ML20031D209
| ML20031D209 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/22/1981 |
| From: | Spencer G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Battey G SMITH-EMERY CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20031D210 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8110130119 | |
| Download: ML20031D209 (2) | |
Text
..
, 7**
(y.,
g y
y y
o SEP 2 21981 License No. 04-19467-01 m
(b R[& NO Smith-Emery Company r-781 East Washington Boulevard E
Los Angeles, California 90021
~
OCT 9 I9 8 1 h -11' u M i @ mu
Attention: Mr. G. E. Battey, Jr.
p President
/
1
/
N Gentlemen:
Subject:
NRC Inspection This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted at the Hunters Point Famility by Ms. B. Riedlinger of this office on August 27, 1981 of activities authorized by the general license issued by 10 CFR 150.20 and by HRC License No. 04-19467-01 and to the discussion of our findings held by Ms. Riedlinger with Mr. Ed Ekberg of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
l The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection l
consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel and observations by the inspector.
l During this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities appeared to be in noncompliance with NRC requirements.
The items and references to the pertinent requirements are listed in Appendix A.
These items have been categorized into severity levels as described in the Federal Register Notice (45 FR 66754) dated October 7,1980.
The findings from this inspection, as well as the one conducted on July 30, 1980 indicate three repetitive items of noncompliance (see Appendix A, Items A, B, and C).
We are concerned about the repetitive nature of the items of noncompliance observed during our inspections.
% addition to the need for corrective action regarding the specific items of noncompliance included in Appendix A, we are concerned about the implenentation of your management control system that allowed these repetitive items of noncompliance to recur.
if[.
Consequently, in your reply you should describe in particular those
&k..
...pl....
....... T '.......
.,n. (i
..)M.,...
~o
-4 RI,EgLMGER,mn,,, B, M,,,
..S.M G..
-a sen, eso,22w s m )-
g1n> -
gjupt
- enonaou Q%h OFFICIAL RECOFiD COPY
' " ' ** - 2n 2 4 emc
Smith-Emery Company SEP 2 2' 1981 management control system. actions taken or planned to impro effectiveness of your overall Since NRC license04-19467-01 was i response to it&,B. as described in Appssued on December 31, 1980, Your response to this notice is to be endix A is not required. further provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 as stated in Asubmitted in accordance w We have adopted a new NRC enforcement ppendix A. Notice of Violation.
Register Notice of that policy we(45 FR 66754) dated October 7,1980. policy, as described i the Atomic Energy Act of 1954are requiring, under the authority of SectiW Violations be submitted under oath o
, as amended, that responses to Hotices of on 182 of paragraph of your letter should include r affirmation.
following:
a statement equivalent to theTherefore, the "I certify that all information cont i any supplements attached thereto, is trua ned in this letter, in of my knowledge and belief."
e and correct to the best DR
^
~
)
SIGfiATURE
~
~
The yignature should be notarized TITI.E
~
please telephone B. Riedlinger onIf you have any questio er or concerning this inspection, 415 943-3700.
Ni$$t s('in :
q, s tit 3GER g
bcc:
DMB/Docu.nent Control Desk (RIDS) DivisiGeorge S. Spencer. Director Distributed by RV:
on of Technical Inspection Engelken (ltr & App. A)
A. Johnson LFMB (ltr) (lti - pp. A)
State of CA