ML20031G779

Notification of 811103-05 Meetings W/Util in Midland,Mi & in Jackson,Mi to Review Mgt Organization & Operation of Plant. Mgt Review Encl

ML20031G779
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	10/16/1981
From:	Hood D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Adensam E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8110230654
Download: ML20031G779 (8)

Text

-

.3

.g.

~

OCT 1 G M Docket Nos. 50-329 and 50-330 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Elinor G. Adensam, Chief Licensing Branch #4 Division of Licensing FROM:

Darl S. Hcod, Project Manager Licensing Branch #4 Division of Licensing

SUBJECT:

' NOTICE OF MEETING - MIDLAND PLANT, UNITS 1 & 2 DATE & TIME:

November 3 - 5, 1981 8:00 AM LOCATION:

Novenber 3 - Midland Service Center 1100 S. Washington Street Midland, Michigan Novenber 4 - Conference Room 23610 and 5 1945 Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan PURPOSE:

Review the organi::ation for the management and operation of Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.

PARTICIPANTS *:

NRC Consumers Dower Co.

D. Hood F. W. Buckman K. Baker G. Slate, et al.

J. Peschel R. Benedict Darl S. Hood, Project Manager Licensing Branch #4 Division of Licensing

Enclosure:

Purpose & Topics

• Meetings between NRC technical staff and applicants for licenses are open for interested members of the public, petitioners, intervenors, or other parties to attend as observers pursuant to "Open Meeting & Statemen'. of NRC Staff Policy",

43 Federal Regisbr 28058, 06/28/78.

F8110230654 810016 PDR ADOCK 05000329

,/

ornco :.D.L,.:,(B,,4,,,,,,PDR[frg[g A

$URNAME).h.NQC d *

.. lot.f18.1...

.....h.O.b.N....

om>.1.01.7../.al..

anc rosu aia oo-sonmcu cao OFFICl AL RE" s>R D COPY usam sesi-aw9eo

f MIDLAND Mr. J. W. Cook Vice President Consumers Power Company 1945 West Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201 cc: Michael I. Miller, Esq.

Mr. Don van Farrowe, Chief Ronald G. Zamarin, Esq.

Division of Radiological Health Alan S. Farnell, Esq.

Department of Public Health Isham, Lincoln & Beale P.O. Box 33035 Suite 4200 Lansing, Michigan 48909 1 First National Plaza

Chicago, Illinois 60603 William J. Scanlon, Esq.

2034 Pauline Boulevard James E. Brunner, Esq.

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Jackson, Michigan 49201 Resident Inspectors Office Route 7 Myron M. Cherry, Esq.

Midland, Michigan 48640 1 IBM Plaza Chicago, Illinois 60611 Ms. Barbara Stamiris 5795 N. River

~

Ms. Mary Sinclair Freeland, Michigan 48623 5711 Summerset Drive Midland, Michigan 48640 Mr. Paul A. Perry, Secretary Consumers Power Company Stewart H. Freeman 212 W. Michigan Avenue Assistant Attorney General Jackson, Michigan 49201 State of Michigan Environmental Protection Division Mr. Walt Apley 720 Law Building c/o Mr. Max Clausen Lansing, Michigan 48913 Battelle Pacific North West Labs (PNWL)

Battelle Blvd.

Mr. Wenda11 Marshall SIGMA IV Building Route 10 Richland, Washington 99352 Midland, Michigan 48640 Mr. I. Charak, Manager l

Mr. Steve Gadler NRC Assistance Project 2120 Carter Avenue Argonne Nati~onal Laburatory St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 9700 South Cass Avenue I

Argonne, Illinois 60439 Mr. Roger W. Huston Suite 220 7910 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 l

l

ENCLOSURE 6

MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY i/OR THE MIDLAND PLANT

$ Overall Objective: Review the proposed organization for operation of the Midland Plant from the laval of the senior corporate officer who willibe 1

in overall charge of nuclear operations down to the proposed operating staff at the plant.

i l.

I To accomplish this objective the review team will wish to apend time at the corporate office and the plant.

Our past practice has been to start the review with a thorough briefing by

..the utility en the proposed (or actual) organization, followed by in-depth discussions with selected individuals in the corporate office and at the plant, sufficient to gain a feeling for the qualifications and attitude of i

the individuals and an understanding of how they actually fit into the operation.

Our prime interest is to gain assurance that the corporate management is involved with, informed about, and dedicated to the safe operation of the nuclear plant and that sufficient techaical resources have been or will be

)

provided to adequately support safe plant operation.

1 1

I Specific Matters to be Covered q

1 1.

Overall corporate organization, showing how the nuclear portion fits into the rewt of the utility's operations. Relation of the senior

)

corporate officer with nuclear responsibility to other corporate cfficials, Responsibility and authority of senior corporate officer in.

i charge of nuclear operations, i

i 1

f' l

l, l

. \\

i 2.

Corporate levet support to be provided to support plant operation? Where j

l-j located?

If not under direct control of senior nuclear officer, how is i

l support obtained? Number and qualifications of technical support

')

personnel? How organized? Relations between corporate support elements l

and plant staff? Training of personnel? Experience of support personnel with contemporary nuclear power plants.

i 3.

We will need to gain an understanding of how the pronosed organization for operation compares with the orgaalzation that is and has been in effect during the plant construction. With emphasis on changes thet have been or will be made to strengthen the organization, a d the l

provisions for maintaining and transferring the plant knowledge gained in the design and construction phase to the operating organization (home office and plant staff).

4.

The involvement of the home office ard plant staff in the preoperational testing and startup testing programs.

l e

S.

For the plent staff, we need to determine the operating organization and.

how it interacts to assure safe plant operation.

Number and ' qualifications of technical support personnel and maintenance personnel? What-

.~

provisions will be made for security and the fire brigade? Proposed chift staffing? Numbers and qualifications per shift? How many shiftst,

s Experience of plant personnel in the operation and maintenance of 1'

i l

-+

~e L

I contemporary. uclear power plants. Training provisions for both licensed and; unlicensed personnel? How many now in training? Future Intentions?

6.

Proposed QA organization for operation? Relation to plant staff? -

Where does it report? Access to corporate level personnel?

7 Intent regarding safety review of plant operations? on-site' review?

Corporate review and audit? Provisions for independent Safety i'

Engineering Group?

t l!

l l

8.

Plans for meeting (and procedures if available) for meeting the l

following Task Action Plan items:

i a.

l. A'.1.ll-Shif t Technical Advisors l'l!

Provisions to be made for $hift Technical Advisors.

How

[

obtained? Qualifications? Reporting channels? Relations to shift staff?

b.

l. A'.l.2!- Shif t Supervisor Administrative Dutles 8

l ll Provisions for relieving the Shif t Supervisor of administrative duties..

c i

'l j

l -

l

.k.

c.

l. A. I.31 - Shi ft Manni.ng E

See item 8. above; numbers of operators in train'ing programs at present and for the near future.

Procedure to limit maximum f

working hours, e

f d.

l. A.2.1 - Training and Qualifications of Operating Personnel Provision to be made for the immediate upgrading of Operator i

and Sanf or Operator training and qualifications.

i c.

l.B. I.2' - Independent Safety Engineering Group i

Provisions for the Independent Safety Engineering Group.

t f.

l.C.2 - Shlft Rollef and Turnover Procedures l

Plans for the Independent Safety Engineering Group.

1 Il g.

I.C.3 - Shift Supervisor Responsibilities Responsibil'tles and authority of shif t supervisor.

Plans for 1

v.

l procedures delineating functions and authority.

I F

.i

h.

1.Cl4 - Control Room Access Procedure for limiting access to the control room.

E i.

1.C'5

. Procedure for Feedback of Operating Experience to the Plant: Staff i

Plans and procedures for evaluation and feedback of operating experience 4 How is information obtained? Who or which group performs evaluation? How is information obtained? Who orfwhich group performs evaiuation? How is infor1 nation disseminated? To whom?' Checks to assure it has reached appropriate parties at plant and corporate. levels.

j.

1.C.6'- Procedure for Verifying Correct Performance of Operating

~

Activities.

{'

Plans 'and procedures for reviewing and revisir48 procedurea.: When is independent verification required? Amount of reliance upon automatic 1

+u system status monitoring? Who has the authority release system?

4 k.

10 CFR 50.48.- Fire Protection Plan (Training Aspects) i

(

Plans for the Fire Protection Training Program.

b 1'

1:

h l

1

^

l

MEETINGf[0TICEDISTRIBUTION Docket Filego - 3 E 7 J. Kramer I;RC PDR J. Stolz Local PDR S. Hanauer DCT 10 W TIC P. Collins NSIC D. Vassallo LB #4 r/f D. Ziemann s

8s\\

N. Hughes T. Murley S

E. Case.

F. Schroeder

/

D. Eisenhut K. Kniel R. Purple D. Skovholt i

gY (3) g T. flovak G. Knigh!.on 2

6

,g 1

T. Ippolito R. Baer Dg% k S. Varga M; Ernst 4

R. A. Clark E. Adensam N

A. Thadani Qi[T'A /.8 R. Tedesco ACRS (16)

J. Youngblood Attorney, OELD A. Schwencer OIE (3)

F. Miraglia OSD (7)

J. R. Miller Project Manager D. Hood G. Lainas Licensing Assistant M. Duncan D. Crutchfield Receptionist W. Rrssell TERA J. Olshinki J. LeDoux, I&E R. Vollmer V. Moore R. Bosnak I&E Headquarters F. Schauer I&E Region I R. E. Jackson I&E Region II G. Lear I&E Region III V. Noonan I&E Region IV S. Pawlicki I&E Region V V. Benaroya Z. Rosztoczy NRC

Participants:

W. Haass D. Muller l

R. Ballard W. Regan l

R. Mattson P. Check Chief, Power Systems Branch

0. Parr l

F. Rosa bec: Applicant & Service List W. Butler W. Kreger K. Baker R. W. Houston J. Peschel

{

Chief, Radiological Assessment Branch R. Benedict W. Gammill D. Vassallo-L. Rubenstein S. Hanauer T. Speis R. Tedesco W. Johnston B. Grimes S. Schwartz F. Pagano S. Ramos l

l

~

'