ML20032B149
| ML20032B149 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 09/30/1981 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20032B148 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8111040630 | |
| Download: ML20032B149 (2) | |
Text
.
5
~
w
)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPRAISAL BY THE DIVISION OF l.ICENSING 4
Sn
' SUPPORTING AMENDMENTS NO. 4 TO CPPR-126 AND CPPR-127 RELATING TO CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNIT NOS.1 kND-2 DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 j.
Description of the Proposed. Action r
By a letter dated May 28, 1981, Texas Utilities Generating Company (TUGCO) filed e
-- a request with the Nuclear Regulatory Comission to reflect additional ownership
~
interdst in the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Unit Nos.1 and 2 (the Station). The action proposed by the permittee is the issuance of amendments to Construction Permit:; CPPR-126 and CPPR-127 that would specify the Tex-La Electric Cooperative of Texas, Incorporated (Tex-La) as an additionti co-owner of the Station. At this time, ~ Station ownership rests with Dallas Power & Light Company (DP&L), Texas Power & Light Company (TP&L), and Texas Electric Service
~
Company (TESCO), Texas Municipal Power Agency (TMPA) and the Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Incorporated (BEPC). The amendments would reduce the TPL interest to 31-1/2% and assign a 4-1/3% interest to Tex-La. TUGCO, the present holder 'of Constructio~n Permits CPPR-126 and CPPR-127, will retain exclusive responsibility for the aesign, construction, operation, and maintenance of the Station,.and will act as agent for all owners in connection with all aspects of NRC licensing and regulation.
l The staff's Final Environmental Stat'ement (FES) relating to construction of the Station was published in June 1974. The Final Environmental Statement related to operation of the Station was issued in September 1981.
Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action Tex-La is a generation and transmission _copperative. which has been organized to engage in rural electrification for its members, Deep East Texas: Electric Cooperative, Houston County Electric Cooperative Jasper-Newton Electric Cooperattve, S'am Houston Electric Cooperative, Rusk Cour.ty Electric Cooperative,
-Cherokee County Electric Cooperative and Wood County Electric Cooperative.' -
In a letter, dated September 16, 1981, the Texas Util.ities Generating Company stated, "there will be no addition or modified transmission. facilities as a l-result of Tex-La Electric Cooperative of Texas, Inc. (Tex-La) becoming part owner of Comanche Peak and there will be no changes in plant design as a result of Tex-La becoming part owner of Comanche Peak." '
l l
ONIko!oo0$$3 PDR 2 _,...-.- -
~ ~ ~
4
&S Conclusion and Basis for Negative Declaration
.0n the basis of the foregoing information, the EC concludes that there will be no environme.ntal impacts resulting from '
proposed action in addition to those impacts predicted and evaluated che Commission's Final Environ-mental Statements issued in June 1974
,,eptember 1981. Having reached this
~~
conclusion, the staff has further '
.suded that no environmental impact statement for the proposed actio" eed be prepared, and that a negative declaration to this ef,fect4s ggpriate.
Dated: September 30, 1981 9
9 l
i I
?
G 5
e 7
- . -.