ML20029E334
| ML20029E334 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/19/1994 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20029E329 | List: |
| References | |
| 15000003-94-01, 15000003-94-1, NUDOCS 9405180164 | |
| Download: ML20029E334 (1) | |
Text
--
ENCLOSURE NOTICE OF VIOLATION Graseby STI Docket No. 150-00003 Waldron, Virginia License No. ARK-796-BP-AS-98 During an NRC inspection conduc'ted March 25, 1994, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:
10 CFR 20.1801 requires that the licensee secure from unauthorized removal or access licensed materials that are stored in unrestricted areas.
10 CFR 20.1901 requires that the licensee control and maintain constant surveillance of licensed material that is in an unrestricted area and that is not in storage. As defined in 10 CFR 20.1003, unrestricted area means an area, access to which is neither limited nor controlled by the licensee.
Contrary to the above, on March 25, 1994, the licensee did not secure from unauthorized removal or limit access to an ammonia test module containing 10 millicuries of nickel-63 located in a cabinet in the Cogentrix boiler facility, an unrestricted area, nor did the licensee control and maintain constant surveillance of this licensed material.
Specifically, the test module was left unsecured in an unlocked cabinet, and the authorized user had left the Richmond area.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement IV).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Graseby STI is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Regional Administrator, Region II, with a copy to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).
This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and' (4) the date when full compliance'will be achieved.
If'an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given 3
to extending the response time.
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia This/94hday of April 1994 9405100164 940419 PDR STPRO ESGAR PDR
+
-