ML20029B139

Forwards State of Nh Ofc of Consumer Advocate Nuclear Decommissioning Finance Committee Motion to Modify Procedural Order 1 (Ndfc 91-1).Procedural Schedule Adjusted by 1 Month

ML20029B139
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	02/26/1991
From:	Holmes M NEW HAMPSHIRE, STATE OF
To:	Smukler L NEW HAMPSHIRE, STATE OF
References
NDFC-91-1, NUDOCS 9103050487
Download: ML20029B139 (4)

Text

e .

TJIE STATE OF NEW l{ AMPSl(1RE

/lI , ? .

CON $t'M t.R ADYOCATE ASSIFTANT CONSL'MLit ADWCATE MICH AI.L W. HOL.M LS k Jost I11 W P,tOIAS

,) . , _ .

'i --

0FFICE OF Tile CONSUMER ADVOCATE 8 OLD SUSCOOK Il0AD CONC 0!(D, NEW ll A MI'Silli:E 0330141M soit7: it 2 26 February 1991 HAND DELIVERY Larry Smukler, Chairman Nuclear Decommissioning Finance Committee N , li . Public Utilities Commission 8 Old Suncook Road Concord, New Hampshire 03301 RE: NDFC 91-1; MOTION TO MODIFY PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 1

Dear Chairman Smukler:

Enclosed please find the original and nine copies of The Office of the Consumer Advocate's Response to New Hampshire Yankee's Motion to Modify Procedural Order No. 1.

Sincerely ,

( eht $N ~

Michael W. Holmes, Esq.

MWH:jsr CC: Robert Cushing Edward A. Haffer, Esq.

Alexander J. Kalinski, Esq.

Robert Backus, Esq.

kftt

, p3 0 p.lMA mnon nn 7 eoCr e e ,, g.

p-

, I s

NDFC 91-1 NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING FINANCE COMMITTEE i SEABROOK DECOMMISSIONING FUND RESPONSE TO MOTION TO MODIFY PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 1 Now comes the Of fice of the Consumer Advocat, and in Responso to New Hampshire Yankee's Motion to Modify procedurel Order No. 1, says:

1. The Of fice of the Consumer Ad.vocato ("OCA") -received, on 20 February 1991, said Motion to Modify, from Edward A. Haffer Esq., dated 14 February 1991, on behalf of New Hampshiro Yankec. Insofar as the OCA roccived this motion 6 days post issuance, we consider this responso to be timely.

2 In said Motion, New Hampshiro Yankee requests a one month extension in timo, (i.e., from 15 April 1991 to 15 May 1991) for filing New Hampshiro Yankoc's decommissioning testimcGy of TLG Engineering, Inc. ("TLG") and William M. Mercor-Moidinger-Hanson Asset planning Incorporated ("Mercor-Meldinger").

3. New Hampshiro Yankee requests that the schedulo of hearings not be altered despite the f act that p' ties such as the OCA will have a month less time to propaa ;huir response.

l

s' * ,

1 .

4 2

4. Assuming the NDFC accommodatos th- Now Hampshiro Yankoo request, the OCA requests that all deadlines and datos post the revised 15 May 1991 deadlino for TLG and Morcor-Moidinger testimony and reports be correspondingly adjusted one month back. The present schedulo, prior to New Hampshire Yankoe's request, is already so short the OCA believes it is the minimum in which it can effectively respond.

WHEREFORE, the Office of the Consumer Advocato respectfully

?

requests the Committoo deny New Hampshiro Yankoo's request to maintain the same hearing schedulo and instead adjust the entire procedural schedule by one month.

Respectfully submitted, OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE DATED: 26 February 1991 Byh 4 d's Michael W. Holmos, Esq.

Office of the Consumer Advocato 8 Old Suncock Road Concord, NH 03301-5185 603.271.1172 CERTIFICATION I hereby cortify a copy of the forogoing has been provided all parties of record by first class mail as well as by FAX where j possible.

't "

l Michael W. Holmes, Esq.

t

!l l,ll Illl!ll1jlll,lfllii llI11 lil' i!!l iA ITi

1ij

/  :.-

0, e

2

_ wt r

- :a 0 r: b:.

7, ~ . eg;i,;

.. . q

' f, g*-n- .

7 $.y  ;

n f'~ .\ :y$ U(:

9 [ 'm m5 g o /i o5 s

7 F nC5 a (( ro 0 n a i y2 1,l

%}E x

\

l et r

_ a o_C l.

l.

uea . l..

N gl D 1, eu 1, f Rg , ,

1, o en I.

rRo . -

ro t r at rg  !

can  !.

eaei l..

eel h l rRcs i ua D NW

_ E T

A eC l

irO iV i sD pA no s t s nR aE o ,-

ns i 6Me t o

iU n m -

r S N x H 90 R N Oon '

t f11 Coac n 8 -

r E N o i H u c s s aT l

F o o 6'c Oote c i E 6I C f

F  :' ii! _

F O

i