ML20030A565

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to AEC 740304 Request for Analysis & Info Re Postulated Cask Drop Accident.Proposes Detailed Mods to Procedures,Equipment & Structures.Mods Can Be Completed within One Yr of AEC Approval
ML20030A565
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/01/1974
From: Sewell R
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To: Goller K
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 8101100064
Download: ML20030A565 (3)


Text

A61L6=%

\\

py

<O

- re-a..

CORSumCTS 6 u[ IWQ!

O POWCr m

_.M C0mpany p

gNg ; :

..n y n i, f7 s

bg.ijp

t e

N,...-m.

3 4

' % g,... ~.,.me,.....co

.o,77ee.eooo

% S.A., o,....s

, ~., _.

%gulal0ry Docket File el July 1, 1974 Acq

'k l 6

m

-4 Mr. Karl R. Goller Re:

Docket 50-155 Assistant Director for Operating Reactors License DPR-6 Directorate of Licensing US Atomic Energy Commission Washington, DC 205b5

Dear.Mr. Goller:

By letter dated February 4,1974, it vas requested that we pro-vide an analysis and other relevant information needed to determine the possible damage in the event of a cask drop caused by a system failure and whether design or procedural modifications would be appropriate to reduce the probability of occurrence for our Big Rock Point Plant. This study of a postulated cask drop accident was performed by Bechtel Corporation at Consumers Power Company's request. The results of this study are con-tained in Attachment A.

The results of this analysis reveal that a cask being dropped into the spent fuel pool could result in a leak in the fuel pool which might be larger than the makeup capcbility of the backup systems. The decay heat being generated inside each fuel pin would eventually melt the fuel pin cladding. The resulting site boundary dose with more than ten (10) bundles in the fuel pool would exceed those limits as specified in 10 CFR 100.

In order to eliminate this potential cask drop accident as well as other less severe cask drop accidents from occurring, detailed modifi-cations to the present procedures, equipment and structures are proposed.

These proposed modifications were based on a multilevel concept of system safety and include:

1.

Modifications of the crane coupled with detailed handling procedures to eliminate the possibility of a cask drop.

2.

Limit-switches and specific cask movement paths minimize possible endangered areas and restrict the maximum drop heights.

3 Poter ;ial impact areas inside those restricted areas are protected if necessary and the fuel bundles relocated to provide a further safety factor.

V/O//Qoo&Y

[

Mr. Kerl R. Goller 2

Docket 50-155, License DPR-6

-July 1, 1974 In addition, the low usage factor of the crane for those weights approaching the crane capacity help to minimize stresses in the crane systems and, therefore, _significantly reduce any probability of failure. The 60-ton refueling cask is expected to be utilized only two to three times per year.

The procedures as described above are being written and imple-mented while the modification to the crane and the fabrication and instal-lation of the impet pad will be initiated upon your approval of these recommended modifications.

It is estimated that these modifications can be completed within one year of receipt of your approval.

Yours very truly, 5

?

w.

JSR/ map R. B. Sewell-Nuclear Licen:ing Administrator CC; JGKeppler, USAEC J

l r

1 AEC DIS ION Fca PART 50 DOCKETJATL. A

)

y' (TDIPORARY FORM)

COSTROL 1:0:

6030

_, j i

FILE:_ /7]/5 /'

FROM:

DATE OF DOC DATE REC'D LTR TWX RPT OTHER

~

Consumers Power Company J2ckson, Michgian 49201 7-1-74 7-3-74 x

R. B. Sewell TO '.

ORIG CC OTHER SENT AEC PDR X

K. R. Coller 1 sigced SENT LOCAL PDR__

X CLASS UNCLASS i

PROP INFO IhPUT NO CYS REC'D DOCKET NO:

xx 40 50-155 DESCRIPTION:

ENCLOSURES:

Ltr trans the following:

Information on Postulated cask drop accident aw /kpphJak ACKNOWLEDGED DO NOT REMOVE PLANT NAIT,. Big Rock Point

( l Orig & 39 cys ree'd )

FOR ACTION /INFOR1'ATION 7-8-74 GC BUTLER (L)

SCIL?ENCER(L) g21DIANN(L)

REGAN(E)

W/ Copico W/ Copies W/9 Copics W/ Copies CLAP.K(L)

STOLZ(L)

DICKER (E)

W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copics PA:R (' l W. 9 11.O(L)

2!!.;;;2N(f.)

W/ Copiec W/ Copies W/ Copiec W/ Copies KNIEL(L)

PURPLE (L)

YOUNGBLOOD(E)

W/ Copico W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies

~

INTERNAL DISTRITUTION PPjIG f TECH REVIEW DENTON LIC ASST A/T IND VAEC PDR IL:3DRIE GRIliES BRAI'DIA'?

'/0GC, ROCM P-506A SCHROEDER GAMMILL

-DIGGS (L)

SALTZMAN MUNIZING/STIJF MACCARY KASTNER GEARIN (L)

B. HURT CASE D;IGHT BALLARD GOULBOURNE (L)

PLA'4S GIAMBUSSO PAULICKI SPANGLER KREUTZER (E) 31CDONALD BOYD SHA0 LEE (L)

CHAPMAN HOORE (L)(3"R)

STELLO ENVIRO MAIGRET (L)

DUBE w/ input DEYOUNG(L)(UTR)

IIOUSTON NULLER REED (E)

E. COUPE SKOVHOLT (L)

NOVAK DICKER SERVICE (L) 4 0LLER(L)

ROSS KNIGHTON SHEPPARD (L)

D. THOMPSON (2)

P, COLLINS IPPOLITO YOUNGBLOOD SLATER (E)

KLECKER DENISE TEDESCO REGAN SMITH (L)

EISENHUT

/ECOPR LONG PROJECT LDR TEETS (L)

FILE & REGION (3)

LAINAS V

SHEA WILLIAMS (E)

MORRIS BENAROYA EARLESS WILSON (L)

STEELE VOLmER EXTERNAL DISTRIEUTTON

/J

^

j - LOCAL FDR Charlevoix, Mich.

j "4 - TIC (ABERNATHY)

(1)(2X10kNM*IONAL LAS'S 1-PDR-S A';/LA /NY I

wi - NSIC(LUCl!A'!AN) 1-ASL5P(E/i 31dr,,Ro 529) 1-LIBRARIAN 1 - ASLB I-U. iENNINGTON, Pc. E-201 GT BROOKHAVEN MAT. LAB 1 - P. R. DAVIS (AEROJET NUCLEAR)

1. CONSULTANT' S 1-AGMED(Ruth Guss r.';

e/.46 - CYS l.CRS M SENT 'IO LIC ASST.

NEk':' ARK / BLUME/AGBABIfM R1-E-127, CT.

T-8-74 DIGGS 1.GSRALD ULRIESCN.. 01"L 1-RD..I'ULLER..T-30 ? S~

1-b & h SWINESRGAD, R E-201 G1 r