ML20030C122
| ML20030C122 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 08/21/1981 |
| From: | Rausch T COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20030C123 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8108250416 | |
| Download: ML20030C122 (2) | |
Text
C:mm:nw::lth cdisem w
~
'C' )
one First National Plaza. Chicago, tilinois
. Of Address Reply to: Post Office Box 767 Chicago, lllinois 6%90 N'0 f/
August 21, 1981 D;5;$? ~4 g:. 'E"$lh [f 5g
'YC-ac s
2 w if 73-N Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
'!k jf U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission BA y#
./p>
e tJashington, DC 20555 ci \\ I'
Subject:
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Unit 2 Reload 5 Cycle 6 Supplemental Reload Licensing Submittal NRC Docket No. 50-265 References (a):
J. S. Abel letter to D. G. Eisenhut dated January 23, 1981.
(b):
E. D. Swartz letter to H. R. Denton dated July 27, 1981.
(c):
NEDO-24259-A, " Generic Inforination for Barrier Fuel Demonstration Bundle Licensing", February, 1981.
Reviewed in R.
L.
Tedesco letter to R. E. Engle (G.E.) dated November 12, 1980.
(d):
R. L.
Tedesco letter to G. G. Sherwood (G.E,), " Acceptance for Referencing General Electric Licensing Topical Report NEDO-24154/NEDE-24154-P",
February 4, 1981.
Dear Mr. Denton:
Commonwealth Edison notified the NRC staff in Reference (a) of our intent to review the subject document per the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59 and, if applicable, proceed with the reload without formal staff review and approval.
This approach assumes prior NRC approval of certain preparatory Technical Specification changes which were necessary as a result of the barrier fuel demonstration and the initial application of the ODYN transient analysis code.
These preparatory changes were submitted in Reference (b).
The generic aspects of barrier fuel and the ODYN code have
/ 00/
been reviewed and approved by the staff in References (c) and (d),
j respectively.
Commonwealth Edison believes, therefore, that application of 10 CFR 50.59 to the reload remains appropriate,
/
pending approval of the license amendments proposed in Reference (b) and pending completion of CECO reviews of the subject document.
C108250416 810821 PDR ADOCK 05000265 P
PDR m
i H. R. Denton August 21, 1981 Nevertheless, as discussed with the Quad Cities NRC Project Manager, we are enclosing forty (40) copies of the subject document for your review.
Should the staff conclude that formal approval is necessary, we would appreciate your targeting the completion of the SER for no later than the end of November 1981, to avoid any conflict with the Cycle 6 startup in early December.
Please direct any questions you may have in this regard to this office.
Very truly yours, i
%d Thomas J. Rausch Nuclear Licensing Administrator Boiling Water Reactors TJR/lm cc:
Region III Inspector - Quad Cities i
2444N
!