ML20032D726
| ML20032D726 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 11/06/1981 |
| From: | Jackie Cook CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8111170426 | |
| Download: ML20032D726 (8) | |
Text
.
d Consumers power James W Cook Vice President - Projects, Engineering and Construction General offices: 1945 West Parnell Road, Jackson, MI 49201 e (517) 788 0453 November 6, 1981 M
s o>
Sc Novj g 1981n !!,
O-u.s W s, W
"%m,b e
Mr Harold R Denton, Director s
\\
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation g /'/q-US Nuclear Regulatory Commission N
Washington, DC 20555 MIDLAND PROJECT MIDLAND DOCKET NOS 50.'.29, 50-330 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT (0LS)
FILE 0505.5 SERIAL 14831 In response to Elinor G Adensam's letter of October 1, 1981 regarding the Midland Plant Environmental Report (OLS), I have enclosed the additional information requested by Enclosure 1 of her letter. This information will be incorporated into the Environmental Report (OLS) as part of Revision 13 by December 1981.
JWC/RJL/dsb
[005.fi oc1181-0471a100 8111170426 811106 PDR ADOCK 05000329 C
i Question #1 For the decade 1981-1991, indicate the changes in capability planned by Consumers Power (CP) and Detroit Edison (DE) to accommodate the peak demand and. energy forecasts. An extension of Table 1.1-9 of Revision 12 to the ER-OL (June 1981) to the Year 1991 would suffice. Also indicate the reserve margin for each year and minimum margin required to meet system (CP and DE) and interconnection standards.
Response
i An extension of Table 1.1-9 (referenced in ER Section 1.1.2) is provided in the attached Question #1 (Part 1 of 2). This table simunniizes system
~
capacity conditions for CP, CP-DE and East Central Area Reliability Coordination -
. Agreement Power Systems (ECAR) for the Years 1986-1991.
Question #1 (Part 2 of 2) provides a table of reserve margins in percent for CP, CP-DE and ECAR for the Period 1981-1991.
I 1
J 4
4
t QUESTION #1 (Part 1 of 2)
CPCo + CP-DE + ECAR Installed Capability (HW),,
Consumers Power Company Consumers Power-lietroit Edison ECAR (flulk)
Installed Ludington Purchases Net Installed Ludington Purchases tiet Installed Het Net Year Capability Lease (Sales)
Capability Capability Lease (Sales) Capability Capability Interchange capability 1986 7918 (159) 37 7796 19706 (312) 136 19530 108805 (81) 1087216 1987 7918 (159) 34 7793 19706 (312) 113 19507 110991 (187) 1108014 1988 7918 (159) 32 7791 19706 (312) 91 19485 115711 16 115727 1989 7918 0
30 7948 19706 0
70 19776 117930 (98) 117832 1990 7918 0
29 7947 19706 0
49 19755 119700 0
119700 1991 8238 0
11 8249 20326 0
11 20337 124800 0
M8%
e V
~
-a
~
+y-1 5ii
~
i
},.
I OUESTION #1 (l'a rt 2 of 2) i, CPCo + CP-DE + ECAR RESERVE MARCIN (%)
(
5 l
YEAR CPCo MECS ECAR (BULK) i l
1981 40.6 35.8 39.5 t
i 1982 37.7 29.3 33.6 l
1983 24.8 20.6 29.9 i
1984 44.3 34.s 31.7 1985 38.1 34.3 33.1 1986 34.6 35.0 32.4 i
i 1987 30.8 31.1 30.9 1988 16.2 26.8 31.4 1989 15.6 25.6 32.0 1
f 1990 22.(
22.2 N/A 1991
'24 6 23.0 N/A f
MINIMUM 23% PER N/A PER 40% PER RESERVE SECTION SECTION SECTION i
REQUIFIMENT 1.1.3.2 1.1.4 1.1.4 I
i h
i t
t I
M
~
---r-w*'
e
~w aw,
e-n-,
r e
w ve--m-s-w-
--ww-w,..
.-.--e w
--c--
-.m e
e-
o 5
i y
Question #2
' Provide's fuel mix (percent coal, gas, oil, other) on an energy basis for the OP-DE system as vould pertain with and without Midland 1 & 2 for the first full year of operatiori.
- tiesponse A' fuel mix breakdown for CP-DE system for the Year 1985 is provided in the attached Question #2. The "Other" category under the " Fuel Type" column l
includes the effects of operating the Ludington Pumped Storage facility.
i
]
I t
i t
i 1
1
]
i-1 i
-,.~.,.-v
.....,e,~.,_,,
.,y,
.m..
~.,..,-n_m--s
...,_m....~~
., -, ~, _
m,
-.v.....
,...m, my.,,,m..
_i,m
,v.
^
,.L :
i:.-
1 I
QUESTION #2 CP-DE SYSTE31
~
}
FUEL MIX (Energy Basis)
_1985 I
FUEL TYPE MIDLAND IN(%)
MIDLAND OUT(%)
011 1.22 2.55 i
I Gas
.29
.35 Coal 74.22 80.40 Nuclear 24.63 17.20 I.
Other
.36
.50 3
e a
I I
i 1
e f
i l
Question #3 Provide the esti=ated electrical energy production during Midland 1 & 2's first 5 years of cc:=ercial operation.
Rescense The estimated electrical output from the Midland Plant during the first five years of co==ercial operation is su-arized in the attached Question #3 The projected reduction of electrical output in 1985 is due to a scheduled 12-week outage for turbine / generator inspection and other routine =aintenance on the Midland 2 Unit.
w n,
f, r f.7 '
..f.
o OUESTION lf3
..c; MIDI.AND a
m i 4 '-
ELECTRICAL OUTPUT
~
i (CWh) i
's
- 4
~
r 5
UNIT 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 w r,
- 1 0
2191 2360 2685 2995 2762 sz-i
- 2 1022 4517 2664 4 27.9 13919 3967
's i
.s 3
)4 TOTAL 1022 6708 5024 6904 6914 6729-l i
.i i' (
/ r t
m.
3 s
4
+
e-(
i.
4 i
i
!t
- a i
~
~'
.i 1
.l 5
f
'S g
g s
d
'*R
}
S
- {
1,,.
)
~
k i
b*
d
\\
?
a
,.e
. s
~
)
h, k
e e
F
'/'..;
P=
/
+
j
~
~
h.
T