. A 6x.
-t.na
%u cMN.. J mL..
s g,,. A m s,d.
t.
,.luls e enacQ9
& La.<9 psick+A
.Ao J
'mt r x G.%A-A.
Lt.' h h yab-9 A e. h.L.
oJok e, to as1 J
~
LL u em m.
m...
u.u.,oA.
b-m_4 -r_A/se w
- 4.
t =
%4 w -g<_1 se h.
M - f.a./ c.0 w. % M 8 9 9 I
9sced fu.4 - s.4 et=Av (see) 6-od \\
am.
a ok
'tw_
(Adc ' M.
h Ap \\
t tsi 1
b.dc. -A cmeA
%h.
L
><adec yd ec (eo) 4 u:.4 ee.>eud-ec-
+ sm uL-aa a_:ua s
.w.4.
unc..
2.
wMx
- 2. w uk_
rt.,,.
et m s a %.<,
%e d*y
- l.
2 AoS
.A h.wn ph m.
.t.
ok keek.
% Ro a ses uc& eva.a
,og
- .~
t
-4%
Fe
?g a 4 7 4A ag Ap G\\
as t -
owa.
w.m e h l g (o J o b b W 8 h
eu.hs qs p e de.
Jac.E t e,~
%. W.na i, 6.4 Tmi-t,
w A.
i c_
A dW fe g b A g %
mM JLR.
L a
A.EO o.due %
% o.
~
R.
4
- s. Ed. e AA< 4 u M m)
A 2
=
s O
aa 2.
- -c d
-.. ~
A_
h c.dua p._e.
~
& 4h co_d 4
1 um 4
m...
r-u+
p n.ir u g,t.t.Ls q m% 4 %
- 1.., &
. 2. - Aa g i
ik L %- % cac. wm.a
(
wa eit 2.
h6 h J-A Ap0 nst
%~
AA%
c 3
g e b.
2.
cp AA, aa.
1.
meue d.
A su hu$-
d hh N
l Nd ed -4o Mc cc.wsM'.d t
.A u dli w d. 4 w a d y ew.gpd bd i
4
& q' &.
pp.%se x.*-
ux> a_
a.
a.a.
a s_.Lu a. % s t _
_ wg i
NcY A.eb
&W am.N
%(
gh cs b 2 044U.x}.gb' ass as
- r. w ssA, s u
1
Pag. s ( 7 u a_
~4 e% %
eu.aa.u 4
~h. ]u.%g
_pe
.e.A
.k, p.f-e %
aoks piJg-w e. 4.kiO eu 2.
JA W
ad 9 p euse 4 ou,g %e<J
_a.
x w u p+ p3< d h4-k.
%bA
%.:4 U-su.e_A. a_ puh a M.
~
I ao M%
o w_A. 4.%_ h
&q hd-S h
m aa$
occa.we d uA 1
a.o M w e A.dtas. t oc sno e
Eb J-w La..
bQ h Re
- oca, I bu.
m. d.5,0 M fu J1a asa y A 1
c 6 3' q
gi.m, oud- % g a >
m..u.,e.x M ed 4
r weMx
.6 au A Q w_
e<:.'c u w AM A %_
dw
.mGJ wus.
~t -, J r.A.d l
coJ % a A mk q y,\\
mt.
%au t.
e A %.
m-pwtAie c.Aw.3%, w. A Moh.J7 1
wto.d-M.%
6A%
c_4. u A %
,4 0 e_e-a psm wa ohv<.1,oA-.4 a.k - %.
m
- 3. %
, pe.u.A J w e& d b w%
pu m e.L e.
w ea, h
b.1 4 e e 1.
kbes +-
M.
GIA a
M < g o h g, J A c u. d e b ke.w up. I4. Add ma eA Mg eucoq k. % + u, 4e p auA
%e cu.ps o{
fa.y4 4 7 k
eack..st L td b
~ aup 4 au.A. h we_
w% w ch -
% me mm setAeG.A qum W yn weas t.
%.m n
mpa4.5 L~
l peu0 6m ec w2 I o.u m Ad
% Mim
.:hA %
a9 ped h.% we ag.
h t.t 2.
te a A A acceps4 I
g a
d_
80 1 40 %
E hCLD4 te.ustua<d m ecc.
O RO W. S7Jb cac.
6d sk d t brk.
Mso o4 3
p u % s es. ~ L u d, x. J.n u a a- %
2 f.o. L( 4 w_
p.o % mkw aba
% A z-h.
L mspS d Ae
~
L w_ an% >
weo.
ae c.3=p3eldg.S+pkA u.a
.3- %. % %d r
kva.
A,._Lah p j ecuaAed
.wu-
.9).v4 w% go JG%
$ aa.cu.L. - A.= AMO,
2 2.de d w m par b d
- ~
d d <a.02 M A 'an.
1.
wo4. hii 4
3e. <_e,ai>. u.4
- y,eJ, m LA6.L1
+
T xau. WJ n
vas.. \\. -\\ q j.m%
aLL % a.9 {ada.
or A + h b-ba 8ee Ad Qb T1ut p.dsoiduo.Q uJa.A ^ den M p%Iecd
~ -
p.Ap.g eoL-R t.
b.w. 0 0 (auet aMga p n..
I o.w._
g e.4 p'% O td'.04 4
hw
{d.
oQ I
~-
.-_______-_______.-___m.
E, s p
~
au.- o,yz~,.
s u n.). s. a aan 1
A%,
I
%. A.
g g o.s m
% MA 4.~ LA
" 6' 6
%h T-we ausaAs.
et h
Ae M coc.
ch c
mg
- o. - hg m
a< J e w d.t Mw f
caanD au' J.
resakeL s u l ',
3 adths c.d L.ted c_t-A M,4,2 S
m LA J L%
&L avakh,
a + w muL g 1 as em% wm
%.s_
c:myne-g of % cRA.
Acce p u. w J
.A. %g's.Qkd,oAle i
1 co w I em.ude_uol.usip$cd d h h
.is m ve.g a needad
-u se%. w.wga%
ut c.
hm
.AcAfdA I p %S r_ w a e w p4
% 3 en ca.1%LI. %g %
r e
eed '
,w
-ntd whk r
em.udivd auAg o
ade>J u
>Aec phd u
M a
s h ~4 oA Jtn.
as:a. n@
wx w 37
~
Potog b f 7 aepded bg g.
mg opA%
.6 og Uses Coc v4.g co-w m he.
tas har guu_Q.W_d 4%
<m7 3 abkLt vec a og c_o u.. u4 95 m
ea cd-%46 T.
c u o. w e.e e d w %M -A 2.
M i
sp og ph -eb A
- e og r e A #
t <>
c)
% hd d ea psg dt$ c d u x c4. cdr h M ke otped.
U k
D Ms wug m.b.
me. S.k,6 1 u@s h e L.d ec_c.to.>sa3 e m 4
61(W h A. be I A e.o.Q 's u 4.h.IJ b
cCm Sed c.kuE. Q EmAn d.
I ca ca_
g Ao MM (d.O m<M- (x* bc' p.h J%
qd.
T.
d ep g g " M ed A
%.sg 9,.3.M acua.a%er lo km er yephx1.ete4..
TC I
- e. m.Acc.et.QQ eko pdso.lu.ca.9 ee.
Oca WM o.gpocLdt b ob h M
d.
g
%. em L I_ aas mah. C 4d-avo.doW t
bh M GC..
%. Os0, M% duem m (a\\g.
1 A u A wg o<pasn,
FE a
tad W A.
ecc.u u se -
N e
g-
T coutdc PRC Med epox3 g e c-a et
% Actce.sht.A$ ) d.\\s olmsdeecel u
.A 3,dM 4 dm W w cyde ee g
<m g
4-y
.e 6
- 4
' ora, o w V.
Gb, a
es,o 1
m u, r x_ -
T
.ge\\Ahd c_ke. Ng g ehe..A ~$
ad
~
m
+h e m h,
ao suqq A
Mb
- ,' euatig 4 An.m(7h~y..L
.a, a.% s I
1 s ~ e uL w gne 3 af T bu.e wode_ d e,kd uM.
ca
-, t.. u q Ms -d w mp.cl T
3 wy naua. A nk n % pasf f
~ L-psp.
n6 M u % w h. to m ud.A mg wiede m
aeh W.0d!.
I auA>s-A pig 4 g ix q w a.1 %
3
%. & k % <. aaA eswuk-9.xeeuM cm Oc & 3 2, 199t i}r Ia ao w.s.
'_ f f lofMl8) as a -s w ~ -x, y e on a v s w Has D.
L 1
1 rstfe.cTt6 A To k 8 b
C. Mj Mh, M P c
( W, T +~Y b,nac i./n',4 c i n,,
b
---n-,-
w
,,,,.-----,,----,.n.-
- - - -