ML20029B076
| ML20029B076 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford |
| Issue date: | 03/01/1991 |
| From: | Burski R ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| W3F1-91-0016, W3F1-91-16, NUDOCS 9103050375 | |
| Download: ML20029B076 (4) | |
Text
_
g Entorgyi
.L gyyp=u
,w Operations
- w ya k! 5% 739 OG50 W3F1-91-0016 A4.05 QA' -
March 1,1991 U.S, Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control-Dosk Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Wate_rford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382-License No. NPP-38 Fitness for Duty Performance Data, Six Month Report Gentlemen:
In accordance with 10CFR26.71(d)', Entergy Operationss Inc. hereby submits by.
attachment, the Fitness for Duty Performance Data for the six month period from-July 1-to December 31, 1990.
If you have any questions concerning this submittal, please contact B.R. Lootzerich at (504) 739-6636.
Very truly yours, uwf' '
-R.F. Burski Director, Nuclear Safety RFB/BRL/ssf
. Attachment cc:
Messrs. R.D.- Martin, NRC Region IV D.L. Wigginton, NRC-NRR E.I). Blake R.B. McGehee
-NRC Resident Inspectors Office-
\\
9103030375 910301 gDR ADOCK 05000382 PDR
rim m muwn m a m Performance Data Personnel Subject to CFR 26 Entergy Operations. Inc.
December 31, 1990 COMPANY 6 MONTHS ENDING Waterford 3 SES, P. O. Box B, Killona, Louisiana 70066 LOCATION Robert F.
Sumicek, Supervisor - Personnel Assurance (504) 739-6307 CONTACT NAME PHONE ONCLU0C AREA CODE)
CUTOFFS: SCREEN / CONFIRMATION (ng/ml)
APPENDlX A TO 10CFR 26 MARIJUANA 50 / 15 AMPHETAMINES 1000 / 500 N/A
/
COCAINE 300 / 150 PHENCYCLIDINE 25 / 25 N/A
/
^
OPIATES 300 / 300 ALCOHOL (% BAC) 0.040%
/
- I positive above NRC limit /2 posit Ives above company limit LONG-TERM
. SHORT TERM CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR TESTING RESULTS LICENSEE EMPLOYEES PERSONNEL PERSONNEL
'; M AVERAGE NUMBER
-.,' fc 403 30 WITH UNESCORTED 759 m.,,
ACCESS i'9 " # " W 1
REFERRED ACCESS CATEGORIES TESTED POSITIVE TO EAP RESTORED TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE PRE EMPLOYMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A PRE-BADGING 62 0
88 0
110 0
PERIODIC
.N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A FOR CAUSE 5
0-1 0
0 0
POST ACCIDENT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1
RANDOM 486 1/2 192 0
14 0
FOLLOW 4)P 5
0 0
0 0
0 j
OTHER 3
0 0
0 0
0 TOTAL 561 2
2 2
281 0
124 0
~. _ _ _
l INDMOUALS TESTED 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
- POSmVE -
4 2
- Tested 891 966 _
% POSITIVE
.457.
.217.
i i i i tiliiiiiii i
iil GRAPH OF 5
i j, j
% POSmVE i i i i i
i1iiiii ii i i 4
j ; ;
j;;,,,j
,jj ;;
I i i i ie i i i iiiiiiii ieiiii ji i i i) iI iiIi eiI iiiI iiiifliiiI I
Iiiiiiiiiii6iiiiiliiii iiiiiiiiii ii I
iiiiiii!iliiifi IiieiiiiliI Iii l
I I I
l i i i i ii i i i i i iii i ieiiiii4 iiiiiii i
e ii i,iiii !!!!!iiii
!i!-iiiiiiiiiiiii i
ii i
ii, Iiii6 i iiiijieii iii! iiiiiiiiiiiii i
i i i i6 ji i
jjj i
CONRRMEO POSmVE TESTS FOR SPECIRC SUBSTANCES MARUUANA l
2 COC 'NE 1
0 0
0 OPIATES l
0 0
AMPHETAMINES l PHENCYCLlDINE O
O ALCOHOL 2
0 l
l l
l
.i
l A
Fitness for Duty Program Summary:
During this reporting period, approximately 58% of the population have been tested.
The rate of positive is less than one_ quarter of a percent.
Of the substances tested for, THC is the drug-of preference.
Positive Results:
The two samples that yielded positive results were both positive for THC.
One sample was above the cut-off limit. established by the company.
It was,_
however, below the 100ng/ml cut-off suggested by the Nuclear Regulatory commission. The other sample encountered autoflorescent interference from a constituent in the sample and the level of cut off of drug and drug; a
metabolites could not be determined from on site screening. This sample was confirmed positive by the HHS-NIDA Laboratory and was confirmed positive by the MRO.
Management Actions:
The two licensee employees that tested positive were reported to management.
Management suspended their access for fourteen days pending recommendation by the Employee Assistance program evaluation and re-entry testing. The two employees were granted access to the protected area upon their return to work and are enrolled in follow-up testing programs, i
presently, four employees are enrolled in follow-up testing programs.
During this reporting period, 56 tests have been administered collectively-to those employees.
All results have been favorable, i
^
Events Reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Committee (RRC):
During'this reporting period, there were no violations of the fitness for-duty policy.
program Weaknesses:
Weaknesses from previous internal audit, discussed in the last submittal (W3p90-1194), have_ been addressed byf the Waterford 3 corrective action program.
4 I
w-m
.. ~,,
7_,
-ryn--...,
.-<p.-
y--
y n
y e_
n-