ML20031A854
| ML20031A854 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 09/24/1981 |
| From: | Woodhead C NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Sanders M Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8109280281 | |
| Download: ML20031A854 (7) | |
Text
o oc o
UNITED STATES g
[
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
WASHING TON, D. C. 20 555 5
<p
% *... [
September 24, 1981 r
Marshall Sanders Room 609 Technological-Hazards Division Office of State & Local Program Support Federal 'mergency Management Agency 500 C atteet, N.W.
Washngton, D.C.
20472 In the Matter of Detroit Edison Company Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2 Docket No. 50-341
Dear Mr. Sanders:
In addition to the "rapidfax" copy of Contention 8 admitted to the Fermi-2 proceeding sent you today, I am enclosing 4 other copies with this letter. Also, I am enclosing a sample of the testimony format for your appointed witness to use.
If I may be of further assistance, please let me know.
Sincerely, W
x, p )
Collen P. Woodhead'f F
CounseiforNRCStjf
. cn, g c" rn p,s Tel. 492-7311
,j
@! 2 E 2 I'
Enclosures:
[c o %y -
^
12 As stated 9 m t-r7 z
3PQ
/
cc - w/ encl. Spen'.e Perry N
General Counsel
/;.. I 4N Federal Emergency Management Agency
- '!i t\\
w 500 C Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20472 7
g50 s
l EElGNATEDORIGINAU\\
p' ;= O.r 00 M ited By 8109280281 810924 4
PDR ADOCK 05000341 O50) 0.
FERMI-2 EMERGENCY PLAN CONTENTION
)
ne Intervenor CEE is concerned over whether there is a feasible CONTENTION 8:
escape route for the residents of the Stony Pointe area which ne only road leading to and is adjacent to the Fermi-2 site.
from the area, Pointe Aux Peaux Rd., lies very close to the In case of accident the residents would have to reactor site.
travel towards the accident before they could move away from it.
O h
O wm eo--
_-a,
_ u t
FERMI-2 EMERGENCY PLAN CONTENTION The Intervenor CEE is concerned over whether there is a feas CONTENTION 8:
escape route for the residents of the Stony Pointe area which The only road leading to and is adjacent to the Fermi-2 site.
from the area, Pointe Aux Peaux Rd., lies very close to the In case of accident the residents would have to reactor site.
travel towards the accident before they could move away from it.
O I
O
-,,_~ _---
z L
t I
FERMI-2 EMERGENCY PLAN CONTENTION
/
'Ihe Intervenor CEE is concerned over whether there is a feas l
CONTENTION 8:
escape route for the residents of the Stony Pointe area which The only road leading to and I
is adjacent to the Fermi-2 site.
from the area, Pointe Aux Peaux Rd., lies very close to the I
In case of accident the residents would have to reactor site.
travel towards the accident before they could move away from it.
.O O
m~
_____~__.,.,en-w^
^*
~
I FERMI-2 EMERGENCY PIAN CONTENTION The Intervenor CEE is concerned over whether there is a feasibl
~
CONTENTION 8:
esespe route for the residents of the Stony Pointe area which The only road leading to and is adjacsnt to the Fermi-2 site.
l from the area, Pointe Aux Peaux Rd., lies very close to the l
l In case of accident the residente would have to reactor site.
travel towards the accident before they could move away from it.
O s
O E
e i
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the liatter of DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-341 (Enrico Fermi Atomic Pon er Plant, Unit 2)
)
TESTIMONY OF (FEMA WITNESS) i Q.1: Please state your name and your position with the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
A:
My name is --
My position is --
My professional qualificatfor.s are attached.
Q.2: What is the purpose of your testimony?
A:
The purpose of my testimony is to explain the available warning system and means of evacuation of the Stony Pointe residential area in partial response to Contention 8 which reads as follows: CEE is concerned over whether there is a feasible escape route for the residents of the Stony Pointe area which is adjacent to the Fermi 2 l
site. The only road leading to and from the area, Pointe Aux Peaux, lies very close to the reactor site.
In case of an accident the residents would have to travel towards the accident before they could move away from it.
Q.3: Have you personally visited the Pointe Aux Peaux Road and the Stony Pointe residential area?
I
-W
O 6 A:
Yes, I have visited both.
Q.4: Have you investigated the public warning system available for the Stony Pointe residents?
A:
Yes.
Q.5: Please describe the warning system available.
A:
Q.6: Have you investigated available means of evacuating the Stony Pointe residents?
A:
Yes.
Q.7: Please describe the available means of evacuation of these residents.
A:
l Q.8: Based upon your information about the means of warning and evacuation available to local officials, what is your opinion of the I
feasibility of the Pointe Aux Peaux Road as an evacuation route for the Stony Pointe residents?
A:
Q.9: Please explain the basis for your opinion.
i l
A:
l l
l l
l
.