ML20032D923
| ML20032D923 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 11/03/1981 |
| From: | Dorsey J DORSEY, J.A., LIMERICK ECOLOGY ACTION, INC. |
| To: | Brenner L Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8111180420 | |
| Download: ML20032D923 (2) | |
Text
O a
DOCM ue JUDITH A. DORSEY
~
'81 U! -9 P 2 :54 1313 wun*.r sTskrrs 1832 PIIILADEI.PIIIA. PA.19107 0FFICE C' !
sis vas.:en DOCKEI" G era
-A-W 44/x
\\
S^
A fa.x November 3, 1981 Qf
,h/A
\\s 61
<~lV r r
V 1
Administrative Judge Lawrence Brenner
-1 "' 8 4,l?
~
IO8fe,, p.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (g
'%lgg g U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
/>>
Y,%
/
Washington, DC 20555 f
x, 77
- i
=
RE:
Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 an PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket Nos. 50-352, 50-353
Dear Judge Brenner,
This is to notify you of the present status of the proceedings in the above-captioned case, particularly with regard to your Memorandum and Order of October 14, 1981.
In spite of your order to the Applicant to promptly make available up to date copies of the FSAR and ER in State College, Philadelphia and Media, such copies are not yet available.
ECNP and FOE have been notified that cocies will be made available (notification arrived on Monday, Nov. 2), but they have not yet
-received ~Eh~eir copies.
No notification regarding a Philadelphia copy has even been sent out by the Applicant.
Contentions are due, according to your Order, on November 17, two weeks ~from today, which means they must be mailed prior to that date.
Furthermore, you have required the Petitioners, to the degree possible, to coordinate their submissions in order to_ eliminate duplicates.
While the requirement of coordination is' an unusual one, I have personally made an attempt to meet the requirement by offering to be lead " coordinator," in spite of the burden that puts on Limerick Ecology Actions's efforts
/ to complere its own contentions in a' timely fashion.
/
The Applicant's refusal thus far to comply with the Board Order to provide the FSAR and ER promptly, has put Petitioners in the position of being very likely unable to comply with your coordination Order.
Petitioners will be fortunate to be able to adequately prepare their contentions at all, let alone submit a coordinated set of contentions.
The Pottstown PDR did not receive Amendment 26 to the OL application, which contained many significant changes, until October 21, in spite of the fact that the NRC received it on September 26. Thus, an updated version of the FSAR and ER have not even been available in the Pottstown g PDR, on which all Petitioners have had to rely for access to 0
8111180420 811103 9'4 0
PDR ADOCK 05000352 hl G
PDR di
r wg
,7,,..
b-r these documents.
I-trust that in light of the Applicant's failure'to
. comply with your order and the inefficiencies of the NRC distribution system, Petitioners will not be held responsible for the resultant delays in this proceeding.
i -
1--
Sincerely, ib' i
\\
t l
J dith A.
Dorsey Counsel for Limerick Ecology Action xc:
Service List
't k
l
..m.
f l
.~
4
- e d
l
_