ML20031D032
| ML20031D032 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 09/23/1981 |
| From: | Mccabe E, Narrow L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20031D012 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-322-81-16, NUDOCS 8110090227 | |
| Download: ML20031D032 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000322/1981016
Text
,
.
.
.
,
.
'
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
Region I
Report No. 50-322/81-16
Docket No. 50-322
License No. CPPR-95
Priority
--
Category
B
Licensee:
Long Island Lighting Company
175 East Old Country Road
Hicksville, New York 11801
Facility Name:
Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1
,
Inspection At:
Shoreham, New York
Inspection Conduc
September 8-11, 1981
.
Ins ectors:
(( U S'
6M#cc/
7
/
- L. Narrow, Reactor Inspector
date ' signed
date signed
.
Approved By:
b
b
%
M f/
E.C. McCabe Q ief, R6 actor Projects Section
date signed
No. 2B, Division of Resident and Project
Inspection
Inspection Summary:
Inspection on September 8-11,1981 (Report No. 50-322/81-16)
Areas Ins'pected:
Routine, unannounced, region-based inspection (25 hr.)
of the licensee's work and QC activities pertaining to control
of significant deficiencies; installation of fire stops and seals; and the
. status of outstanding items.
Results: One violation was identified (fai. lure to procedurally require
,
reporting ~of potentially reportable deficiencies within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />) one
area (Paragraph 3.a).
.
Region I Form 12
(Rev. April 77)
,
8110090227 810924
PDR ADOCK 05000322 ,
G
.
b
d
y
-
n
.
.
K
'
.
f
.
M
DETAILS
1.
Per3ans Contacted?
'
l.ong Island Lighting Co71any
R. DiRocher,- QA Engineer
H. Eckert, Assistant Project Engineer
- T.F. Gerecke, Engineering QA Manager
- J.M. Kelly, Field QA Manager
J.J. McCarthy, QA Engineer
B.R. McCaffrey, Assistant Project Manager
- M.H. Milligan, Project Engineer
E.J. Nicholas, Section Supervis.or, Field QA
C. Seamans, Assistant Project Engineer
-
T. Spati, Assistant Projech Engineer
,/
,
.
Stone and Webster Engineering (S&W)
- T.T. Arrington, Superintendent, FQC
Reactor Controls Incorporated (RCI)
S. Kepler, Site Manager
B. Kienlen, QC Supervisor
Keasby/ Bisco (K/B)
,
R. Lieto, Project Manager
.
- denotes persons in attendance at the exit interview.
The inspector als6 interviewed other licensee and contracto personnel
during the inspection.
-
42.
Plant Tour
Thetinspector observed work activities in progress, completed work and
construction status in several areas. Work items were examined for
obvious defects and for noncompliance with regulatory requirements and
licensee commitments.
Specific activities and completed work observed
by the inspector included installation of pipe supports, cleaning of
the retctor vessel
and setting base plates for in-core probes.
^
.
h
%
6
y
-
(
.
'
.
_
$
_
_
_--
%
-
-
3
.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
ll
3 .~
Control of Significant Deficiencies
- .
a.
. Procedures
The ins'pector reviewed procedures for control of nonconformances
and records pertaining to nonconforming conditiions which were
'
considered to be potentially reportable.
Project Procedure P304, Revision 6, "Nonconformance Control"
establishes the requirements for reporting of nonconforming
-
conditions to "LILCo Project" and for review and reporting of
deficiencies in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(e) and 10 CFR 21.
Paragraph 3.3.2 states that S&W, GE, and other contractors "..are
4
responsible for promptly advising LILCo of any deficiency within
their . scope of responsibility which is possibly reportable in
accordance with.10 CFR 50.55(e)."; that ". .the Project Engineer
sha'll make a determination of reportability within a twenty-four
hour period.."; and provides instruc.tions concerning reporting
requirements. The inspector noted that the procedure contained
no instructions concerning deficiencies which were potentially
_ reportable but for which a determination dould not be made within
twenty-four hours. Quality Assurance Procedure QAP 15.2, Revision
5, " Reporting Requirements-NRC," requires in Section 3.1.3 that a
Project Manager is responsible for notifying the Office of I$spection
and Enforcement of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission about a
-
possible reportable deficiency within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after he has been
made aware of it."
t
v
Region I had received telephone notification of one item, distortien
of Rockbestos cable insulation by nylon binding under certain
conditions, on May 14, 1981.
The inspector discussed this item
with representatives of the licensee, and asked why a written
report had not been received. They stated that this notification
,
had been fnr information only and that they did not consider this
itain to be reportable under 10 CFR 50.55(e) inasmuch as initial
a
tests had shown the cable to be acceptable. Additional tests
,
after aging and under LOCA conditions will be performed.
The inspector and licensee representatives reviewed the NRC
position with regard to notificati'on of potentian' reportable
.
deficiencies as provided in " Guidance-10 CFR 50.55(e), Construction
Deficiency Reporting" dated April 1,1980, a copy of which had
'
been furnished to the licensee shortly after its issue.
'
The licensee was informed that lack of instructions concerning
reporting of potentially reportable deficiencies in Project
Procedure P304 is considered to be in violatien of 10 CFR Appendix
B, Criterion V (332/81-16-01).
n
-- , _ _ - -
-.
o
,
.
,
,
1
4
b.
Records
The inspector examined records of items which had been submitted
to "LILCo Projects" as possibly reportable during 1981. Of-
seventeen such items; one is discussed-in Section a. above, and
six had no information on file to show whether they had been
received. All of these items are considered by the licensee to
be not reportable. However, information was not available during
this inspection to support this judgement.
This item is unresolved pending review by an NRC inspector of
this supporting information.
(322/81-16-02)
.4.
Installation of Fire Stops and Seals
A subcontract for installation of fire stops and seals had been
awarded to Keasby/ Bisco and the inspector was informed that this work
was in progress in the radwaste building.
.,The inspector examined:
,
S&W Specification SH1-459 and Addendum No.1, " Cable and Mechanical
--
Penetrations Fire Stops and Seals",
--
Keasby/ Bisco QA Manual, and
-
--
Keasby/ Bisco Production Procedures.
The inspector also observed penetrations which had been filled and
pumping of non-foam material which was in progress. The inspector
also discussed work and record procedures, including traceability,
with Keasby/ Bisco representatives and examined a sample oferecords for
work in progress.
n
~
No items of noncompliance
de tifi d.
g
5.
Ring Wall Around Condensate Sto use Tank
~
>
,
g
A Seismic Category I ring wall has been installed around the lower
portion of the condensate storage tank to prevent complete draining of ,
the tank in case of a seismic event.
The inspector examined drawing SK 15.11-143D and inspection reports,
for placement of, concrete for this ring wall .
,
No items of noncompliance were identified.
J
8
k
9
,
g,
-.
C
a.
-
,
'
5
t
6.
Review hf Nonroutine Events Peported by the Licensee
.a.
Limit Switches on GE 4160 Volt Circuit Breakers (80-00-01)
~
'By letters SNRC-466, dated March 5, 1980, and SNRC-483, dated
~ July 1,1980, the licensee reported, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(e), that limit switches on several of these circuit breakers
had become' loose during operation of the breakers. As corrective
action the licensee has secured these screws with Lock-Tite No.
222-and will revise Station Breaker inspection procedures to
require inspection of these switches.
The inspector reviewed the following records:
Repair / Rework request R 22-75,
--
LILCo DR No. 0399 which identified the problem and was
--
dispositioned to repair per E&DCR F30960,
iv
E&DCR-30960 which provides for securi g monitoring screws
-
with Lock-Tite No. 222,
--
LILCo 0QA Verification Report dated April 23, 1981 which
varified completion of Repair / Rework Request R 22-75.
The inspectar had no further questions conderning this item.
.
7.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
1
(Closed) Unresolved Item (81-08-01): Nuts and Studs from Acimet
Manufacturing Company.
e
The studs and nuts for the RPV had been supplied by GE.
Information
I
was obtained from the GE representative to the effect that they had
'
been furni'shed by Poutfic Aircraft Supply Company. This item is
resulved.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (80-05-03): Additional fire loading due to
.
combustible sealant material used for cable splices.
1
S&W has informed LILCo that the Fire Hazard Analysis Report is not
appreciably affected by considering the sleeve material and that this
will be discussed ir. the FSAR when revised.
The inspector had no
-
further questions concerning this item.
8.
Unresolsed Items
.
Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required
in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, or items of
noncompliance. An unresolved item is discussed in Details 3.b.
.
l
A$
.
'
0
m;;'
~ .
'
jy*=: f.'
'
+
..
',-
,. qyg -g , .
A
,
.
I
_
4
'
6
l-
p.m
-3,
-
..
.
,
9 .'
Exit Interview-
- -
i
The inspector met with licensee and construction personnel (denoted in
- Details 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on September 11, 1981.
'
'
- In addition, the NRC Resident Inspector attended the meeting. The
- inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection.
r
.,
.
,
s
!
l
O
'*
4,
Y
a
A .
.
h
4
9
g
.
P
%
.
Et
.
,a
'h
n
. *
l
'
.
. .
. , , _
- , . _ . .
_ _ . -
.,
m
.. __
- - - . - - - - - -
,-
- , - -, ,