ML20030C139
| ML20030C139 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 08/06/1981 |
| From: | Boardman J, Randy Hall, Jaudon J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20030C132 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-313-81-20, 50-368-81-19, NUDOCS 8108250431 | |
| Download: ML20030C139 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000313/1981020
Text
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION IV
Report:
50-313/81-20
50-368/81-19
Dockets:
50-313
Licenses: DPR-51
50-368
Licensee: Arkansas Power and Light Company
-
Post Office Box 551
Little Rock, Arkansas 72203
Facility Name:
Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO), Units 1 and 2
Inspection at:
AND Site, Russellville, Arkansas
Inspection conducted: July 20-23,1981
(
/
Inspectors:
g P. Jaudon, Reactor Inspector, Systems and Technical
D6te'
Section (Paragraphs 1, 2, and 6)
Y!
T
l
,< R. Boardman, Reactor Inspector, Systems and Technical
D6ts
Section (Paragraphs 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6)
/
(
Approved: g
R. E. Hall, Chief, Systems and Technical Section
D6te'
Inspection Summary
Inspection Conducted July 20-23, 1981 (Report:_ 50-313/81-20; 50-368/81-19)
]
Areas _ Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of follow up on previously
,
j
identified items; material receipt, handling and storage; and the Plant
i
Review Committee. The inspection involved 48 inspector-hours by two NRC
inspectors.
Results: Within the three areas inspected, no violations or deviations
were identified.
l
8108250431 81080
DRADOCKOSOOOg
_
DETAILS
1.
Persons Contacted
B. Austir, Assistant Office Services Supervisor
- B. Baker, Operations Manager
M. Bishop, Office Services Supervisor
C. Cole, Surveillance Test Coordinator
T. Cogburn, Plant Analysis Superintendent
- L. Duggar, Special Projects Manager
J. Garrett, Material Management Supervisor
C. Halbert, Mechanical Engineering Superintendent
- B. Hampton, Stores Supervisor
P. Jones, I&C Superintendent
J. O'Hanlon, General Manager
W. Poskey, Maintenance Supervisor, Electrical
- S. Strasner, Quality Control Supervisor
The NRC inspectors also contacted other plaat nm. sonnel including
administrative, clerical, engineering, and maintenance personnel.
- Denotes presence at exit interview conducted July 23, 1981.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
(Closed) 313/7906-01 (Unresolved): The Operations Superintendent had
not been maintaining a list of valves requiring in-service testing in
accordance with Procedure 1005.08, although the required testing was
being accomplished. The NRC inspector found that Procedure 1005.08 had
been replaced by Procedure 1015.106, Revision 2 (6/24/81), "ASME Code
Section XI Operational Readiness Testing." Procedure 1015.06 was found
to specify various sub-tier procedures for in-service testing of valves
and to designate the Surveillance Test Coordinator to track completion
of this testing.
The NRC inspector checked surveillance records for
eight of the sub-tier in-service test procedures and found that in each
case the testing was completed within the time period required by
Technical Specificatic,ns.
The NRC inspector concluded that the licensee
was complying with the procedure in effect (1015.06) for in-service
testing of valves.
This item is closed.
(Closed) 313/7909-10 (0 pen):
Procedure 1304.08 (Integrated ES Test) had
been found to specify an incorrect valve lineup and did not include
instructions to restore the system to normal. The NRC inspector deter-
mined that Procedure 1304.08 had been replaced by Procedure 1305.06,
Revision 0 (3/20/81), " Integrated ES System Test." The NRC inspector
reviewed Procedure 1305.06 and determined that the above noted problems
had been corrected. No additional problems were identified.
This item is closed.
-2-
1
_
__ . _ - - - _ _ _ _ _
_ , _ _ _.
.
(Closed) 313/7916-10; 368/7914-09 (Unresolved):
Some electrical
maintenance had purportedly been conducted without use of an approved
procedure and then a licensee procedure for maintenance of electric
motors was too general. The NRC inspector found, by interview, that
approved procedures were used for electrical maintenance.
Although
no deviations from this were noted, licensee representatives stated
that there had been occasional past lapses in discipline with use of
procedures.
Licensee representatives stated that, for these occasional
lapses, corrective action had been taken with the individuals concerned.
The NRC inspector reviewed three procedures for preventative maintenance
of small electric motors.
From this review, the NRC inspector concluded
that these three procedures provided adequatel; detailed instructions.
1
This item is closed.
(Closed) 313/8016-01; 368/8016-01 (Violation):
The Plant Safety Committee
(PSC) had not been reviewing the results of audits as required by Proce-
dure 1000.02.
The NRC inspector found that the PSC Chainnan received
copies of all audits and that PSC action items were assigned to specific
audit findings.
By review of PSC meeting minutes and by interviews with
the PSC Chairman and the PSC Secretary, the NRC inspector determined
that it was now the licensee's practice to follow up on all audit findings.
The NRC inspector concluded that this met the requirements of Procedure
1000.02, kevision 1 (2/25/81), " Plant Safety Committee Operations."
This item is closed.
(Closed) 313/8016-03; 368/8016-03 (Unresolved):
Equipment lists, which
the licensee controlled as if they were drawings, had been found not to
be available at designated locations.
On a previous check of this item
(IE Inspection Report 50-313/81-14; 50-368/81-12), the NRC inspector had
found that the licensee had issued a specific Procedur;, 1013.10,
Revision 2 (2/2/81), " Drawing Control and Distribution," to control all
drawings (including equipment lists), but that the problem with equipment
still existed as evidenced by outstanding NCRs (Nos. 81-083-0, 81-084-0,81-060, and 81-083-0). At this inspection, the NRC inspector found that
the above listed NCRs had been closed and that equipment index lists had
been clearly marked as " controlled documents." A random cneck at two
locations designated for equipment lists showed that the documents were
available.
Interviews with personnel responsible for updating controlled
drawing files at remote locations indicated that tney believed the problem
to be corrected.
This item is closed.
(0 pen) 313/8016-04; 368/8016-04 (Unresolved): This item was unresolved
pending completion of licensee action to convert records of quality related
activities to microfilm and dual site storage. The NRC inspector found
that the licensee was converting all current records directly to microfilm
and storing them both on and off site.
It was further determined that the
licensee was continuing to microfilm older records and expected to complete
this task in January 1982.
-3-
_.
-
n
-e
__
_
.
.
This item remains open pending completion of licensee action to convert
1
all older records of quality related activities to microfilm and/or dual
j
storage.
(Closed) 313/8106-01; 368/8105-01 (Violation): Some licensed operators
had not read emergency procedures every six months as required by licensee
Procedure 1023.08.
The NRC inspector found that the licensee had divided
the year into two six month segments for the purpose of meeting the re-
quirement to review emergency procedures.
Licensee records indicated that
all licensed operators had completed the review for the six month period
ending in May 1981, and that several operators had already completed their
review for the period which will end in November 1981.
This item is closed.
(Closed) 313/8114-01; 368/8112-01 (Unresolved): This item was unresolved
pending licensee action to resolve a difference between Procedure 1000.09
and actual practice in scheduling water chemistry surveillance tests.
The
NRC inspector reviewed Procedure 1000.09, Revision 2 (5/27/81), " Surveil-
lance Test Program Control," and found that the licensee had modified
Procedure 1000.09 to eliminate the apparent conflict between it and the
scheduling practice for water chemistry surveillance tests.
This item is closed.
(Closed) 313/8114-02; 368/8112-02 (Unresolved): This item was unresolved
pending licensee action to issue draft Procedure 1001.09, which was re-
quired by licensee Procedure 1000.09. The NRC inspector found that
i
Procedure 1001.09, Revision 0 (4/17/81), " Master Test Control List," had
been issued. The NRC inspector noted that this procedure had been updated
on July 7, 1981, and that a revision was under review.
,
This item is closed.
3.
Procurement
,
The NRC. inspector reviewed the licensee's procurement activities relating
to material receipt, receipt inspection, identification, and storage for
'
i
compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B; licensee Quality Assurance
Manual Operations, AP&L-TOP-1A, Revision 5, dated October 10, 1980; and
l
licensee implementing Procedures 1000.10, Revision 1 (6/3/81), " Control
of Procurement"; 1033.01, Revision 1 (5/27/81), " Receipt Inspection";
1033.02, Revision 1 (1/14/81), " Control of Material"; and 1033.06,
Revision 2 (7/2/81), " Stores Receipt, Issue, and Return."
Areas inspected included review of selected receipt inspection documen-
'
tation packages for acceptable objective quality evidence of material
conformance; review of qualifications r
personnel performing receipt
inspection; evaluation of the acceptability of storage areas; ano
inspection of stored material for detericration and adequate packaging.
No violations or deviations were identified in these areas.
l
-4-
- - -
-
.
_
_
.
.
It was determined that the licensee had not implemented a program of
shelf life identification and control for elastomer products and other
parts and materials subject to aging during storage.
Licensee material
identificatica is basically by part number and simple noun nomenclature
such as " gasket 100877-1 Rev A" without sufficient description to
establish shelf life requirements when necessary. This is considered
an unresolved item (313/8120-01; 368/8119-01) pending further review by
the NRC inspector during a subsequent inspection.
4.
On-Site Review Committee
,
The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's operation of the Plant Safety
Committee for compliance with Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Sections 6.5.1 and 6.8.2, and with licensee's implementing Procedure
1000.02, Revision 1 (2/25/81), " Plant Safety Committee (PSC) Operation."
Areas inspected included review of the composition of the committee
and approval of alternate chairmen, and review of the minutes of the
following PSC meetings:
81-001 (1/3/81)81-015 (1/24/81)81-053 (3/13/81)
i
81-002 (1/5/81)81-026 (2/11/81)
81-073A (4/15/81)81-014 (1/23/81)81-040 (2/26/81)81-081 (4/27/81)
i
In addition, the PSC meeting held July 21, 1981, was attended, and the
minutes were reviewed.
I
No violations or deviations were identified.
,
5.
Unresolved Items
Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required
in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, violations,
or deviations. An unresolved item is discussed in paragraph 3 of this
report (Shelf Life Control).
,
.
6.
Exit Interview
An exit interview was conducted July 23, 1981, with those Arkansas Power
and Light Company personnel denoted in paragraph 1 of this report. At
i
l
this meeting, the scope of the inspection and the findings were summarized.
l
'
,
l
l
i
-5 -
-- - - . - . - . - - . -.
--
- - - _-
-
-
,,
.__
.-
.--