ML20031G594
| ML20031G594 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/16/1981 |
| From: | Mcneill W, Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20031G591 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900004 NUDOCS 8110230320 | |
| Download: ML20031G594 (6) | |
Text
.
ORGANIZATION: GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY, FUEL OPERATIONS DIVISION SAN DIEG0, CALIFORNIA REPORT NO.: 99900004/81-01 INSPECTION DATE(S): 8/24-28/81 INSPECTION ON-SITE HOURS: 30 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRE.',S: General Atomic Company Fuel Operations Division ATTN: Mr. D. R. Van Hilton Executive Vice President Post Office Box 81608 San Diego, CA 92138 ORGANIZATION CONTACT:
Mr. T. R. Colandrea, Director, QA Division TELEPHONE:
(714) 455-4570 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Nuclear Fuel Assmeblies NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: Nuclear fuel supplier for GA designed cores.
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR: b. N.
b a:00 9///,/8/
W. M. McNeill, C6mponents Section (CS)
Date
~
OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
f 1](
QA" I
lb
$1 APPROVED BY:
~
U. Potapovs, Acting Chi'ef,\\ CS '
Dat INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES: 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B.
B.
SCOPE: Document centrol; fuel particle manufacturing; audits; and control of nonconformances and corrective action.
DESIC"ATED ORIGINAL Certified By
@ /(_RL egonW4 e@oa 99900004
ORGANIZATION: GENERAL ATCMIC COMPANY, TUEL OPERATIONS DIVISION SAN DIEG0, CALIFORNIA REPORT NO.: o9900004/81-01 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 3 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
1.
Contrary to the Procedure FPD-203, Section 5.5.11(b) and Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFs Dart 50, one mix lot of four inspected was found below procedure and specification limits and had not been placed on hold and resampled. An erroneous carbon result had been recorded on the run sheet.
2.
Contrary to the Quality Assurance Manual, Section 18, paragraph 4.2 and Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, one special process, BAF measurements, was not audited in 1980 and 1981.
3.
Contrary to the Procedure 00I-18-2, Section 4.2.6 and Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, the records uf the two lead auditors sampled had no evidence of a passing score on the GA Lead Auditor Examination or performance of a practical examination.
4 Ccntrary to the Procedure 001-23-11, Section 5.1.2 and Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, two of three bottles of nonconforming recycle mix material were found to be not tagged. The third bottle was tagged with a Notice of Discrepancy (NOD) tag with an erroneous Nonconformance Report (NR) number.
C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
1.
Document Control - Fourteen manufacturing anc inspection procedures and one design specificatica, GA 10600 were inspcted. The current issues of procedures were found at work stations.
Proper review were and approval was verified. Changes were made in acccrdance with the established procedure.
2.
Fuel particle manufacturing - The manufacturing activity during this inspection was on fertile particle mixing, sizing, spheroidizing, and screening. The mixing operation was reviewed in detail for conformance to the procedure and specification requirements. The use of released starter material and the proper identification of material were verified.
In this area nonconformance number 1 was found.
3.
Audits - Annual audits of fuel operations for 1981, 1980, and 1979 were inspected. The qualification records of four auditors were reviewed.
The documentation of audit results and findings was verified. The audit schedule was found to be current. The use of check lists, independent auditors and compliance to the procedure were verified.
In this area nonconformances Nos. 2 and 3 were found.
ORGANIZATION: GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY, FUEL OPERATIONS DIVISION SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA REPORT NO.: 99900004/81-01 INSPECTION RESL.TS:
PAGE 3 of 3 4
Nonconformances and corrective action - Six recent noncor.formances were reviewed in detail. Three of these had been reviewed and dispositioned in accordance with the procedure. The Material Review Board activity was inspected for each of these Nonconformance Reports (NR). The NR summary and analysis for segment nine fuel were inspected.
In this area nonconformance number 4 was found.
"U NN-Inspector W --(
Report flo. gf-ef ~~
Page 'y of g-~ ~ " ~ ~
Scope / Module --
D_0CUMErlTS EXAMIflED i
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
- 0. NSQRilIU 1% W
_f_Y/ll_. b._ -
___@N/zT~tLE,Miy L/AIE Qgep_teMLk_L7715JEE]:__
FfD-16b 3
_Q]i9}9i 6
,3
'nicRwm in1y /2,J_Sygtq5,_g er:,- wci$qj9
_~
0 9
DEfi&E 9
_Rea) nummeL ITRE/JS6
? k 3'L
/M<u.- &
_ bht _1TE_lRaul N'[L-WCG/f/dHNCALS jfo,/L(L _/2[__
8.
/?s>uts'cdhnadc.
/!aut/ O
\\
W (ihisii?
d
><a k L k s6 4 4 _he_cssta__ k M C
.2-25-2I
_f_
i01..8-I
.3 fIs1 3
Aleccpfcacy]Liag_)&ff(G~ (EEPA(2Kiic Al -
.R-23p_t _ _tE
\\
IL-e-ze
_/)_ _.
it;- z 3
Mti7y Asset &Mr Dferzin??7evj sy'.s7De
_ d-/B R A
AhlsaAYE 1 Act3(El6 5TD7715 SEPOW 0
)
/6 - 3 3
G opaBI jL -Y 3
&ASSIFieA7iad N~ calD204]' Ait'GM Tb &t! Alt 1?'
10-30-KL
/9 ___-
~~a 'e '60 _Q,___
/VlffiT:/?_IBL.
TKhly l A6 OKLib)]dGERJ}CLD, Pbby;G
?M n's 3
Auf/eAfiwf E<2&2L/(1 cat 7cp b $ c/nc_l_0g_dgSS[htzA7tJ75
._&l~lA1 h
Ege.7)DE lo m,nc n et <D/7. b7&erret?y
~~~'
~'
9 CA 95/2 5 X 7 21&
9
_fN AS R LZ)Cp
^
9 Senu;ar Q
%,soa,,wa /dpoim i 7 ms,
/
Columns:
Document Types:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Speci fica tion 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Date of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable) 7
- 9. N kf6
T k
i 5
, h1 l E
2 i
i i
I tr % h l
t l
5 I
l stTE m p l M t)l iV is. t-i I
l 3EE*
I l
j iI l
l i
i 4
+
l l
-g33
-oyg m;
% s e
88e jnis-WW-sj j
s-g
==g ntj qw s' 5
'G d q M @b.
c-G E-8.3 %
2 m
N') %, Aj l
[$CES p
o Q((y s
I x
qf g
'A
\\\\,
to el kb Ml L{
g'
., I q
]
1:
$ 4 k
lN NE
\\3^
a C.,
CP a
2 tb, 3
h,v-P g,
$e v
(D.
d E
S J'
-0 al,E(
/-
1 4
5 m
e y
L m
h l
i
(.,/k Ji k,
C
-j a
s; m
' c a g g v, 0
s
%D Q
1 1 J.l U$f
' h W L';
V d P t4g s qu h
T 5 % $
b8 w
W N
Te e
lJ l 12 h
{' h Y' h$h 2 E t s_
o i
i
.3
- q. 4 p l _.
03"1 eJ
%a s
=ces o
.g,
- C,)~ gL g
a-ao rr
~
l q
~
i
' cb &
l 5
I l
W U
ic-5; o>.L' 5 @
7l @D Mi ) 09' 7. d W
N i
i "EtEE i,
smest
'M l
l m
.2 EERE&
I s*']+l?
4 5
u3 e
eW#
8 2
pS 4 % i ut kk E!
h!
I i
m
'Compa'ny JAldbl Dates EN -2 6 Cccket/ Report No.
kkf M Inspector P3ge /
of 3
' LAME (Please Print)
TITLE (? lease Print)
ORGANIZATIOM(Ploese Print) h(
f O L MA)MGs hiz. <op < A,Div l
G,. A.
l l
+CB.RDsh sa A h m W R os.
I h
F. 9, h a p e n w /t Abia Osscary Epsisk l
u t 3, F, DsseucesT A$a /-?a. 4wd)
I l
e N P L. W L 2 A W I?
R)EL CXERAGR.
I l
E.k Huma h72c.,0. M J, l
l 4
M,D,$sVRY
~ Td as. 4 W 4 Tm /.
I I
- 6. 0.
G.7GLrjax.)
mpgg(cy l
l A) r ft M a s s s<fe, Ge LAf$
I l
v I
Vl2 h?nt-A V
^5x STR FP E%.
l i
I/d 1 2 4 A A M /2 D W'tTdQ\\ Gr, l l
lf,#,LOFFTDS
%. W @ Q\\ Etw.I I.
dT2 P VA/d El foet bo.1%a.
I l
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I la wtreren ekm useTies l
I I
I I
II I
I I
I' I
I I
I