ML20031F617
| ML20031F617 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/13/1981 |
| From: | Hunter V, Whitesell D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20031F605 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900376 NUDOCS 8110200221 | |
| Download: ML20031F617 (8) | |
Text
_ _
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No.
99900376/81-01 Program No. 51400 Company:
Champlain Cable Corporation Hercules Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Inspection Conducted:
June;8-11, 98.1 Inspectors:
J A
o-r-m-xi
. Hunter, Co~ntractor Inspector Date
~
Components Section Vendor Inspection Branch M/
Approved by: ~/O.k9, M~
ev.n.N D. E! Whitesell, Chief Date Components Section Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inspection June 8-11, 1981 (Report No. 99900376/81-01)
Areas Inspected:
Implementation of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B Criteria, and applicab'e codes and standards, including:
action on previous inspection findings, manufacturing process control, change control, nonconformance/
corrective action control, and 10 CFR Part 21 implementation.
The inspec-tion involved 20 inspector-hours on site.
Results:
In the five areas inspected there were no findings in four areas.
The following violation was identified in the remaining area:
Violation:
Contrary to the requirements of 10 CFR Part 21 and Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, posting requirements had not been accomplished (See Notice of Violation).
8110200221 01072 O PDR GA999 ElW****DR 99900376 P
2 DETAILS SECTION A.
Principal Persons Contacted R. E. Smith, Operations Manager R. W. Curren, Engineering Manager I. Jhaveri, Quality Manager C. L. Martin, Quality Control Engineer All of the above persons attended the exit meeting on June 10, 1981.
B.
Vendor Activities Effective January 1, 1981, Haveg Industries was renamed as the Champlain Cable Corporation. The facility is approximately 192,000 square feet and employs 369 people.
The principal product is wire / cable with less than two percent committed for use in nuclear power plants.
The company has only one nuclear customer.
C.
Actions on Previous Inspection Findings 1.
Deviation (Closed) Inspection Report No. 99900376/79-01, Notice of Deviation, Item A:
It was verified that receiving inspection log Form QCF-0193 has been revised to include lot and sample size.
Further, all older log sheets have been replaced with the revised form.
2.
Deviation (Closed) Inspection Report No. 99900376/79-01, Notice of Deviation, Item B:
It was verified that discrepant record cards, and calibration labels, have been corrected; and that QC has initiated an equipment calibration check list that includes the due dates.
Also verified that QC has performed four audits of this function, to assure compliance.
3.
Deviation (Closed) Inspection Report No. 99900376/79-01, Notice of Deviation, Item C:
It was verified that the reference equipment has been recalibrated and QC has initiated an equipment calibration check list that includes due dates.
It was also verified that QC has performed audits of this function, to assure compliance.
3 4.
Deviation (Closed) Inspection Report No. 99900376/79-01, Notice of Deviation, Item D:
It was verified that drawing number 30-02906, has been reviewed and approved.
Further, that 0C has audited this function on three occasions to assure compliance.
5.
Dev Mtion (Closed) Inspection Repo t No. 99900376/79-01, Notice of Dr J-tion, Item E:
It was verified that the accounting is in ret vipt of all appropriatt revised engineering instructions, and that QC has subsequently audited this function to assure compliance.
6.
Deviation (Closed) Inspection Report No. 99900376/79-01, Notice of l
Deviation, Item F:
It was verified that reinspection of material designated as rework, is currently being performed.
Further tnat QC has subsequently audited this function to assure compliance.
7.
Deviation (Closed) Inspection Report No. 99900376/79-01, Notice of Deviation, I'em G:
It was verified that the Strobotac and Sparbtester have been calibrated and that QC has initiated an equipment calibration check list that includes due dates.
- Further, that QC has subsequently audited this function to assure compliance.
8.
Deviation (Closed) Inspection Report No. 99900376/79-01, Notice of Deviation, Item H:
It was verified that in process records were i
on file for the date of August 22, 1979.
9.
Deviation (Closed) Inspection Report No. 99900376/79-01, Notice of Deviation, Item I:
It was verified that QC has initiated a com-prehensive audit check list, to cover all phases of the QC program.
Further, that this check list has been used for all subsequent audits.
D.
Manufacturing Process Control 1.
Objectives Tne objectives of this area of the inspect, ion were to verify that measures had been established and documented, to control aanufacturing, inspection, and test activities.
Also, to verify that these activities had been accomplished in accordance with the established and documented measures.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
i
- ~
. - ~
4 a.
Review of the following documents, to verify that measures had been established and documented to control manufacturing, inspection, and test activities; (1) Quality Control Manual, dated April 8,1981:
paragraphs 2.41, 3.6.4, 3.6.5, 3.6.6, 3.6.7, 3.7, 3.9.5.1, and 3.10.
(2) Manufacturing Specification Drawing Numbers:
51-04627, revision 21; 31-00964, revision 1; 35-01195, revision 5; 35-01432, revisto 2, and 30-04253, revision 0.
(3) Quality Control Procedures, Numbers:
OCP-0001, revision 2 for spark testing; OCP-0015, revision 1 for testing wire I
shield coverage; OCP-0023, revision 0 for testing conductor resistance; and OCP-0034, revision 1 for concen-tricity tests.
(4) Process Control Records for:
Dip coating machine number 22 and Tape wrapping machine number 29.
b.
Observed.
(1) In process inspection of the Durad Department for bond, color, conductor diameter, Durad wall, and overall diameter for Order No. 30-04038.
(2) Dip Top coating operation on Order No. 30-04287, at machine number 22.
(3) Tape wrapping operation on Order No. 30-01119, at machine number 29.
(4) Extrusion operation on Order No. 30-04253, at mr:.~ne number 2, in the Irradiated Products Department.
3.
Inspection Findings Within this area of the inspection there were nc apparent noncon-formances or unresolved items identified.
E.
Change Control 1.
Objectives I
i
5 The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that measures had been established, to control changes to software and hardware.
Also, to verify that the measures for software changes, included provisions for review, approval, and distribution to, and usage at, the location where the prescribed activity is per-formed.
Also, to verify that the measures have been implemented.
2.
Metnod of Accomplishment i
The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
a.
Review of the following documents to verify that measures
><er been established to control changes to software and hardware:
Quality Control Manual, dated April 8, 1981; paragraphs 2.4.4, 3.5.7, 3.6.3.4, 3.6.3.6, 3.6.5.8, and 3.8.
b.
Review of the following documentation to verify that procedures have been implemented:
(1) Manufacturing Specifications (traveler.7), Drawing Numbe rs 51-04627, revision 21; 11-00964, revision 1; 35-01195, revision 5; 35-01437, revision 2; and 30-04253, revision 0.
(2) Engineering Instructions, Drawing Numbers:
EI-700051, revision 1; EI-700059, revision 0; EI-700036, revision 6; EI-700079, revision 2; and EI-700085, revision 4.
(3) Raw Material Rejection Reports, Numbers:
13361, dated May 5, 1981; 001004, dated May 22, 1981; 13360, dated May 15, 1981; and 001002, dated May 22, 1981.
3.
Inspection Findings Within this area of the inspection there were no apparent noncon-formances or unresolved items identified.
F.
Nonconformance/ Corrective Action Controls 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:
6 a.
Procedures have beer. developed, and approved by the vendor, that prescribes a system for the control of nonconformances, and assures effective corrective action, in a manner con-sistent with NRC rules and regulations, and the vendor's commitments in his Quality Control Manual.
b.
The system for '5e control or nonconformances and corrective dCtions, is bc..g effectively implemented by the vendor.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The objectives of this are one inspection were accomplished by:
a.
Review of Quality Control Manual, dated April 8, 1981, para-graphs 2.4, 3.1, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8, 3.10, and 3.14.
To verify that the vendor has developed, and approved, a system for the control of nonconformances, and corrective actions.
b.
Review of the following documents:
1 (1) Raw material rejection' reports 13361, 001004, 13360, and 001002.
(2; One hundred production rejection sheets, numbered 00797 through 00897.
To verify that the approved system was being effectively implemented.
3.
Inspection Findinos Within this area of the inspection, there were no apparent noncon-formances or unresolved items identified.
G.
Implementation of 10 CFR Pa*t 21 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that the vendor of safety-related cquipment, has established, and imple-mented procedures in accordance with 10 CFR Part 21.
'l 2.
Methods of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
7 a.
Review of the following purchase orders:
- 63471, 63914,
- 63979, 64389, and
- 38336, to verify that 10 CFR Part 21, had bean imposed on the vendor.
1 b.
Review of procedure QCP-0137, revision 0, dated October 30, 1978, to verify that internal reporting procedures have been l
developed.
Observed document posting areas to verify that the posting c.
requirement established by Section 206 and 10 CFR Part 21, is being implemented.
1 3.
Inspection Findings a.
Violation See Notice of Violation.
b.
Unresolved Items None H.
Exit Meeting 1.
The inspector met with those persons listed in paragraph A at the conclusion of the inspection on June 11, 1981.
2.
The following subjects were discussed:
a Areas inspected; b.
Violation identified, and j
c.
How the vendor is to respond to the inspection findings.
The contractor was requested to structure his responses under headings of corrective action, preventive measures, and dates for the completion of each violation and deviation.
8 Additionally, the management representative was requested to notify the Commission in writing if dates require adjustment, or the commitments require modification, etc.
.